Hi Maor,
that's interesting.
Honestly, I don't remember the exact paths, but I think we did setup
everything the standard way :). A colleague of
mine tries to reproduce this again, this time with a newer engine
version.
Will this patchset get included in 3.3.1?
We would like to give it a shot,
Hi Christopher,
Your understanding of the terms is correct.
A small clarification - Hosts are mostly referred to as nodes when running
oVirt Node, a custom Linux distribution purposely made to be used as a host in
oVirt.
As for your question:
DEFROUTE=yes/no in the hosts' ifcfg files
Hi all,
sorry for this rant, but...
I now tried several times to test the beta 3.3.1 rpms, but they can't
even be installed in the most times. One time it required a future
selinux-policy, although the needed selinux fix was delivered in a much
lower version. Now the rpms have broken
Hi,
I'm currently setting up a fresh 3.3.1 from ovirt.org beta repo
I just wanted to say that maybe more people would test from ovirt.org
repo if the download speed could get bumped up somewhat:
yum install ovirt-engine
Regarding the pep8 breakage - Try updating your pep8.
- Original Message -
From: Patrick Hurrelmann patrick.hurrelm...@lobster.de
To: oVirt Mailing List users@ovirt.org
Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2013 11:34:20 AM
Subject: [Users] Low quality of el6 vdsm rpms
Hi all,
sorry for this
On 12.11.2013 11:07, Assaf Muller wrote:
Regarding the pep8 breakage - Try updating your pep8.
Hi,
thanks for the hint, but according to
http://www.ovirt.org/Vdsm_Developers the latest python-pep8
(python-pep8-1.3.3-3.el6) for el6 is already installed.
And further digging shows that probably
Il 12/11/2013 10:34, Patrick Hurrelmann ha scritto:
Hi all,
sorry for this rant, but...
I now tried several times to test the beta 3.3.1 rpms, but they can't
even be installed in the most times.
I'm glad to read you're testing 3.3.1. May I ask you to add yourself to
Il 12/11/2013 10:34, Sven Kieske ha scritto:
Hi,
I'm currently setting up a fresh 3.3.1 from ovirt.org beta repo
Hi, may I invite you to add yourself to
http://www.ovirt.org/Testing/Ovirt_3.3.1_testing?
I just wanted to say that maybe more people would test from ovirt.org
repo if the
Hey Patrick,
For the pep8 issue, as mentioned you should check pep8 --version and use 1.4.6.
If you use older version, just upgrade with python-pip
(yum install python-pip , and then `pip-install install pep8 --upgrade`)
Second, try to follow http://www.ovirt.org/Vdsm_Developers , it specifies
Hi,
done that.
We encountered this bug:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023739
we tested 3.3.1 from the beta ovirt.org repo.
Could this bug fix please be included in 3.3.1 release?
Am 12.11.2013 11:33, schrieb Sandro Bonazzola:
Il 12/11/2013 10:34, Sven Kieske ha scritto:
Hi,
On 11/12/2013 06:37 AM, Sven Kieske wrote:
Hi,
done that.
We encountered this bug:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023739
we tested 3.3.1 from the beta ovirt.org repo.
Could this bug fix please be included in 3.3.1 release?
patch isn't small and 3.3.1 has been in beta/frozen
Can users outside of the hosts' networks reach the VMs in the hosts?
If you use netstat -rn it is expected that the gateway will be 0.0.0.0, as
ifcfg-ovirtmgmt has DEFROUTE=yes and ifcfg-public has DEFROUTE=no, then
ovirtmgmt's
'gateway' (0.0.0.0) will be determined as the host's default
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 11:31:04AM +0100, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
Il 12/11/2013 10:34, Patrick Hurrelmann ha scritto:
Hi all,
sorry for this rant, but...
Thanks for ranting. Community testing and ranting are to be cherished.
We must improve in the points you have raised.
I now tried
On Nov 12, 2013, at 7:58 AM, Assaf Muller wrote:
Can users outside of the hosts' networks reach the VMs in the hosts?
I have not tested this yet. I have been focused on the host's networking
behavior outside of the ovirt/vdsm bits.
(Mainly, it checking in on other things.) I realize this
When I try to remove viritual disk from ovirt engine I get error User
admin@internal finished removing disk test_vm with storage failure in
domain DATA_DOMAIN.
VM itself was running fine with no errors.
DATA_DOMAIN is GlusterFS replicated volume (on ovirt host).
ovirt engine comp (fc19)
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 4:33 PM, Sander Grendelman
san...@grendelman.com wrote:
Done: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1029069
The patch at http://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/19983/ from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1015071 seems to fix this issue.
I could not patch
- Original Message -
From: Dan Kenigsberg dan...@redhat.com
To: Sandro Bonazzola sbona...@redhat.com, dc...@redhat.com
Cc: vdsm-devel vdsm-de...@fedorahosted.org, oVirt Mailing List
users@ovirt.org
Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2013 4:33:44 PM
Subject: Re: [Users] Low quality of el6
hello users, i think this software is great but there is something i am yet
to see. i am wondering if we can have our ovirt hosts on amazon , thereby
creating a hybrid set up.
can ovirt hosts/ custer be on amazon ?
pockey
___
Users mailing list
i want to configure site disaster recvery in ovirt
environment.
do you have idea about site disaster recovery in ovirt?
(any pdf or link for this concept)
thanks
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Hi,
we just discovered a bug in ovirt-engine 3.3.1 beta from ovirt.org repo:
You can't create a VM (via webadmin) with the following options:
set VM-Name
select Operating System: Other Linux, Linux, or any Linux distro
click: Show advanced options
switch: console: protocol: from SPICE to VNC
Hi,
I don't think it's possible as Amazon is already a virtualized environment.
Nested KVM would be possible but as I understand Amazon AWS is running on Xen.
Same answer is given here:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/14193821/run-kvm-on-top-of-amazon-ec2-possible
Kind regards,
Jorick
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 10:31:24AM -0500, Eyal Edri wrote:
snip
- There's a Jenkins job to enforce the former requirement of spec
requirement. David, Sandro, any idea why it is not running these days?
it does run, but we can't enable it since it's still failing:
Hi Patrick,
On 11/12/2013 09:33 AM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 11:31:04AM +0100, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
Il 12/11/2013 10:34, Patrick Hurrelmann ha scritto:
Hi all,
sorry for this rant, but...
Thanks for ranting. Community testing and ranting are to be cherished.
We must
On 12.11.2013 11:31, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
Il 12/11/2013 10:34, Patrick Hurrelmann ha scritto:
Hi all,
sorry for this rant, but...
I now tried several times to test the beta 3.3.1 rpms, but they can't
even be installed in the most times.
I'm glad to read you're testing 3.3.1. May I ask
On 12.11.2013 19:15, Mike Burns wrote:
On 11/12/2013 03:51 PM, Douglas Schilling Landgraf wrote:
Indeed, that's bad. It has been included from a patch only on Fedora
koji build rawhide. The others points here already have been answered by
others developers. Anyway, we have updated the build.
On 12.11.2013 15:33, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
I suspect you are not interested in excuses for each of the failures,
let us look forwards. My conclusions are:
- Do not require non-yet-existing rpms. If we require a feature that is
not yet in Fedora/Centos, we must wait. This is already in
- Original Message -
From: Patrick Hurrelmann patrick.hurrelm...@lobster.de
To: oVirt Mailing List users@ovirt.org
Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2013 11:34:20 AM
Subject: [Users] Low quality of el6 vdsm rpms
Hi all,
sorry for this rant, but...
/usr/bin/pep8
Hi,
I had a working engine, using 3.3.0 on Fedora 19. I rebooted my engine,
and JBoss AS won't come back up. I get the attached errors from server.log.
Has anyone seen this before? Any suggestions on how to recover?
How I got here:
I had a working Engine (mach1 F19) and Host (mach2 F19),
What I found so far...
Function returning error is getDomPath in
/usr/share/vdsm/storage/fileSD.py:
def getDomPath(sdUUID):
pattern = os.path.join(sd.StorageDomain.storage_repository,
sd.DOMAIN_MNT_POINT, '*', sdUUID)
# Warning! You need a global proc pool
Well, this looks to me like an instance of
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?format=multipleid=996005
That bug has not been updated in almost 3 months, however. The last note
says Working on CI. Does that mean Code Integration? It looks like
maybe it was fixed in version is10, whatever
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 03:51:36PM -0500, Douglas Schilling Landgraf wrote:
Indeed, that's bad. It has been included from a patch only on Fedora
koji build rawhide. The others points here already have been
answered by others developers. Anyway, we have updated the build.
We would
On 11/12/2013 04:52 PM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 03:51:36PM -0500, Douglas Schilling Landgraf wrote:
Indeed, that's bad. It has been included from a patch only on Fedora
koji build rawhide. The others points here already have been
answered by others developers. Anyway, we
I have just set up an Ovirt 3.3.0 install and have done a test install of
Centos 6.4 in a VM. The VM was configured with an IDE drive and a virtio-scsi
drive. The Centos 6.4 install sees both drives OK.
I'm wanting to do some testing on a product that is based on EL5, but I'm
finding that it
Hello, could you help me with installation of self hosted engine on bare
Ovirt 3.3. Where can i find any packages for installation?
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Hi,
- Original Message -
From: Pavel Gandalipov pgandali...@gmail.com
To: users@ovirt.org
Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2013 9:22:05 AM
Subject: [Users] Installation of self hosted engine
Hello, could you help me with installation of self hosted engine on bare
Ovirt 3.3.
It's
35 matches
Mail list logo
