Re: Dependent Models
One more thing. Just forgot to mention: If I implement the proper interfaces in Parent objects, that will help to make children component reusable. Thanks again for the idea. Andrei. -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Dependent-Models-tp2270083p2270188.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Dependent Models
Martin. Thanks for clarification. This will solve the problem for sure and I'll continue this way. The only problem I can envision is - it will make the children not reusable. They will have the references to the parent (Page or/and Panel) and to use them on another page I have to modify the Forms (and Panels). Not a big deal though. Regards, Andrei. -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Dependent-Models-tp2270083p2270185.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Dependent Models
Hi! > 1. Yes, I think I do use "Hollywood principle". The children do not call > Parent. I think you have it the wrong way around. The dependants should call the parent to ask status. Otherwise you have the parents running all around trying to find all the dependants. It's easier for the dependants to know what they depend on instead of parents like shepards ... ** Martin > So, I do not call Form method from the other Form (through Parent hierarchy) > 2. I also do not have references to the Parent (Page, Panel) inside the > Form. > 3. I try to synchronize forms through Models. > > 4. I just have no Idea how to create proper chained models using > composition. I mean - include one model into several others. > > Sorry, if I misunderstood your reply about "Hollywood principle". > > Thanks again. > Andrei. > -- > View this message in context: > http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Dependent-Models-tp2270083p2270146.html > Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Dependent Models
Martin. Thanks for reply. 1. Yes, I think I do use "Hollywood principle". The children do not call Parent. So, I do not call Form method from the other Form (through Parent hierarchy) 2. I also do not have references to the Parent (Page, Panel) inside the Form. 3. I try to synchronize forms through Models. 4. I just have no Idea how to create proper chained models using composition. I mean - include one model into several others. Sorry, if I misunderstood your reply about "Hollywood principle". Thanks again. Andrei. -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Dependent-Models-tp2270083p2270146.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Dependent Models
Do you use hollywood principle? ** Marti 2010/6/27 Andrei Razin : > > Hello. > > I have a problem: > > 1.There are 3 forms on the Page: GroupsForm, UsersForm, DocumentsForm. > Each of them reflects a Dcorrespoding Domain object and supposed to have a > Model. > > 2.Functionality: > Selecting a Group in GroupsForm should > force other 2 forms to show a list of corresponding objects – > Users and Documents for the selected Group. > > 3.So, the User Object has a Group object inside and Document object has a > Group as well. > > 4.For now, I am able to synchronize 2 forms GroupsForm and UsersForm. > The models for them look like: > > CompoundPropertyModel userModel = new > CompoundPropertyModel(getInitContactObject()); > > groupModel = new PropertyModel(userModel, "group"); > > 5.So, the groupModel is derived from userModel. This synchronizes 2 > models. But how can I synchronize the 3d one? > > 6.It should be another way of chaining models, something like Composition. > I want to include (opposite from derive) groupModel into other two: > userModel and documentModel. > Is it possible? > > Thanks in advance. > Appreciate any help. > > -- > View this message in context: > http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Dependent-Models-tp2270083p2270083.html > Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Dependent Models
Hello. I have a problem: 1.There are 3 forms on the Page: GroupsForm, UsersForm, DocumentsForm. Each of them reflects a Dcorrespoding Domain object and supposed to have a Model. 2.Functionality: Selecting a Group in GroupsForm should force other 2 forms to show a list of corresponding objects – Users and Documents for the selected Group. 3.So, the User Object has a Group object inside and Document object has a Group as well. 4.For now, I am able to synchronize 2 forms GroupsForm and UsersForm. The models for them look like: CompoundPropertyModel userModel = new CompoundPropertyModel(getInitContactObject()); groupModel = new PropertyModel(userModel, "group"); 5.So, the groupModel is derived from userModel. This synchronizes 2 models. But how can I synchronize the 3d one? 6.It should be another way of chaining models, something like Composition. I want to include (opposite from derive) groupModel into other two: userModel and documentModel. Is it possible? Thanks in advance. Appreciate any help. -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Dependent-Models-tp2270083p2270083.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: inmethod custom PagingToolbar with dropdownchoice for setting rows not working correctly
I've remove the filter-form and toolbar to see if they affect this situation, sadly they dont. When the rows-per-page DDC is outside the toolbar (and outside the grid markup) choosing a value will correctly change the DDC's model object and then the grid is rendered again using the correct DDC integer value. When this DDC is inside the toolbar the grid is first rendered and only then the DDC's model object is updated - causing a "delay" between the DDC's model object and the grids rows per page value. any ideas? or do I have to create a new grid instance as nino suggests?
Re: inmethod custom PagingToolbar with dropdownchoice for setting rows not working correctly
vov: adding this behavior doesn't solve the problem. with this behavior the ddc never reaches the "getDataGrid().setRowsPerPage(newSelection);" line in the code.
scriptaculous SortableListView
Hello, My problem is that I have multiple SortableListViews, all of them work fine, but I want to have the ability to drag the items between the different ListView also. I have tried to work with SortableListViews an DragTargets but then I can't sort the list furthermore I don't know how to let the sortablelistview allow "free" dragging not only horizontal or vertical. Perhaps you have some ideas? Thanks Sebastian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
