Also, can you share what you get from Wicket that you don't get from GWT?
That would be useful for those who venture on this list considering GWT
versus Wicket.
Thanks,
Richard
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 9:53 AM, Richard Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> If ExtJS essentially gives you what you want
If ExtJS essentially gives you what you want in the way of widgets, why not
look into integration of ExtJS and Wicket? In the near future, we will be
migrating our applications that use ExtJS to Wicket. There has already been
some work done in this area. See the following links.
ExtJS 2.2: http://
>
> At the same time, I want to embed certain GWT or GWT-Ext widgets in the
> Wicket pages because they are really cool and would take a considerable
> effort for any developer to implement them in javascript.
Sounds like an idea I also had before: using GWT to create rich JavaScript
components e
so be achieved if I don't use Wicket. Wicket
usage is desired for the server side goodies that it can provide to
individual page.
Regards,
Nitin
-Original Message-
From: jWeekend [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2008 4:32 PM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: W
Nitin,
I have spoken to several GWT experts about this as the idea does at first
seem very attractive. Although it is technically feasible (with some
significant effort to make a _decent_ integration of the two frameworks), we
have never managed to come up with a compelling use-case that would m
By integration I meant that if I can make use of the server side features of
the Wicket & integrate the widgets of GWT just like someone would integrate
YUI with Wicket pages.
Both technologies are great. Just thinking of a possible marriage for a
faster, better app. Any issues seen in this?
By
Personally i dont see an integration at all between GWT an Wicket.
Both are ui techs that do things completely different.
Give us an example how you see flow (setResponsePage()) in wicket and
what GWT then should do
On 11/13/08, nitingupta183 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> I am worki
