AW: OSGi Wicket

2009-10-31 Thread Giambalvo, Christian
Hi, i'm also interested in making a modular, during runtime extensible wicket appliaction. Meaning a Wicketapplication which can be extended by plugins during runtime. Can OSGi accomplish this? Could you please explain the wstarter a little bit more in detail. I only developed normal wicket web

Re: OSGi Wicket

2009-10-31 Thread Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
Hi Chris, Comments inlined. 2009/10/31 Giambalvo, Christian christian.giamba...@excelsisnet.com Hi, i'm also interested in making a modular, during runtime extensible wicket appliaction. Meaning a Wicketapplication which can be extended by plugins during runtime. Can OSGi accomplish

Re: OSGi Wicket

2009-10-31 Thread Igor Vaynberg
it is easy to create a pluggable application in wicket. all you need is a registry of component providers, whether it be something like spring [1], a custom registry like brix uses [2] or something more advanced like osgi. the choice should be based on the featureset you need. eg, if you need hot

Re: urlFor(ResourceReference) strangeness

2009-10-31 Thread pieter claassen
Alex, My apologies, but I cannot reproduce this issue again. Even if I mount a page and then land on that page, I now get the correct behaviour with the default URL encoding strategy. I am wondering if I called the correct urlFor()? No good speculating on this though If I see this again, I

Re: 508 accessibility support

2009-10-31 Thread Ryan McKinley
takes values for alt attribute . Like the sortable columns , If I can set value for alt attribute that would be really nice. how about: div.add( new AttributeModifier( alt, true, new ModelString( what it should say... ))

open modal window w/o ajax resolved?

2009-10-31 Thread Jason Novotny
Hi, I was trying to figure out how to display wicketmodal once a page is created-- this has been a popular issue http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-12 It seems just a week ago it has been marked resolved in wicket 1.4.4, can someone tell me what the fix is or what I need to do

Re: OSGi Wicket

2009-10-31 Thread David Leangen
If you do go with OSGi, you will have problems with classloaders and deserialization. To my knowledge, nobody has yet solved this (i.e. implemented a good solution) in a decent way. The Eclipse buddy system is not proper OSGi, IMO. pax-wicket does solve this problem (using proper

Re: OSGi Wicket

2009-10-31 Thread Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
I do agree Eclipse buddy system in not proper OSGi, but it makes a lot easier to develop applications because 1- Your application, components, etc, will be same as in any normal Wicket application (no changes to are needed) 2- If you find out OSGi is not suitable at the end, you can always build