Re: Good reference for clustering and page/session store options?
as of 1.3.1 the clustering piggy backs on whatever clustering you use to cluster httpsession, so i guess there isnt much to tell... -igor On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 11:29 PM, Ned Collyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Can someone tell me of a good reference for this? > > The wiki and ... even google search results seem a bit light on. > > Does someone have a handy link? > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/Good-reference-for-clustering-and-page-session-store-options--tp16045170p16045170.html > Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Good reference for clustering and page/session store options?
Can someone tell me of a good reference for this? The wiki and ... even google search results seem a bit light on. Does someone have a handy link? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Good-reference-for-clustering-and-page-session-store-options--tp16045170p16045170.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Junit required for WicketTester?
On Fri, 07 Mar 2008, reikje wrote: > Do you have to have junit.jar in the classpath if you want to use > WicketTester? We are using TestNG here and in a regular TestNG test case Supposedly BaseWicketTester is testing framework neutral, and WicketTester the JUnit version of it. Theoretically you might be able to do TestNgWicketTester by extending BaseWicketTester, but I don't know if it would work in practice. Best wishes, Timo -- Timo Rantalaiho Reaktor Innovations Oyhttp://www.ri.fi/ > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ListView: if my entry is one component, can I not have it nested inside the entry?
My list entry is only one component, but the only way I can get the ListView
to work is have the markup with one level nesting like this:
EE
Is it possible to just have markup without the additional level of nesting?
Like this:
EE
and somehow in java, make the "entry" span become my list entry component?:
new ListView("entry", data) {
populateItem(ListItem item) {
item.JUST-BECOME-THIS-COMPONENT(new Label("entry",
item.getModelObject().toString()));
}
};
Wicket Testing
I need to test drop down values in a list using WicketTester ... like is
there wicketTester.assertXXX or something that i could use ? I tried
getTagByWicketId("some_thing_").getValue() but it only gives me the HTML for
it ...
my drop down is something like
add(dChoice = new DropDownChoice("someModelClassChoice",new
CompoundPropertyModel(SomeModelClass.class),
Arrays.asList("MODEL0","MODEL1","MODEL2")){
@Override
protected boolean wantOnSelectionChangedNotifications() {
return true;
}
@Override
protected void onSelectionChanged(Object newSelection) {
System.out.println(" Something happened");
params.put("Selected", newSelection);
setResponsePage(new WelcomePage(params));
}
});
My apologies if the question is a little dumb ...
Regards
Vyas, Anirudh
|| ॐ ||
display images in the TreeTable cell
i need to display different images for each cell in my tree table, i'm using a ModelBean that maintains the different properties for different cell just like the example, so how to i make it so the cell can display an image instead of just text? i tried to implement my own column that simply returns a new panel for the new cell, and the panel only contains the image, but this doesn't work. so can anyone give me some suggestion? i'm very new to wicket, so some code snippet would be very helpful. thanks in advanced! -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/display-images-in-the-TreeTable-cell-tp16043906p16043906.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: How to pre-select a DropDownChoice
Set the model of the DDC to the value you want to have selected. On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 7:53 PM, Michael Mehrle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I feel silly asking this, but I can't figure it out. I need to set my > DropDownChoice component to the id I'm passing into my page via a > pageparam. How do I do that? I don't see anything resembling > setSelected(). > > Michael > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Nick Heudecker Professional Wicket Training & Consulting http://www.systemmobile.com Eventful - Intelligent Event Management http://www.eventfulhq.com
How to pre-select a DropDownChoice
I feel silly asking this, but I can't figure it out. I need to set my DropDownChoice component to the id I'm passing into my page via a pageparam. How do I do that? I don't see anything resembling setSelected(). Michael - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: LinkTree Node Refresh
Make sure your tree model fires the appropriate events when your tree is modified. The Tree implementation should properly update the changed portions of tree (assuming you call the update() method). -Matej On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 1:27 AM, jeredm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I have a LinkTree where am adding new nodes via AJAX where the node is not > visually refreshing until I call myLinkTree.invalidateAll();. The problem > is that the tree refresh takes too long when I have a bunch of nodes > displayed. AbstractTree.invalidateAll() appears to "redraw" the whole tree, > but I only need to "redraw" the single node (I may be wrong on this and it > may be working exactly as I need it to, but it is slow). > > My basic setup is a tree on the left that dynamically swaps out panels via > AJAX on the right based on the node selected. The tree itself only starts > with the root and first children. All first children load their child nodes > via an AJAX call on expand. These nodes will correctly refresh as the nodes > are added and then the parent is expanded. I cannot collapse and re-expand > the parent node in this case as expanding a node would cause the tree to > close nodes the user has already opened. What I need is to be able to > insert a node like so... > > - My Root > |--First Child > |-- First Grandchild > |-- NEW NODE > |-- Last Grandchild > > I need the First Grandchild and Last Grandchild to already be expanded and > displaying before I add NEW NODE. > > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/LinkTree-Node-Refresh-tp16041813p16041813.html > Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Resizable and reorderable grid components. http://www.inmethod.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
LinkTree Node Refresh
I have a LinkTree where am adding new nodes via AJAX where the node is not visually refreshing until I call myLinkTree.invalidateAll();. The problem is that the tree refresh takes too long when I have a bunch of nodes displayed. AbstractTree.invalidateAll() appears to "redraw" the whole tree, but I only need to "redraw" the single node (I may be wrong on this and it may be working exactly as I need it to, but it is slow). My basic setup is a tree on the left that dynamically swaps out panels via AJAX on the right based on the node selected. The tree itself only starts with the root and first children. All first children load their child nodes via an AJAX call on expand. These nodes will correctly refresh as the nodes are added and then the parent is expanded. I cannot collapse and re-expand the parent node in this case as expanding a node would cause the tree to close nodes the user has already opened. What I need is to be able to insert a node like so... - My Root |--First Child |-- First Grandchild |-- NEW NODE |-- Last Grandchild I need the First Grandchild and Last Grandchild to already be expanded and displaying before I add NEW NODE. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/LinkTree-Node-Refresh-tp16041813p16041813.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: JNLP File Link (within same webapp)
see ContextImage and how it builds a context-relative path... -igor On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 2:20 PM, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This is probably a dumb question, but what kind of link should I use > to link to a JNLP file which resides within the same webapp? We have > the JnlpDownloadServlet running which accepts any *.jnlp file requests > and we're using WicketFilter (so it shouldn't interfere). I don't > think it's an ExternalLink, since it lives within the same webapp. I > guess I could use external link, but I'll have to do a little URL > building to get the correct url with the correct context path and > everything, right? > > James > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
FeedbackPanel#newMessageDisplayComponent throws NullPointerException if empty message is inserted
Hi,
I sometimes do:
try {
// work
} catch (Exception e) {
error(e.getMessage());
}
and came across an Exception that didn't have a message, and was greeted with a NullPointerException from the FeedbackPanel. Ofcourse this
was my mistake but maybe the code could be changed like this:
protected Component newMessageDisplayComponent(String id, FeedbackMessage
message) {
Label label = new Label(id, message.getMessage().toString()); // Current
Label label = new Label(id, message.getMessage() != null ?
message.getMessage().toString() : getString("emptyMessage")); // New
label.setEscapeModelStrings(FeedbackPanel.this.getEscapeModelStrings());
return label;
}
.. and then add emptyMessage or some key to FeedbackPanel.properties or is this
a bad idea?
-- Edvin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
JNLP File Link (within same webapp)
This is probably a dumb question, but what kind of link should I use to link to a JNLP file which resides within the same webapp? We have the JnlpDownloadServlet running which accepts any *.jnlp file requests and we're using WicketFilter (so it shouldn't interfere). I don't think it's an ExternalLink, since it lives within the same webapp. I guess I could use external link, but I'll have to do a little URL building to get the correct url with the correct context path and everything, right? James - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problem serving images from resource folder named 'resources'
Hi, wicket-users, I just upgraded several Wicket sites from 1.2.4 to 1.3. I now have a problem where images in a folder called 'resources' won't appear. In other words, I have a WAR source directory of 'src/main/webapp' which has images in a folder 'resources'. My HTML then has images referenced by: Attempts to view these images result in error: ERROR [SharedResourceRequestTarget] shared resource button.gif not found I have other folders, such as 'src/main/webapp/[anything but 'resources']' and images serve just fine out of those folders. In fact, if I simply rename 'resources' to 'resources1' and update my HTML everything works. The problem is I have 3 webapps and many images with this problem and, more importantly, a political issue with going back to the HTML designers if we can't use 'resources' as a folder name anymore. Interestingly, if I attempt to serve an image in a folder under 'resources', such as 'resources/tabs/tab.gif' I get exception: ERROR [SharedResourceRequestTarget] unable to lazily register shared resource resources/tabs/tab.gif java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: resources ... (SharedResourceRequestTarget:146) Is there a workaround so I can use the name 'resources'? Perhaps a way to explicitly declare a resource path alias? Enrique - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: getConverter() in TextArea not being called
This was very helpful - thank you again, Igor!
-Original Message-
From: Igor Vaynberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2008 12:55 PM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: getConverter() in TextArea not being called
textarea.settype(mytype.class); or new
textarea("id",model,mytype.class);
yes, alternatvely you can override convertvalue()
-igor
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 12:22 PM, Michael Mehrle
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for help (again), Igor :-) However, I'm not sure I understand -
> could you please give me a code fragment?
>
> BTW, I just dug around in FormComponent - isn't an alternative
approach
> to override convertValue()?
>
> Michael
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Igor Vaynberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2008 12:12 PM
> To: users@wicket.apache.org
> Subject: Re: getConverter() in TextArea not being called
>
> you have to set the type either via constructor arg or a call to
settype
>
> -igor
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 12:08 PM, Michael Mehrle
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I've got a custom TextArea which overrides getConverter(), however
for
> > some reason that method never gets called. getConverter() returns
an
> > implementation of IConverter - it all looks pretty basic.
> >
> > Is there anything special I have to do for getConverter() to be
> called?
> > By the way I added the @Override annotation, so I'm sure the
method
> sig
> > is correct.
> >
> > Michael
> >
> >
> >
-
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Converter gets called before Validator?
yes. validators work on types not strings, if they didnt then every converter would have to attempt to type convert the string and deal with conversion errors. so first we typeconvert, then run validators on the result -igor On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 12:23 PM, Michael Mehrle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I read the update docs and at this time assume that my component's > Validator gets called AFTER the Converter. Is that correct for 1.3? > > Michael > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: getConverter() in TextArea not being called
textarea.settype(mytype.class); or new textarea("id",model,mytype.class);
yes, alternatvely you can override convertvalue()
-igor
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 12:22 PM, Michael Mehrle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for help (again), Igor :-) However, I'm not sure I understand -
> could you please give me a code fragment?
>
> BTW, I just dug around in FormComponent - isn't an alternative approach
> to override convertValue()?
>
> Michael
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Igor Vaynberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2008 12:12 PM
> To: users@wicket.apache.org
> Subject: Re: getConverter() in TextArea not being called
>
> you have to set the type either via constructor arg or a call to settype
>
> -igor
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 12:08 PM, Michael Mehrle
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I've got a custom TextArea which overrides getConverter(), however for
> > some reason that method never gets called. getConverter() returns an
> > implementation of IConverter - it all looks pretty basic.
> >
> > Is there anything special I have to do for getConverter() to be
> called?
> > By the way I added the @Override annotation, so I'm sure the method
> sig
> > is correct.
> >
> > Michael
> >
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Different content for user
Thanks! I'm really confused on what to do here. What is your approach to this? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Different-content-for-user-tp16027844p16036638.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Converter gets called before Validator?
I read the update docs and at this time assume that my component's Validator gets called AFTER the Converter. Is that correct for 1.3? Michael - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: getConverter() in TextArea not being called
Thanks for help (again), Igor :-) However, I'm not sure I understand - could you please give me a code fragment? BTW, I just dug around in FormComponent - isn't an alternative approach to override convertValue()? Michael -Original Message- From: Igor Vaynberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2008 12:12 PM To: users@wicket.apache.org Subject: Re: getConverter() in TextArea not being called you have to set the type either via constructor arg or a call to settype -igor On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 12:08 PM, Michael Mehrle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've got a custom TextArea which overrides getConverter(), however for > some reason that method never gets called. getConverter() returns an > implementation of IConverter - it all looks pretty basic. > > Is there anything special I have to do for getConverter() to be called? > By the way I added the @Override annotation, so I'm sure the method sig > is correct. > > Michael > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: getConverter() in TextArea not being called
you have to set the type either via constructor arg or a call to settype -igor On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 12:08 PM, Michael Mehrle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've got a custom TextArea which overrides getConverter(), however for > some reason that method never gets called. getConverter() returns an > implementation of IConverter - it all looks pretty basic. > > Is there anything special I have to do for getConverter() to be called? > By the way I added the @Override annotation, so I'm sure the method sig > is correct. > > Michael > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
getConverter() in TextArea not being called
I've got a custom TextArea which overrides getConverter(), however for some reason that method never gets called. getConverter() returns an implementation of IConverter - it all looks pretty basic. Is there anything special I have to do for getConverter() to be called? By the way I added the @Override annotation, so I'm sure the method sig is correct. Michael - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wicket Portlet Error in Liferay
I have a simple portlet created using wicket. It contains a PageableListView
and PagingNavigator components. The portlet initially renders just fine.
When I click on one of the paging links, I get ClassCastException. Part of
the stacktrace looks like this...
java.lang.ClassCastException: com.liferay.portlet.ActionResponseImpl
at
org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.portlet.WicketFilterPortletContext.setupFilter(WicketFilterPortletContext.java:75)
at
org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.WicketFilter.doFilter(WicketFilter.java:163)
Stepping through the code in WicketFilterPortletContext, it looks like
(RenderResponse)filterRequestContext.getRequest().getAttribute("javax.portlet.response")
returns com.liferay.portlet.ActionResponseImpl which does not implement
RenderResponse
I'm using Liferay 4.2.2 and Wicket 1.3.1.
Any ideas?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Wicket-Portlet-Error-in-Liferay-tp16036090p16036090.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Wicketstuff/dojo Examples
Thank you Maurice! -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Maurice Marrink [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 13. März 2008 17:39 An: users@wicket.apache.org Betreff: Re: Wicketstuff/dojo Examples Try https://wicket-stuff.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/wicket-stuff/trunk/wicketstuff-dojo-examples Maurice On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 5:16 PM, Stefan Lindner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Where can I find the source for the wicketstuff/dojo examples? I do > not mean the code snipplets like the ones at > > http://wicketstuff.org/confluence/display/STUFFWIKI/Simple+Dojo+D%27n% > 27 > D+tutorial? > > The repositories that are mentiones all around the page contain only > source for the wicket-doje-integration etself. not for the examples. > And it would speed up the learning if I could start from a working > demo application (where to put the js-code in html etc.) > > I Have tried som veriants (
Re: Different content for user
yep, you can write something like tapestry's if, it would look very
much like the onbeforerender stuff i wrote below...
-igor
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 11:38 AM, James Carman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tapestry has an actual If component. Would that work in Wicket?
>
>
>
> On 3/13/08, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > if (condition) add component is static - if you put it into
> > constructor it is only evaluated once, so if login status changes in
> > the middle of the lifecyle of the panel it will not reflect the
> > change.
> >
> > personally something like
> >
> > add(new loggedinpanel(..) { isvisible() { return isuserloggedin(); } });
> > add(new notloggedinpanel(..) { isvisible() { return !isuserloggedin();
> }});
> >
> > works much better
> >
> > if these panels contain a lot of components, or components that are
> > expensive to construct, you can add the appropriate one in
> > obeforerender
> >
> > onbeforerender() {
> >if (loggedin()) {
> > if (get("panel")==null) add(new loggedinpanel("panel");
> > else if (!get("panel") instanceof loggedinpanel) {
> > get("panel").replacewith(new loggedinpanel("panel"); }
> > } else {
> > if (get("panel")==null) add(new loggedoutpanel("panel");
> > else if (!get("panel") instanceof loggedoutpanel) {
> > get("panel").replacewith(new loggedoutpanel("panel"); }
> > }
> >
> > -igor
> >
> >
> >if (isuserloggedin()) { add(new loggedinpanel
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 11:25 AM, Mathias P.W Nilsson
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Ehh looks complicated. What about the old if( condition ) add
> Component ?
> > > --
> > > View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/Different-content-for-user-tp16027844p16034721.html
> > >
> > >
> > > Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> > >
> > >
> > > -
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > >
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Different content for user
Tapestry has an actual If component. Would that work in Wicket?
On 3/13/08, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> if (condition) add component is static - if you put it into
> constructor it is only evaluated once, so if login status changes in
> the middle of the lifecyle of the panel it will not reflect the
> change.
>
> personally something like
>
> add(new loggedinpanel(..) { isvisible() { return isuserloggedin(); } });
> add(new notloggedinpanel(..) { isvisible() { return !isuserloggedin(); }});
>
> works much better
>
> if these panels contain a lot of components, or components that are
> expensive to construct, you can add the appropriate one in
> obeforerender
>
> onbeforerender() {
>if (loggedin()) {
> if (get("panel")==null) add(new loggedinpanel("panel");
> else if (!get("panel") instanceof loggedinpanel) {
> get("panel").replacewith(new loggedinpanel("panel"); }
> } else {
> if (get("panel")==null) add(new loggedoutpanel("panel");
> else if (!get("panel") instanceof loggedoutpanel) {
> get("panel").replacewith(new loggedoutpanel("panel"); }
> }
>
> -igor
>
>
>if (isuserloggedin()) { add(new loggedinpanel
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 11:25 AM, Mathias P.W Nilsson
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Ehh looks complicated. What about the old if( condition ) add
> Component ?
> > --
> > View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/Different-content-for-user-tp16027844p16034721.html
> >
> >
> > Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Different content for user
if (condition) add component is static - if you put it into
constructor it is only evaluated once, so if login status changes in
the middle of the lifecyle of the panel it will not reflect the
change.
personally something like
add(new loggedinpanel(..) { isvisible() { return isuserloggedin(); } });
add(new notloggedinpanel(..) { isvisible() { return !isuserloggedin(); }});
works much better
if these panels contain a lot of components, or components that are
expensive to construct, you can add the appropriate one in
obeforerender
onbeforerender() {
if (loggedin()) {
if (get("panel")==null) add(new loggedinpanel("panel");
else if (!get("panel") instanceof loggedinpanel) {
get("panel").replacewith(new loggedinpanel("panel"); }
} else {
if (get("panel")==null) add(new loggedoutpanel("panel");
else if (!get("panel") instanceof loggedoutpanel) {
get("panel").replacewith(new loggedoutpanel("panel"); }
}
-igor
if (isuserloggedin()) { add(new loggedinpanel
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 11:25 AM, Mathias P.W Nilsson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Ehh looks complicated. What about the old if( condition ) add Component ?
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/Different-content-for-user-tp16027844p16034721.html
>
>
> Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Back link
Thanks I will look into this! -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Back-link-tp16026896p16034782.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Different content for user
Ehh looks complicated. What about the old if( condition ) add Component ? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Different-content-for-user-tp16027844p16034721.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Hide "Wicket AJAX Debug" window
You really should deploy using DEPLOYMENT mode, not randomly modifying settings in your init() method. Martijn On 3/13/08, hjuturu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Thanks Ryan and Gerolf. > I put the settings in the init() method and it works fine. > > > > hjuturu wrote: > > > > Hi All > > i have a label on my webpage on which i do a in line edit using > > AjaxEditableLabel. > > I have included wicket-event.js and wicket-ajax.js javascripts in my page. > > When i start editing the label the "wicket ajax debug" window appears on > > the lower right corner. > > how can i hide that window. > > Thanks > > Haritha > > > > > > -- > > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/Hide-%22Wicket-AJAX-Debug%22-window-tp16013820p16032285.html > > Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Buy Wicket in Action: http://manning.com/dashorst Apache Wicket 1.3.1 is released Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.1 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Why does SqlTimestampConverter only use the time portion of the timestamp?
Hi- is there any reason why SqlTimestampConverter.convertToString() only returns a time? Or is this a bug? Thanks, -kusako This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Is it possible to escape HTML in a feedback message?
I believe you can do this using decorating your FeedbackPanel with a behavior
(see IBehavior, AbstractBehavior).
Sri
mraible wrote:
>
>
> Yes it does - thanks!
>
> FeedbackPanel feedback = (FeedbackPanel) backPage.get("feedback");
> feedback.setVisible(true);
> feedback.setEscapeModelStrings(true);
>
> Is there anyway to make "escapeModelStrings" on by default?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Matt
>
>
> igor.vaynberg wrote:
>>
>> does feedbackpanel.setescapemodelstrings(true) do it?
>>
>> -igor
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 10:34 AM, mraible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>>
AjaxEditableMultiLineLabel in does not work in safari
Hi All, i am using a AjaxEditableLabel and AjaxEditableMultiLineLabel wicket components inside a tag. They both work fine on Firefox and IE7. But when i try it on safari, the AjaxEditableMultiLineLabel component doesnt expand when clicked on. The AjaxEditableLabel component works fine though. Is there any bug associated with AjaxEditableMultiLineLabel components in safari. Can someone please update me about this. Thanks Haritha -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/AjaxEditableMultiLineLabel-in-%3Ctable%3E-does-not-work-in-safari-tp16033319p16033319.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [Howto] WizardStep communication ?
Show us the code from your ConfirmStep. My guess is that you're not familiar
with the need for models yet. For instance, my guess would be that you're
doing this:
public ConfirmStep(MyObj obj) {
add(new Label("time", obj.getTime()));
add(new Label("location", obj.getLocation()));
}
If you are - that's the problem. Try this:
public ConfirmStep(MyObj obj) {
add(new Label("time", new PropertyModel(obj, "time")));
add(new Label("location", new PropertyModel(obj, "location")));
}
That will fix this problem, but you need to go learn as much as you can about
models. You should probably also be passing an IModel into the constructor of
each step, as well... Not the actual object.
Hope this helps.
Jeremy Thomerson
-- sent from a wireless device
-Original Message-
From: "smallufo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Sent: 3/13/08 9:10 AM
Subject: [Howto] WizardStep communication ?
This is my Wizard and steps :
MyObj myObj = new MyObj(); // build MyObj with default Time / Location
WizardModel model = new WizardModel();
model.add(new TimeStep(myObj));
model.add(new LocationStep(myObj));
model.add(new ConfirmStep(myObj));
init(model);
MyObj is just a class containing time / location data , and with default
value.
The wizard first asks user to input time , and then input location ,
In the third step (ConfirmStep) , it will show the data inputed , asking the
user to confirm.
The problem is , the ConfirmStep always shows the default value .
Time / Location in the 1st and 2nd Step is not shown.
It seems it is because that the ConfirmStep is instantiated and all values
are pulled at the construction time.
Is there any way to prevent this ?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Panel not updated on modelchange
Thanks, now it works.
Ole-Harald
igor.vaynberg wrote:
>
> change that to new propertymodel(getmodel(), "name")
>
> -igor
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 1:26 AM, deletethisprofile
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Running Panel.detach from onselectionchanged in the radiogroup didn't
>> help.
>>
>> It seems like the panels is updated, but labels in the panel is not.
>> The labels are added like this: add(new Label("name", new
>> PropertyModel(getModelObject(), "name")));
>>
>> Ole-Harald
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> igor.vaynberg wrote:
>> >
>> > sounds like your model is not detachable or being cached somewhere
>> >
>> > perhaps you are loading the panel's model somewhere before it is
>> > updated. like panel { isvisible() { return getmodelobject().isempty();
>> > }
>> >
>> > try calling panel.detach() <== which will also detach the panel's
>> model
>> >
>> > -igor
>> >
>> >
>> > On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 10:29 AM, deletethisprofile
>> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Non-ajax.
>> >>
>> >> Ole-Harald
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Eelco Hillenius wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > Ajax or non-ajax?
>> >> >
>> >> > Eelco
>> >> >
>> >> > On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 9:40 AM, deletethisprofile
>> >> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Hi
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I have a panel with an AbstractReadOnlyModel that i want to
>> change
>> >> when
>> >> >> i
>> >> >> select an radiobutton on another panel. The radiobuttons are in
>> a
>> >> >> radiogroup
>> >> >> with a properymodel to the same object that I have in the
>> >> >> AbstractReadOnlyModel. But when I select the radiobuttons the
>> >> >> modelobject is
>> >> >> changed but panel is not updated. I have have tried triggering
>> an
>> >> >> modeupdate
>> >> >> on the panel when when a radiobutten is selected but the panel
>> is
>> >> not
>> >> >> updated. If I go to another page on the selection of a
>> radiobutton
>> >> the
>> >> >> panel
>> >> >> updates correctly, But I want i to update even the page dont
>> change.
>> >> >> Any Ideas on how can I make that happend?
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Ole-Harald
>> >> >> --
>> >> >> View this message in context:
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> http://www.nabble.com/Panel-not-updated-on-modelchange-tp16007420p16007420.html
>> >> >> Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> -
>> >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> -
>> >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> View this message in context:
>> >>
>> http://www.nabble.com/Panel-not-updated-on-modelchange-tp16007420p16009871.html
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> -
>> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> > -
>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://www.nabble.com/Panel-not-updated-on-modelchange-tp16007420p16023202.html
>>
>>
>> Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Panel-not-updated-on-modelchange-tp16007420p16032288.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Hide "Wicket AJAX Debug" window
Thanks Ryan and Gerolf. I put the settings in the init() method and it works fine. hjuturu wrote: > > Hi All > i have a label on my webpage on which i do a in line edit using > AjaxEditableLabel. > I have included wicket-event.js and wicket-ajax.js javascripts in my page. > When i start editing the label the "wicket ajax debug" window appears on > the lower right corner. > how can i hide that window. > Thanks > Haritha > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Hide-%22Wicket-AJAX-Debug%22-window-tp16013820p16032285.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Wicket, Hibernate and Models
whew - glad to hear :-)
[having probably hundreds of anonymous models in his projects]
Am 13.03.2008 um 17:46 schrieb Igor Vaynberg:
actually not in 1.3. our serialization is smart enough to take this
into account if i remember correctly.
-igor
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 8:47 AM, Leszek Gawron
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Maurice Marrink wrote:
I believe refreshingview has better support for reusing items but in
our apps we hardly ever use refreshingview. both are suitable for
use
with hibernate.
Maurice
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 4:35 PM, carloc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
What should I use when I am accessing hibernate?
Should I use a ListView or should I use a refreshing view?\
In the api it says to use refreshingview instead of using
listview when
using database collections
what is better to use?
carloc wrote:
Hi everyone,
I have been reading wicket in action recently and I have seen
pitfalls of
hibernate section.
I was wondering about the stuff about hibernate and memory leaks
due to
hibernate proxy objects maintaining a reference to the session
with
them
Am I doing this wrong then?
@SpringBean
private UserService userService;
add(new ListView("user", userService.findUsers() {
})
is this wrong? I'm using it directly meaning it will be stored
in the page
store right?
should i be doing this instead?
LoadableDetachableModel model = new LoadableDetachablemodel() {
Object load() {
return usrService.findUsers()
}
}
please mind that you shouldn't create anonymous model classes as they
keep the reference to the page/panel and you will fall into other
memory
issues.
--
Leszek Gawron http://www.mobilebox.pl/
krs.html
CTO at MobileBox Ltd.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Wicket, Hibernate and Models
actually not in 1.3. our serialization is smart enough to take this
into account if i remember correctly.
-igor
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 8:47 AM, Leszek Gawron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Maurice Marrink wrote:
> > I believe refreshingview has better support for reusing items but in
> > our apps we hardly ever use refreshingview. both are suitable for use
> > with hibernate.
> >
> > Maurice
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 4:35 PM, carloc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> What should I use when I am accessing hibernate?
> >> Should I use a ListView or should I use a refreshing view?\
> >> In the api it says to use refreshingview instead of using listview when
> >> using database collections
> >> what is better to use?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> carloc wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Hi everyone,
> >> >
> >> > I have been reading wicket in action recently and I have seen pitfalls
> of
> >> > hibernate section.
> >> > I was wondering about the stuff about hibernate and memory leaks due to
> >> > hibernate proxy objects maintaining a reference to the session with
> >> > them
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Am I doing this wrong then?
> >> > @SpringBean
> >> > private UserService userService;
> >> >
> >> > add(new ListView("user", userService.findUsers() {
> >> > })
> >> >
> >> > is this wrong? I'm using it directly meaning it will be stored in the
> page
> >> > store right?
> >> >
> >> > should i be doing this instead?
> >> >
> >> > LoadableDetachableModel model = new LoadableDetachablemodel() {
> >> > Object load() {
> >> >return usrService.findUsers()
> >> >}
> >> >
> >> > }
>
> please mind that you shouldn't create anonymous model classes as they
> keep the reference to the page/panel and you will fall into other memory
> issues.
>
>
> --
> Leszek Gawron http://www.mobilebox.pl/krs.html
> CTO at MobileBox Ltd.
>
>
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Wicket, Hibernate and Models
> please mind that you shouldn't create anonymous model classes as
they keep the reference to the page/panel and you will fall into other
memory issues.
could you elaborate on that?
Am 13.03.2008 um 16:47 schrieb Leszek Gawron:
Maurice Marrink wrote:
I believe refreshingview has better support for reusing items but in
our apps we hardly ever use refreshingview. both are suitable for use
with hibernate.
Maurice
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 4:35 PM, carloc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
What should I use when I am accessing hibernate?
Should I use a ListView or should I use a refreshing view?\
In the api it says to use refreshingview instead of using listview
when
using database collections
what is better to use?
carloc wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> I have been reading wicket in action recently and I have seen
pitfalls of
> hibernate section.
> I was wondering about the stuff about hibernate and memory leaks
due to
> hibernate proxy objects maintaining a reference to the session
with
> them
>
>
> Am I doing this wrong then?
> @SpringBean
> private UserService userService;
>
> add(new ListView("user", userService.findUsers() {
> })
>
> is this wrong? I'm using it directly meaning it will be stored
in the page
> store right?
>
> should i be doing this instead?
>
> LoadableDetachableModel model = new LoadableDetachablemodel() {
> Object load() {
>return usrService.findUsers()
>}
>
> }
please mind that you shouldn't create anonymous model classes as
they keep the reference to the page/panel and you will fall into
other memory issues.
--
Leszek Gawron http://www.mobilebox.pl/krs.html
CTO at MobileBox Ltd.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Wicketstuff/dojo Examples
Try https://wicket-stuff.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/wicket-stuff/trunk/wicketstuff-dojo-examples Maurice On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 5:16 PM, Stefan Lindner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Where can I find the source for the wicketstuff/dojo examples? I do not > mean the code snipplets like the ones at > http://wicketstuff.org/confluence/display/STUFFWIKI/Simple+Dojo+D%27n%27 > D+tutorial? > > The repositories that are mentiones all around the page contain only > source for the wicket-doje-integration etself. not for the examples. And > it would speed up the learning if I could start from a working demo > application (where to put the js-code in html etc.) > > I Have tried som veriants (
RE: Different content for user
Take a look at Wicket-Security at Wicket Stuff site. http://wicketstuff.org/confluence/display/STUFFWIKI/Wicket-Security I am using it to do the same types of things you are talking about, and it works great. > -Original Message- > From: Mathias P.W Nilsson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2008 8:11 AM > To: users@wicket.apache.org > Subject: Different content for user > > > > How can I show different content for logged in users. > > I have a DataSheet page that allows users to add to cart, edit and so on. > Some users should not be able to edit the content or even add to cart. How > can I achive this? > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/Different-content-for-user-tp16027844p16027844.html > Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wicketstuff/dojo Examples
Where can I find the source for the wicketstuff/dojo examples? I do not mean the code snipplets like the ones at http://wicketstuff.org/confluence/display/STUFFWIKI/Simple+Dojo+D%27n%27 D+tutorial? The repositories that are mentiones all around the page contain only source for the wicket-doje-integration etself. not for the examples. And it would speed up the learning if I could start from a working demo application (where to put the js-code in html etc.) I Have tried som veriants (
RE: downloading Wicket examples
They come bundled with the Wicket download under src\jdk-1.5\wicket-examples -Original Message- From: Andrew Broderick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2008 10:45 AM To: 'users@wicket.apache.org' Subject: downloading Wicket examples Hi, I found many useful Wicket examples at: http://wicketstuff.org/wicket13/ You can browse the source code, but not all classes are there (e.g WicketExampleApplication). Where can I download jar or zip files of the sources for these examples? Thanks ___ The information in this email or in any file attached hereto is intended only for the personal and confiden- tial use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is propri- etary and confidential. If you are not the intended recipient of this message you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. This communica- tion is for information purposes only and should not be regarded as an offer to sell or as a solicitation of an offer to buy any financial product. Email trans- mission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error- free. P6070214 __ The information contained in this message is proprietary and/or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please: (i) delete the message and all copies; (ii) do not disclose, distribute or use the message in any manner; and (iii) notify the sender immediately. In addition, please be aware that any message addressed to our domain is subject to archiving and review by persons other than the intended recipient. Thank you. _ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Wicket, Hibernate and Models
Maurice Marrink wrote:
I believe refreshingview has better support for reusing items but in
our apps we hardly ever use refreshingview. both are suitable for use
with hibernate.
Maurice
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 4:35 PM, carloc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What should I use when I am accessing hibernate?
Should I use a ListView or should I use a refreshing view?\
In the api it says to use refreshingview instead of using listview when
using database collections
what is better to use?
carloc wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> I have been reading wicket in action recently and I have seen pitfalls of
> hibernate section.
> I was wondering about the stuff about hibernate and memory leaks due to
> hibernate proxy objects maintaining a reference to the session with
> them
>
>
> Am I doing this wrong then?
> @SpringBean
> private UserService userService;
>
> add(new ListView("user", userService.findUsers() {
> })
>
> is this wrong? I'm using it directly meaning it will be stored in the page
> store right?
>
> should i be doing this instead?
>
> LoadableDetachableModel model = new LoadableDetachablemodel() {
> Object load() {
>return usrService.findUsers()
>}
>
> }
please mind that you shouldn't create anonymous model classes as they
keep the reference to the page/panel and you will fall into other memory
issues.
--
Leszek Gawron http://www.mobilebox.pl/krs.html
CTO at MobileBox Ltd.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Wicket, Hibernate and Models
heh. make sure all your listviews override getlistitemmodel()
otherwise you can run into all kinds of problems if you use listview
to select items not just display them...
-igor
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 8:38 AM, Maurice Marrink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I believe refreshingview has better support for reusing items but in
> our apps we hardly ever use refreshingview. both are suitable for use
> with hibernate.
>
> Maurice
>
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 4:35 PM, carloc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > What should I use when I am accessing hibernate?
> > Should I use a ListView or should I use a refreshing view?\
> > In the api it says to use refreshingview instead of using listview when
> > using database collections
> > what is better to use?
> >
> >
> >
> > carloc wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi everyone,
> > >
> > > I have been reading wicket in action recently and I have seen pitfalls
> of
> > > hibernate section.
> > > I was wondering about the stuff about hibernate and memory leaks due to
> > > hibernate proxy objects maintaining a reference to the session with
> > > them
> > >
> > >
> > > Am I doing this wrong then?
> > > @SpringBean
> > > private UserService userService;
> > >
> > > add(new ListView("user", userService.findUsers() {
> > > })
> > >
> > > is this wrong? I'm using it directly meaning it will be stored in the
> page
> > > store right?
> > >
> > > should i be doing this instead?
> > >
> > > LoadableDetachableModel model = new LoadableDetachablemodel() {
> > > Object load() {
> > >return usrService.findUsers()
> > >}
> > >
> > > }
> > > }
> > >
> > > add(new ListView("listView", model)) {
> > > }
> > >
> > > this is to avoid storing the users in the session...
> > > will doing the first one actually result in a memory leak?
> > >
> > > thanks
> > >
> >
> > --
> > View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/Wicket%2C-Hibernate-and-Models-tp16025532p16028751.html
> >
> >
> > Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Wicket, Hibernate and Models
I believe refreshingview has better support for reusing items but in
our apps we hardly ever use refreshingview. both are suitable for use
with hibernate.
Maurice
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 4:35 PM, carloc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> What should I use when I am accessing hibernate?
> Should I use a ListView or should I use a refreshing view?\
> In the api it says to use refreshingview instead of using listview when
> using database collections
> what is better to use?
>
>
>
> carloc wrote:
> >
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > I have been reading wicket in action recently and I have seen pitfalls of
> > hibernate section.
> > I was wondering about the stuff about hibernate and memory leaks due to
> > hibernate proxy objects maintaining a reference to the session with
> > them
> >
> >
> > Am I doing this wrong then?
> > @SpringBean
> > private UserService userService;
> >
> > add(new ListView("user", userService.findUsers() {
> > })
> >
> > is this wrong? I'm using it directly meaning it will be stored in the page
> > store right?
> >
> > should i be doing this instead?
> >
> > LoadableDetachableModel model = new LoadableDetachablemodel() {
> > Object load() {
> >return usrService.findUsers()
> >}
> >
> > }
> > }
> >
> > add(new ListView("listView", model)) {
> > }
> >
> > this is to avoid storing the users in the session...
> > will doing the first one actually result in a memory leak?
> >
> > thanks
> >
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/Wicket%2C-Hibernate-and-Models-tp16025532p16028751.html
>
>
> Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Wicket, Hibernate and Models
What should I use when I am accessing hibernate?
Should I use a ListView or should I use a refreshing view?\
In the api it says to use refreshingview instead of using listview when
using database collections
what is better to use?
carloc wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> I have been reading wicket in action recently and I have seen pitfalls of
> hibernate section.
> I was wondering about the stuff about hibernate and memory leaks due to
> hibernate proxy objects maintaining a reference to the session with
> them
>
>
> Am I doing this wrong then?
> @SpringBean
> private UserService userService;
>
> add(new ListView("user", userService.findUsers() {
> })
>
> is this wrong? I'm using it directly meaning it will be stored in the page
> store right?
>
> should i be doing this instead?
>
> LoadableDetachableModel model = new LoadableDetachablemodel() {
> Object load() {
>return usrService.findUsers()
>}
>
> }
> }
>
> add(new ListView("listView", model)) {
> }
>
> this is to avoid storing the users in the session...
> will doing the first one actually result in a memory leak?
>
> thanks
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Wicket%2C-Hibernate-and-Models-tp16025532p16028751.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Panel not updated on modelchange
change that to new propertymodel(getmodel(), "name")
-igor
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 1:26 AM, deletethisprofile
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Running Panel.detach from onselectionchanged in the radiogroup didn't help.
>
> It seems like the panels is updated, but labels in the panel is not.
> The labels are added like this: add(new Label("name", new
> PropertyModel(getModelObject(), "name")));
>
> Ole-Harald
>
>
>
>
>
>
> igor.vaynberg wrote:
> >
> > sounds like your model is not detachable or being cached somewhere
> >
> > perhaps you are loading the panel's model somewhere before it is
> > updated. like panel { isvisible() { return getmodelobject().isempty();
> > }
> >
> > try calling panel.detach() <== which will also detach the panel's model
> >
> > -igor
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 10:29 AM, deletethisprofile
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >> Non-ajax.
> >>
> >> Ole-Harald
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Eelco Hillenius wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Ajax or non-ajax?
> >> >
> >> > Eelco
> >> >
> >> > On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 9:40 AM, deletethisprofile
> >> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> Hi
> >> >>
> >> >> I have a panel with an AbstractReadOnlyModel that i want to change
> >> when
> >> >> i
> >> >> select an radiobutton on another panel. The radiobuttons are in a
> >> >> radiogroup
> >> >> with a properymodel to the same object that I have in the
> >> >> AbstractReadOnlyModel. But when I select the radiobuttons the
> >> >> modelobject is
> >> >> changed but panel is not updated. I have have tried triggering an
> >> >> modeupdate
> >> >> on the panel when when a radiobutten is selected but the panel is
> >> not
> >> >> updated. If I go to another page on the selection of a radiobutton
> >> the
> >> >> panel
> >> >> updates correctly, But I want i to update even the page dont change.
> >> >> Any Ideas on how can I make that happend?
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> Ole-Harald
> >> >> --
> >> >> View this message in context:
> >> >>
> >>
> http://www.nabble.com/Panel-not-updated-on-modelchange-tp16007420p16007420.html
> >> >> Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> -
> >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> > -
> >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >> --
> >> View this message in context:
> >>
> http://www.nabble.com/Panel-not-updated-on-modelchange-tp16007420p16009871.html
> >>
> >>
> >> Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >>
> >>
> >> -
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>
> >>
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> >
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/Panel-not-updated-on-modelchange-tp16007420p16023202.html
>
>
> Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: downloading Wicket examples
Not sure if the wicket-examples war is generated using https://wicket-stuff.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/wicket-stuff/trunk but you can find the source for a number of examples there too, or else you might have to look in another branch. Maurice On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 3:59 PM, Andrew Broderick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Not all of the examples on wicketstuff.org are in the distribution. Thanks > anyway. > > > > -Original Message- > From: Martijn Dashorst [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2008 9:48 AM > To: users@wicket.apache.org > Subject: Re: downloading Wicket examples > > http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.1 > > Download the distribution, read the readme, look in lib/ for > wicket-examples.war > > Martijn > > On 3/13/08, Andrew Broderick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I found many useful Wicket examples at: > > > > http://wicketstuff.org/wicket13/ > > > > You can browse the source code, but not all classes are there (e.g > WicketExampleApplication). Where can I download jar or zip files of the > sources for these examples? > > > > Thanks > > > > ___ > > > > The information in this email or in any file attached > > hereto is intended only for the personal and confiden- > > tial use of the individual or entity to which it is > > addressed and may contain information that is propri- > > etary and confidential. If you are not the intended > > recipient of this message you are hereby notified that > > any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of > > this message is strictly prohibited. This communica- > > tion is for information purposes only and should not > > be regarded as an offer to sell or as a solicitation > > of an offer to buy any financial product. Email trans- > > mission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error- > > free. P6070214 > > > > > -- > Buy Wicket in Action: http://manning.com/dashorst > Apache Wicket 1.3.1 is released > Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.1 > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Different content for user
How can I show different content for logged in users. I have a DataSheet page that allows users to add to cart, edit and so on. Some users should not be able to edit the content or even add to cart. How can I achive this? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Different-content-for-user-tp16027844p16027844.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Back link
setResponsePage(new DetailsPage(SearchPage.this)); Or if you want to keep bookmarkability, then you need to do some pagemap wizardry, retrieving the previous page from the page history and checking if that is a searchpage instance, if so put it in a link. i think a couple of weeks ago this was also discussed on the list, so you can find the code for retrieving the page there. Martijn On 3/13/08, Mathias P.W Nilsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi! > > I was wondering on how to deal with a back link. Not back button of browser > but a back link ( not history.back() in javascript ) > > A user has performed a search for items. He/she found one on page 3. In my > wicket link onclick event I do the following. > > Item i = ( Item ) item.getModelObject(); > setResponsePage( new ItemOverViewPage( i ) ) or something like this. > > How do I in the ItemOverViewPage handle so that the user can go back to the > latest search? Is there any built in feature in Wicket for this? > > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/Back-link-tp16026896p16026896.html > Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Buy Wicket in Action: http://manning.com/dashorst Apache Wicket 1.3.1 is released Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.1 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: downloading Wicket examples
Not all of the examples on wicketstuff.org are in the distribution. Thanks anyway. -Original Message- From: Martijn Dashorst [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2008 9:48 AM To: users@wicket.apache.org Subject: Re: downloading Wicket examples http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.1 Download the distribution, read the readme, look in lib/ for wicket-examples.war Martijn On 3/13/08, Andrew Broderick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I found many useful Wicket examples at: > > http://wicketstuff.org/wicket13/ > > You can browse the source code, but not all classes are there (e.g > WicketExampleApplication). Where can I download jar or zip files of the > sources for these examples? > > Thanks > > ___ > > The information in this email or in any file attached > hereto is intended only for the personal and confiden- > tial use of the individual or entity to which it is > addressed and may contain information that is propri- > etary and confidential. If you are not the intended > recipient of this message you are hereby notified that > any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of > this message is strictly prohibited. This communica- > tion is for information purposes only and should not > be regarded as an offer to sell or as a solicitation > of an offer to buy any financial product. Email trans- > mission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error- > free. P6070214 > -- Buy Wicket in Action: http://manning.com/dashorst Apache Wicket 1.3.1 is released Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.1 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Wicket, Hibernate and Models
Yes I think you are right. By using the LoadableDetachableModel you prevent the List to be put in the session. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Wicket%2C-Hibernate-and-Models-tp16025532p16026919.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Back link
Hi! I was wondering on how to deal with a back link. Not back button of browser but a back link ( not history.back() in javascript ) A user has performed a search for items. He/she found one on page 3. In my wicket link onclick event I do the following. Item i = ( Item ) item.getModelObject(); setResponsePage( new ItemOverViewPage( i ) ) or something like this. How do I in the ItemOverViewPage handle so that the user can go back to the latest search? Is there any built in feature in Wicket for this? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Back-link-tp16026896p16026896.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: downloading Wicket examples
http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.1 Download the distribution, read the readme, look in lib/ for wicket-examples.war Martijn On 3/13/08, Andrew Broderick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I found many useful Wicket examples at: > > http://wicketstuff.org/wicket13/ > > You can browse the source code, but not all classes are there (e.g > WicketExampleApplication). Where can I download jar or zip files of the > sources for these examples? > > Thanks > > ___ > > The information in this email or in any file attached > hereto is intended only for the personal and confiden- > tial use of the individual or entity to which it is > addressed and may contain information that is propri- > etary and confidential. If you are not the intended > recipient of this message you are hereby notified that > any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of > this message is strictly prohibited. This communica- > tion is for information purposes only and should not > be regarded as an offer to sell or as a solicitation > of an offer to buy any financial product. Email trans- > mission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error- > free. P6070214 > -- Buy Wicket in Action: http://manning.com/dashorst Apache Wicket 1.3.1 is released Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.1 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
downloading Wicket examples
Hi, I found many useful Wicket examples at: http://wicketstuff.org/wicket13/ You can browse the source code, but not all classes are there (e.g WicketExampleApplication). Where can I download jar or zip files of the sources for these examples? Thanks ___ The information in this email or in any file attached hereto is intended only for the personal and confiden- tial use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is propri- etary and confidential. If you are not the intended recipient of this message you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. This communica- tion is for information purposes only and should not be regarded as an offer to sell or as a solicitation of an offer to buy any financial product. Email trans- mission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error- free. P6070214
Is there any way to be notified somehow just after the CompoundPropertyModel is resolved by the component hierarchy?
Hi everyone, Is there any way to be notified somehow just after the CompoundPropertyModel is resolved by the component hierarchy? Vitaly - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Wicket, Hibernate and Models
I think the memleak will not occur that easily because i believe
hibernate removes the session from each proxy / persistent bag after
it is closed. But you really should use the LDM (or another sort of
lazy loading model) because it will prevent a lot of
lazyinitexceptions and other hibernate exceptions that might occur
because the session for those objects is no longer available.
Maurice
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 3:04 PM, carloc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> I have been reading wicket in action recently and I have seen pitfalls of
> hibernate section.
> I was wondering about the stuff about hibernate and memory leaks due to
> hibernate proxy objects maintaining a reference to the session with them
>
>
> Am I doing this wrong then?
> @SpringBean
> private UserService userService;
>
> add(new ListView("user", userService.findUsers() {
> })
>
> is this wrong? I'm using it directly meaning it will be stored in the page
> store right?
>
> should i be doing this instead?
>
> LoadableDetachableModel model = new LoadableDetachablemodel() {
> Object load() {
>return usrService.findUsers()
>}
>
> }
> }
>
> add(new ListView("listView", model)) {
> }
>
> this is to avoid storing the users in the session...
> will doing the first one actually result in a memory leak?
>
> thanks
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/Wicket%2C-Hibernate-and-Models-tp16025532p16025532.html
> Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Howto] WizardStep communication ?
This is my Wizard and steps : MyObj myObj = new MyObj(); // build MyObj with default Time / Location WizardModel model = new WizardModel(); model.add(new TimeStep(myObj)); model.add(new LocationStep(myObj)); model.add(new ConfirmStep(myObj)); init(model); MyObj is just a class containing time / location data , and with default value. The wizard first asks user to input time , and then input location , In the third step (ConfirmStep) , it will show the data inputed , asking the user to confirm. The problem is , the ConfirmStep always shows the default value . Time / Location in the 1st and 2nd Step is not shown. It seems it is because that the ConfirmStep is instantiated and all values are pulled at the construction time. Is there any way to prevent this ?
Wicket, Hibernate and Models
Hi everyone,
I have been reading wicket in action recently and I have seen pitfalls of
hibernate section.
I was wondering about the stuff about hibernate and memory leaks due to
hibernate proxy objects maintaining a reference to the session with them
Am I doing this wrong then?
@SpringBean
private UserService userService;
add(new ListView("user", userService.findUsers() {
})
is this wrong? I'm using it directly meaning it will be stored in the page
store right?
should i be doing this instead?
LoadableDetachableModel model = new LoadableDetachablemodel() {
Object load() {
return usrService.findUsers()
}
}
}
add(new ListView("listView", model)) {
}
this is to avoid storing the users in the session...
will doing the first one actually result in a memory leak?
thanks
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Wicket%2C-Hibernate-and-Models-tp16025532p16025532.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: StringResourceModel labels within values
Sebastiaan van Erk wrote:
How's this:
public class RecursiveStringResourceModel extends AbstractReadOnlyModel {
private final String resourceKey;
private final Component component;
public RecursiveStringResourceModel(final String resourceKey, final
Component component) {
this.resourceKey = resourceKey;
this.component = component;
}
@Override
public Object getObject() {
return new StringResourceModel(resourceKey, component, new
CompoundPropertyModel(new AbstractMap() {
@Override
public Object get(Object key) {
return new RecursiveStringResourceModel((String) key,
component).getObject();
}
@Override
public Set> entrySet() {
return null;
}
})).getObject();
}
}
I'm sure it can be done more efficiently (i.e., less model creation),
but hey, it works! ;-)
For starters, it's much better to subclass LoadableDetachableModel and
move the getOjbect() to load(). :-)
Regards,
Sebastiaan
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: Wicket Kitchen Sink Application?
wicket-examples, wicket-phonebook, jtrac, artifactory, jalbum(?) Martijn On 3/13/08, Hoover, William <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Anyone know of a good kitchen sink application for Wicket (preferably one > application)? We need something robust enough to test most of the Wicket > features in our current environment. > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Buy Wicket in Action: http://manning.com/dashorst Apache Wicket 1.3.1 is released Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.1 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wicket Kitchen Sink Application?
Anyone know of a good kitchen sink application for Wicket (preferably one application)? We need something robust enough to test most of the Wicket features in our current environment. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: IntelliJ WicketForge issue: NPE when trying to use "New Wicket Page" to create both Java and markup
Kurt R. Hoehn wrote: That can happen if the html directory is different then the source directory and the html directory has not been created yet. I'm a Wicket and IDEA newbie working with the Wicket QuickStart structure. I don't even know how to make the HTML and component directories different ;-) -Kevin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: StringResourceModel labels within values
How's this:
public class RecursiveStringResourceModel extends AbstractReadOnlyModel {
private final String resourceKey;
private final Component component;
public RecursiveStringResourceModel(final String resourceKey, final
Component component) {
this.resourceKey = resourceKey;
this.component = component;
}
@Override
public Object getObject() {
return new StringResourceModel(resourceKey, component, new
CompoundPropertyModel(new AbstractMap() {
@Override
public Object get(Object key) {
return new RecursiveStringResourceModel((String) key,
component).getObject();
}
@Override
public Set>
entrySet() {
return null;
}
})).getObject();
}
}
I'm sure it can be done more efficiently (i.e., less model creation),
but hey, it works! ;-)
Regards,
Sebastiaan
i ii wrote:
how will this work with example i gave? i'm not sure how to get some.label and some.text back into some.key? would i use something like
StringResourceModel srm = new StringResourceModel("some.key", this, null);
PropertyVariableInterpolator.interpolate("some.label", srm);
not sure that works :(
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 12:17:09 +0100
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: StringResourceModel labels within values
At one point I wanted to do interpolation in constant strings, so I just
used the property interpolator directly:
PropertyVariableInterpolator.interpolate(value, modelObject);
You can use that to build a model that recursively interpolates until
there are no more ${...} occurrences in the value.
Regards,
Sebastiaan
i ii wrote:
thank you for help! which way is better? my own component or srm model that
gets from localizer?
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 13:57:10 -0700
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: StringResourceModel labels within values
but will that work recusively? :)
-igor
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 1:44 PM, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think if you just give SRM a model that again gets the values from
the localizer then it should work fine.
On 3/12/08, i ii <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> is there way to do something like:
>
> .properties file:
>
> some.label=Some Label
> some.text=Some Text
> some.key=This text will have ${some.label} and ${some.text}
>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: Ajax CheckGroup problem exception: java.lang.IllegalStateException: No Page found for component
you can't hold reference tocheckboxes.add(checkbox); like that
Because onPopulate() can be called again when you refresh the page and then
you get a new set
You can use a reusestrategy for that but still
If you want to set states then you should set states on your model object
that the checkboxes have
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 1:18 PM, Eyal Golan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> I made a select-all check box inside a table.
> I used the example from
>
> http://javathoughts.capesugarbird.com/2007/09/ajax-select-all-checkbox-for-wicket.html
> It works well in most cases.
>
> Here's some code:
>
> Adding the checkgroup to the panel:
>private void addCheckGroup() {
>checkGroup = new MyAjaxCheckBox("allChecked", new
> PropertyModel(this, "allChecked")) {
>private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
>
>@Override
>protected void onUpdate(AjaxRequestTarget target) {
>final boolean isSelected = isChecked();
>if (isSelected) {
>checkGroupModel.addAll(entitiesList);
>} else {
>checkGroupModel.clear();
>}
>for (MyAjaxCheckBox check : checkboxes) {
>check.setOutputMarkupId(true);
>target.addComponent(check);
>}
>for (EntityWrapper entity : entitiesList) {
>entity.setSelect(isSelected);
>}
> //target.addComponent(EntitiesPanel.this);
>EntitiesPanel.this.onUpdate(target);
>}
>@Override
>public boolean isVisible() {
>return (withSelect && entitiesList != null &&
> entitiesList.size() > 0);
>}
>};
>checkGroup.setOutputMarkupId(true);
> //checkGroup.setVisible(false);
>add(checkGroup);
>}
>
> The Checkbox column inside the table, and the fragment it uses:
>private AbstractColumn createCheckboxColumn() {
>AbstractColumn p = new AbstractColumn(new Model()) {
>private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
>
>public void populateItem(Item cellItem, String componentId,
> IModel rowModel) {
>EntityWrapper confEntity = (EntityWrapper)
> rowModel.getObject();
>Fragment frag = new CheckboxEntityFrag(componentId,
> "checkboxFrag",
>EntitiesPanel.this, confEntity);
>cellItem.add(frag);
>}
>};
>return p;
>}
>
>private CheckboxEntityFrag(String id, String markupId,
> MarkupContainer markupProvider,
>final EntityWrapper value) {
>super(id, markupId, markupProvider);
>checkbox = new MyAjaxCheckBox("entityCheckbox", new
> PropertyModel(value, "select")) {
>private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
>
>@Override
>protected void onUpdate(AjaxRequestTarget target) {
>if (isChecked()) {
>if (!checkGroupModel.contains(value))
>checkGroupModel.add(value);
>} else {
>checkGroupModel.remove(value);
>}
>setAllChecked(checkGroupModel.size() ==
> entitiesList.size());
>checkGroup.setOutputMarkupId(true);
>target.addComponent(checkGroup);
>EntitiesPanel.this.onUpdate(target);
>}
>};
>add(checkbox);
>checkboxes.add(checkbox);
>}
>}
>
> The problem:
> someone else uses my panel for his purposes.
> He has a page (search page) that has my panel (with the table and the
> checkboxes).
> His page has a navigation button - NEXT that uses setResponsePage.
> The next page has a PREV button to go back.
> Going back is also with setResponsePage WITH THE ORIGINAL one.
>
> The scenario:
> Open the search page (with my panel) - the 'select-all' work fine.
> Press next.
> Press back.
>
> Press the 'select-all' again.
> I get an exception: java.lang.IllegalStateException: No Page found for
> component [MarkupContainer [Component id = entityCheckbox, page = Page>,
> path = 1:cells:1:cell:entityCheckbox.EntitiesPanel$CheckboxEntityFrag$1]]
>
> Is there something in a page's component's life cycle that I'm missing?
>
> Hope it's clear.
>
> (I'll be away for a few days so bare with me if I'm not answering)
>
> Thanks
> --
> Eyal Golan
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Visit: http://jvdrums.sourceforge.net/
>
Page redirect behavior
Hi All, I have different behavior when using a RedirectPage which I'm trying to understand. I have a web page which has a Tree. In one case when a tree node is clicked, in the onNodeClicked() method this.setResponsePage( new RedirectPage( http.)) is called and the URL opens in the same browser window. In another case the tree node click makes visible a panel which has a form for some input parameters and a Link used for the redirect. In that panel in the onClick() method for the link this.setResponsePage( new RedirectPage( http ...)) is called and the URL is opened in a new browser window which is what I want to happen in both cases. Does anyone know why the first case opens the URL in the same browser window but the second case opens the URL in a new window? Or is there a better way to have the URL opened in an new window? Thanks, Jim -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Page-redirect-behavior-tp16024984p16024984.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: object sharing between pages
Frank van Lankvelt wrote:
ok, I'll go ahead with storing the object in the session directly (as
meta-data) and use models in the pages to access this object.
May I ask what your use case is?
it's very simple; when carrying out an action on page A, I want to
display a modal window ("are you sure?" with ok/cancel). The modal
window creates a separate page, B, with the label and the buttons.
The information (a boolean) about what option was chosen determines what
to do on page A when the modal window is closed.
cheers, Frank
Ok, that definitely seems like something you should *not* be using the
session for. I'd think that's what you normally use a callback for, but
unfortunately I don't know how in Wicket (not without using shared
state), because for example, the onClose() method does not pass you the
contents of the ModalWindow...
I mean, you could do something like this if the contents were given back
to you:
modal1.setWindowClosedCallback(new ModalWindow.WindowClosedCallback()
{
// Hypothetical callback with extra contents argument...
public void onClose(Component modalWindowPage,
AjaxRequestTarget target)
{
boolean myBoolean = myModalWindowPage.getResult();
// do whatever with the result...
target.addComponent(result);
}
});
When I look at the Wicket examples for ModalWindow there is actually
shared state passed between pages (i.e., the page with the modal window
is passed as a parameter to the page IN the modal window). The modal
window page then calls methods (setResult(...)) to change the state on
the page that opened the modal window
I'm wondering now if this is safe in combination with serialization, if
so, why, and if not, what is the proper way to do this, because via the
session is awful.
Regards,
Sebastiaan
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: PageParameter question
Stupid, I should have known that :'(
Thanks Martijn
Martijn Dashorst schreef:
You keep adding your new parameters to the parameters from the page.
Not a new page parameters object.
You should do something like:
PageParameters p = new PageParameters(getPage().getPageParameters());
p.add(key, value);
Martijn
On 3/13/08, Thijs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Sorry I'm not sure I follow.
What I'm trying is to add a new PageParameter to the set that the
current page is created with. So I get the Page, get it's pageParameters
and add a new one to the existing set and feed that to the
bookmarkablepagelink.
If I would do:
protected void populateItem(ListItem item) {
PageParameters p = new PageParameters();
String key = (String)item.getModelObject();
p.add("key", key);
BookmarkablePageLink lnk = new BookmarkablePageLink("link", HomePage.class,
p);
item.add(lnk);
}
the bookmarkablepagelink would only contain the new pageparameter, not
the already existing pageparameters
What happens now is that getPage().getPageParameters is not returning
the PageParameters from the current page, but is returning the
pageparameters I just added to the bookmarkablepagelink + the ones that
are already in getPage().getPageParameters.
So if you take the example below, and say I have clicked on the first
link. The output of HTML would then look like:
test
test
test
test
While I expect:
test
test
test
test
Thijs
Martijn Dashorst schreef:
So why don't you expect the loop to add them to the existing parameters?
>
> Martijn
>
> On 3/13/08, Thijs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> because I want to use the already existing parameters and add them to
>> the link.
>>
>> Thijs
>>
>> Martijn Dashorst schreef:
>>
>>
>>> Why don't you create a new PageParameters object in each populateItem?
>>>
>> >
>> > Martijn
>> >
>> > On 3/13/08, Thijs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >
>> >> I'm having troubles with pageparameters.
>> >>
>> >> when I use Page.getPageParameters() they are always null untill I call
>> >> super(paramters) in my constructor.
>> >> But when I then add a BookmarkablePageLink I get very strange behavior.
>> >> See the following example code:
>> >>
>> >> public HomePage(final PageParameters parameters) {
>> >> super(parameters);
>> >> ArrayList list = new ArrayList();
>> >> list.add("aaa");
>> >> list.add("bbb");
>> >> list.add("ccc");
>> >> list.add("ddd");
>> >> add(new ListView("test", list ){
>> >> protected void populateItem(ListItem item) {
>> >> PageParameters p = item.getPage().getPageParameters(); //
>> >> getPage().getPageParameters();
>> >> if(p==null) p = new PageParameters();
>> >> String key = (String)item.getModelObject();
>> >> p.add("key", key);
>> >> BookmarkablePageLink lnk = new BookmarkablePageLink("link",
>> >> HomePage.class, p);
>> >> item.add(lnk);
>> >> }
>> >> });
>> >> }
>> >>
>> >> this results in a page that constructs links that look like:
>> >>
>> >> test
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> test
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> test
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> > >> wicket:id="link"> test
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> As you can see the pageparameters are added to the previously created
>> >> pageparameters.
>> >> While I was expecting that every link had it's own key, and that when I
>> >> click the link, the previous parameters would be added to the new link.
>> >> Debugging shows that for every loop over populateItem,
>> >> getPage().getPageParameters() returns the newly created PageParameters
>> >> instead of the current PageParameters.
>> >>
>> >> Am I doing something wrong?
>> >>
>> >> Thijs
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> -
>> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: object sharing between pages
> > ok, I'll go ahead with storing the object in the session directly (as
> > meta-data) and use models in the pages to access this object.
> May I ask what your use case is?
>
it's very simple; when carrying out an action on page A, I want to
display a modal window ("are you sure?" with ok/cancel). The modal
window creates a separate page, B, with the label and the buttons.
The information (a boolean) about what option was chosen determines what
to do on page A when the modal window is closed.
cheers, Frank
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: PageParameter question
You keep adding your new parameters to the parameters from the page.
Not a new page parameters object.
You should do something like:
PageParameters p = new PageParameters(getPage().getPageParameters());
p.add(key, value);
Martijn
On 3/13/08, Thijs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry I'm not sure I follow.
> What I'm trying is to add a new PageParameter to the set that the
> current page is created with. So I get the Page, get it's pageParameters
> and add a new one to the existing set and feed that to the
> bookmarkablepagelink.
>
> If I would do:
>
>
> protected void populateItem(ListItem item) {
>
> PageParameters p = new PageParameters();
>
> String key = (String)item.getModelObject();
> p.add("key", key);
> BookmarkablePageLink lnk = new BookmarkablePageLink("link", HomePage.class,
> p);
> item.add(lnk);
> }
>
>
>
> the bookmarkablepagelink would only contain the new pageparameter, not
> the already existing pageparameters
>
> What happens now is that getPage().getPageParameters is not returning
> the PageParameters from the current page, but is returning the
> pageparameters I just added to the bookmarkablepagelink + the ones that
> are already in getPage().getPageParameters.
>
> So if you take the example below, and say I have clicked on the first
> link. The output of HTML would then look like:
>
>
> test
>
>
>
>
> test
>
>
>
>
>wicket:id="link">test
>
>
>
>
>wicket:id="link">test
>
>
> While I expect:
>
>
> test
>
>
>
> test
>
>
>
> test
>
>
>
>
> test
>
>
> Thijs
>
> Martijn Dashorst schreef:
>
> > So why don't you expect the loop to add them to the existing parameters?
> >
> > Martijn
> >
> > On 3/13/08, Thijs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> because I want to use the already existing parameters and add them to
> >> the link.
> >>
> >> Thijs
> >>
> >> Martijn Dashorst schreef:
> >>
> >>
> >>> Why don't you create a new PageParameters object in each populateItem?
> >>>
> >> >
> >> > Martijn
> >> >
> >> > On 3/13/08, Thijs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> I'm having troubles with pageparameters.
> >> >>
> >> >> when I use Page.getPageParameters() they are always null untill I
> call
> >> >> super(paramters) in my constructor.
> >> >> But when I then add a BookmarkablePageLink I get very strange
> behavior.
> >> >> See the following example code:
> >> >>
> >> >> public HomePage(final PageParameters parameters) {
> >> >> super(parameters);
> >> >> ArrayList list = new ArrayList();
> >> >> list.add("aaa");
> >> >> list.add("bbb");
> >> >> list.add("ccc");
> >> >> list.add("ddd");
> >> >> add(new ListView("test", list ){
> >> >> protected void populateItem(ListItem item) {
> >> >> PageParameters p = item.getPage().getPageParameters(); //
> >> >> getPage().getPageParameters();
> >> >> if(p==null) p = new PageParameters();
> >> >> String key = (String)item.getModelObject();
> >> >> p.add("key", key);
> >> >> BookmarkablePageLink lnk = new BookmarkablePageLink("link",
> >> >> HomePage.class, p);
> >> >> item.add(lnk);
> >> >> }
> >> >> });
> >> >> }
> >> >>
> >> >> this results in a page that constructs links that look like:
> >> >>
> >> >> test
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> test
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> test
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> wicket:id="link"> test
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> As you can see the pageparameters are added to the previously created
> >> >> pageparameters.
> >> >> While I was expecting that every link had it's own key, and that
> when I
> >> >> click the link, the previous parameters would be added to the new
> link.
> >> >> Debugging shows that for every loop over populateItem,
> >> >> getPage().getPageParameters() returns the newly created
> PageParameters
> >> >> instead of the current PageParameters.
> >> >>
> >> >> Am I doing something wrong?
> >> >>
> >> >> Thijs
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> -
> >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >> -
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
--
Buy Wicket in Action: http://manning.com/dashorst
Apache Wicket 1.3.1 is released
Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cg
Re: PageParameter question
Sorry I'm not sure I follow.
What I'm trying is to add a new PageParameter to the set that the
current page is created with. So I get the Page, get it's pageParameters
and add a new one to the existing set and feed that to the
bookmarkablepagelink.
If I would do:
protected void populateItem(ListItem item) {
PageParameters p = new PageParameters();
String key = (String)item.getModelObject();
p.add("key", key);
BookmarkablePageLink lnk = new BookmarkablePageLink("link", HomePage.class, p);
item.add(lnk);
}
the bookmarkablepagelink would only contain the new pageparameter, not
the already existing pageparameters
What happens now is that getPage().getPageParameters is not returning
the PageParameters from the current page, but is returning the
pageparameters I just added to the bookmarkablepagelink + the ones that
are already in getPage().getPageParameters.
So if you take the example below, and say I have clicked on the first
link. The output of HTML would then look like:
test
test
test
test
While I expect:
test
test
test
test
Thijs
Martijn Dashorst schreef:
So why don't you expect the loop to add them to the existing parameters?
Martijn
On 3/13/08, Thijs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
because I want to use the already existing parameters and add them to
the link.
Thijs
Martijn Dashorst schreef:
Why don't you create a new PageParameters object in each populateItem?
>
> Martijn
>
> On 3/13/08, Thijs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I'm having troubles with pageparameters.
>>
>> when I use Page.getPageParameters() they are always null untill I call
>> super(paramters) in my constructor.
>> But when I then add a BookmarkablePageLink I get very strange behavior.
>> See the following example code:
>>
>> public HomePage(final PageParameters parameters) {
>> super(parameters);
>> ArrayList list = new ArrayList();
>> list.add("aaa");
>> list.add("bbb");
>> list.add("ccc");
>> list.add("ddd");
>> add(new ListView("test", list ){
>> protected void populateItem(ListItem item) {
>> PageParameters p = item.getPage().getPageParameters(); //
>> getPage().getPageParameters();
>> if(p==null) p = new PageParameters();
>> String key = (String)item.getModelObject();
>> p.add("key", key);
>> BookmarkablePageLink lnk = new BookmarkablePageLink("link",
>> HomePage.class, p);
>> item.add(lnk);
>> }
>> });
>> }
>>
>> this results in a page that constructs links that look like:
>>
>> test
>>
>>
>> test
>>
>>
>> test
>>
>>
>> > wicket:id="link"> test
>>
>>
>> As you can see the pageparameters are added to the previously created
>> pageparameters.
>> While I was expecting that every link had it's own key, and that when I
>> click the link, the previous parameters would be added to the new link.
>> Debugging shows that for every loop over populateItem,
>> getPage().getPageParameters() returns the newly created PageParameters
>> instead of the current PageParameters.
>>
>> Am I doing something wrong?
>>
>> Thijs
>>
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: object sharing between pages
yes Pages are not serialized in 1 go They are seperated from each other and saved as there own entity thats why you have that shared instance problem On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 12:40 PM, Sebastiaan van Erk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sebastiaan van Erk wrote: > > Maurice Marrink wrote: > >> Assuming B has a reference to Page A, wont A be Serialized with B, > >> when you go to C, and both still share the same serialized object? > > > > When B is serialized, so is A, and serialization makes sure the > > instances to your object are kept shared > > > But when A is serialized alone (and if A does not have a reference to > > B), then when A is deserialized you'll have a copy of the instance you > > gave to B and the reference is no longer shared. > > Actually, that's how serialization would NORMALLY work. :-) I'm not > really 100% sure how Wicket serialization works (I believe a referenced > page is not serialized inline, but instead a page id is written, which > could mean you always get copies of your instances on deserialize, but > then again I'm not sure). > > In either case, even with standard serialization you would have > issues... But to be honest I've never really run into this issue with > Wicket at all... When do you have *instance* variables in a page that > point to shared objects which are not immutable? I hardly have any > instance variables (other than maybe a few Components and Spring beans). > > Regards, > Sebastiaan > > > >>> So the best thing is that you shouldnt depend on shared variablen. > >> > >> Ok so there are a lot of gotchas :) > > > > Yep! > > > >> Maurice > >> > >> - > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> >
Re: object sharing between pages
Frank van Lankvelt wrote: Assuming B has a reference to Page A, wont A be Serialized with B, when you go to C, and both still share the same serialized object? When B is serialized, so is A, and serialization makes sure the instances to your object are kept shared how can this be? Aren't different pages written to different streams and thereby incapable of sharing objects? Yes, I believe you are correct. But when A is serialized alone (and if A does not have a reference to B), then when A is deserialized you'll have a copy of the instance you gave to B and the reference is no longer shared. So the best thing is that you shouldnt depend on shared variablen. Ok so there are a lot of gotchas :) Yep! ok, I'll go ahead with storing the object in the session directly (as meta-data) and use models in the pages to access this object. May I ask what your use case is? Regards, Sebastiaan cheers, Frank Maurice - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: object sharing between pages
Sebastiaan van Erk wrote: Maurice Marrink wrote: Assuming B has a reference to Page A, wont A be Serialized with B, when you go to C, and both still share the same serialized object? When B is serialized, so is A, and serialization makes sure the instances to your object are kept shared > But when A is serialized alone (and if A does not have a reference to > B), then when A is deserialized you'll have a copy of the instance you > gave to B and the reference is no longer shared. Actually, that's how serialization would NORMALLY work. :-) I'm not really 100% sure how Wicket serialization works (I believe a referenced page is not serialized inline, but instead a page id is written, which could mean you always get copies of your instances on deserialize, but then again I'm not sure). In either case, even with standard serialization you would have issues... But to be honest I've never really run into this issue with Wicket at all... When do you have *instance* variables in a page that point to shared objects which are not immutable? I hardly have any instance variables (other than maybe a few Components and Spring beans). Regards, Sebastiaan So the best thing is that you shouldnt depend on shared variablen. Ok so there are a lot of gotchas :) Yep! Maurice - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: Customising Radio Buttons with JS and CSS
Instead of using RadioChoice use a RadioGroup, i think there are examples here: http://wicketstuff.org/wicket13/forminput/ This allows you to customise the ui of your radio's much more than a RadioGroup does and should aid you in your jazziness Richard Ballist1c wrote: > > Hey guys, > > I got a funky idea for the UI. > > I have a form that consists of set static radio choices and I am looking > to add a bit of zing with it. > > Rather than having the radio button with text, i want to jazz it up with > having a 100x100px tile with an image on it representing each of the radio > choices. The functionality i want to capture is only one option can be > selected at any one time, so clicking on another tile will de-select what > is currently selected and select the new tile. > > I am a bit stuck with this one, I am attempting to re-write the radio > choice object but im not having much luck with that so far. > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Customising-Radio-Buttons-with-JS-and-CSS-tp16015072p16024767.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: object sharing between pages
> > Assuming B has a reference to Page A, wont A be Serialized with B, > > when you go to C, and both still share the same serialized object? > When B is serialized, so is A, and serialization makes sure the > instances to your object are kept shared > how can this be? Aren't different pages written to different streams and thereby incapable of sharing objects? > But when A is serialized alone (and if A does not have a reference to > B), then when A is deserialized you'll have a copy of the instance you > gave to B and the reference is no longer shared. > > >> So the best thing is that you shouldnt depend on shared variablen. > > > > Ok so there are a lot of gotchas :) > > Yep! > ok, I'll go ahead with storing the object in the session directly (as meta-data) and use models in the pages to access this object. cheers, Frank > > Maurice > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: StringResourceModel labels within values
how will this work with example i gave? i'm not sure how to get some.label and
some.text back into some.key? would i use something like
StringResourceModel srm = new StringResourceModel("some.key", this, null);
PropertyVariableInterpolator.interpolate("some.label", srm);
not sure that works :(
> Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 12:17:09 +0100
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: users@wicket.apache.org
> Subject: Re: StringResourceModel labels within values
>
> At one point I wanted to do interpolation in constant strings, so I just
> used the property interpolator directly:
>
> PropertyVariableInterpolator.interpolate(value, modelObject);
>
> You can use that to build a model that recursively interpolates until
> there are no more ${...} occurrences in the value.
>
> Regards,
> Sebastiaan
>
> i ii wrote:
> > thank you for help! which way is better? my own component or srm model that
> > gets from localizer?
> >
> >> Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 13:57:10 -0700
> >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> To: users@wicket.apache.org
> >> Subject: Re: StringResourceModel labels within values
> >>
> >> but will that work recusively? :)
> >>
> >> -igor
> >>
> >>
> >> On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 1:44 PM, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>> I think if you just give SRM a model that again gets the values from
> >>> the localizer then it should work fine.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 3/12/08, i ii <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>> >
> >>> > is there way to do something like:
> >>> >
> >>> > .properties file:
> >>> >
> >>> > some.label=Some Label
> >>> > some.text=Some Text
> >>> > some.key=This text will have ${some.label} and ${some.text}
> >>> >
> >>>
> >>> -
> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>
> >>>
> >> -
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>
> >
Re: PageParameter question
So why don't you expect the loop to add them to the existing parameters?
Martijn
On 3/13/08, Thijs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> because I want to use the already existing parameters and add them to
> the link.
>
> Thijs
>
> Martijn Dashorst schreef:
>
> > Why don't you create a new PageParameters object in each populateItem?
> >
> > Martijn
> >
> > On 3/13/08, Thijs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> I'm having troubles with pageparameters.
> >>
> >> when I use Page.getPageParameters() they are always null untill I call
> >> super(paramters) in my constructor.
> >> But when I then add a BookmarkablePageLink I get very strange behavior.
> >> See the following example code:
> >>
> >> public HomePage(final PageParameters parameters) {
> >> super(parameters);
> >> ArrayList list = new ArrayList();
> >> list.add("aaa");
> >> list.add("bbb");
> >> list.add("ccc");
> >> list.add("ddd");
> >> add(new ListView("test", list ){
> >> protected void populateItem(ListItem item) {
> >> PageParameters p = item.getPage().getPageParameters(); //
> >> getPage().getPageParameters();
> >> if(p==null) p = new PageParameters();
> >> String key = (String)item.getModelObject();
> >> p.add("key", key);
> >> BookmarkablePageLink lnk = new BookmarkablePageLink("link",
> >> HomePage.class, p);
> >> item.add(lnk);
> >> }
> >> });
> >> }
> >>
> >> this results in a page that constructs links that look like:
> >>
> >> test
> >>
> >>
> >> test
> >>
> >>
> >> test
>
> >>
> >>
> >> >> wicket:id="link"> test
> >>
> >>
> >> As you can see the pageparameters are added to the previously created
> >> pageparameters.
> >> While I was expecting that every link had it's own key, and that when I
> >> click the link, the previous parameters would be added to the new link.
> >> Debugging shows that for every loop over populateItem,
> >> getPage().getPageParameters() returns the newly created PageParameters
> >> instead of the current PageParameters.
> >>
> >> Am I doing something wrong?
> >>
> >> Thijs
> >>
> >>
> >> -
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
--
Buy Wicket in Action: http://manning.com/dashorst
Apache Wicket 1.3.1 is released
Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.1
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: IntelliJ WicketForge issue: NPE when trying to use "New Wicket Page" to create both Java and markup
That can happen if the html directory is different then the source directory and the html directory has not been created yet. -kurt On Tue, 2008-03-11 at 08:25 -0500, Nick Heudecker wrote: > I'll dig into it today. Thanks for the report. > > On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 6:40 AM, Kevin Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > This is not a high-priority issue, but it seems that it should be pretty > > trivial for the maintainer to fix. > > > > What steps will reproduce the problem? > > > > 1. Add "New Wicket Page" to Project View Popup Menu via Customizations > > 2. Right-click on a folder containing Wicket source files, and choose > > New/New Wicket Page > > 3. Check "Create associated markup file" > > 4. Click OK > > 5. NPE error > > > > What is the expected output? What do you see instead? > > > > The Java file is created. The HTML file is not. > > > > What version of the product are you using? On what operating system? > > > > WicketForge 0.3.1 with IntelliJ IDEA 7.0.3 > > > > > > Regards, > > Kevin > > > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: PageParameter question
because I want to use the already existing parameters and add them to
the link.
Thijs
Martijn Dashorst schreef:
Why don't you create a new PageParameters object in each populateItem?
Martijn
On 3/13/08, Thijs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm having troubles with pageparameters.
when I use Page.getPageParameters() they are always null untill I call
super(paramters) in my constructor.
But when I then add a BookmarkablePageLink I get very strange behavior.
See the following example code:
public HomePage(final PageParameters parameters) {
super(parameters);
ArrayList list = new ArrayList();
list.add("aaa");
list.add("bbb");
list.add("ccc");
list.add("ddd");
add(new ListView("test", list ){
protected void populateItem(ListItem item) {
PageParameters p = item.getPage().getPageParameters(); //
getPage().getPageParameters();
if(p==null) p = new PageParameters();
String key = (String)item.getModelObject();
p.add("key", key);
BookmarkablePageLink lnk = new BookmarkablePageLink("link",
HomePage.class, p);
item.add(lnk);
}
});
}
this results in a page that constructs links that look like:
test
test
test
test
As you can see the pageparameters are added to the previously created
pageparameters.
While I was expecting that every link had it's own key, and that when I
click the link, the previous parameters would be added to the new link.
Debugging shows that for every loop over populateItem,
getPage().getPageParameters() returns the newly created PageParameters
instead of the current PageParameters.
Am I doing something wrong?
Thijs
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: object sharing between pages
Maurice Marrink wrote: Assuming B has a reference to Page A, wont A be Serialized with B, when you go to C, and both still share the same serialized object? When B is serialized, so is A, and serialization makes sure the instances to your object are kept shared But when A is serialized alone (and if A does not have a reference to B), then when A is deserialized you'll have a copy of the instance you gave to B and the reference is no longer shared. So the best thing is that you shouldnt depend on shared variablen. Ok so there are a lot of gotchas :) Yep! Maurice - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: StringResourceModel labels within values
At one point I wanted to do interpolation in constant strings, so I just
used the property interpolator directly:
PropertyVariableInterpolator.interpolate(value, modelObject);
You can use that to build a model that recursively interpolates until
there are no more ${...} occurrences in the value.
Regards,
Sebastiaan
i ii wrote:
thank you for help! which way is better? my own component or srm model that
gets from localizer?
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 13:57:10 -0700
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: StringResourceModel labels within values
but will that work recusively? :)
-igor
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 1:44 PM, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think if you just give SRM a model that again gets the values from
the localizer then it should work fine.
On 3/12/08, i ii <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> is there way to do something like:
>
> .properties file:
>
> some.label=Some Label
> some.text=Some Text
> some.key=This text will have ${some.label} and ${some.text}
>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: PageParameter question
Why don't you create a new PageParameters object in each populateItem?
Martijn
On 3/13/08, Thijs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm having troubles with pageparameters.
>
> when I use Page.getPageParameters() they are always null untill I call
> super(paramters) in my constructor.
> But when I then add a BookmarkablePageLink I get very strange behavior.
> See the following example code:
>
> public HomePage(final PageParameters parameters) {
> super(parameters);
> ArrayList list = new ArrayList();
> list.add("aaa");
> list.add("bbb");
> list.add("ccc");
> list.add("ddd");
> add(new ListView("test", list ){
> protected void populateItem(ListItem item) {
> PageParameters p = item.getPage().getPageParameters(); //
> getPage().getPageParameters();
> if(p==null) p = new PageParameters();
> String key = (String)item.getModelObject();
> p.add("key", key);
> BookmarkablePageLink lnk = new BookmarkablePageLink("link",
> HomePage.class, p);
> item.add(lnk);
> }
> });
> }
>
> this results in a page that constructs links that look like:
>
> test
>
>
> test
>
>
> test
>
>
> wicket:id="link"> test
>
>
> As you can see the pageparameters are added to the previously created
> pageparameters.
> While I was expecting that every link had it's own key, and that when I
> click the link, the previous parameters would be added to the new link.
> Debugging shows that for every loop over populateItem,
> getPage().getPageParameters() returns the newly created PageParameters
> instead of the current PageParameters.
>
> Am I doing something wrong?
>
> Thijs
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
--
Buy Wicket in Action: http://manning.com/dashorst
Apache Wicket 1.3.1 is released
Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.1
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PageParameter question
I'm having troubles with pageparameters.
when I use Page.getPageParameters() they are always null untill I call
super(paramters) in my constructor.
But when I then add a BookmarkablePageLink I get very strange behavior.
See the following example code:
public HomePage(final PageParameters parameters) {
super(parameters);
ArrayList list = new ArrayList();
list.add("aaa");
list.add("bbb");
list.add("ccc");
list.add("ddd");
add(new ListView("test", list ){
protected void populateItem(ListItem item) {
PageParameters p = item.getPage().getPageParameters(); //
getPage().getPageParameters();
if(p==null) p = new PageParameters();
String key = (String)item.getModelObject();
p.add("key", key);
BookmarkablePageLink lnk = new BookmarkablePageLink("link",
HomePage.class, p);
item.add(lnk);
}
});
}
this results in a page that constructs links that look like:
test
test
test
wicket:id="link"> test
As you can see the pageparameters are added to the previously created
pageparameters.
While I was expecting that every link had it's own key, and that when I
click the link, the previous parameters would be added to the new link.
Debugging shows that for every loop over populateItem,
getPage().getPageParameters() returns the newly created PageParameters
instead of the current PageParameters.
Am I doing something wrong?
Thijs
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: object sharing between pages
> This only works if the session is not replicated and the Action on B is > executed on a different machine. Don't you mean on the same machine? > > But if somebody goes from PageB to PageC and then uses the back button to > get to B and then executes the action > The shared instance is not shared anymore (just as session replication) Assuming B has a reference to Page A, wont A be Serialized with B, when you go to C, and both still share the same serialized object? > > So the best thing is that you shouldnt depend on shared variablen. Ok so there are a lot of gotchas :) Maurice - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: StringResourceModel labels within values
if you use again StringResourceModels in the model that you give to your
outer StringResourceModel :)
johan
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 9:57 PM, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> but will that work recusively? :)
>
> -igor
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 1:44 PM, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > I think if you just give SRM a model that again gets the values from
> > the localizer then it should work fine.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On 3/12/08, i ii <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > is there way to do something like:
> > >
> > > .properties file:
> > >
> > > some.label=Some Label
> > > some.text=Some Text
> > > some.key=This text will have ${some.label} and ${some.text}
> > >
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
RE: StringResourceModel labels within values
thank you for help! which way is better? my own component or srm model that
gets from localizer?
> Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 13:57:10 -0700
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: users@wicket.apache.org
> Subject: Re: StringResourceModel labels within values
>
> but will that work recusively? :)
>
> -igor
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 1:44 PM, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I think if you just give SRM a model that again gets the values from
> > the localizer then it should work fine.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On 3/12/08, i ii <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > is there way to do something like:
> > >
> > > .properties file:
> > >
> > > some.label=Some Label
> > > some.text=Some Text
> > > some.key=This text will have ${some.label} and ${some.text}
> > >
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Re: object sharing between pages
the problem is that if you have 2 page that share the same object instance and 1 of the pages get serialized and then deserialized The object instance is not the same anymore For example this still works: Object A instance PageA has that instance. PageA creates PageB and passes that instance (and itself) PageB is rendered Action executed on PageB PageB sets an internal variable on Object A and then sets PageA as te response page. This only works if the session is not replicated and the Action on B is executed on a different machine. But if somebody goes from PageB to PageC and then uses the back button to get to B and then executes the action The shared instance is not shared anymore (just as session replication) So the best thing is that you shouldnt depend on shared variablen. On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 10:42 AM, Maurice Marrink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Why shouldn't pages share objects? > pushing object x from page a to page b to modify x and then return to > either the same or another instance of page a is just fine. > You can also wrap object x in a model and use that same model on > different pages / components. > > Maurice > > On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 10:14 AM, Frank van Lankvelt > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > please excuse my newbie question; is it correct that pages cannot share > > objects? (any pointers on the subject of wickets serialization would > be > > greatly appreciated) > > > > I want to provide some feedback to the main page from a modal-window, > > and now do this by putting meta-data in the session. Is there a > cleaner > > way to do this? > > > > thanks, Frank > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
Adding javascript in html
Hi, we just started using version 1.3.2 and noticed that references to js-files without wicket:id doesn't work any more. They were working in 1.3.1. code: src="/syncrontech/common/gate/component/GateConfirm.js"> log: 192.168.2.155 - st [13/Mar/2008:09:29:03 +] "GET /wicket//syncrontech/common/gate/component/GateConfirm.js? HTTP/1.1" 404 1123 I know that we can (and probably should) start using for example CompressedResourceReference new CompressedResourceReference(GateConfirmPanel.class, "GateConfirm.js"); + add(HeaderContributor.forJavaScript(GATE_CONFIRM_JS)); However is this a bug in 1.3.2? - Juha - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: London Wicket Training at Easter ... still 4 places left
Thanks for the feedback and questions so far ... for immediate answers to most course/training related questions, take a look at the http://jweekend.com/dev/Faq/ FAQ as well. Regards - Cemal http://jWeekend.co.uk jWeekend.co.uk Al and I are preparing for the London Wicket course coming up next week. This http://jweekend.com/dev/JW035/ 2 day intensive Wicket course has evolved very nicely since we delivered the very first one (to a single student!, from Belgium) in 2007. Students on all our Wicket courses since then have been very generous with their praise and many have been enquiring about a follow-on course which we will consider developing for the summer if there is enough interest ( http://jweekend.com/dev/ContactUsBody/ drop us a line ).We have 4 places left for the course on Friday and Saturday next week, so http://jweekend.com/dev/BookingPage/ book early if you would like to join us for 2 days of intensive Wicket training.Our students also get a MEAPs edition of Martijn jweekend wrote: > > Al and I are preparing for the London Wicket course coming up next week. > This http://jweekend.com/dev/JW035/ 2 day intensive Wicket course has > evolved very nicely since we delivered the very first one (to a single > student!, from Belgium) in 2007. Students on all our Wicket courses since > then have been very generous with their praise and many have been > enquiring about a follow-on course which we will consider developing for > the summer if there is enough interest ( > http://jweekend.com/dev/ContactUsBody/ drop us a line ). > We have 4 places left for the course on Friday and Saturday next week, so > http://jweekend.com/dev/BookingPage/ book early if you would like to join > us for 2 days of intensive Wicket training. > Our students also get a MEAPs edition of Martijn & Eelco's > http://manning.com/dashorst/ Wicket In Action (which is now pretty > complete and really complements the wiki etc well ...) courtesy of > jWeekend. If you are travelling far (still some 80% of our students travel > from abroad), we can also try to help you fix some suitable accommodation. > Regards - Cemal > http://jWeekend.co.uk http://jWeekend.co.uk > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/London-Wicket-Training-at-Easter-...-still-4-places-left-tp16015858p16024482.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: object sharing between pages
Why shouldn't pages share objects? pushing object x from page a to page b to modify x and then return to either the same or another instance of page a is just fine. You can also wrap object x in a model and use that same model on different pages / components. Maurice On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 10:14 AM, Frank van Lankvelt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > please excuse my newbie question; is it correct that pages cannot share > objects? (any pointers on the subject of wickets serialization would be > greatly appreciated) > > I want to provide some feedback to the main page from a modal-window, > and now do this by putting meta-data in the session. Is there a cleaner > way to do this? > > thanks, Frank > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
object sharing between pages
Hi, please excuse my newbie question; is it correct that pages cannot share objects? (any pointers on the subject of wickets serialization would be greatly appreciated) I want to provide some feedback to the main page from a modal-window, and now do this by putting meta-data in the session. Is there a cleaner way to do this? thanks, Frank - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Panel not updated on modelchange
Running Panel.detach from onselectionchanged in the radiogroup didn't help.
It seems like the panels is updated, but labels in the panel is not.
The labels are added like this: add(new Label("name", new
PropertyModel(getModelObject(), "name")));
Ole-Harald
igor.vaynberg wrote:
>
> sounds like your model is not detachable or being cached somewhere
>
> perhaps you are loading the panel's model somewhere before it is
> updated. like panel { isvisible() { return getmodelobject().isempty();
> }
>
> try calling panel.detach() <== which will also detach the panel's model
>
> -igor
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 10:29 AM, deletethisprofile
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Non-ajax.
>>
>> Ole-Harald
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Eelco Hillenius wrote:
>> >
>> > Ajax or non-ajax?
>> >
>> > Eelco
>> >
>> > On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 9:40 AM, deletethisprofile
>> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hi
>> >>
>> >> I have a panel with an AbstractReadOnlyModel that i want to change
>> when
>> >> i
>> >> select an radiobutton on another panel. The radiobuttons are in a
>> >> radiogroup
>> >> with a properymodel to the same object that I have in the
>> >> AbstractReadOnlyModel. But when I select the radiobuttons the
>> >> modelobject is
>> >> changed but panel is not updated. I have have tried triggering an
>> >> modeupdate
>> >> on the panel when when a radiobutten is selected but the panel is
>> not
>> >> updated. If I go to another page on the selection of a radiobutton
>> the
>> >> panel
>> >> updates correctly, But I want i to update even the page dont change.
>> >> Any Ideas on how can I make that happend?
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Ole-Harald
>> >> --
>> >> View this message in context:
>> >>
>> http://www.nabble.com/Panel-not-updated-on-modelchange-tp16007420p16007420.html
>> >> Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> -
>> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> > -
>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://www.nabble.com/Panel-not-updated-on-modelchange-tp16007420p16009871.html
>>
>>
>> Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Panel-not-updated-on-modelchange-tp16007420p16023202.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
