Great! I'm happy to see that we agree on release a new main version! I
guess I should get in contact with Sally Khudairi to prepare an
announcement for press. Maybe Martijn could help us with this task. The
last announcement can be found here:
+1 for next Milestone
kind regards
Tobias
> Am 26.06.2019 um 08:02 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik :
>
> Also +1 :)
>
> On Wed, Jun 26, 2019, 13:01 Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
> wrote:
>
>> +1 non binding. I was going to write asking for a M3 release right now :-)
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at
Also +1 :)
On Wed, Jun 26, 2019, 13:01 Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
wrote:
> +1 non binding. I was going to write asking for a M3 release right now :-)
>
> On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 12:02 AM Martin Grigorov
> wrote:
>
> > In that case I vote to release 9.0.0 with the next releases of 7.x and
> 8.x,
+1 non binding. I was going to write asking for a M3 release right now :-)
On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 12:02 AM Martin Grigorov
wrote:
> In that case I vote to release 9.0.0 with the next releases of 7.x and 8.x,
> no need to wait until Q3.
>
> On Sun, Jun 23, 2019 at 11:43 AM Sven Meier wrote:
>
In that case I vote to release 9.0.0 with the next releases of 7.x and 8.x,
no need to wait until Q3.
On Sun, Jun 23, 2019 at 11:43 AM Sven Meier wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I haven't had time to work an wicket-ajax-no-jquery.js, and I agree that
> we as well might try that in Wicket 10.
>
> Meanwhile
Hi all,
I haven't had time to work an wicket-ajax-no-jquery.js, and I agree that
we as well might try that in Wicket 10.
Meanwhile I'm preparing a pull request for another modal-dialog
proposal, but this doesn't have to delay a Wicket 9 release either.
Have fun
Sven
On 20.06.19 11:50,
On Thu, Jun 20, 2019, 23:17 Andrea Del Bene wrote:
>
> On 6/20/19 12:46 PM, Martin Grigorov wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 1:37 PM Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro <
> > reier...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Martin and Andrea,
> >>
> >> Many thanks for answers. So, I will try to convince my
On 6/20/19 12:46 PM, Martin Grigorov wrote:
On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 1:37 PM Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro <
reier...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Martin and Andrea,
Many thanks for answers. So, I will try to convince my teammates to switch
development to 9.x branch and that way provide "life feedback"
On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 1:37 PM Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro <
reier...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Martin and Andrea,
>
> Many thanks for answers. So, I will try to convince my teammates to switch
> development to 9.x branch and that way provide "life feedback" on new
> developments.
>
> The only
Hi Martin and Andrea,
Many thanks for answers. So, I will try to convince my teammates to switch
development to 9.x branch and that way provide "life feedback" on new
developments.
The only bigger task I am aware of is the vanilla wicket-ajax.js rewrite
> that has been suggested by Korbinian
Hi,
The only bigger task I am aware of is the vanilla wicket-ajax.js rewrite
that has been suggested by Korbinian Bachl (some time ago) and Andrew
Kondratev (more recently). Sven said that he wants to work on it.
But in my opinion this task should not stop us to release 9.0.0. The
vanilla impl
Hi,
I'm happy you started to appreciate Wicket 9.x in its earliest versions!
The short answer is no, there is no estimated time for 9.x to become EA.
But at the moment I'm not aware of any huge feature or refactoring being
in progress or even proposed. Let's hear what other developers have to
Same here! I would love to go with wicket 9 ASAP. I'm using 9.0.0-M2 on
a new
project and very much appreciate the switch to java.time.Duration, which
saves
me a lot of conversions. Junit5 is also a huge plus in my opinion. So
far I did not
encounter any problems.
Good moment to THANK THE
Hi,
Is there an estimated time for 9.x official release? My question is not
just moot: I'm keeping a parallel version of our project based on wicket
9.x. branch, and some problems I encountered on wicket 8.x. are easier to
solve on 9.x. So, if release is not too far in the future I might try to
14 matches
Mail list logo