Hi Johannes, everyone,
actually this is sort of repsonse to Johannes @jstoldt contribution here
http://xwiki.475771.n2.nabble.com/Back-to-the-future-of-XWiki-tt6084764.html
regarding VM's and it is off-topic in either dev and user.
Johannes, why not drill deeper into this VM stuff ?
If you have
On Mar 10, 2011, at 11:16 AM, Ludovic Dubost wrote:
I think it's kind of easy to create one VM. The issue is that we need an easy
way to create them everytime there is a new version.
Best would be a solution to create them using maven. We should check if there
is any progress in this
Am 10.03.2011 11:16, schrieb Ludovic Dubost:
I think it's kind of easy to create one VM. The issue is that we need
an easy way to create them everytime there is a new version.
Best would be a solution to create them using maven. We should check
if there is any progress in this area.
I see.
Hi everyone,
First of all, I agree with Ludovic and Vincent, a new VM should be created
every time a new version is out. It obviously is a lot of data that needs to
be stored but the problem with not having an up to date VM is that people
who just want to check out XWiki in a ready to go and
Hi Johannes,
On Mar 10, 2011, at 12:41 PM, jstoldt wrote:
Hi everyone,
First of all, I agree with Ludovic and Vincent, a new VM should be created
every time a new version is out. It obviously is a lot of data that needs to
be stored but the problem with not having an up to date VM is that
Am 10.03.2011 12:41, schrieb jstoldt:
Hi everyone,
First of all, I agree with Ludovic and Vincent, a new VM should be created
every time a new version is out. It obviously is a lot of data that needs to
be stored but the problem with not having an up to date VM is that people
who just want
Hi,
Vincent, about the part you had trouble understanding, I was merely trying
to reason why the idea Andreas had about only creating a VM every once in a
while and not on a regular basis (i.e. for every version) is not good
according to my oppinion. Anyway, great that we agree on the wizard and
