://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/trinidad/trunk/
trinidad
Henk
Adam Winer wrote:
Can someone provide a minimal page that is failing for
them? I'd like to get this debugged and eliminated
by 1.0.1, but haven't reproduced it yet.
-- Adam
On 5/29/07, Henk Vanhoe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I had
! When you leave the detail open
and hit the save-button, the changes are submitted...
Regards,
Henk
Henk Vanhoe wrote:
I have tested this problem again with the latest trinidad from the svn
repository, and now the test results are a little bit different...
When I use CLIENT_STATE_METHOD 'all
Winer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've filed the detailStamp bug as:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-75
It repros in the Trinidad demo bundle too.
-- Adam
On 6/25/07, Adam Winer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/22/07, Henk Vanhoe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Finally, I have found
, and we show an error that the required
field is empty - but the user can't see the field that
has the error!
What's the concern with leaving immediate=false
on the table?
-- Adam
On 6/27/07, Henk Vanhoe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now it works without problems, thank you!
I already feared
Hi,
I am using an editable table inside a detailstamp facet. The data in the
table comes from a request-scoped managed bean. As I want to avoid
session scoped beans, I use the tomahawk savestate tag to save the state
of my beans. Everything works fine, except that when I change something
in
Hi,
I'm using a trinidad navigation tree, but I'm having this exception
(full stacktrace at th end of this mail):
java.io.NotSerializableException: java.util.RandomAccessSubList
I suppose this is happening during serialization because I'm using the
'client' STATE_SAVING_METHOD (with the
Indeed, the exception is gone now!
Thanks a lot,
Henk
Adam Winer wrote:
Fixed!
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-27
Thanks for tracking down that crucial bit of information. I'd
never known that List.subList() wasn't serializable!
-- Adam
On 5/21/07, Henk Vanhoe [EMAIL
lose my changes when
I submit. Is this the normal behaviour of the table component?
But if we don't use the immediate attribute, each time someone clicks on
the 'hide' or 'show' link, all inputfields are validated, which is not
the behaviour we want to have...
Regards,
Henk
Henk Vanhoe
I had the same problem. It went away when I added
client-validationINLINE/client-validation to my trinidad-config.xml.
Henk
Luka Surija wrote:
No, there is no JS errors any more. Just clicking on any link nothing
happened. just like a href=# /a.
I look like the problem when you forget to put
Hi,
In our tables we need to use our own collection model (a wrapper for
org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.model.CollectionModel with its own
implementation of getRowKey and setRowKey). However the getter in the
backing bean for the value used in the table returns a java.util.List
and the trinidad
anybody
Henk Vanhoe wrote:
Hi,
In our tables we need to use our own collection model (a wrapper for
org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.model.CollectionModel with its own
implementation of getRowKey and setRowKey). However the getter in the
backing bean for the value used in the table returns
and in the war archive).
Henk
Max Starets wrote:
Henk,
I must be missing something - why don't you just instantiate your custom
CollectionModel as a backing bean
and EL-bind table's value to it?
Max
Henk Vanhoe wrote:
Hi,
I found one way to force the trinidad table to use our own
, then return an instance
of your custom collection model that wraps the List.
Max
Henk Vanhoe wrote:
Hi Max,
I cannot use my custom model in the backing bean because it is an EJB3
entity with a one-to-many relationship to another entity. The table
should be filled with instances of this other
Hi,
Another question I was having...
In one of our tables we are using the detailStamp facet. When I add a
detailStamp there automatically appears an extra column with a
Details-link in it. Does anybody know a way to disable this column?
(The details should always be visible in the screen we
,
Henk
Henk Vanhoe wrote:
Hi,
Another question I was having...
In one of our tables we are using the detailStamp facet. When I add a
detailStamp there automatically appears an extra column with a
Details-link in it. Does anybody know a way to disable this column?
(The details should always
9, 2008 at 9:28 AM, Henk Vanhoe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I suppose it would not be particularly difficult to add an extra
attribute to the trinidad table, something like a
detailsLinkEnabled attribute with which it would be possible to
show/hide
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Henk,
would you open a JIRA issue, please?
--
Kind regards,
Mathias
-Original Message-
From: Henk Vanhoe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2008 1:55 PM
To: MyFaces Discussion
17 matches
Mail list logo
