> What I found was that I was instantiating my LDM's as private variables in
> my custom components but that they were not being detached. In this case
> you need to programatically register your non default models to participate
> in the detachment process. See the Wiki here for an example:
> ht
On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 5:23 PM, Vladimir K wrote:
>
> Although it is possible I wouldn't recommend authoring certainly different UI
> basing on the asynchronisity of the request. For instance I experience
> inconvinience when mistakely opening Outlook Web Access in Firefox instead
> of MS IE and
Although it is possible I wouldn't recommend authoring certainly different UI
basing on the asynchronisity of the request. For instance I experience
inconvinience when mistakely opening Outlook Web Access in Firefox instead
of MS IE and seeing a bit different non-ajaxy UI.
All the handlers of fal
have you actually hit a scalability problem?
if you are trying to optimize upfront you can use a less invasive
technique. all resource urls in wicekt are served under the
/resources/ virtual folder. you can enable the setting where wicket
will append a last-modified date to the end of each resourc
In case of AjaxFallback components you would construct them anyway.
Martin Grigorov wrote:
I think he meant wasting CPU cycles for constructing your components
which will be added to no-op ajaxrequesttarget
then you'll have to make check like "if (target instanceOf
NullAjaxRequestTarget) {retur
Sven,
I created my own implementation of a Wizard ButtonBar that adds the
AjaxFormSubmittingBehavior to the existing buttons.
I am not sure what I need to do in the overridden onSubmit(...) for each
of the buttons. My current implementation simply calls
wizard.getForm().onFormSubmitted() in each
Thanks!
giovanni
Resources are limited, Imagination is unlimited.
From: Igor Vaynberg
To: users@wicket.apache.org; d...@wicket.apache.org; annou...@wicket.apache.org
Sent: Sat, October 24, 2009 12:12:55 AM
S
Yes, you can implement your own button bar which adds
AjaxFormSubmitBehavior to the normal wizard buttons.
Sven
Corbin, James wrote:
Thanks for the info Sven.
I assume by Ajax-ify you mean to create a new implementation that
mirrors WizardButton but extends AjaxButton instead of just Button?
Nothing broken on this side of the fence:
onclick(target) {
deleteRow();
if (target==null) {
// don't bother
} else {
target.addComponent(table);
}
}
Sven
Igor Vaynberg wrote:
On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 7:18 AM, Sven Meier wrote:
I don't think he meant a *complete* no-op request
On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 7:18 AM, Sven Meier wrote:
> I don't think he meant a *complete* no-op request target, just the method
> addComponent() would be a no-op. The fake request target will rerender the
> complete page as any other standard request would do.
this is not possible. all public con
Thanks for the info Sven.
I assume by Ajax-ify you mean to create a new implementation that
mirrors WizardButton but extends AjaxButton instead of just Button?
Also, our code base is currently on 1.4.1, I noticed 1.4.3 (stable?) is
released but the main Apache Wicket Page hasn't been updated?
Wh
Have another question about serving up CSS (JS, img, etc) files statically:
a) I'd like to have the option to serve my CSS up statically via an apache
proxy. I'd also like to avoid serving CSS requests up via the wicket filter
- even if served up by Jetty - as I think it will scale just a bit bett
Hi,
on the wicket-wiki
(http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/i18n-and-resource-bundles.html) I've
found a point that won't work.
Below the point "Load resources dynamically for a component" there is
the first alternative using ...PackageResource.get(MyComponent.class,
"Mycomponent.properties")...
I've
Hi James,
regretfully the standard Wicket dialog doesn't support non-AJAX request
- perhaps this restriction applies to the YUI version too?
You'll have to ajax-ify the wizard - see Wizard#newButtonBar(). I've
done it for our project but I don't have the code available at the moment.
Regard
Hi Martin,
I saw the same type of behavior you are talking about with
LoadableDetachableModels not detaching but AbstractReadOnlyModel's
working properly.
What I found was that I was instantiating my LDM's as private variables
in my custom components but that they were not being detached. I
Hi Sven,
I'm running the wizard in a modal popup (YUI).
One other thing that is happening is when I press the next button in the
wizard that should take me to the next step, my dialog closes. I'm not
sure what would cause the dialog to dismiss/close in this manner.
J.D.
-Original Message--
I am using Ajax but not adding wizard to target. I will play with
that. Thank you for the suggestion.
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 24, 2009, at 8:32, "Sven Meier" wrote:
Hi James,
>but Wicket's implementation seems to only evaluate the condition at
step
>creation and not when I'm changi
Hi James,
>but Wicket's implementation seems to only evaluate the condition at step
>creation and not when I'm changing the state of my radios.
see NextButton#isEnabled() and FinishButton#isEnabled(). As far as I can
see these method should support your usecase. Implementing ICondition as
you
Hi all,
IMHO Vladimir has made a reasonable suggestion.
> I think he meant wasting CPU cycles for constructing your components
> which will be added to no-op ajaxrequesttarget
I don't think he meant a *complete* no-op request target, just the
method addComponent() would be a no-op. The fake re
Hi folks,
Since my app will be english and german aswell, that is something I need
too. I tried to mount and unmount my pages
when the locale changes from german to english or vice versa.
I tried using ResourceModel Strings for the urls, but it's not working
the way I want it to be. And it wou
I think he meant wasting CPU cycles for constructing your components
which will be added to no-op ajaxrequesttarget
then you'll have to make check like "if (target instanceOf
NullAjaxRequestTarget) {return;}" which is not better than before
El sáb, 24-10-2009 a las 12:18 +0200, Andreas Petersson
I think it absolutely makes sense (for a future release of wicket).
having a NullObject instance of AjaxRequestTarget would not waste a lot
of cpu cycles at all, at least not how i use it. the only thing i do
with the object is call .addComponent() and then refering a
already-initialized variab
Sounds weird.
Why should my component burn cpu cycles to feed a fake ajax target
which does nothing at all?
I would prefer some null checks in that case.
Would you also provide a FakeDatabaseConnection in case you
application does not support databases? :-)
Am 24.10.2009 um 07:42 schrie
Hi Igor,
ah, you're completly right. I have forgotten to remove the
wicket:message-tags from the panels after
seperating them.
Thanks for the hint!
Have a nice saturday.
Marc
Igor Vaynberg schrieb:
> so headerLogo is a Panel?
>
> you cannot do that, you cannot have markup with wicket:ids insid
so headerLogo is a Panel?
you cannot do that, you cannot have markup with wicket:ids inside a
tag that you want to be replaced with a panel.
-igor
On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 12:16 AM, Marc Ende wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I had worked on several projects with 1.3 and now I have changed to
> 1.4.2 (and now to
Hi,
I had worked on several projects with 1.3 and now I have changed to
1.4.2 (and now to 1.4.3).
After that I have a strange error when I'm using panels:
WicketMessage: close tag not found for tag: . Component: [MarkupContainer [Component id =
headerLogo]]
This happens within a panel which look
26 matches
Mail list logo