In the message dated: Fri, 18 Oct 2019 15:34:02 -,
The pithy ruminations from WALLIS Michael on
[[gridengine users] SGE rolling over MAX_SEQNUM, peculiar things happened] were:
=> Hi folks,
=>
=> Our instance of (quite old, 2011.11p1_155) SGE rolled over 10,000,000 jobs
at the start of the
Hi Daniel,
Thank you for your feedback. I am kind of thinking of staying with the FQDN at
this point since that technique has been working well for us.
Regards,
--
Mun
From: Daniel Povey
Sent: Monday, October 28, 2019 3:24 PM
To: Mun Johl
Cc: Skylar Thompson ; users@gridengine.org
I always use the FQDN. I recall running into problems with SunRPC if
not... there may be ways to get around that, e.g. have each host announce
it's raw hostname as its FQDN, but it might not be compatible with the
hosts having normal network access.
I forget what specific mechanism SunRPC uses to
Hi Reuti,
Thank you for your quick response!
> -Original Message-
> Am 28.10.2019 um 22:18 schrieb Mun Johl:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I do have a follow-up question: When I am specifying hostnames for the
> execution hosts, admin hosts, etc.; do I need to use the FQDN? Or can I
> simply
Hi all,
I do have a follow-up question: When I am specifying hostnames for the
execution hosts, admin hosts, etc.; do I need to use the FQDN? Or can I simply
use the hostname in order for grid to operate correctly? That is, do I have to
use hostname.domain.com (as I am currently doing). Or
Am 28.10.2019 um 22:18 schrieb Mun Johl:
> Hi all,
>
> I do have a follow-up question: When I am specifying hostnames for the
> execution hosts, admin hosts, etc.; do I need to use the FQDN? Or can I
> simply use the hostname in order for grid to operate correctly? That is, do
> I have
