Re: Cobertura plugin doesn't generate XML
I can think of two things, that could go wrong: 1. Did you configure this under the reporting section or under the build section of your pom file? It should be under the build section afaik. 2. Otherwise, what version of the cobertura plugin are you using? Hth, Nick Stolwijk ~Java Developer~ Iprofs BV. Claus Sluterweg 125 2012 WS Haarlem www.iprofs.nl On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 12:04 PM, Lewis, Eric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi I'm trying to generate an XML report using the Cobertura plugin (2.2 apparently). I configured the plugin according to the documentation: plugin groupIdorg.apache.maven.plugins/groupId artifactIdcobertura-maven-plugin/artifactId configuration formats formatxml/format /formats /configuration /plugin Then I start Maven (mvn clean install cobertura:cobertura), but the plugin generates the HTML reports under .../target/site/cobertura/ (which I tell it not to do), but doesn't create any XML files. What am I doing wrong? Best regards, Eric - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cobertura plugin doesn't generate XML
Hello, may you can try the configuration in your reporting section of the POM. - jens Hi I'm trying to generate an XML report using the Cobertura plugin (2.2 apparently). I configured the plugin according to the documentation: plugin groupIdorg.apache.maven.plugins/groupId artifactIdcobertura-maven-plugin/artifactId configuration formats formatxml/format /formats /configuration /plugin Then I start Maven (mvn clean install cobertura:cobertura), but the plugin generates the HTML reports under .../target/site/cobertura/ (which I tell it not to do), but doesn't create any XML files. What am I doing wrong? Best regards, Eric - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cobertura plugin
Danger! Will Robinson! Danger! How will you know that instrumenting your tests is not causing them to pass? Seriously, we had hand tweaked the pom to run the tests only once when they were instrumented, and as the instrumentation was forcing synchronisation (in order to track code path execution) it was eliminating a major concurrency bug that our unit tests were trying to prove was not there... IMHO, you _want_ to run the tests twice. -Stephen On Jan 10, 2008 12:26 PM, globulon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Houdy, I am newby to Maven 2. I have Introduced the Cobertura plugin in the reporting section of the pom.xml file of my main project as follows: reporting ... plugins !-- - JUNIT test report activation -- plugin groupIdorg.apache.maven.plugins/groupId artifactIdmaven-surefire-report-plugin/artifactId /plugin !-- - Cobertura Code coverage module -- plugin groupIdorg.codehaus.mojo/groupId artifactIdcobertura-maven-plugin/artifactId configuration formats formathtml/format /formats instrumentation/ check !-- should not stop in case of Cobertura reporting error -- haltOnFailurefalse/haltOnFailure /check /configuration /plugin /plugins ... /reporting It works fine. As I am also using the surefire reporting, it seems the test phase is run twice, one by surefire and once by cobertura. Is there any way to instrument code before surefire execution for the two plugin to share the same test sequence ? Thanx for your response ? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Cobertura-plugin-tp14731193s177p14731193.html Sent from the Maven - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cobertura plugin using version 1.7
HI,
when i am mvn test for mvn site, getting Error. Here I have enclosed my
configuration and error.
plugin
groupIdorg.codehaus.mojo/groupId
artifactIdcobertura-maven-plugin/artifactId
configuration
instrumentedDirectorytarget/cobertura/instrumented-classes/instrumentedDirectory
outputDirectorytarget/cobertura/report/outputDirectory
/configuration
executions
execution
idinstrument/id
phasetest-compile/phase
goals
goalinstrument/goal
/goals
/execution
execution
goals
goalclean/goal
/goals
/execution
/executions
/plugin
reporting
-
plugins
plugin
groupIdorg.codehaus.mojo/groupId
artifactIdsurefire-report-maven-plugin/artifactId
/plugin
/plugins
/reporting
Error
Compiling 24 source files to E:\latest-i401k\cs-cache\classes
[INFO] [resources:testResources]
[INFO] Using default encoding to copy filtered resources.
[INFO] [compiler:testCompile]
[INFO] No sources to compile
[INFO] [cobertura:instrument {execution: instrument}]
[INFO]
[ERROR] BUILD ERROR
[INFO]
[INFO] Unable to prepare instrumentation directory.
Embedded error: Failed to copy full contents from
E:\latest-i401k\cs-cache\classes\generated-classes\cobertura\generated-classes\cobertura\generated-classes\cobertura\generated-classes\cobertura\generated-classes\cobertura\citistreet\id\util\cache\CreateCacheObjectEvent$CreateType.class
to
E:\latest-i401k\cs-cache\classes\generated-classes\cobertura\generated-classes\cobertura\generated-classes\cobertura\generated-classes\cobertura\generated-classes\cobertura\generated-classes\cobertura\citistreet\id\util\cache\CreateCacheObjectEvent$CreateType.class
[INFO]
[INFO] For more information, run Maven with the -e switch
[INFO]
[INFO] Total time: 7 seconds
[INFO] Finished at: Tue Jul 04 19:28:19 GMT+05:30 2006
[INFO] Final Memory: 5M/12M
[INFO]
I dont why its creates multiple folders in classes directory.
Please help me on this issue.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Cobertura-plugin-using-version-1.7-tf1889535.html#a5178718
Sent from the Maven - Users forum at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cobertura plugin using version 1.7
hello, I don't get the instrument goal but please find below a simple example working here ... it's all help i can give. cordialement build plugins plugin groupIdorg.codehaus.mojo/groupId artifactIdcobertura-maven-plugin/artifactId executions execution goals goalclean/goal /goals /execution /executions /plugin /plugins /build reporting plugins plugin groupIdorg.codehaus.mojo/groupId artifactIdcobertura-maven-plugin/artifactId /plugin -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Cobertura-plugin-using-version-1.7-tf1889535.html#a5182548 Sent from the Maven - Users forum at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cobertura plugin using version 1.7
Hi, Following is the simple example which is working at my end. Try it... build plugins plugin groupIdorg.codehaus.mojo/groupId artifactIdcobertura-maven-plugin/artifactId configuration check branchrate=80 linerate=70 haltonerror=true totalbranchrate=80 totallinerate=70 /check /configuration executions execution goals goalinstrument/goal goalclean/goal goalcheck/goal /goals /execution /executions /plugin /plugins /build reporting plugins plugin groupIdorg.codehaus.mojo/groupId artifactIdcobertura-maven-plugin/artifactId /plugin /plugins /reporting On 7/5/06, leahpar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hello, I don't get the instrument goal but please find below a simple example working here ... it's all help i can give. cordialement build plugins plugin groupIdorg.codehaus.mojo /groupId artifactIdcobertura-maven-plugin/artifactId executions execution goals goalclean/goal /goals /execution /executions /plugin /plugins /build reporting plugins plugin groupIdorg.codehaus.mojo /groupId artifactIdcobertura-maven-plugin/artifactId /plugin -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Cobertura-plugin-using-version-1.7-tf1889535.html#a5182548 Sent from the Maven - Users forum at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: cobertura plugin
this problem was fixed in SVN (asm is no longer propogated to tests themselves) On 2/20/06, javed mandary [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi David, I solved the problem with the Cobertura plugin running hibernate junit tests by adding the following dependency in my POM: dependency groupIdasm/groupId artifactIdasm/artifactId version1.5.3/version /dependency It seems that Cobertura is looking for asm-2.1 in its POM while hibernate requires asm-1.5.3. By setting the dependency asm-1.5.3 , this is placed in classpath and everything works fine , cobertura site report is generated successfully. regards, Javed On 2/17/06, David Sag [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Maven 2 is what I am on about. see the jira issue, but i am getting the same problem as you describe. perhaps you'd like to vote on that issue and add your comments there. Kind regards, Dave Sag javed mandary [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 17-02-2006 14:14:17: ok , what about the cobertura plugin for maven 2 ? In maven site I am getting a problem after cobertura runs the junit tests and try to create a report it crashes and fails the build. Has anyone got similar problems and any solutions to that? this is what i am using: plugin groupIdorg.codehaus.mojo/groupId artifactIdcobertura-maven-plugin/artifactId version2.0-SNAPSHOT/version executions execution goals goalclean/goal /goals /execution /executions /plugin regards, Javed On 2/17/06, David Sag [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Brett I have files jira issue http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MOJO-299 and included an example project that displays the bug. if you could put your repo manager code somewhere in a zip file I can try it out here and see if I get the same problems. Kind regards, Dave Sag Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 17-02-2006 13:33:08: Hi David, There might be a release coming up, but we haven't worked on your issue and there are still some other issues outstanding that should be fixed first. If you could confirm that cobertura fails for you on the repository manager app (if SVN is a problem I can upload it somewhere), that would isolate it to you environment over your particular project. Thanks, Brett On 2/17/06, David Sag [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sorry brett the last i heard from you was that you were working on the problem and there would be a release late this week. So I have been working on other things and waiting paitiently. But if you are now telling me I need to file a jira issue then that's what i'll do. I'll have to put together a minimal project and reproduce the problem in some code that is not the EPOs tho. This probably won't happen today. Kind regards, Dave Sag Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 17-02-2006 13:20:42: On 2/17/06, David Sag [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sorry are you talking about maven 1 or 2 plugin? They are talking about Maven 1.0 I was told that 2.0-SNAPSHOT is the one to use for maven 2 but since updating to maven 2.0.2 the reporting part of cobertura hasn't worked. I can't reproduce it. If it never gets filed in JIRA, it'll never get fixed... can you please do that at http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MOJO? Did you try the repository manager example I showed you last time that is working for me? - Brett - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: cobertura plugin
I guess we are having different problems. In a reply to my Jira issue Carlos Sanchez points out that my problem lies in the fact that cobertura is trying to instrument the classes twice. I am not sure why this is happening, nor am i sure why this is even a problem, but clearly you are not getting this problem. could you show me your pom.xml so i can look for any obvious differences between what you are doing and what I am doing. Kind regards, Dave Sag Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 20-02-2006 09:05:19: this problem was fixed in SVN (asm is no longer propogated to tests themselves) On 2/20/06, javed mandary [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi David, I solved the problem with the Cobertura plugin running hibernate junit tests by adding the following dependency in my POM: dependency groupIdasm/groupId artifactIdasm/artifactId version1.5.3/version /dependency It seems that Cobertura is looking for asm-2.1 in its POM while hibernate requires asm-1.5.3. By setting the dependency asm-1.5.3 , this is placed in classpath and everything works fine , cobertura site report is generated successfully. regards, Javed On 2/17/06, David Sag [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Maven 2 is what I am on about. see the jira issue, but i am getting the same problem as you describe. perhaps you'd like to vote on that issue and add your comments there. Kind regards, Dave Sag javed mandary [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 17-02-2006 14:14:17: ok , what about the cobertura plugin for maven 2 ? In maven site I am getting a problem after cobertura runs the junit tests and tryto create a report it crashes and fails the build. Has anyone got similar problems and any solutions to that? this is what i am using: plugin groupIdorg.codehaus.mojo/groupId artifactIdcobertura-maven-plugin/artifactId version2.0-SNAPSHOT/version executions execution goals goalclean/goal /goals /execution /executions /plugin regards, Javed On 2/17/06, David Sag [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Brett I have files jira issue http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MOJO-299 and included an example project that displays the bug. if you could put your repo manager code somewhere in a zip file I can try it out here and see if I get the same problems. Kind regards, Dave Sag Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 17-02-2006 13:33:08: Hi David, There might be a release coming up, but we haven't worked on your issue and there are still some other issues outstanding that should be fixed first. If you could confirm that cobertura fails for you on the repository manager app (if SVN is a problem I can upload it somewhere), that would isolate it to you environment over your particular project. Thanks, Brett On 2/17/06, David Sag [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sorry brett the last i heard from you was that you were working on the problem and there would be a release late this week. So I have been working on other things and waiting paitiently. But if you are now telling me I need to file a jira issue then that's what i'll do. I'll have to put together a minimal project and reproduce the problem in some code that is not the EPOs tho. This probably won't happen today. Kind regards, Dave Sag Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 17-02-2006 13:20:42: On 2/17/06, David Sag [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sorry are you talking about maven 1 or 2 plugin? They are talking about Maven 1.0 I was told that 2.0-SNAPSHOT is the one to use for maven 2 but since updating to maven 2.0.2 the reporting part of cobertura hasn't worked. I can't reproduce it. If it never gets filed in JIRA, it'll never get fixed... can you please do that at http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MOJO? Did you try the repository manager example I showed you last time that is working for me? - Brett - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: cobertura plugin
Am running maven site with cobertura report generation: ?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8? project [.] build resources resource directorysrc/main/resources/directory includes include*.xls/include include**/*.xml/include include*.properties/include /includes /resource /resources plugins plugin groupIdorg.codehaus.mojo/groupId artifactIdsurefire-report-maven-plugin/artifactId version2.0-beta-1/version configuration testFailureIgnoretrue/testFailureIgnore /configuration /plugin plugin groupIdorg.codehaus.mojo/groupId artifactIdcobertura-maven-plugin/artifactId version2.0-SNAPSHOT/version /plugin /plugins /build reporting plugins plugin groupIdorg.codehaus.mojo/groupId artifactIdsurefire-report-maven-plugin/artifactId version2.0-beta-1/version /plugin plugin groupIdorg.codehaus.mojo/groupId artifactIdcobertura-maven-plugin/artifactId version2.0-SNAPSHOT/version /plugin /plugins /reporting dependencies dependency groupIdasm/groupId artifactIdasm/artifactId version1.5.3/version /dependency dependency groupIdorg.springframework/groupId artifactIdspring-mock/artifactId version1.2.6/version scopetest/scope exclusions exclusion artifactIdjta/artifactId groupIdjavax.transaction/groupId /exclusion exclusion artifactIdjdbc-stdext/artifactId groupIdjavax.sql/groupId /exclusion exclusion artifactIdjsf-api/artifactId groupIdjavax.faces/groupId /exclusion /exclusions /dependency dependency groupIdorg.springframework/groupId artifactIdspring-remoting/artifactId version1.2.6/version /dependency dependency groupIdorg.springframework/groupId artifactIdspring-core/artifactId version1.2.6/version /dependency dependency groupIdaxis/groupId artifactIdaxis/artifactId version1.2.1/version exclusions exclusion artifactIdactivation/artifactId groupIdjavax.activation/groupId /exclusion exclusion artifactIdmail/artifactId groupIdjavax.mail/groupId /exclusion /exclusions /dependency dependency groupIdaxis/groupId artifactIdaxis-jaxrpc/artifactId version1.2.1/version /dependency dependency groupIdaxis/groupId artifactIdaxis-saaj/artifactId version1.2.1/version /dependency /dependencies /project On 2/20/06, David Sag [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I guess we are having different problems. In a reply to my Jira issue Carlos Sanchez points out that my problem lies in the fact that cobertura is trying to instrument the classes twice. I am not sure why this is happening, nor am i sure why this is even a problem, but clearly you are not getting this problem. could you show me your pom.xml so i can look for any obvious differences between what you are doing and what I am doing. Kind regards, Dave Sag Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 20-02-2006 09:05:19: this problem was fixed in SVN (asm is no longer propogated to tests themselves) On 2/20/06, javed mandary [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi David, I solved the problem with the Cobertura plugin running hibernate junit tests by adding the following dependency in my POM: dependency groupIdasm/groupId artifactIdasm/artifactId version1.5.3/version /dependency It seems that Cobertura is looking for asm-2.1 in its POM while hibernate requires asm-1.5.3. By setting the dependency asm-1.5.3 , this is placed in classpath and everything works fine , cobertura site report is generated successfully. regards, Javed On 2/17/06, David Sag [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Maven 2 is what I am on about. see the jira issue, but i am getting the
Re: cobertura plugin
Interesting
the main difference between the way
you do it and the way I am doing is that I specify the goal and execution
phase in my build declarations thusly:
plugin
groupIdorg.codehaus.mojo/groupId
artifactIdcobertura-maven-plugin/artifactId
version2.0-SNAPSHOT/version
executions
execution
idinstrument-classes/id
phaseprocess-classes/phase
goals
goalinstrument/goal
/goals
/execution
/executions
/plugin
could this be causing my problem? i
doubt it.
Also I explicitly tell surefire where
the instrumented classes are:
!-- run
the unit tests on the cobertura instrumented classes --
plugin
artifactIdmaven-surefire-plugin/artifactId
version2.0/version
configuration
classesDirectory${project.build.directory}/classes-instrumented/classesDirectory
/configuration
/plugin
otherwise we are doing pretty much
the same thing.
I can't see in your pom.xml how your
tests know to run the instrumented classes, nor is it obvious in what phase
you are instrumenting your classes. what sort of coverage reports
are you getting?
Kind regards,
Dave Sag
javed mandary [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote on 20-02-2006 13:57:41:
Am running maven site with cobertura report generation:
?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8?
project
[.]
build
resources
resource
directorysrc/main/resources/directory
includes
include*.xls/include
include**/*.xml/include
include*.properties/include
/includes
/resource
/resources
plugins
plugin
groupIdorg.codehaus.mojo/groupId
artifactIdsurefire-report-maven-plugin/artifactId
version2.0-beta-1/version
configuration
testFailureIgnoretrue/testFailureIgnore
/configuration
/plugin
plugin
groupIdorg.codehaus.mojo/groupId
artifactIdcobertura-maven-plugin/artifactId
version2.0-SNAPSHOT/version
/plugin
/plugins
/build
reporting
plugins
plugin
groupIdorg.codehaus.mojo/groupId
artifactIdsurefire-report-maven-plugin/artifactId
version2.0-beta-1/version
/plugin
plugin
groupIdorg.codehaus.mojo/groupId
artifactIdcobertura-maven-plugin/artifactId
version2.0-SNAPSHOT/version
/plugin
/plugins
/reporting
dependencies
dependency
groupIdasm/groupId
artifactIdasm/artifactId
version1.5.3/version
/dependency
dependency
groupIdorg.springframework/groupId
artifactIdspring-mock/artifactId
version1.2.6/version
scopetest/scope
exclusions
exclusion
artifactIdjta/artifactId
groupIdjavax.transaction/groupId
/exclusion
exclusion
artifactIdjdbc-stdext/artifactId
groupIdjavax.sql/groupId
/exclusion
exclusion
artifactIdjsf-api/artifactId
groupIdjavax.faces/groupId
/exclusion
/exclusions
/dependency
dependency
groupIdorg.springframework/groupId
artifactIdspring-remoting/artifactId
version1.2.6/version
/dependency
dependency
groupIdorg.springframework/groupId
artifactIdspring-core/artifactId
version1.2.6/version
/dependency
dependency
groupIdaxis/groupId
artifactIdaxis/artifactId
version1.2.1/version
exclusions
exclusion
artifactIdactivation/artifactId
groupIdjavax.activation/groupId
/exclusion
exclusion
artifactIdmail/artifactId
groupIdjavax.mail/groupId
/exclusion
/exclusions
/dependency
dependency
groupIdaxis/groupId
artifactIdaxis-jaxrpc/artifactId
version1.2.1/version
/dependency
dependency
groupIdaxis/groupId
artifactIdaxis-saaj/artifactId
version1.2.1/version
/dependency
/dependencies
/project
On 2/20/06, David Sag [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I guess we are having different problems. In a reply to
my Jira issue
Carlos Sanchez points out that my problem lies in the fact that
cobertura is
trying to instrument the classes twice. I am not sure why
this is
happening, nor am i sure why this is even a problem, but clearly
you are not
getting this problem.
could you show me your pom.xml so i can look for any obvious
differences
between what you are doing and what I am doing.
Kind regards,
Dave Sag
Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
on 20-02-2006 09:05:19:
this problem was fixed in SVN (asm is no longer propogated
to tests
themselves)
On 2/20/06, javed mandary [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi David,
I solved
the problem with the Cobertura plugin running
hibernate
RE: cobertura plugin
David, you are way overcomplicating the cobertura setup. Remove your
executions and the surefire config. There's no need - all this is
handled internally when the plugin executes with 'cobertura:cobertura'.
_
From: David Sag [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 20, 2006 7:20 AM
To: Maven Users List
Subject: Re: cobertura plugin
Interesting
the main difference between the way you do it and the way I am doing is
that I specify the goal and execution phase in my build declarations
thusly:
plugin
groupIdorg.codehaus.mojo/groupId
artifactIdcobertura-maven-plugin/artifactId
version2.0-SNAPSHOT/version
executions
execution
idinstrument-classes/id
phaseprocess-classes/phase
goals
goalinstrument/goal
/goals
/execution
/executions
/plugin
could this be causing my problem? i doubt it.
Also I explicitly tell surefire where the instrumented classes are:
!-- run the unit tests on the cobertura instrumented classes --
plugin
artifactIdmaven-surefire-plugin/artifactId
version2.0/version
configuration
classesDirectory${project.build.directory}/classes-instrumented/class
esDirectory
/configuration
/plugin
otherwise we are doing pretty much the same thing.
I can't see in your pom.xml how your tests know to run the instrumented
classes, nor is it obvious in what phase you are instrumenting your
classes. what sort of coverage reports are you getting?
Kind regards,
Dave Sag
javed mandary [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 20-02-2006 13:57:41:
Am running maven site with cobertura report generation:
?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8?
project
[.]
build
resources
resource
directorysrc/main/resources/directory
includes
include*.xls/include
include**/*.xml/include
include*.properties/include
/includes
/resource
/resources
plugins
plugin
groupIdorg.codehaus.mojo/groupId
artifactIdsurefire-report-maven-plugin/artifactId
version2.0-beta-1/version
configuration
testFailureIgnoretrue/testFailureIgnore
/configuration
/plugin
plugin
groupIdorg.codehaus.mojo/groupId
artifactIdcobertura-maven-plugin/artifactId
version2.0-SNAPSHOT/version
/plugin
/plugins
/build
reporting
plugins
plugin
groupIdorg.codehaus.mojo/groupId
artifactIdsurefire-report-maven-plugin/artifactId
version2.0-beta-1/version
/plugin
plugin
groupIdorg.codehaus.mojo/groupId
artifactIdcobertura-maven-plugin/artifactId
version2.0-SNAPSHOT/version
/plugin
/plugins
/reporting
dependencies
dependency
groupIdasm/groupId
artifactIdasm/artifactId
version1.5.3/version
/dependency
dependency
groupIdorg.springframework/groupId
artifactIdspring-mock/artifactId
version1.2.6/version
scopetest/scope
exclusions
exclusion
artifactIdjta/artifactId
groupIdjavax.transaction/groupId
/exclusion
exclusion
artifactIdjdbc-stdext/artifactId
groupIdjavax.sql/groupId
/exclusion
exclusion
artifactIdjsf-api/artifactId
groupIdjavax.faces/groupId
/exclusion
/exclusions
/dependency
dependency
groupIdorg.springframework/groupId
artifactIdspring-remoting/artifactId
version1.2.6/version
/dependency
dependency
groupIdorg.springframework/groupId
artifactIdspring-core/artifactId
version1.2.6/version
/dependency
dependency
groupIdaxis/groupId
artifactIdaxis/artifactId
version1.2.1/version
exclusions
exclusion
artifactIdactivation/artifactId
groupIdjavax.activation/groupId
/exclusion
exclusion
artifactIdmail/artifactId
groupIdjavax.mail/groupId
/exclusion
/exclusions
/dependency
dependency
groupIdaxis/groupId
RE: cobertura plugin
You are so right. Removing the extra
configuration solved all of my cobertura problems.
Kind regards,
Dave Sag
Mike Perham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote on 20-02-2006 15:44:17:
David, you are way overcomplicating the cobertura setup. Remove
your
executions and the surefire config. There's no need - all this
is
handled internally when the plugin executes with 'cobertura:cobertura'.
_
From: David Sag [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 20, 2006 7:20 AM
To: Maven Users List
Subject: Re: cobertura plugin
Interesting
the main difference between the way you do it and the way I am doing
is
that I specify the goal and execution phase in my build declarations
thusly:
plugin
groupIdorg.codehaus.mojo/groupId
artifactIdcobertura-maven-plugin/artifactId
version2.0-SNAPSHOT/version
executions
execution
idinstrument-classes/id
phaseprocess-classes/phase
goals
goalinstrument/goal
/goals
/execution
/executions
/plugin
could this be causing my problem? i doubt it.
Also I explicitly tell surefire where the instrumented classes are:
!-- run the unit tests on the cobertura instrumented
classes --
plugin
artifactIdmaven-surefire-plugin/artifactId
version2.0/version
configuration
classesDirectory${project.build.directory}/classes-instrumented/class
esDirectory
/configuration
/plugin
otherwise we are doing pretty much the same thing.
I can't see in your pom.xml how your tests know to run the instrumented
classes, nor is it obvious in what phase you are instrumenting your
classes. what sort of coverage reports are you getting?
Kind regards,
Dave Sag
javed mandary [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 20-02-2006
13:57:41:
Am running maven site with cobertura report generation:
?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8?
project
[.]
build
resources
resource
directorysrc/main/resources/directory
includes
include*.xls/include
include**/*.xml/include
include*.properties/include
/includes
/resource
/resources
plugins
plugin
groupIdorg.codehaus.mojo/groupId
artifactIdsurefire-report-maven-plugin/artifactId
version2.0-beta-1/version
configuration
testFailureIgnoretrue/testFailureIgnore
/configuration
/plugin
plugin
groupIdorg.codehaus.mojo/groupId
artifactIdcobertura-maven-plugin/artifactId
version2.0-SNAPSHOT/version
/plugin
/plugins
/build
reporting
plugins
plugin
groupIdorg.codehaus.mojo/groupId
artifactIdsurefire-report-maven-plugin/artifactId
version2.0-beta-1/version
/plugin
plugin
groupIdorg.codehaus.mojo/groupId
artifactIdcobertura-maven-plugin/artifactId
version2.0-SNAPSHOT/version
/plugin
/plugins
/reporting
dependencies
dependency
groupIdasm/groupId
artifactIdasm/artifactId
version1.5.3/version
/dependency
dependency
groupIdorg.springframework/groupId
artifactIdspring-mock/artifactId
version1.2.6/version
scopetest/scope
exclusions
exclusion
artifactIdjta/artifactId
groupIdjavax.transaction/groupId
/exclusion
exclusion
artifactIdjdbc-stdext/artifactId
groupIdjavax.sql/groupId
/exclusion
exclusion
artifactIdjsf-api/artifactId
groupIdjavax.faces/groupId
/exclusion
/exclusions
/dependency
dependency
groupIdorg.springframework/groupId
artifactIdspring-remoting/artifactId
version1.2.6/version
/dependency
dependency
groupIdorg.springframework/groupId
artifactIdspring-core/artifactId
version1.2.6/version
/dependency
dependency
groupIdaxis/groupId
artifactIdaxis/artifactId
version1.2.1/version
exclusions
exclusion
artifactIdactivation/artifactId
groupIdjavax.activation/groupId
/exclusion
exclusion
artifactIdmail/artifactId
groupIdjavax.mail/groupId
/exclusion
/exclusions
/dependency
dependency
groupIdaxis/groupId
artifactIdaxis-jaxrpc/artifactId
version1.2.1/version
/dependency
dependency
groupIdaxis/groupId
artifactIdaxis-saaj/artifactId
version1.2.1/version
/dependency
/dependencies
/project
On 2/20/06, David Sag [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I guess we are having different problems. In a reply
to my Jira
issue
Carlos
Re: cobertura plugin
Hi David, I solved the problem with the Cobertura plugin running hibernate junit tests by adding the following dependency in my POM: dependency groupIdasm/groupId artifactIdasm/artifactId version1.5.3/version /dependency It seems that Cobertura is looking for asm-2.1 in its POM while hibernate requires asm-1.5.3. By setting the dependency asm-1.5.3 , this is placed in classpath and everything works fine , cobertura site report is generated successfully. regards, Javed On 2/17/06, David Sag [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Maven 2 is what I am on about. see the jira issue, but i am getting the same problem as you describe. perhaps you'd like to vote on that issue and add your comments there. Kind regards, Dave Sag javed mandary [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 17-02-2006 14:14:17: ok , what about the cobertura plugin for maven 2 ? In maven site I am getting a problem after cobertura runs the junit tests and try to create a report it crashes and fails the build. Has anyone got similar problems and any solutions to that? this is what i am using: plugin groupIdorg.codehaus.mojo/groupId artifactIdcobertura-maven-plugin/artifactId version2.0-SNAPSHOT/version executions execution goals goalclean/goal /goals /execution /executions /plugin regards, Javed On 2/17/06, David Sag [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Brett I have files jira issue http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MOJO-299 and included an example project that displays the bug. if you could put your repo manager code somewhere in a zip file I can try it out here and see if I get the same problems. Kind regards, Dave Sag Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 17-02-2006 13:33:08: Hi David, There might be a release coming up, but we haven't worked on your issue and there are still some other issues outstanding that should be fixed first. If you could confirm that cobertura fails for you on the repository manager app (if SVN is a problem I can upload it somewhere), that would isolate it to you environment over your particular project. Thanks, Brett On 2/17/06, David Sag [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sorry brett the last i heard from you was that you were working on the problem and there would be a release late this week. So I have been working on other things and waiting paitiently. But if you are now telling me I need to file a jira issue then that's what i'll do. I'll have to put together a minimal project and reproduce the problem in some code that is not the EPOs tho. This probably won't happen today. Kind regards, Dave Sag Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 17-02-2006 13:20:42: On 2/17/06, David Sag [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sorry are you talking about maven 1 or 2 plugin? They are talking about Maven 1.0 I was told that 2.0-SNAPSHOT is the one to use for maven 2 but since updating to maven 2.0.2 the reporting part of cobertura hasn't worked. I can't reproduce it. If it never gets filed in JIRA, it'll never get fixed... can you please do that at http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MOJO? Did you try the repository manager example I showed you last time that is working for me? - Brett
Re: cobertura plugin
Please - that would be nice. Kind regards, Dave Sag Arnaud HERITIER [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 16-02-2006 16:24:10: Isn't it possible to release it ? Arnaud On 2/16/06, Mike Perham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The plugin code in SVN already uses 1.7. It's never been released so you must be using an old version you compiled. Update svn and recompile it. -Original Message- From: Nicolas De Loof [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2006 8:36 AM To: Maven Users List Subject: cobertura plugin Is there any plan to upgrade cobertura plugin to use cobertura 1.7 ? I'm using AspectJ and JiBX that both operate on bytecode and are not compatible with cobertura 1.6 instrumentation (plugin fails) Upgrading dependency to 1.7 solves this problem I've created http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detailaid=1432911group_i d=61626atid=497853 for this. Nico. This message contains information that may be privileged or confidential and is the property of the Capgemini Group. It is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy, disseminate, distribute, or use this message or any part thereof. If you receive this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete all copies of this message. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: cobertura plugin
1.2-SNAPSHOT works fine for me. Thanks ! Nicolas De Loof a écrit : I'm using maven-cobertura-plugin from [EMAIL PROTECTED] As this site uses CVS, this seems you've in mind another cobertura plugin. Where to find it ? Mike Perham a écrit : The plugin code in SVN already uses 1.7. It's never been released so you must be using an old version you compiled. Update svn and recompile it. -Original Message- From: Nicolas De Loof [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2006 8:36 AM To: Maven Users List Subject: cobertura plugin Is there any plan to upgrade cobertura plugin to use cobertura 1.7 ? I'm using AspectJ and JiBX that both operate on bytecode and are not compatible with cobertura 1.6 instrumentation (plugin fails) Upgrading dependency to 1.7 solves this problem I've created http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detailaid=1432911group_i d=61626atid=497853 for this. Nico. This message contains information that may be privileged or confidential and is the property of the Capgemini Group. It is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy, disseminate, distribute, or use this message or any part thereof. If you receive this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete all copies of this message. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This message contains information that may be privileged or confidential and is the property of the Capgemini Group. It is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy, disseminate, distribute, or use this message or any part thereof. If you receive this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete all copies of this message. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: cobertura plugin
Is the 1.2-SNAPSHOT for maven 1 or for maven 2 ? On 2/17/06, Nicolas De Loof [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 1.2-SNAPSHOT works fine for me. Thanks ! Nicolas De Loof a écrit : I'm using maven-cobertura-plugin from [EMAIL PROTECTED] As this site uses CVS, this seems you've in mind another cobertura plugin. Where to find it ? Mike Perham a écrit : The plugin code in SVN already uses 1.7. It's never been released so you must be using an old version you compiled. Update svn and recompile it. -Original Message- From: Nicolas De Loof [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2006 8:36 AM To: Maven Users List Subject: cobertura plugin Is there any plan to upgrade cobertura plugin to use cobertura 1.7 ? I'm using AspectJ and JiBX that both operate on bytecode and are not compatible with cobertura 1.6 instrumentation (plugin fails) Upgrading dependency to 1.7 solves this problem I've created http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detailaid=1432911group_i d=61626atid=497853 for this. Nico. This message contains information that may be privileged or confidential and is the property of the Capgemini Group. It is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy, disseminate, distribute, or use this message or any part thereof. If you receive this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete all copies of this message. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This message contains information that may be privileged or confidential and is the property of the Capgemini Group. It is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy, disseminate, distribute, or use this message or any part thereof. If you receive this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete all copies of this message. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: cobertura plugin
maven 1 Arnaud On 2/17/06, javed mandary [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is the 1.2-SNAPSHOT for maven 1 or for maven 2 ? On 2/17/06, Nicolas De Loof [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 1.2-SNAPSHOT works fine for me. Thanks ! Nicolas De Loof a écrit : I'm using maven-cobertura-plugin from [EMAIL PROTECTED] As this site uses CVS, this seems you've in mind another cobertura plugin. Where to find it ? Mike Perham a écrit : The plugin code in SVN already uses 1.7. It's never been released so you must be using an old version you compiled. Update svn and recompile it. -Original Message- From: Nicolas De Loof [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2006 8:36 AM To: Maven Users List Subject: cobertura plugin Is there any plan to upgrade cobertura plugin to use cobertura 1.7 ? I'm using AspectJ and JiBX that both operate on bytecode and are not compatible with cobertura 1.6 instrumentation (plugin fails) Upgrading dependency to 1.7 solves this problem I've created http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detailaid=1432911group_i d=61626atid=497853 for this. Nico. This message contains information that may be privileged or confidential and is the property of the Capgemini Group. It is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy, disseminate, distribute, or use this message or any part thereof. If you receive this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete all copies of this message. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This message contains information that may be privileged or confidential and is the property of the Capgemini Group. It is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy, disseminate, distribute, or use this message or any part thereof. If you receive this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete all copies of this message. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: cobertura plugin
Sorry are you talking about maven 1 or 2 plugin? I was told that 2.0-SNAPSHOT is the one to use for maven 2 but since updating to maven 2.0.2 the reporting part of cobertura hasn't worked. Kind regards, Dave Sag Nicolas De Loof [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 17-02-2006 11:12:27: 1.2-SNAPSHOT works fine for me. Thanks ! Nicolas De Loof a écrit : I'm using maven-cobertura-plugin from [EMAIL PROTECTED] As this site uses CVS, this seems you've in mind another cobertura plugin. Where to find it ? Mike Perham a écrit : The plugin code in SVN already uses 1.7. It's never been released so you must be using an old version you compiled. Update svn and recompile it. -Original Message- From: Nicolas De Loof [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2006 8:36 AM To: Maven Users List Subject: cobertura plugin Is there any plan to upgrade cobertura plugin to use cobertura 1.7 ? I'm using AspectJ and JiBX that both operate on bytecode and are not compatible with cobertura 1.6 instrumentation (plugin fails) Upgrading dependency to 1.7 solves this problem I've created http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detailaid=1432911group_i d=61626atid=497853 for this. Nico. This message contains information that may be privileged or confidential and is the property of the Capgemini Group. It is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy, disseminate, distribute, or use this message or any part thereof. If you receive this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete all copies of this message. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This message contains information that may be privileged or confidential and is the property of the Capgemini Group. It is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy, disseminate, distribute, or use this message or any part thereof. If you receive this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete all copies of this message. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: cobertura plugin
On 2/17/06, David Sag [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sorry are you talking about maven 1 or 2 plugin? They are talking about Maven 1.0 I was told that 2.0-SNAPSHOT is the one to use for maven 2 but since updating to maven 2.0.2 the reporting part of cobertura hasn't worked. I can't reproduce it. If it never gets filed in JIRA, it'll never get fixed... can you please do that at http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MOJO? Did you try the repository manager example I showed you last time that is working for me? - Brett
Re: cobertura plugin
Sorry brett the last i heard from you was that you were working on the problem and there would be a release late this week. So I have been working on other things and waiting paitiently. But if you are now telling me I need to file a jira issue then that's what i'll do. I'll have to put together a minimal project and reproduce the problem in some code that is not the EPOs tho. This probably won't happen today. Kind regards, Dave Sag Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 17-02-2006 13:20:42: On 2/17/06, David Sag [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sorry are you talking about maven 1 or 2 plugin? They are talking about Maven 1.0 I was told that 2.0-SNAPSHOT is the one to use for maven 2 but since updating to maven 2.0.2 the reporting part of cobertura hasn't worked. I can't reproduce it. If it never gets filed in JIRA, it'll never get fixed... can you please do that at http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MOJO? Did you try the repository manager example I showed you last time that is working for me? - Brett
Re: cobertura plugin
Hi David, There might be a release coming up, but we haven't worked on your issue and there are still some other issues outstanding that should be fixed first. If you could confirm that cobertura fails for you on the repository manager app (if SVN is a problem I can upload it somewhere), that would isolate it to you environment over your particular project. Thanks, Brett On 2/17/06, David Sag [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sorry brett the last i heard from you was that you were working on the problem and there would be a release late this week. So I have been working on other things and waiting paitiently. But if you are now telling me I need to file a jira issue then that's what i'll do. I'll have to put together a minimal project and reproduce the problem in some code that is not the EPOs tho. This probably won't happen today. Kind regards, Dave Sag Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 17-02-2006 13:20:42: On 2/17/06, David Sag [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sorry are you talking about maven 1 or 2 plugin? They are talking about Maven 1.0 I was told that 2.0-SNAPSHOT is the one to use for maven 2 but since updating to maven 2.0.2 the reporting part of cobertura hasn't worked. I can't reproduce it. If it never gets filed in JIRA, it'll never get fixed... can you please do that at http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MOJO? Did you try the repository manager example I showed you last time that is working for me? - Brett
Re: cobertura plugin
Hi Brett I have files jira issue http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MOJO-299 and included an example project that displays the bug. if you could put your repo manager code somewhere in a zip file I can try it out here and see if I get the same problems. Kind regards, Dave Sag Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 17-02-2006 13:33:08: Hi David, There might be a release coming up, but we haven't worked on your issue and there are still some other issues outstanding that should be fixed first. If you could confirm that cobertura fails for you on the repository manager app (if SVN is a problem I can upload it somewhere), that would isolate it to you environment over your particular project. Thanks, Brett On 2/17/06, David Sag [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sorry brett the last i heard from you was that you were working on the problem and there would be a release late this week. So I have been working on other things and waiting paitiently. But if you are now telling me I need to file a jira issue then that's what i'll do. I'll have to put together a minimal project and reproduce the problem in some code that is not the EPOs tho. This probably won't happen today. Kind regards, Dave Sag Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 17-02-2006 13:20:42: On 2/17/06, David Sag [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sorry are you talking about maven 1 or 2 plugin? They are talking about Maven 1.0 I was told that 2.0-SNAPSHOT is the one to use for maven 2 but since updating to maven 2.0.2 the reporting part of cobertura hasn't worked. I can't reproduce it. If it never gets filed in JIRA, it'll never get fixed... can you please do that at http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MOJO? Did you try the repository manager example I showed you last time that is working for me? - Brett
Re: cobertura plugin
ok , what about the cobertura plugin for maven 2 ? In maven site I am getting a problem after cobertura runs the junit tests and try to create a report it crashes and fails the build. Has anyone got similar problems and any solutions to that? this is what i am using: plugin groupIdorg.codehaus.mojo/groupId artifactIdcobertura-maven-plugin/artifactId version2.0-SNAPSHOT/version executions execution goals goalclean/goal /goals /execution /executions /plugin regards, Javed On 2/17/06, David Sag [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Brett I have files jira issue http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MOJO-299 and included an example project that displays the bug. if you could put your repo manager code somewhere in a zip file I can try it out here and see if I get the same problems. Kind regards, Dave Sag Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 17-02-2006 13:33:08: Hi David, There might be a release coming up, but we haven't worked on your issue and there are still some other issues outstanding that should be fixed first. If you could confirm that cobertura fails for you on the repository manager app (if SVN is a problem I can upload it somewhere), that would isolate it to you environment over your particular project. Thanks, Brett On 2/17/06, David Sag [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sorry brett the last i heard from you was that you were working on the problem and there would be a release late this week. So I have been working on other things and waiting paitiently. But if you are now telling me I need to file a jira issue then that's what i'll do. I'll have to put together a minimal project and reproduce the problem in some code that is not the EPOs tho. This probably won't happen today. Kind regards, Dave Sag Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 17-02-2006 13:20:42: On 2/17/06, David Sag [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sorry are you talking about maven 1 or 2 plugin? They are talking about Maven 1.0 I was told that 2.0-SNAPSHOT is the one to use for maven 2 but since updating to maven 2.0.2 the reporting part of cobertura hasn't worked. I can't reproduce it. If it never gets filed in JIRA, it'll never get fixed... can you please do that at http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MOJO? Did you try the repository manager example I showed you last time that is working for me? - Brett
Re: cobertura plugin
Maven 2 is what I am on about. see the jira issue, but i am getting the same problem as you describe. perhaps you'd like to vote on that issue and add your comments there. Kind regards, Dave Sag javed mandary [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 17-02-2006 14:14:17: ok , what about the cobertura plugin for maven 2 ? In maven site I am getting a problem after cobertura runs the junit tests and try to create a report it crashes and fails the build. Has anyone got similar problems and any solutions to that? this is what i am using: plugin groupIdorg.codehaus.mojo/groupId artifactIdcobertura-maven-plugin/artifactId version2.0-SNAPSHOT/version executions execution goals goalclean/goal /goals /execution /executions /plugin regards, Javed On 2/17/06, David Sag [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Brett I have files jira issue http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MOJO-299 and included an example project that displays the bug. if you could put your repo manager code somewhere in a zip file I can try it out here and see if I get the same problems. Kind regards, Dave Sag Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 17-02-2006 13:33:08: Hi David, There might be a release coming up, but we haven't worked on your issue and there are still some other issues outstanding that should be fixed first. If you could confirm that cobertura fails for you on the repository manager app (if SVN is a problem I can upload it somewhere), that would isolate it to you environment over your particular project. Thanks, Brett On 2/17/06, David Sag [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sorry brett the last i heard from you was that you were working on the problem and there would be a release late this week. So I have been working on other things and waiting paitiently. But if you are now telling me I need to file a jira issue then that's what i'll do. I'll have to put together a minimal project and reproduce the problem in some code that is not the EPOs tho. This probably won't happen today. Kind regards, Dave Sag Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 17-02-2006 13:20:42: On 2/17/06, David Sag [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sorry are you talking about maven 1 or 2 plugin? They are talking about Maven 1.0 I was told that 2.0-SNAPSHOT is the one to use for maven 2 but since updating to maven 2.0.2 the reporting part of cobertura hasn't worked. I can't reproduce it. If it never gets filed in JIRA, it'll never get fixed... can you please do that at http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MOJO? Did you try the repository manager example I showed you last time that is working for me? - Brett
Re: cobertura plugin
I'm not a developer on mavenn plugins @ sf and I don't if there's lot of activity. If nobody can do it, I'll ask to add me to the dev team to do it. Arnaud On 2/16/06, Nicolas De Loof [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is there any plan to upgrade cobertura plugin to use cobertura 1.7 ? I'm using AspectJ and JiBX that both operate on bytecode and are not compatible with cobertura 1.6 instrumentation (plugin fails) Upgrading dependency to 1.7 solves this problem I've created http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detailaid=1432911group_id=61626atid=497853 for this. Nico. This message contains information that may be privileged or confidential and is the property of the Capgemini Group. It is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy, disseminate, distribute, or use this message or any part thereof. If you receive this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete all copies of this message. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: cobertura plugin
The plugin code in SVN already uses 1.7. It's never been released so you must be using an old version you compiled. Update svn and recompile it. -Original Message- From: Nicolas De Loof [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2006 8:36 AM To: Maven Users List Subject: cobertura plugin Is there any plan to upgrade cobertura plugin to use cobertura 1.7 ? I'm using AspectJ and JiBX that both operate on bytecode and are not compatible with cobertura 1.6 instrumentation (plugin fails) Upgrading dependency to 1.7 solves this problem I've created http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detailaid=1432911group_i d=61626atid=497853 for this. Nico. This message contains information that may be privileged or confidential and is the property of the Capgemini Group. It is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy, disseminate, distribute, or use this message or any part thereof. If you receive this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete all copies of this message. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: cobertura plugin
Isn't it possible to release it ? Arnaud On 2/16/06, Mike Perham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The plugin code in SVN already uses 1.7. It's never been released so you must be using an old version you compiled. Update svn and recompile it. -Original Message- From: Nicolas De Loof [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2006 8:36 AM To: Maven Users List Subject: cobertura plugin Is there any plan to upgrade cobertura plugin to use cobertura 1.7 ? I'm using AspectJ and JiBX that both operate on bytecode and are not compatible with cobertura 1.6 instrumentation (plugin fails) Upgrading dependency to 1.7 solves this problem I've created http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detailaid=1432911group_i d=61626atid=497853 for this. Nico. This message contains information that may be privileged or confidential and is the property of the Capgemini Group. It is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy, disseminate, distribute, or use this message or any part thereof. If you receive this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete all copies of this message. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: cobertura plugin
I'm using maven-cobertura-plugin from [EMAIL PROTECTED] As this site uses CVS, this seems you've in mind another cobertura plugin. Where to find it ? Mike Perham a écrit : The plugin code in SVN already uses 1.7. It's never been released so you must be using an old version you compiled. Update svn and recompile it. -Original Message- From: Nicolas De Loof [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2006 8:36 AM To: Maven Users List Subject: cobertura plugin Is there any plan to upgrade cobertura plugin to use cobertura 1.7 ? I'm using AspectJ and JiBX that both operate on bytecode and are not compatible with cobertura 1.6 instrumentation (plugin fails) Upgrading dependency to 1.7 solves this problem I've created http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detailaid=1432911group_i d=61626atid=497853 for this. Nico. This message contains information that may be privileged or confidential and is the property of the Capgemini Group. It is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy, disseminate, distribute, or use this message or any part thereof. If you receive this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete all copies of this message. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This message contains information that may be privileged or confidential and is the property of the Capgemini Group. It is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy, disseminate, distribute, or use this message or any part thereof. If you receive this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete all copies of this message. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: cobertura plugin
It's still in the mojo sandbox. Brett and I were working on it a week or two ago. Personally I think it's ready to promote out of the sandbox to a top level plugin and an initial alpha release. -Original Message- From: Arnaud HERITIER [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2006 9:24 AM To: Maven Users List Subject: Re: cobertura plugin Isn't it possible to release it ? Arnaud On 2/16/06, Mike Perham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The plugin code in SVN already uses 1.7. It's never been released so you must be using an old version you compiled. Update svn and recompile it. -Original Message- From: Nicolas De Loof [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2006 8:36 AM To: Maven Users List Subject: cobertura plugin Is there any plan to upgrade cobertura plugin to use cobertura 1.7 ? I'm using AspectJ and JiBX that both operate on bytecode and are not compatible with cobertura 1.6 instrumentation (plugin fails) Upgrading dependency to 1.7 solves this problem I've created http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detailaid=1432911group _i d=61626atid=497853 for this. Nico. This message contains information that may be privileged or confidential and is the property of the Capgemini Group. It is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy, disseminate, distribute, or use this message or any part thereof. If you receive this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete all copies of this message. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: cobertura plugin
You are referring to the M1 plugin. I'm referring to the M2 plugin. Sorry for the mixup. -Original Message- From: Nicolas De Loof [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2006 9:26 AM To: Maven Users List Subject: Re: cobertura plugin I'm using maven-cobertura-plugin from [EMAIL PROTECTED] As this site uses CVS, this seems you've in mind another cobertura plugin. Where to find it ? Mike Perham a écrit : The plugin code in SVN already uses 1.7. It's never been released so you must be using an old version you compiled. Update svn and recompile it. -Original Message- From: Nicolas De Loof [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2006 8:36 AM To: Maven Users List Subject: cobertura plugin Is there any plan to upgrade cobertura plugin to use cobertura 1.7 ? I'm using AspectJ and JiBX that both operate on bytecode and are not compatible with cobertura 1.6 instrumentation (plugin fails) Upgrading dependency to 1.7 solves this problem I've created http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detailaid=1432911group_ i d=61626atid=497853 for this. Nico. This message contains information that may be privileged or confidential and is the property of the Capgemini Group. It is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy, disseminate, distribute, or use this message or any part thereof. If you receive this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete all copies of this message. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This message contains information that may be privileged or confidential and is the property of the Capgemini Group. It is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy, disseminate, distribute, or use this message or any part thereof. If you receive this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete all copies of this message. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: cobertura plugin
A snapshot has been deployed at http://maven-plugins.sourceforge.net/snapshot-repository/maven-plugins/plugins/ Please test it and we can make a new release On 2/16/06, Nicolas De Loof [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is there any plan to upgrade cobertura plugin to use cobertura 1.7 ? I'm using AspectJ and JiBX that both operate on bytecode and are not compatible with cobertura 1.6 instrumentation (plugin fails) Upgrading dependency to 1.7 solves this problem I've created http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detailaid=1432911group_id=61626atid=497853 for this. Nico. This message contains information that may be privileged or confidential and is the property of the Capgemini Group. It is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy, disseminate, distribute, or use this message or any part thereof. If you receive this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete all copies of this message. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- I could give you my word as a Spaniard. No good. I've known too many Spaniards. -- The Princess Bride - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: cobertura plugin breaks with maven 2.02 - wors fine with 2.0
You need to svn-update the cobertura mojo and rebuild it - the bug has been fixed for 2.0.2.,.. On 26/01/06, David Sag [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have just updated my maven 2 to 2.0.2 and now the instrumentation of my classes fails when using the cobertura plugin. I get NoClassDefFoundError: org/apache/maven/wagon/util/FileUtils any clues as to what changed between 2.0 and 2.0.2 that would lead to this error? most frustrating Kind regards, Dave Sag
Re: cobertura plugin breaks with maven 2.02 - wors fine with 2.0
Nigel Magnay wrote: You need to svn-update the cobertura mojo and rebuild it - the bug has been fixed for 2.0.2.,.. I'll ping the current fellow working on the plugin and see if he can do a release. On 26/01/06, David Sag [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have just updated my maven 2 to 2.0.2 and now the instrumentation of my classes fails when using the cobertura plugin. I get NoClassDefFoundError: org/apache/maven/wagon/util/FileUtils any clues as to what changed between 2.0 and 2.0.2 that would lead to this error? most frustrating Kind regards, Dave Sag -- jvz. Jason van Zyl jason at maven.org http://maven.apache.org A man enjoys his work when he understands the whole and when he is responsible for the quality of the whole -- Christopher Alexander - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
