Didnt you encounter the big thread (at least 100 messages) where we
discussed/voted going to 1.4? (and cool down dev on 1.3)
On 6/1/08, Ayodeji Aladejebi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> scan this user forum, you will realize that there is no high demand for
> generics in wicket from users. I am yet t
1) Generifying* Wicket
[X] Can best be done like currently in the 1.4 branch, where models
and components are both generified. I care most about the improved
static type checking generified models and components give Wicket.
2) How strongly do you feel about your choice above?
[ ] Whatever
In 1.3.4 this error shouldnt happen, it is just ignored
On 6/1/08, atul singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> As a result of code integration from various teams we have introduced
> some change which is causing problems...
> but the sad part is that we do not know what is happening--
> I will l
We use approach 1. We do not pull messages from Wicket resources, they
are just static in the file. The link to the correct js file is however
created by a dynamic component that uses the current Locale.
You could go with approach 2, but to me it sounds like a lot of work.
Regards,
Erik.
You should the other getResource*() methods, those on Class:
http://java.sun.com/javase/6/docs/api/java/lang/Class.html#getResourceAsStream(java.lang.String)
Regards,
Erik.
Michael Mehrle wrote:
Right now I had to resort to the solution below, but I would very much
like to know the standard
Michael Allan wrote:
Fearing a span-demic in my code, I came up with this:...
There's probably a more elegant way to code it, though.
Neh, that is a very common approach ;)
Erik.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECT
Hi, Atul,
That sounds like a reasonable request to me (I am no core member). Its
best to open a new issue in Wicket's jira, preferably with a patch attached.
Regards,
Erik.
atul singh wrote:
Hi,
I see that only error() feedback takes a serializabel message. This allows
me to pass any java
My application's supposed to support both English,Simpilify
Chinese,Traditional Chinese,and even Vietnamese. The great I18N feature of
Wicket helps me solve many i18n problems.
The only remains is how to do i18n of javascript.
Due to the initial design, we put some of messages in the .js file,like
Because deployment happens to a staging or production server, I simply set
the jvm startup params with -Dwicket.configuration=deployment.
I also have a small block in my Application instance that turns params on
and off depending on the mode as well, so for instance I can have tags
stripped etc.
Erik van Oosten wrote:
> The idea is to put a span inside the a, and then attach a Label to the
> span.
Fearing a span-demic in my code, I came up with this:
http://zelea.com/project/votorola/g/servlet/BookmarkablePageLinkX.java
http://zelea.com/project/votorola/_/javadoc/votorola/g/servle
On Sun, 01 Jun 2008, atul singh wrote:
> I will loove to know if someone else has seen similar exceptions and
> how they solved if they were able to::
> Also what do these exceptions mean--i mean situation they might happen in??
>
> 1.
> java.lang.IllegalStateException: No Page found for component
You can also try changing "fit width" to "fit visible", in the example
pdf provided before the zoom went from 137% to 171%
Daniel
Eyal Golan wrote:
>
>
>> > I downloaded the free first chapter of WIA.
>> > It seems to me that the font is a bit small.
>> > even when I "fit width" it is st
Right now I had to resort to the solution below, but I would very much
like to know the standard way of doing this, as this required me to
place my properties file into the src/main/resources folder:
static {
try {
properties.load(Thread.currentThread().getContextClassLoad
1) Generifying* Wicket
[X] Can best be done in a limited fashion, where we only generify
IModel but not components. I care more about what generifying can do
for API clarity (declaring a component to only accept certain models
for instance) than static type checking.
2) How strongly do you f
wow this has a pattern for sure doesn't it ? ;)
Rick
On Sun, Jun 1, 2008 at 7:25 PM, Matthew Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [X] Can best be done in a limited fashion, where we only generify
> IModel but not components. I care more about what generifying can do
> for API clarity (declaring a
[X] Can best be done in a limited fashion, where we only generify
IModel but not components. I care more about what generifying can do
for API clarity (declaring a component to only accept certain models
for instance) than static type checking.
[X] I might rethink upgrading if my choice doesn't
On Sun, Jun 1, 2008 at 4:44 PM, Eelco Hillenius
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 1) Generifying* Wicket
> [ ] Can best be done like currently in the 1.4 branch, where models
> and components are both generified. I care most about the improved
> static type checking generified models and components gi
[X ] Can best be done like currently in the 1.4 branch, where models
and components are both generified. I care most about the improved
static type checking generified models and components give Wicket.
I think generifying Components give more clarity (Don't blame Wicket for
Messed up Generic Nota
I just refactored one of my pages and externalized an inner class into
an outer class that however still needs access to that page's property
stings. Can I just treat that page's properties file as a resource
bundle and retrieve the strings the old fashioned way? Or will there be
problems?
Than
1) [ X] Can best be done like currently in the 1.4 branch, where models
and components are both generified. I care most about the improved
static type checking generified models and components give Wicket.
2) [ X] I might rethink upgrading if my choice doesn't win.
AT
> 1) Generifying* Wicket
> [X] Can best be done in a limited fashion, where we only generify
> IModel but not components. I care more about what generifying can do
> for API clarity (declaring a component to only accept certain models
> for instance) than static type checking.
>
>
> 2) How strong
1) Generifying* Wicket
[X ] Can best be done in a limited fashion, where we only generify
IModel but not components. I care more about what generifying can do
for API clarity (declaring a component to only accept certain models
for instance) than static type checking.
2) How strongly do you fee
On Sun, Jun 1, 2008 at 2:46 PM, Ayodeji Aladejebi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> scan this user forum, you will realize that there is no high demand for
> generics in wicket from users. I am yet to see one user or thread here of
> wicket users screeming out for generics addition. I think users has be
Okay, this is what I'm getting:
[DEBUG EviteApplication] I OVERRODE THIS CONVERTER: null
Strange - isn't it? The only thing I changed was to remove
from your IConverter definition. I'm using Wicket 1.3.4.
Thoughts?
Michael
-Original Message-
From: Jeremy Thomerson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTE
[X ] Can best be done in a limited fashion, where we only generify
IModel but not components. I care more about what generifying can do
for API clarity (declaring a component to only accept certain models
for instance) than static type checking.
[ X] Whatever choice ultimately made, I'll happily
[X] *Can best be done in a limited fashion*, where we only generify
IModel but not components. I care more about what generifying can do
for API clarity (declaring a component to only accept certain models
for instance) than static type checking.
*Reason* - Well, I haven't started working "hard" o
scan this user forum, you will realize that there is no high demand for
generics in wicket from users. I am yet to see one user or thread here of
wicket users screeming out for generics addition. I think users has been
doing just fine without it at least speaking for myself.
Anything more than IMo
1)
[ X] Can best be done in a limited fashion, where we only generify
IModel but not components. I care more about what generifying can do
for API clarity (declaring a component to only accept certain models
for instance) than static type checking.
*Reason::* I think generifying data-structure/mod
wow.
thanks.
That was very helpful :)
Eyal
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 12:08 AM, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Wicket supports private state for individual components, whereas the
> traditional (REST) pattern assumes to take the state out (to string
> based request parameters) and up t
Thanks,
But i am sure, that is not happening ..I looked at all that code..
Any other suggestions/guesses??
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 12:09 AM, Maurice Marrink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Are you by any chance replacing components? This could happen if you
> let the ajax render a component that has b
Wicket supports private state for individual components, whereas the
traditional (REST) pattern assumes to take the state out (to string
based request parameters) and up to the request level. The big
difference is that without using a framework like Wicket, you can't
really create self contained co
Found the method:
public final Component setOutputMarkupPlaceholderTag(final boolean
outputTag)
Jeremy Thomerson
http://www.wickettraining.com
-- sent from a wireless device
-Original Message-
From: smallufo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, June 01, 2008 3:04 PM
To: users@wicket.apac
setoutputmarkupplaceholdertag(true)
-igor
On Sun, Jun 1, 2008 at 1:39 PM, Jeremy Thomerson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There's another boolean on component that you should set to true. It will
> output a container where the component should be, even if the component is
> invisible. Unfortuna
Hi,
I read chapter 1 in Wicket in Action and I have a question.
in section 1.2.1 it says:
"You can get rid of all of these problems by using Wicket. It is a
stateful framework, so you
don't have to follow the REST (though you can, but we will talk about
that later in this book)
approac
Hi all,
We have had several threads in this and the dev list, and some
discussions in the public on how to incorporate generics in Wicket.
I'd like to use this thread to gather the opinions of as many regular
Wicket users as we can. Please help us get an impression of what our
users think about t
There's another boolean on component that you should set to true. It will
output a container where the component should be, even if the component is
invisible. Unfortunately, I'm not at my computer, and I can't remember the
name. Look for set*(boolean), and it may have the word container in i
Hi
I want to use an AjaxFallbackLink to show/hide a checkGroup , but I can
only "hide" it , cannot "re-show" it...
I did checkGroup.setRenderBodyOnly(false);
and listView.setReuseItems(true);
But still can still only hide the checkGroup , cannot make it re-appear...
Can somebody help me c
Okay, so I need to treat the link text as a separate entity - makes
sense. Thanks a lot - can't believe I didn't think of that...
Michael
-Original Message-
From: Erik van Oosten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, June 01, 2008 2:00 AM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: Changi
Are you by any chance replacing components? This could happen if you
let the ajax render a component that has been removed from the page.
Maurice
On Sun, Jun 1, 2008 at 7:32 PM, atul singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> As a result of code integration from various teams we have introduced
> s
Thx,
J.
Martijn Dashorst wrote:
label.add(new AttributeModifier("class", true, new Model() { public
Object getObject() { return formcomponent.isValid() ? "" : "error";
}});
On Sun, Jun 1, 2008 at 8:05 PM, Jürgen Lind <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I am looking for the solution for a quite c
label.add(new AttributeModifier("class", true, new Model() { public
Object getObject() { return formcomponent.isValid() ? "" : "error";
}});
On Sun, Jun 1, 2008 at 8:05 PM, Jürgen Lind <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am looking for the solution for a quite common problem: I want the label
Hi,
I am looking for the solution for a quite common problem: I want the label
of a form element to change its color if the input is invalid. Searching the
web I found some very old postings of Igor and Jonathan discussing this matter;
however, I have not found any links to the final solution. Ca
Hi,
As a result of code integration from various teams we have introduced
some change which is causing problems...
but the sad part is that we do not know what is happening--
I will loove to know if someone else has seen similar exceptions and
how they solved if they were able to::
Also what do the
Hi,
I see that only error() feedback takes a serializabel message. This allows
me to pass any java object as message and implement custom filtering of
messages by components.
but info,debug etc take a string and so do not help me in that kind of
filtering.
Actually what we have is a TabbedWizard th
Just add your custom tabbar and a panel to your page. and let the
tabbar know which panel it should update.
Note that in the case of panels you should use Link in your tabbar component.
Maurice
On Sun, Jun 1, 2008 at 12:01 PM, cresc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Thanks Erik.. I understand ur su
Well if you are talking about having other html elements between the
tab bar and the content itself, then no you would have to write your
own components. but using some css or overriding the default markup
for the tabbedpanel you might be able to achieve the same visual
effect.
Maurice
On Sun, Ju
Thanks Erik.. I understand ur suggestion. But I do have an other problem
where I need to split the navigation panel & the panel content. Any idea how
to achieve this?
http://www.nabble.com/split-tabpanel-navigation-and-panel-content-tt17583663.html
- nazeem
Erik van Oosten wrote:
>
> Tabbed
cool thanks
On Sun, Jun 1, 2008 at 12:51 PM, Martijn Dashorst <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> All Manning e-books use the same font and layout between the PDF and
> printed versions. I don't know if our sample chapter will be updated
> (I certainly hope so!) but the final PDF will look like all the
All Manning e-books use the same font and layout between the PDF and
printed versions. I don't know if our sample chapter will be updated
(I certainly hope so!) but the final PDF will look like all the other
Manning PDF ebooks, for example:
http://www.manning.com/gallo/sample-ch2.pdf
Martijn
On
When using wickets tabbed panel can I split the navigation and the panel
contents to diff blocks. The use cases I require is use a vertical tab
(sidebar) as tab and display the contents in RHS side.
Please suggest any workaround to achieve this.
Thank u.
--
View this message in context:
http:/
Tabbed pages are easy to create yourself (a lot easier then tabbed
panels). Just create a list (ol) with elements (li) with in each a link
(a). Now attach a Link component to the latter (any link type, but you
probably are looking for a BookmarkableLink).
Put this all in a Panel you can reuse ov
The idea is to put a span inside the a, and then attach a Label to the span.
Is that something you can work with?
Regards,
Erik.
Michael Mehrle wrote:
Okay, this seems so easy, but I'm somehow stuck. How do I change the
string of a Link based on some condition? Do I simply provide a
termin
Hi,
I plan to buy this book but not sure if to buy only the ebook or also the
paper version as well.
I prefer just the e-book so I won't waist another tree :)
I downloaded the free first chapter of WIA.
It seems to me that the font is a bit small.
even when I "fit width" it is still too small.
I
53 matches
Mail list logo
