Re: F27 to F28 Upgrade Fails at Offline Install Time

2018-07-12 Thread Stephen Morris
On 12/7/18 9:28 am, Sam Varshavchik wrote: Stephen Morris writes: and that installed all the package updates that caused the conflicts. Having done this I was able to complete the upgrade to F28, but now I have big problems. Under F28 my USB network device doesn't work because dkms can't

Re: F27 to F28 Upgrade Fails at Offline Install Time

2018-07-12 Thread Stephen Morris
On 13/7/18 8:30 am, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 07/12/2018 03:27 PM, Stephen Morris wrote: I've checked things out on this front and among others packages clang5.0-libs, gcc and libstdc++-devel which are all already installed have stdarg.h in their various folder structures under their include

Re: F27 to F28 Upgrade Fails at Offline Install Time

2018-07-12 Thread Sam Varshavchik
Stephen Morris writes: On 12/7/18 9:28 am, Sam Varshavchik wrote: Stephen Morris writes: and that installed all the package updates that caused the conflicts. Having done this I was able to complete the upgrade to F28, but now I have big problems. Under F28 my USB network device doesn't

Re: Quick (I hope!) dnf question. [CLOSED]

2018-07-12 Thread Samuel Sieb
On 07/12/2018 06:34 PM, home user via users wrote: There are subtle details of these dnf capabilities I'm not grasping ("dnf search" does not find xeyes, even with the "--all" option.  But it is finding a few of the Python IDEs. # dnf provides xeyes xorg-x11-apps-7.7-20.fc28.x86_64 : X.Org

Re: F27 to F28 Upgrade Fails at Offline Install Time

2018-07-12 Thread Rick Stevens
On 07/12/2018 02:57 PM, Stephen Morris wrote: > On 12/7/18 9:28 am, Sam Varshavchik wrote: >> Stephen Morris writes: >> >>> and that installed all the package updates that caused the conflicts. >>> Having done this I was able to complete the upgrade to F28, but now I >>> have big problems. >>> >>>

Re: F27 to F28 Upgrade Fails at Offline Install Time

2018-07-12 Thread Samuel Sieb
On 07/12/2018 03:27 PM, Stephen Morris wrote: I've checked things out on this front and among others packages clang5.0-libs, gcc and libstdc++-devel which are all already installed have stdarg.h in their various folder structures under their include folder, hence: 1).    What do I need to do

Re: Quick (I hope!) dnf question. [CLOSED]

2018-07-12 Thread home user via users
(sigh, I can finally get back to this) Thank-you, Samuel. There are subtle details of these dnf capabilities I'm not grasping ("dnf search" does not find xeyes, even with the "--all" option. But it is finding a few of the Python IDEs. I'm trying to learn Python so I can calculate air's

Re: F27 to F28 Upgrade Fails at Offline Install Time

2018-07-12 Thread Stephen Morris
On 12/7/18 9:24 am, Stephen Morris wrote: On 12/7/18 8:38 am, Rick Stevens wrote: On 07/11/2018 03:16 PM, Stephen Morris wrote: On 11/7/18 8:47 am, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 07/10/2018 03:17 PM, Stephen Morris wrote: 1). Can anyone shed any light on why the install may have failed and what I

Re: F27 to F28 Upgrade Fails at Offline Install Time

2018-07-12 Thread Stephen Morris
On 13/7/18 8:16 am, Rick Stevens wrote: On 07/12/2018 02:57 PM, Stephen Morris wrote: On 12/7/18 9:28 am, Sam Varshavchik wrote: Stephen Morris writes: and that installed all the package updates that caused the conflicts. Having done this I was able to complete the upgrade to F28, but now I

Re: F27 to F28 Upgrade Fails at Offline Install Time

2018-07-12 Thread Stephen Morris
On 13/7/18 8:50 am, Stephen Morris wrote: On 13/7/18 8:30 am, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 07/12/2018 03:27 PM, Stephen Morris wrote: I've checked things out on this front and among others packages clang5.0-libs, gcc and libstdc++-devel which are all already installed have stdarg.h in their various

Re: Quick (I hope!) dnf question. [CLOSED]

2018-07-12 Thread Ed Greshko
On 07/13/18 11:16, Samuel Sieb wrote: > # dnf provides xeyes > xorg-x11-apps-7.7-20.fc28.x86_64 : X.Org X11 applications > Repo    : fedora > Matched from: > Provide    : xeyes = 1.1.1 > > You want to know why "search" won't find it?  This is why: > > # dnf info xorg-x11-apps > Available

Re: /etc/motd shows up twice now?

2018-07-12 Thread Tom Horsley
On Thu, 12 Jul 2018 09:45:09 +0800 Ed Greshko wrote: > Edit your /etc/ssh/sshd_config and change the PrintMotd from the default > "yes" to > "no" and/or read the notes in sshd_config.rpmnew which probably now exists > on your system. Yep, that did it. Thanks.

[389-users] Re: keepalived with 389-ds

2018-07-12 Thread Brian Lehnhardt
Thanks. To make sure I'm understanding, you're saying it's not a good idea to use a VIP between the two masters? Is this type of setup not compatible? ___ 389-users mailing list -- 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

[389-users] Re: keepalived with 389-ds

2018-07-12 Thread William Brown
On Thu, 2018-07-12 at 18:05 +, Brian Lehnhardt wrote: > Thanks. To make sure I'm understanding, you're saying it's not a > good idea to use a VIP between the two masters? Is this type of > setup not compatible? It's not that it's not compatible, as much as LDAP isn't really meant to work

[389-users] Failed modrdn operation

2018-07-12 Thread Sergei Gerasenko
Hello, Somebody in my group was using an ipa command to rename a user’s login and the operation apparently failed. The audit log shows the operation was: dn: uid=userX,cn=users,cn=accounts,dc=ourdomain,dc=com changetype: modrdn newrdn: uid=userY deleteoldrdn: 1 … and the result was 1, which I