gt; Von: Gerolf Seitz [mailto:gerolf.se...@gmail.com]
>> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 26. November 2009 19:36
>> An: users@wicket.apache.org
>> Betreff: Re: PropertyModels *without* strings
>>
>> that's why i was wondering about a lombok based bindgen implementation,
>&
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Gerolf Seitz [mailto:gerolf.se...@gmail.com]
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 26. November 2009 19:36
> An: users@wicket.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: PropertyModels *without* strings
>
> that's why i was wondering about a lombok based bindgen imple
: PropertyModels *without* strings
that's why i was wondering about a lombok based bindgen implementation,
since
lombok is available as apt processor and eclipse plugin :)
On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 5:13 PM, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
> you guys are missing the point. Bindgen is a *standard apt processo
asy to fix your own code (in contrast to some strings)
> >>> >>
> >>> >> On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 8:04 AM, Giambalvo, Christian <
> >>> >> christian.giamba...@excelsisnet.com> wrote:
> >>> >>
> >>> >>> Is
in the code where you use the "old names".
>>> so it
>>> >> should be
>>> >> fairly easy to fix your own code (in contrast to some strings)
>>> >>
>>> >> On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 8:04 AM, Giambalvo, Christian <
>
o some strings)
> >> >>
> >> >> On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 8:04 AM, Giambalvo, Christian <
> >> >> christian.giamba...@excelsisnet.com> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >>> Is refactoring available for bindgen?
>> >>
>> >> On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 8:04 AM, Giambalvo, Christian <
>> >> christian.giamba...@excelsisnet.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> Is refactoring available for bindgen?
>> >>>
>> >>> -Ursprünglich
trast to some strings)
>> >>
>> >> On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 8:04 AM, Giambalvo, Christian <
>> >> christian.giamba...@excelsisnet.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> Is refactoring available for bindgen?
>> >>>
>> >&g
t;>>
> >>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> >>> Von: Igor Vaynberg [mailto:igor.vaynb...@gmail.com]
> >>> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 25. November 2009 22:56
> >>> An: users@wicket.apache.org; d...@wicket.apache.org
> >>> Betreff: PropertyM
e:
> >>
> >>> Is refactoring available for bindgen?
> >>>
> >>> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> >>> Von: Igor Vaynberg [mailto:igor.vaynb...@gmail.com]
> >>> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 25. No
>>> Von: Igor Vaynberg [mailto:igor.vaynb...@gmail.com]
>>> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 25. November 2009 22:56
>>> An: users@wicket.apache.org; d...@wicket.apache.org
>>> Betreff: PropertyModels *without* strings
>>>
>>>
>>> http://wicke
; > > > On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 8:04 AM, Giambalvo, Christian <
> > > > christian.giamba...@excelsisnet.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Is refactoring available for bindgen?
> > > >
ix your own code (in contrast to some strings)
> > >
> > > On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 8:04 AM, Giambalvo, Christian <
> > > christian.giamba...@excelsisnet.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Is refactoring available for bindgen?
>
iambalvo, Christian <
> > christian.giamba...@excelsisnet.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Is refactoring available for bindgen?
> >>
> >> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> >> Von: Igor Vaynberg [mailto:igor.vaynb...@gmail.com]
> >> Gesendet: Mittwoch,
On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 8:54 AM, Martin Makundi <
martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com> wrote:
> I would say that refactoring calls for improvement in the bindgen
> approach. Is it theoretically possible to facilitate refactoring with
> bindgen? Is it practically possible to facilitate refactoring w
>>> should be
>>> fairly easy to fix your own code (in contrast to some strings)
>>>
>>> On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 8:04 AM, Giambalvo, Christian <
>>> christian.giamba...@excelsisnet.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Is refactoring available for
:04 AM, Giambalvo, Christian <
> >> christian.giamba...@excelsisnet.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Is refactoring available for bindgen?
> >>>
> >>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> >>> Von: Igor Vaynberg [mailto:igor.vaynb...@gmail.com]
>
08:44
An: users@wicket.apache.org
Betreff: Re: PropertyModels *without* strings
the whole point is that strings brake, whether they are constants or not.
eg
add(new Label("parentName", new PropertyModel(person, "parent.name")));
suppose you rename Person.getName() to Person.
iambalvo, Christian <
>> christian.giamba...@excelsisnet.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Is refactoring available for bindgen?
>>>
>>> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
>>> Von: Igor Vaynberg [mailto:igor.vaynb...@gmail.com]
>>> Gesendet: Mittwoch
Ok thanks.
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Gerolf Seitz [mailto:gerolf.se...@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 26. November 2009 08:19
An: users@wicket.apache.org
Betreff: Re: PropertyModels *without* strings
as far as i have read, the binding "methods" aren't automatic
n?
>>
>> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
>> Von: Igor Vaynberg [mailto:igor.vaynb...@gmail.com]
>> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 25. November 2009 22:56
>> An: users@wicket.apache.org; d...@wicket.apache.org
>> Betreff: PropertyModels *without* strings
>>
cket.apache.org; d...@wicket.apache.org
> Betreff: PropertyModels *without* strings
>
>
> http://wicketinaction.com/2009/11/removing-fragile-string-expressions-from-wicket-code/
>
> -igor
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e
Is refactoring available for bindgen?
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Igor Vaynberg [mailto:igor.vaynb...@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 25. November 2009 22:56
An: users@wicket.apache.org; d...@wicket.apache.org
Betreff: PropertyModels *without* strings
http://wicketinaction.com/2009/11
http://wicketinaction.com/2009/11/removing-fragile-string-expressions-from-wicket-code/
-igor
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
24 matches
Mail list logo
