Re: Component specific JavaScript

2012-02-19 Thread Jorge Rodrigez
Hi, I think you just need: class MyComponent extends SomeWicketComponent { @Override public void renderHead(IHeaderResponse response) { response.renderOnDomReadyJavascript(someJSToExecute()); } } someJSToExecute() will be executed every time an instance of MyComponent is rendered. Both

Re: Component specific JavaScript

2012-02-19 Thread Jürgen Lind
Hi Jorge, thanks for the hint, unfortunately, this method is only available in Wicket 1.5 - in this projekt, I am still using Wicket 1.4. Maybe I should stop looking for a general solution for this project and in the future use the solution you suggested... J. On 19.02.2012 10:30, Jorge

Re: Component specific JavaScript

2012-02-19 Thread Martin Grigorov
Hi Juergen, Both Component#renderHead(IHeaderResponse) IHeaderResponse#renderOnDomReadyJavascript() methods are available in 1.4.x. What exactly you think is not available there ? From: Jürgen Lind juergen.l...@iteratec.de To: users@wicket.apache.org

Re: Component specific JavaScript

2012-02-19 Thread Jürgen Lind
Strange, I am using 1.4.12 and neither is present there. The javadoc at http://wicket.apache.org/apidocs/1.4/org/apache/wicket/Component.html also does not show the method with this signature... J. On 19.02.2012 12:23, Martin Grigorov wrote: Hi Juergen, Both

Re: Component specific JavaScript

2012-02-19 Thread Martin Grigorov
Well, I haven't used 1.4.x for almost two years now ... It seems you need to add implements IHeaderContributor to your component. From: Jürgen Lind juergen.l...@iteratec.de To: users@wicket.apache.org users@wicket.apache.org; Martin Grigorov

Re: Component specific JavaScript

2012-02-19 Thread Christoph Leiter
On 18.02.2012 17:46, Jürgen Lind wrote: thank you for your reply, I did not know that such a method exists (does it for 1.4 or is this already Wicket 1.5). An secondly: are these handlers fired on a ajax update of an existing DOM Element or only when it is added? This is also available in 1.4.

Re: Component specific JavaScript

2012-02-19 Thread Jürgen Lind
Christoph, I have use yout approach (jQuery + css-class) for some time now as well. However, I have found that if the DOM tree grows rather large, a full scan puts significant load on the browser. That's why I want to be more specific and limit the scanning + updating to the relevant parts of

Re: Component specific JavaScript

2012-02-19 Thread Christoph Leiter
Hi Juergen, there's actually no need to scan the full DOM with this method. :) The first argument of the event handler is the added element. You can simply use it as is or pass it to $() to do jQuery magic just for the relevant part. Christoph On 19.02.2012 13:18, Jürgen Lind wrote:

Re: Component specific JavaScript

2012-02-19 Thread Jürgen Lind
I'm not sure if I get you right on this one: the first argument of which event handler is the added element? Could you probably add some code to illustrate this? J. On 19.02.2012 13:28, Christoph Leiter wrote: Hi Juergen, there's actually no need to scan the full DOM with this method. :) The

Re: AjaxLink.onClick() Not Triggered

2012-02-19 Thread Andrea Del Bene
Hi, at first glance I can't say what's wrong with your code, but you should try debugging wicketAjaxGet function with FireBug or some other dev tool. In this way you should find why there's no AJAX call. I have an Ajax link in a drop down menu, created like this: final

Re: Component specific JavaScript

2012-02-19 Thread Christoph Leiter
Sure: $(document).ready(function() { Wicket.Event.subscribe('/dom/node/added', function(element) { $(element).css('border', '1px solid red'); }); }); On 19.02.2012 13:39, Jürgen Lind wrote: I'm not sure if I get you right on this one: the first argument of which event handler

Re: objectautocomplete with first item selected

2012-02-19 Thread northar
Ok, now i researched some some more: What i wan't to do: Have an autocompletetextbox with custom layout in the dropdown. The default autocomplete fills the first criteria, but then i would like to modify the html-output thats created in the dropdown. The default output is final though and outputs

Re: Component specific JavaScript

2012-02-19 Thread Jürgen Lind
Thanks a lot. One last stupid question: is this supposed to work for Wicket 1.4? J. On 19.02.2012 15:28, Christoph Leiter wrote: $(document).ready(function() { Wicket.Event.subscribe('/dom/node/added', function(element) { $(element).css('border', '1px solid red'); }); });

wicket DropDownChoice and List box Issue

2012-02-19 Thread mukesh kumar
Hi, Can any person help my this issue ? Actually i am facing two issue in my all wicket application version 1.5.3. First is, I have a dropdown choice. When the page is render first time, in dropdownchoice , choose one shown. But when select any item from drop down and click on save

Howto go for editable grid with add/remove row in wicket 1.4?

2012-02-19 Thread Emmanouil Batsis (Manos)
Subject says it all... currently using inmethod from wicketstuff but there is no add/remove row in the 1.4.x versions. Manos - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: Integrating Wicket with Jquery Flexigrid

2012-02-19 Thread AGarhy
Check out Flexigrid for Wicket: http://code.google.com/p/flexigrid-for-wicket/ Verma Shalini (HCTM/ETA Shalini.Verma at us.bosch.com writes: Hi, I was trying to search if anybody has integrated the Jquery Felxigrid plugin with Wicket.As the tool is very powerful. Thanks Shalini

Re: Howto go for editable grid with add/remove row in wicket 1.4?

2012-02-19 Thread Jorge Rodrigez
You just need to add/remove an item to your data source. Next time you rerender the grid it will show/hide the added/removed item/row. On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 6:46 PM, Emmanouil Batsis (Manos) ma...@abiss.grwrote: Subject says it all... currently using inmethod from wicketstuff but there is no

Shrinking the session size, simply by zipping it. Saved my day.

2012-02-19 Thread Per
Hi all, thought I'd share a really simple hack that we're using to reduce the Wicket session size (on Wicket 1.4). Background: We deploy to Google App Engine, and there's a strict 1MB limit. We've been using LDMs and all sorts of optimisations, but we were still reaching the limits when a user

Re: Howto go for editable grid with add/remove row in wicket 1.4?

2012-02-19 Thread Emmanouil Batsis (Manos)
On 02/19/2012 10:56 PM, Jorge Rodrigez wrote: You just need to add/remove an item to your data source. Next time you rerender the grid it will show/hide the added/removed Any custom datasource examples out there? Essentially I'd like to bind the grid to a POJO collection member. Manos

Re: Shrinking the session size, simply by zipping it. Saved my day.

2012-02-19 Thread robmcguinness
very nice thanks! -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Shrinking-the-session-size-simply-by-zipping-it-Saved-my-day-tp4402980p4403065.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

RE: Component specific JavaScript

2012-02-19 Thread Wilhelmsen Tor Iver
Thanks a lot. One last stupid question: is this supposed to work for Wicket 1.4? Doubful, the event system was added in 1.5 - Tor Iver - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands,

Re: Shrinking the session size, simply by zipping it. Saved my day.

2012-02-19 Thread Josh Kamau
Thanks for the post. I wish this could be integrated into the core. Josh. On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 5:32 AM, robmcguinness robert.mcguinness@gmail.com wrote: very nice thanks! -- View this message in context:

Re: Component specific JavaScript

2012-02-19 Thread Jürgen Lind
That's right, I just checked the sources... Anyways, although migration the project now does not make sense, it is a good idea for the next project... Thanks everybody, J. On 20.02.2012 08:31, Wilhelmsen Tor Iver wrote: Thanks a lot. One last stupid question: is this supposed to work for