Re: Re: Google App Engine and Wicket

2009-10-20 Thread A. Maza
On 20:59, Eelco Hillenius wrote: It's probably a good idea to have a specialized implementation of ISessionStore for App Engine that uses whatever makes sense with App Engine for medium term storage ('cause that's what it is... short term storage is the current page, which is typically local

Re: Re: Google App Engine and Wicket

2009-10-20 Thread richardwilko
Hi, The Terracotta SecondLevelCacheSessionStore does not contain any Terracotta specific implementation or dependencies, and should work fine on AppEngine (I haven't tested it though). All it is is an implementation of IPageStore, where the pages are serialized to byte arrays (like the disk

Re: Google App Engine and Wicket

2009-10-20 Thread A. Maza
On 20.10.2009 13:30, richardwilko wrote: Hi, The Terracotta SecondLevelCacheSessionStore does not contain any Terracotta specific implementation or dependencies, and should work fine on AppEngine (I haven't tested it though). All it is is an implementation of IPageStore, where the pages are

Re: Google App Engine and Wicket

2009-10-20 Thread richardwilko
andr, From Wikipedia [1]: The Apache License does not require modified versions of the software to be distributed using the same license nor even that it be distributed as free/open-source software. The Apache license only requires that a notice is kept informing recipients that Apache licensed

Re: Google App Engine and Wicket

2009-10-20 Thread richardwilko
Oh, sorry I just realized that it has the terracotta licence header on it, had I realized i would have removed it. That's because the version of the file i had to hand was from the terracotta forge svn repo, and code in there has to have their licence. Originally it was Apache 2 licensed and I

Re: Google App Engine and Wicket

2009-10-20 Thread A. Maza
On 20.10.2009 14:48, richardwilko wrote: Oh, sorry I just realized that it has the terracotta licence header on it, had I realized i would have removed it. That's because the version of the file i had to hand was from the terracotta forge svn repo, and code in there has to have their licence.

Re: Google App Engine and Wicket

2009-08-29 Thread Scott Swank
Here's a minor point that tripped me up. I have my WicketFilter mapped to a given path: filter-mapping filter-nameWicketFilter/filter-name url-pattern/evansforlv/*/url-pattern /filter-mapping And then when I start up my local app and browse to

Re: Google App Engine and Wicket

2009-05-11 Thread Jim Pinkham
I've followed with interest all the wicket on GAE threads I can, and these all seem to address necessary minor tweaks to get it set up, but the one big thing I haven't seen much discussion on is the BigTable storage system, since we wouldn't be able to use MySQL. Maybe that's the whole point for

Re: Google App Engine and Wicket

2009-05-11 Thread Jeremy Thomerson
You can get a dedicated server at GoDaddy for under $100 per month. I've had one running Java / Wicket apps with an uptime of around two years now. With your very small load, you could also use redwoodvirtual and use a Linux Virtual Server for $20 or $40. I also had a server with them running

Re: Google App Engine and Wicket

2009-05-11 Thread Juha Palomäki
File uploads seem to be causing some problems. On Wicket uploaded files are first written to some temporary file and on AppEngine this is obviously not possible. I haven't yet investigated if it is easy to change this behavior in Wicket. Another option might be to write a separate servlet for just

Re: Google App Engine and Wicket

2009-04-12 Thread Eelco Hillenius
Both articles avoid the DiskPageStore problem by using the HttpSessionStore, however if you do a search through the mailing list archives for HttpSessionStore you'll find numerous references to problems in using it in the long term and especially in a real, production application, so I don't

Re: Google App Engine and Wicket

2009-04-12 Thread Adriano dos Santos Fernandes
Maarten Bosteels wrote: But AFAIK GAE doesn't use/guarantee sticky sessions, so I am afraid you can't rely on local memory. App Engine uses multiple web servers to run your application, and automatically adjusts the number of servers it is using to handle requests reliably. A given request may

Re: Google App Engine and Wicket

2009-04-12 Thread Maarten Bosteels
Good news: http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java/msg/f50bbb131dc524c1 quote HttpSessions will work out of the box if you enable them in your appengine-web.xml. We do not guarantee that all requests for the same session go to the same JVM, but persistence of sessions is managed

Re: Google App Engine and Wicket

2009-04-11 Thread Sergey Podatelev
Here are a couple of pointers regarding Wicket on GAE: http://www.danwalmsley.com/2009/04/08/apache-wicket-on-google-app-engine-for-java/ On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 6:15 PM, Matthew Welch matt...@welchkin.net wrote: I've been experimenting a bit with Google App Engine and Wicket and things seemed

Re: Google App Engine and Wicket

2009-04-11 Thread Peter Thomas
Here's another article about Wicket and GAE on DZone: http://www.dzone.com/links/rss/wicket_on_google_app_engine.html On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 8:22 AM, Sergey Podatelev brightnesslev...@gmail.com wrote: Here are a couple of pointers regarding Wicket on GAE:

Re: Google App Engine and Wicket

2009-04-11 Thread Matt Welch
Both articles avoid the DiskPageStore problem by using the HttpSessionStore, however if you do a search through the mailing list archives for HttpSessionStore you'll find numerous references to problems in using it in the long term and especially in a real, production application, so I don't