DVD Deltaisos available for Fedora 12 - Fedora Unity 20100202 12 (both i386 and x86_64)

2010-02-11 Thread Andre Robatino
I've made available DVD deltaisos for Fedora 12 - Fedora Unity 20100202 12 (both i386 and x86_64) at http://thepiratebay.org/user/andre14965/ i386: Fraction of full ISO size: 14.6% applydeltaiso's approximate running time: 20 minutes x86_64: Fraction of full ISO size: 15.2% applydeltaiso's

Re: tp_smapi for Thinkpads

2010-02-11 Thread Richard Hughes
On 10 February 2010 02:00, Timothy Murphy gayle...@eircom.net wrote: What exactly is the status of tp_smapi for Fedora-12? Is it available in some repository? It needs to be pushed upstream to kernel.org Richard. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change

Re: Turning off ipv6

2010-02-11 Thread Andrew Parker
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 12:45 AM, Paul Allen Newell pnew...@cs.cmu.edu wrote: Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: I prefer changing something in /etc/sysctl.conf because it's clearly where this kind of configuration change belongs. Changing ifcfg-eth0 may or may not work at the moment -- I'm guessing

Re: question about partition mounted by hal

2010-02-11 Thread Bryn M. Reeves
On Wed, 2010-02-10 at 22:57 +0100, François Patte wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Bonjour, For some reason (which I totally ignore...) hal mounts a partition on /media/_1 I have 4 disks 2 main disks are for the system and data (raid-1 and lvm) and 2 other disks

Re: Disk usage error

2010-02-11 Thread Don Quixote de la Mancha
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 5:01 AM, William John Murray bill.mur...@stfc.ac.uk wrote:   Any more ideas? I guess I could copy the filesystem contents to another disk and back, I have the space for that, but it seems a little over-the-top. And it may well come back... That would have the added

ATI Radeon vs nVidia 3D accelleration

2010-02-11 Thread Don Quixote de la Mancha
How well is radeonhd's 3D accelleration expected to work in Fedora 11? I did a yum update recently. My box at work and my box at home are both Core 2 Quad Xeons. My work box runs Ubuntu 8.10 and has an nVidia card - lspci says: nVidia Corporation Device 0658 (rev a1) lsmod shows that it's

Re: setting up the android SDK on fedora

2010-02-11 Thread Don Quixote de la Mancha
Robert, On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 4:37 AM, Robert P. J. Day rpj...@crashcourse.ca wrote:  i mentioned this before, but i plan on documenting how to get the android SDK up and running on fedora, and i've started documenting the process here:

Re: ATI Radeon vs nVidia 3D accelleration

2010-02-11 Thread Roberto Ragusa
Don Quixote de la Mancha wrote: However while the nVideo card at work can run glxgears at a frame rate of 5000 FPS, my Radeon can only do 300! Note that glxgears has always been considered a bad speed test. Better base your speed doubts on something else. -- Roberto Ragusamail at

Re: ATI Radeon vs nVidia 3D accelleration

2010-02-11 Thread Marko Vojinovic
On Thursday 11 February 2010 12:38:38 Don Quixote de la Mancha wrote: How well is radeonhd's 3D accelleration expected to work in Fedora 11? My box at work and my box at home are both Core 2 Quad Xeons. The idea of 2D and 3D acceleration is to take the load off the processor. So you should

Re: Moving LV To New Machine

2010-02-11 Thread Bryn M. Reeves
On Thu, 2010-02-11 at 11:16 +, Dave Cross wrote: I'm in the process of moving data from an old machine to a new one. Both machines are running Fedora 12. There's rather a lot of data on the old machine and I'm reaching the conclusion that rather than transfering it over the network I'll

Re: ATI Radeon vs nVidia 3D accelleration

2010-02-11 Thread Don Quixote de la Mancha
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 5:42 AM, Marko Vojinovic vvma...@gmail.com wrote: The idea of 2D and 3D acceleration is to take the load off the processor. So you should not expect the performance of accelerated graphics to depend on the CPU model. Not too much, anyway. That depends on the

Re: Zen kernel, what are advantages if any?

2010-02-11 Thread Don Quixote de la Mancha
As for TuxOnIce, you can hardly blame people for wanting software which will not only suspend but includes resume. Suspend/Hibernate are pretty broken, for many people TOI works. How true! Thanks for pointing out TuxOnIce. I have been very frustrated by the stock hibernate on my

Re: [389-users] Multiple sync aggrements between Ad and DS?

2010-02-11 Thread Rich Megginson
Theodotos Andreou wrote: Guys I' ve seen this warning on the 8.1 Administration Guide: WARNING There can only be a single sync agreement between the Directory Server environment and the Active Directory environment. Multiple sync agreements to the same Active Directory domain can create

RE: Building the kernel and kernel objects

2010-02-11 Thread Dave Higton
On 2010-02-11 09:10 I wrote: On 10-02-10 20:03:00, Tony Nelson wrote: You might also look into building out of tree kernel modules, also in those instructions. If only I could understand them. To be more specific: the instructions seem to assume that, if module foo.ko is being

Re: Moving LV To New Machine

2010-02-11 Thread Jamie Bohr
I've done this many times with HP-UX using vgexport and vgimport, have you looked at those? - Jamie On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 4:16 AM, Dave Cross dav...@gmail.com wrote: I'm in the process of moving data from an old machine to a new one. Both machines are running Fedora 12. There's rather a

Question on installing FC12-X86_64

2010-02-11 Thread Jim
*I have a ; Dell Studio Hybrid-118 Desktop Core 2 Duo 2.16GHz 3GB 320GB DVDRW DL WiFi* Product Features Intel Core2 Duo mobile processor T5850 with 2 processing cores, 667MHz system bus, 2MB L2 cache and 2.16GHz processor speed per core Am I wrong or right that this computer will take a

Re: Zen kernel, what are advantages if any?

2010-02-11 Thread Marko Vojinovic
On Thursday 11 February 2010 15:10:49 Roberto Ragusa wrote: Bryn M. Reeves wrote: On Thu, 2010-02-11 at 14:02 +0100, Roberto Ragusa wrote: Bill Davidsen wrote: As for TuxOnIce, you can hardly blame people for wanting software which will not only suspend but includes resume.

Re: Zen kernel, what are advantages if any?

2010-02-11 Thread Don Quixote de la Mancha
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 12:41 PM, Marko Vojinovic vvma...@gmail.com wrote: So what are the reasons for its absence from the mainline kernel then? If it works better than the current mechanisms and is open source, why does it take years to get it into mainline? Is there some

Re: Question on installing FC12-X86_64

2010-02-11 Thread Don Quixote de la Mancha
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 12:04 PM, Jim mickey...@sbcglobal.net wrote: Am I wrong or right that this computer will take a FC12  32 or 64bit install. Core 2 Duos are 64-bit processors, so you can install the 64-bit Fedora. However, all the x86_64 (aka AMD64) CPUs can run in 32-bit mode. So you

Re: Question on installing FC12-X86_64

2010-02-11 Thread Jim
On 02/11/2010 04:00 PM, Don Quixote de la Mancha wrote: Don Quixote Don Quixote, Thank you for your help -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines:

Iptables on Client w/OpenVPN

2010-02-11 Thread Chris
Greetings, Here's my situation: I want to deny all incoming on my PC but want to allow my OVPN client to access a remove OVPN server. My PC has just has the one nic and goes to a cable modem. Nothing real fancy. Any pointers or examples would be greatly appreciated! TIA -- Regards, Chris

Re: Iptables question

2010-02-11 Thread Clint Dilks
Craig White wrote: Perhaps this is just a thing with Linode VPS but it is Fedora 11. I would think that given my iptables rules, this shouldn't happen # ssh r...@localhost ssh: connect to host localhost port 22: Connection refused Yes, port 22 is not allowed for eth0 but it should be on

Re: Iptables question

2010-02-11 Thread Craig White
On Fri, 2010-02-12 at 13:44 +1300, Clint Dilks wrote: Craig White wrote: Perhaps this is just a thing with Linode VPS but it is Fedora 11. I would think that given my iptables rules, this shouldn't happen # ssh r...@localhost ssh: connect to host localhost port 22: Connection refused

Re: ATI Radeon vs nVidia 3D accelleration

2010-02-11 Thread Marko Vojinovic
On Friday 12 February 2010 01:04:37 Don Quixote de la Mancha wrote: This is very odd: on my F11 box at home, with the Radeon card... You can check for direct rendering like this: glxinfo | grep direct If it says yes, then all should be well. :-) Indeed it says yes, and glxinfo |

Re: ATI Radeon vs nVidia 3D accelleration

2010-02-11 Thread Don Quixote de la Mancha
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 6:04 PM, Marko Vojinovic vvma...@gmail.com wrote: AFAIK, the radeon driver doesn't support 3D acceleration for HD4*** family of cards. and that is probably the reason why tuxracer doesn't work. However, I don't know why glxinfo reports that direct rendering is active in

Left rotated display one pixel too wide

2010-02-11 Thread Tobias Ringström
I'm using a dual rotated 1280x1024 monitor setup with Fedora 12, and there a funny little issue with the display size, or rather applications idea of display size, because both the desktop background and the GNOME Panel protrude one pixel into the right display. It's not really a big problem

Re: Display settings should not be per user

2010-02-11 Thread Don Quixote de la Mancha
2010/2/11 Tobias Ringström tob...@ringis.se: Why would anyone even want user specific display settings? Are users expected to move monitors around between logging in? Per user settings might be useful as a feature, but it's a very unfriendly default, or am I missing something? It would make

Re: ATI Radeon vs nVidia 3D accelleration

2010-02-11 Thread Suvayu Ali
On Thursday 11 February 2010 10:08 PM, Don Quixote de la Mancha wrote: On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 10:01 PM, Suvayu Ali fatkasuvayu+li...@gmail.com wrote: On Thursday 11 February 2010 06:04 PM, Marko Vojinovic wrote: AFAIK, the radeon driver doesn't support 3D acceleration for HD4*** family of

Re: Display settings should not be per user

2010-02-11 Thread Ed Greshko
Tobias Ringström wrote: I'm using two 1280x1024 displays rotated 90 degrees with an Nvidia graphics card, and I was very impressed by Fedora 12, because it was the first Fedora release where I could get this setup working without using Nvidia's closed source driver, and I didn't even have

Re: Display settings should not be per user

2010-02-11 Thread Marcel Rieux
2010/2/12 Tobias Ringström tob...@ringis.se: I'm using two 1280x1024 displays rotated 90 degrees with an Nvidia graphics card, and I was very impressed by Fedora 12, because it was the first Fedora release where I could get this setup working without using Nvidia's closed source driver, and I

Re: Display settings should not be per user

2010-02-11 Thread Tim
On Thu, 2010-02-11 at 22:56 -0800, Don Quixote de la Mancha wrote: It would make sense for the cathode ray tube multisync monitors from the days of yore. Obsessive geek types could set the resolution very high to fit more source code on the screen... ... while those with poor eyesight

Re: [389-users] With LDAP server stopped, local authentication fails...

2010-02-11 Thread Edward Capriolo
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 2:11 PM, Sean Carolan scaro...@gmail.com wrote: The best you can do here is set 'bind policy soft' ldap conf. Also enable your chkconfig nscd on. If you are going to do ldap auth make sure you have an LDAP cluster/farm and a load balancer or some high availability

Re: [389-users] Multiple sync aggrements between Ad and DS?

2010-02-11 Thread Theodotos Andreou
Hi Rich, Thanks for the reply! On Thu, 2010-02-11 at 08:19 -0700, Rich Megginson wrote: Theodotos Andreou wrote: Guys I' ve seen this warning on the 8.1 Administration Guide: WARNING There can only be a single sync agreement between the Directory Server environment and the Active