My plan was to wait until 1.38 is released and then re-install Geany
with GTK3. It would be a big distraction for me as I have a good
working Geany at the moment and am busy with projects.
For the record I have double checked my paths and they are the debian
defaults:
I wasn't convinced that it was a slip. ;)
John Y.
On Sun, Nov 15, 2020 at 3:10 PM David Topham wrote:
> I like the freudian slip! autofools. 邏
>
> On Sun, Nov 15, 2020 at 2:11 AM Colomban Wendling <
> lists@herbesfolles.org> wrote:
>
>> Le 14/11/2020 à 23:16, Lex Trotman a écrit :
>> > On
Le 15/11/2020 à 11:28, Lex Trotman a écrit :
> On Sun, 15 Nov 2020 at 20:11, Colomban Wendling
>> This is our Ubuntu hack `fix-ubuntu-libdir` that you can find in
>> src/Makefile.am.
>
> Ok, so why not do exactly as autotools does, adding /sbin to path?
Sounds like a good idea if libtool is
I like the freudian slip! autofools. 邏
On Sun, Nov 15, 2020 at 2:11 AM Colomban Wendling <
lists@herbesfolles.org> wrote:
> Le 14/11/2020 à 23:16, Lex Trotman a écrit :
> > On Sun, 15 Nov 2020 at 00:21, Colomban Wendling
> > […]
> >> All this said, for the problem at hand if it's indeed
On Sun, 15 Nov 2020 at 20:11, Colomban Wendling
wrote:
>
> Le 14/11/2020 à 23:16, Lex Trotman a écrit :
> > On Sun, 15 Nov 2020 at 00:21, Colomban Wendling
> > […]
> >> All this said, for the problem at hand if it's indeed problematic with
> >> stock Ubuntu setups, maybe we could go the sad way
Le 14/11/2020 à 23:16, Lex Trotman a écrit :
> On Sun, 15 Nov 2020 at 00:21, Colomban Wendling
> […]
>> All this said, for the problem at hand if it's indeed problematic with
>> stock Ubuntu setups, maybe we could go the sad way and hardcode
>> ldconfig's path;
>
> Can we? AFAICT all ldconfig
On Sun, 15 Nov 2020 at 00:21, Colomban Wendling
wrote:
>
> Le 11/11/2020 à 22:21, Geoff Kaniuk a écrit :
> > The best I can do is to report that several Debian users have come
> > across this kind of problem. For example, someone asked: "Why is it so
> > bad to have /usr/sbin in PATH?" The
Le 11/11/2020 à 22:21, Geoff Kaniuk a écrit :
> The best I can do is to report that several Debian users have come
> across this kind of problem. For example, someone asked: "Why is it so
> bad to have /usr/sbin in PATH?" The answer given in the forums was
> "Because sbin contains programs and
The best I can do is to report that several Debian users have come
across this kind of problem. For example, someone asked: "Why is it so
bad to have /usr/sbin in PATH?" The answer given in the forums was
"Because sbin contains programs and scripts only executable by root".
Debian used to
On Wed, 11 Nov 2020 at 21:31, Geoff Kaniuk wrote:
>
> I do not think I have modified $PATH from system settings:
>
> ~$ echo $PATH
> /usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/local/games:/usr/games
>
I do not think I have modified $PATH from system settings:
~$ echo $PATH
/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/local/games:/usr/games
Geoff
33 Ashbury Close, Cambridge CB1 3RW 01223
Whats your PATH?
On Wed, 11 Nov 2020 at 09:07, Geoff Kaniuk wrote:
>
> As far as I know, nothing special. But in Debian Buster:
> -
> ~$ whereis ldconfig
> ldconfig: /sbin/ldconfig /usr/share/man/man8/ldconfig.8.gz
>
As far as I know, nothing special. But in Debian Buster:
-
~$ whereis ldconfig
ldconfig: /sbin/ldconfig /usr/share/man/man8/ldconfig.8.gz
-
The error message I got was:
On 09.11.20 14:17, Geoff Kaniuk wrote:
> 6. ~$ sudo make install
> On Debian that failed because of path problems locating ldconfig.
This is unexpected for me. Running Debian for >10 years now and never
seen that need before. Do you have any special sh-configuration?
.f
Please do not reply directly, keep the discussion on the list.
Also please use plain text emails.
Cheers
Lex
On Tue, 10 Nov 2020 at 01:42, Mike McCauley wrote:
>
>
>
> On 11/8/20 10:21 PM, Lex Trotman wrote:
>
> Hi Mike,
>
> On Mon, 9 Nov 2020 at 10:45, Mike McCauley wrote:
>
> Under Ubuntu
I have successfully installed 1.36 on Debian Buster, and similar
procedures might be relevant for Ubuntu. In Buster, 1.33 is in the
repos, but I was alarmed to find that debugger-plugin had been dropped.
After a few false starts, I ended up with the following to build
1.36(GTK-2):
1. Save
On Mon, 9 Nov 2020 at 14:54, Woodrow Stool wrote:
>
> Thanks for the clarification Lex. Actually this ends up being my bad - I
> recalled there was a .deb file on the Geany site, but checking now I see it
> is source for Linux and installers for MacOS and Windows. There was a PPA
> somewhere
Thanks for the clarification Lex. Actually this ends up being my bad - I
recalled there was a .deb file on the Geany site, but checking now I see it
is source for Linux and installers for MacOS and Windows. There was a PPA
somewhere that had .deb versions of the latest releases, I'll have to
On Mon, 9 Nov 2020 at 14:09, Woodrow Stool wrote:
>
> I think what the OP was asking was something like this:
>
> - Ubuntu 20.04
>
> - Geany 1.36 from the Ubuntu distro, installed with apt install geany
>
> - Now 1.37.1 is available. It will be a long time before this hits the
> Ubuntu repo.
I think what the OP was asking was something like this:
- Ubuntu 20.04
- Geany 1.36 from the Ubuntu distro, installed with apt install geany
- Now 1.37.1 is available. It will be a long time before this hits the
Ubuntu repo. What is the best way to install it now, keeping my settings?
I'd be
Hi Mike,
On Mon, 9 Nov 2020 at 10:45, Mike McCauley wrote:
>
>
> Under Ubuntu Linux, what is the recommended technique to upgrade Geany
> as newer versions are released?
>
> All I've been able to find online is info on how to do an initial
> install, and some upgrade suggestions that didn't
21 matches
Mail list logo
