Re: Antwort: Wicket community traction / Wicket Web 2.0 experience

2008-10-23 Thread Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael
Hehe Bruno I were about to write a similar mail.. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: That's ok Chris, It's just a matter of time until they find out they did the wrong choice - unless this is going to be a small software, with very specific functions, like GMail. :-) There's a team by my side here

Antwort: Re: Antwort: Wicket community traction / Wicket Web 2.0 experience

2008-10-23 Thread christoph . grothaus
Hi Bruno, I appreciate it that you pray for the rest of my team :-) I won't be a bad looser, so I will give my best with the other devs to build a good solution with GWT. I really hope that it is not inherent to GWT that the code gets big and unmaintainable. So I cross my fingers and hope for

Re: Re: Antwort: Wicket community traction / Wicket Web 2.0 experience

2008-10-23 Thread Igor Vaynberg
http://ptrthomas.wordpress.com/2008/09/04/wicket-and-gwt-compared-with-code/ -igor On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 10:42 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Bruno, I appreciate it that you pray for the rest of my team :-) I won't be a bad looser, so I will give my best with the other devs to build a

Antwort: Wicket community traction / Wicket Web 2.0 experience

2008-10-22 Thread christoph . grothaus
Martin, Richard, thanks for your answers! Unfortunately, I could not convince the other devs of the various advantages of wicket. The team chose GWT because it allows to create Web 2.0 style user interfaces with fewer effort. Regards, Christoph

Re: Antwort: Wicket community traction / Wicket Web 2.0 experience

2008-10-22 Thread bruno . borges
That's ok Chris, It's just a matter of time until they find out they did the wrong choice - unless this is going to be a small software, with very specific functions, like GMail. :-) There's a team by my side here that is working in a sub-project with GWT and they chose it using that same

Wicket community traction / Wicket Web 2.0 experience

2008-10-21 Thread christoph . grothaus
Hi Wicket users! At my company, we are currently evaluating technology choices for building web user interfaces. We narrowed our candidate list down to two remaining candidates: Wicket and GWT. We already did some prototyping with these two. Our main conclusions are - Wicket has the better

Re: Wicket community traction / Wicket Web 2.0 experience

2008-10-21 Thread Richard Allen
We have just started evaluating frameworks to migrate our Struts 1.x apps. We are considering Wicket, GWT, and Spring MVC (I know, they are quite a bit different). Having prototyped in Wicket and GWT, which do you think allows you to write code that is easier to maintain? There is a wiki page

Re: Wicket community traction / Wicket Web 2.0 experience

2008-10-21 Thread Martin Voigt
just some quick pros for wicket which helped us to make a decision (someone please correct me if i'm wrong on any of these): * wicket started from a professional background, ie people noticed there is a reason to develop it because no available framework met their needs * the architecture is