:57 AM, John Patterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You would also need to setVisible(false) on the WMC or wicket would throw
an
exception at the missing child components. I use a simple class
InvisibleComponent for this.
Eric Rotick wrote:
One more thing that was suggested in class
I thought I understood the component hierarchy but then I started to tell
the guys about it and now I'm not so sure.
If the markup defines a hierarchy as A contains B contains C, in effect,
this means that C is added to B which is added to A. If we expand B to be
more complex we can use maybe a
. as for variable
component hierarchy inside the repeater itself, you are correct: you
have to either use a panel or a fragment.
-igor
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 9:37 AM, Eric Rotick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I thought I understood the component hierarchy but then I started to
tell
the guys about
wicket:id=image/
/span
/wicket:panel
and if the image was not needed it could be no-op'ed out by defining a
WebMarkupContainer but with no children.
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 6:53 PM, Eric Rotick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Many thanks for the clarification.
As I am about to start teaching the rudiments
Javascript event handler. I've not yet
figured out how this works yet.
Has anyone used the DatePicker in this way to confirm that it does or does
not work as expected?
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 1:18 PM, Eric Rotick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a situation where the DateTextField and DatePicker
am still not really happy with this but for 1.3/1.4 this is the way it
works
And i guess the String converter that does String to String doesnt óok
at
that convert empty input to null value at all
Do you have your own?
johan
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 1:38 PM, Eric Rotick
I have a requirement to allow users to change such things as colour, font
etc. for certain markup. Currently this is all 'wrapped' by CSS ids/classes
but the use of varying ids/classes seems wrong.
The use case if for engineers viewing data from sensors. Some engineers
require values below a
events (I stole the idea from the datepicker)..
regards Nino
Eric Rotick wrote:
I have a requirement to allow users to change such things as colour,
font
etc. for certain markup. Currently this is all 'wrapped' by CSS
ids/classes
but the use of varying ids/classes seems wrong.
The use
are inside your map... Ask if you have
questions..:)
regards Nino
Eric Rotick wrote:
Where can I find out more about this approach?
On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 2:07 PM, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
if you need to do it dynamicly, you could just use
. However you could cache this, it
totally up to you..
regards Nin
Eric Rotick wrote:
Now I see. I had not discovered these classes!
I was hoping to avoid embedding the CSS within the HTML as this does
not
benefit from the size reduction that CSS separation gives. However,
you've
I've just realised that the database is getting filled with columns of empty
strings which then don't cause the 'not null' test to trip.
The culprit is the TextField returning an empty string rather than a null. I
can see there are some special considerations for returning a null and I
want to
I have a page with many buttons to do different things. I decided the best
strategy was to setup the default page via a call to setReponsePage at the
start of the page and then overrride this in the onSubmit method for each
button.
This appears not to work. However, if I set a value of the
);
}
}
} );
add( form );
}
}
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 11:32 AM, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
do you have some sample code??
what do you mean with setResponsePage outside of an onSubmit or click?
outside of what? when is it called?
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 12:22 PM, Eric
, 2008 at 1:08 PM, Eric Rotick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have simplified the class and it behaves the same.
public class SingleItemForm extends Panel {
public SingleItemForm(
String id,
final boolean readonly,
final ISingleDisplay display,
final
, 2008 at 1:42 PM, Eric Rotick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for the help, I'm getting there...slowly!
Does this mean that I can't do something like
new MyPage1( ).setResponsePage( new MyPage2( ) );
and then somewhere else
new MyPage1( ).setResponsePage( new MyPage3
Good point.
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 2:01 PM, Maurice Marrink [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 1:42 PM, Eric Rotick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for the help, I'm getting there...slowly!
Does this mean that I can't do something like
new MyPage1( ).setResponsePage
I would like to be able to create a form where the number and type of form
component is decided at run time.
I've done the research and found various guides, e.g
http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/forms-with-dynamic-elements.html but I've not
managed to crack it yet.
I've created some panels for the
17 matches
Mail list logo
