Update:
When setting #setAllowDefault(false), the #onevent method of the web markup
container is called, but in addition also the #on select method of sortable.
When setting #setAllowDefault(true), the #onevent method is not called at all,
only the #on select method.
It seems that
Hi Chris,
Sorry for the mistake, its
attributes.setEventPropagation(EventPropagation.STOP);
Best regards,
Sebastien.
On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 10:12 PM, Chris chris...@gmx.at wrote:
Update:
When setting #setAllowDefault(false), the #onevent method of the web
markup container is called, but
Hi Sebastian - thanks for your answer.
I experience that when adding #attributes.setEventPropagation, the #onEvent
method of infoLink is not called at all, and the #onselect method of the
sortable is still called. It would be awesome if you know how to fix it.
@Override
protected void
Hi Chris,
Actually what you describe is the opposite of what is supposed to happen :)
I will try to look at this... There could be several reason: the region
occupied by the markup container can be misleading for instance, or there
could be a canceling bubble conflict between registered wicket
Thanks a lot, with #setAllowDefault(true) the #onEvent(AjaxRequestTarget
target) of the respective webmarkupcontainer is called. Nevertheless, after
that, the #onselect method of the sortable is called as well. How to prevent
this call?
br, Chris
Am 06.02.2015 um 21:20 schrieb Martin
Hi Sebastian,
thanks for the solution with #onConfigure - it works.
Would it also be an option to remove the item from the liststring and render
the sortable again,
instead of calling MySortable.this.onRemove?
Best regards
Am 08.02.2015 um 19:13 schrieb Sebastien seb...@gmail.com:
Hi
Hi Chris,
Not sure to understand. OnRemove already removes from the list but also
indicates that the model has changed...
target.add(MySortable.this) re-render the sortable with the updated list.
So everything should work, that's why I am not sure to understand the
question...
Thanks,
Sebastien
Hi Sebastian,
currently, I am deleting the element that should be removed from the list and
render the view again.
I am not calling #onRemove, but the code works, too. Therefore, I wanted to ask
you if it is better to call #onRemove.
br, Chris
Am 08.02.2015 um 19:55 schrieb Sebastien
Hi Chris,
Actually jquery ui's selectable provides the ability to prevent their
events to be fired. The option is cancel [1]
So, as I was testing, here is the full code to manage your remove button:
CSS
style type=text/css
.sortable { list-style-type: none; margin: 0; padding: 0; width:
Damned, I sent the mail a little bit to quickly... the button does not
remove the correct item if it has moved... Will fix that.
Hi Chris,
As I told you earlier (but it seems it was in another post), in our case we
need to retrieve the item's data-hash for retrieving and deleting the
correct item
So the code becomes:
item.add(new AjaxLinkVoid(remove) {
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
@Override
Hi Chris,
So overriding the #updateAjaxAttributes may not help?
Right, it seems that the selectable widget registers its event with a
higher priority level somehow.
The link's click event is just never fired, so we can forget about stopping
propagation here. And worst, even an inline onclick
Hi Sebastian,
i also tried it with the AjaxLink. It seems that the #onselect method is always
called first, and only after that the ajaxlink. So overriding the
#updateAjaxAttributes may not help?
thanks for your help!
Chris
Am 08.02.2015 um 14:17 schrieb Sebastien seb...@gmail.com:
Hi
Hi Chris,
Yes it works like you did but on a strict point of view, its better to
notify the component its modelobject changed (and the page is also aware
that a child component model has changed)... So event if it is not much
important yet, it is still better to call #onRemove because it already
Hi Sebastian,
thanks for your help. Has that the method signature recently changed? The
method #setPreventDefault is not available on the object #attributes.
Link link = new AjaxFallbackLinkString(link) {
@Override
public void onClick(AjaxRequestTarget target) {
Hi Chris,
Yes, generally speaking, you have to cancel bubbling events to parent
elements.
For a [Ajax]Link (or any event-behavior related) you have to set the
preventDefault property to true;
protected void updateAjaxAttributes(AjaxRequestAttributes attributes)
{
Hi,
On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 10:13 PM, Chris chris...@gmx.at wrote:
Hi Sebastian,
thanks for your help. Has that the method signature recently changed? The
method #setPreventDefault is not available on the object #attributes.
Link link = new AjaxFallbackLinkString(link) {
Hi Sebastian,
I would have a follow-up question regarding the #Sortable:
Is it possible to add an AjaxLink to the item with its own behavior so that if
the user clicks on this link, then its on-click behavior should be called
instead of the #onselect method from the sortable. At the moment,
I've opened the issue:
https://github.com/sebfz1/wicket-jquery-ui/issues/153
On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 10:29 AM, Sebastien seb...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Chris,
Right, Sortable is processing events thought the Event Bus, that's because
2 sortables can be connected and then, these should be able to
Hi Chris,
Right, Sortable is processing events thought the Event Bus, that's because
2 sortables can be connected and then, these should be able to communicate
As you are sending the event from the Sortable, you enter the condition:
if (event.getSource() instanceof Sortable?)
I will try to find
Hi,
would you be so kind and apply some more information like StackTrace of
the interal server error.
Thanks a lot.
kind regards
Tobias.
Am 04.02.15 um 20:05 schrieb Chris:
Sven, I have an additional situation where I am getting an internal error.
Could you help me in figuring out the
Hi Tobias - sorry, here it is:
Last cause: mycompany.DeleteItem cannot be cast to java.lang.String
WicketMessage: Method onRequest of interface
org.apache.wicket.behavior.IBehaviorListener targeted at
com.googlecode.wicket.jquery.ui.interaction.selectable.SelectableBehavior$1@127d9785
on
Hi,
you're using a DeleteItem as payload of the event:
send(getPage(), Broadcast.BREADTH, new DeleteItem(target));
Yet in #onRemove() you're casting the payload to a String:
java.lang.ClassCastException: tripplanner.mycompany.DeleteItem cannot
be cast to java.lang.String
Sven, I have an additional situation where I am getting an internal error.
Could you help me in figuring out the problem?
Panel A senses the selection of an item from a user and adds the „sortable“ as
container to the ajax target.
In addition, Panel B should be added to the ajax target, using
Hi Sven, thanks.
The onRemove method is from the class
com.googlecode.wicket.jquery.ui.interaction.sortable.Sortable:
@Override
public void onRemove(AjaxRequestTarget target, String item) {
super.onRemove(target, item);
}
Why is the payload processed in this method, as it takes the target
Sven - thank you. That solved it!
Am 04.02.2015 um 14:14 schrieb Sven Meier s...@meiers.net:
Your container has to output its markup id:
container.setOutputMarkupId()
Regards
Sven
On 04.02.2015 14:11, Chris wrote:
Hi,
When the user clicks on a certain icon, a specific
Your container has to output its markup id:
container.setOutputMarkupId()
Regards
Sven
On 04.02.2015 14:11, Chris wrote:
Hi,
When the user clicks on a certain icon, a specific part of the page should be
reloaded through ajax. The icon is part of a panel, the specific part is a
Hi,
When the user clicks on a certain icon, a specific part of the page should be
reloaded through ajax. The icon is part of a panel, the specific part is a
webmarkupcontainer added directly to the page. I am using Wicket Events to push
the click event. However, when adding the web markup
28 matches
Mail list logo
