e "eye pick", which reminds me
of the Hellraiser movies. Depending on your language, ymmv.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Serge Kolgan
Sent: Wed 4/13/2005 4:24 PM
To: 'Discussion of IronPython'
Subject: RE: [IronPython] To Compile or No
@ cox.net)
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Keith J. Farmer
Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2005 6:44 PM
To: Discussion of IronPython
Subject: RE: [IronPython] To Compile or Not to compile, that's the question
Google found references to a pyc.e
IronPython] To Compile or Not to compile, that's the
question
> to type it's name even less often. So - are you telling me you
actually
> compile C# projects by opening a window and typing "csc
> somefilename.cs"? If so, why?
__
> to type it's name even less often. So - are you telling me you actually
> compile C# projects by opening a window and typing "csc
> somefilename.cs"? If so, why?
in my observation: it often happens that microsoft releases SDKs
before visual studios (betas), and when they release it, its usuall
how bout 'prom' for "Python Running On Mono" ?
maybe 'porn' for Python On Runtime-.Net"?
;-)
I type 'mkae' a lot, so I'm all for short names.
Drew
___
users-ironpython.com mailing list
users-ironpython.com@lists.ironpython.com
http://lists.ironpython.com/
On Sun, Apr 17, 2005 at 11:49:31AM +0100, Innes MacKenzie wrote:
> On 4/17/05, Joe Mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 17, 2005 at 10:55:08AM +0100, Innes MacKenzie wrote:
> > > On 4/17/05, Swaroop C H <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > "ipc" is just too cryptic.
> > >
> > > What about
Innes MacKenzie wrote:
> Not on my XP laptop it doesnt.
Oops - sorry - was using another shell when I tested this out.My bad.
Sriram
___
users-ironpython.com mailing list
users-ironpython.com@lists.ironpython.com
http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.
On 4/17/05, Joe Mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 17, 2005 at 10:55:08AM +0100, Innes MacKenzie wrote:
> > On 4/17/05, Swaroop C H <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > "ipc" is just too cryptic.
> >
> > What about 'dir', 'cd', 'csc'?
>
> The first two are historical, and it's too late to
On 4/17/05, Sriram Krishnan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Joe Mason wrote:
>
> >
> > What? What OS are you talking about? On Linux it works everywhere,
> > even searching $PATH. On Windows, why does it matter? Don't you
> > just associate .py with the executable and doubleclick it?
> >
>
> It'
Joe Mason wrote:
>
> What? What OS are you talking about? On Linux it works everywhere,
> even searching $PATH. On Windows, why does it matter? Don't you
> just associate .py with the executable and doubleclick it?
>
It's the same on Windows - tab completion in your command prompt searche
On Sun, Apr 17, 2005 at 10:55:08AM +0100, Innes MacKenzie wrote:
> On 4/17/05, Swaroop C H <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > "ipc" is just too cryptic.
>
> What about 'dir', 'cd', 'csc'?
The first two are historical, and it's too late to change them. The
third is just stupid.
> > If the command-li
On 4/17/05, Swaroop C H <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "ipc" is just too cryptic.
What about 'dir', 'cd', 'csc'?
> Why isn't just "ironpython" good enough for everybody?.
I hear there's a current thread on the subject, on the iron-python
mailing list. This may be a useful source for finding out p
On 4/17/05, Muhammad Abubakar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have noticed that on windows world ppl are more used to using some
> sort of ide but on linux/unix world ppl (hackers?) like to do a lot on
> just shell using the name of the things they use. Since u r used to
> typing python and jython w
ses to use someone else's makefile.
> >
> > (Personally, I never objected to IronPythonConsole -- but if there's a
> > movement to change it, I still say change it to be in line with the other
> > existing naming patterns.)
> >
> >
> >
>
gt; existing naming patterns.)
>
> ________________
>
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Joe Mason
> Sent: Fri 4/15/2005 9:47 AM
> To: Discussion of IronPython
> Subject: Re: [IronPython] To Compile or Not to compile, that's the question
>
> On
I still say change it to be in line with the other existing
naming patterns.)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Joe Mason
Sent: Fri 4/15/2005 9:47 AM
To: Discussion of IronPython
Subject: Re: [IronPython] To Compile or Not to compile, that's the question
On Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 10:02:03AM -0700, Keith J. Farmer wrote:
> For a compiler, 4 characters is about my limit. After all, it's all
> about my code -- not the tool that is used to transform it into
> something else.
You type the name of the compiler by hand a lot? Wouldn't it be invoked
from
Guys,
You've been typing tens of messages about a way to save a few
characters in the compiler/interpreter name. Given your investment in
keystrokes during the debate, the resulting name has better be
short...
Just kidding !
Regards,
Nicolas
On 4/15/05, Keith J. Farmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
For a compiler, 4 characters is about my limit. After all, it's all
about my code -- not the tool that is used to transform it into
something else.
And it's not matter of there being a hard time -- it's a matter of
muddying the issue. You have to start prefixing when you start talking
about thes
iginal Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Anthony Tarlano
> Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2005 12:29 PM
> To: Muhammad Abubakar; Discussion of IronPython
> Subject: Re: [IronPython] To Compile or Not to compile, that's the
> question
&
t/, which Brian could tell you
about.
I think the name should be unique -- and short.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Anthony Tarlano
Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2005 12:29 PM
To: Muhammad Abubakar; Discussion of IronPython
Subject: Re: [IronP
gt; >
> > > Brian Lloyd[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > V.P. Engineering 540.361.1716
> > > Zope Corporation http://www.zope.com
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >>-Original Message-----
> > >>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >>[
day, April 13, 2005 3:38 PM
>>To: Discussion of IronPython>>Subject: Re: [IronPython] To Compile or Not to compile, that's the>>question>>>>>>On 4/13/05, R.R. Sprinkhuizen <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:>>>>>I think that's a very lean wa
ED]
> >>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
> >>Travis Watkins
> >>Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2005 3:38 PM
> >>To: Discussion of IronPython
> >>Subject: Re: [IronPython] To Compile or Not to compile, that's the
> >>question
> >>
&g
6
Zope Corporation http://www.zope.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Travis Watkins
Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2005 3:38 PM
To: Discussion of IronPython
Subject: Re: [IronPython] To Compile or Not to compile, that's the
question
On 4/13/05, R.R.
Google found references to a pyc.exe, and none in English.
+1
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Brian Lloyd
Sent: Wed 4/13/2005 3:38 PM
To: Travis Watkins; Discussion of IronPython
Subject: RE: [IronPython] To Compile or Not to compile, that's the que
nt: Wednesday, April 13, 2005 3:38 PM
> To: Discussion of IronPython
> Subject: Re: [IronPython] To Compile or Not to compile, that's the
> question
>
>
> On 4/13/05, R.R. Sprinkhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I think that's a very lean way to describ
> > I think that's a very lean way to describe a compiler: it creates an
> > .exe file. But I see where you're coming from.
> >
> > IPC is short, so why not?
> IPC is also an acronym for interprocess communication. Might be confusing.
Seems like all the good names are taken...
Cheers!
Reginal
On 4/13/05, R.R. Sprinkhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think that's a very lean way to describe a compiler: it creates an .exe
> file. But I see where you're coming from.
>
> IPC is short, so why not?
IPC is also an acronym for interprocess communication. Might be confusing.
>
> Reginald
29 matches
Mail list logo
