Re: [ClusterLabs] corosync - CS_ERR_BAD_HANDLE when multiple nodes are starting up

2015-10-23 Thread Thomas Lamprecht
ping On 10/14/2015 02:10 PM, Thomas Lamprecht wrote: Hi, On 10/08/2015 10:57 AM, Jan Friesse wrote: Hi, Thomas Lamprecht napsal(a): [snip] Hello, we are using corosync version needle (2.3.5) for our cluster filesystem (pmxcfs). The situation is the following. First we start up the pmxcfs

Re: [ClusterLabs] corosync - CS_ERR_BAD_HANDLE when multiple nodes are starting up

2015-10-07 Thread Thomas Lamprecht
Hi, again thanks for the response! Thomas, Thomas Lamprecht napsal(a): Hi, thanks for the response! I added some information and clarification below. On 10/01/2015 09:23 AM, Jan Friesse wrote: Hi, Thomas Lamprecht napsal(a): Hello, we are using corosync version needle (2.3.5) for our

[ClusterLabs] corosync - CS_ERR_BAD_HANDLE when multiple nodes are starting up

2015-09-30 Thread Thomas Lamprecht
Hello, we are using corosync version needle (2.3.5) for our cluster filesystem (pmxcfs). The situation is the following. First we start up the pmxcfs, which is an fuse fs. And if there is an cluster configuration, we start also corosync. This allows the filesystem to exist on one node

Re: [ClusterLabs] [DRBD-user] DRBD fencing issue on failover causes resource failure

2016-03-19 Thread Thomas Lamprecht
On 16.03.2016 18:51, Tim Walberg wrote: > Is there a way to make this work properly without STONITH? I forgot to mention > that both nodes are virtual machines (QEMU/KVM), which makes STONITH a minor > challenge. Also, since these symptoms occur even under "pcs cluster standby", > where STONITH

[ClusterLabs] Reliability questions on the new QDevices in uneven node count Setups

2016-07-25 Thread Thomas Lamprecht
Hi all, I'm currently testing the new features of corosync 2.4, especially qdevices. First tests show quite nice results, like having quorum on a single node left out of a three node cluster. But what I'm a bit worrying about is what happens if the server where qnetd runs, or the qdevice

[ClusterLabs] corosync-quorum tool, output name key on Name column if set?

2016-09-20 Thread Thomas Lamprecht
Hi, when I'm using corosync-quorumtool [-l] and have my ring0_addr set to a IP address, which does not resolve to a hostname, I get the nodes IP addresses for the 'Name' column. As I'm using the nodelist.node.X.name key to set the name of a node it seems a bit confusing to me that not this

Re: [ClusterLabs] corosync-quorum tool, output name key on Name column if set?

2016-09-21 Thread Thomas Lamprecht
On 09/20/2016 12:36 PM, Christine Caulfield wrote: On 20/09/16 10:46, Thomas Lamprecht wrote: Hi, when I'm using corosync-quorumtool [-l] and have my ring0_addr set to a IP address, which does not resolve to a hostname, I get the nodes IP addresses for the 'Name' column. As I'm using

Re: [ClusterLabs] corosync 2.4 CPG config change callback

2018-05-07 Thread Thomas Lamprecht
Hi, Am 04/25/2018 um 09:57 AM schrieb Jan Friesse: Thomas Lamprecht napsal(a): On 4/24/18 6:38 PM, Jan Friesse wrote: On 4/6/18 10:59 AM, Jan Friesse wrote: Thomas Lamprecht napsal(a): Am 03/09/2018 um 05:26 PM schrieb Jan Friesse: I've tested it too and yes, you are 100% right. Bug

Re: [ClusterLabs] corosync 2.4 CPG config change callback

2018-03-12 Thread Thomas Lamprecht
Hi, On 3/9/18 5:26 PM, Jan Friesse wrote: > ... > >> TotemConfchgCallback: ringid (1.1436) >> active processors 3: 1 2 3 >> EXIT >> Finalize  result is 1 (should be 1) >> >> >> Hope I did both test right, but as it reproduces multiple times >> with testcpg, our cpg usage in our filesystem, this

[ClusterLabs] corosync 2.4 CPG config change callback

2018-03-07 Thread Thomas Lamprecht
Hi, first some background info for my questions I'm going to ask: We use corosync as a basis for our distributed realtime configuration file system (pmxcfs)[1]. We got some reports of a completely hanging FS with the only correlations being high load, often IO, and most times a message that

Re: [ClusterLabs] corosync 2.4 CPG config change callback

2018-03-07 Thread Thomas Lamprecht
First thanks for your answer! On 3/7/18 11:16 AM, Jan Friesse wrote: > Thomas, > > >> Hi, >> >> first some background info for my questions I'm going to ask: >> We use corosync as a basis for our distributed realtime configuration >> file system (pmxcfs)[1]. > > nice > >> >> We got some

Re: [ClusterLabs] corosync 2.4 CPG config change callback

2018-04-05 Thread Thomas Lamprecht
Hi Honza, Am 03/09/2018 um 05:26 PM schrieb Jan Friesse: Thomas, TotemConfchgCallback: ringid (1.1436) active processors 3: 1 2 3 EXIT Finalize  result is 1 (should be 1) Hope I did both test right, but as it reproduces multiple times with testcpg, our cpg usage in our filesystem, this seems

Re: [ClusterLabs] corosync 2.4 CPG config change callback

2018-04-25 Thread Thomas Lamprecht
Honza, On 4/24/18 6:38 PM, Jan Friesse wrote: >> On 4/6/18 10:59 AM, Jan Friesse wrote: >>> Thomas Lamprecht napsal(a): >>>> Am 03/09/2018 um 05:26 PM schrieb Jan Friesse: >>>>> I've tested it too and yes, you are 100% right. Bug is there and it'

Re: [ClusterLabs] corosync 2.4 CPG config change callback

2018-04-24 Thread Thomas Lamprecht
Hi Honza On 4/6/18 10:59 AM, Jan Friesse wrote: > Thomas Lamprecht napsal(a): >> Am 03/09/2018 um 05:26 PM schrieb Jan Friesse: >>> I've tested it too and yes, you are 100% right. Bug is there and it's >>> pretty easy to reproduce when node with lowest nodeid is pause

Re: [ClusterLabs] Announcing ClusterLabs Summit 2020

2019-11-11 Thread Thomas Lamprecht
On 11/5/19 3:07 AM, Ken Gaillot wrote: > Hi all, > > A reminder: We are still interested in ideas for talks, and rough > estimates of potential attendees. "Maybe" is perfectly fine at this > stage. It will let us negotiate hotel rates and firm up the location > details. Maybe we (Proxmox) could