y: 3779 milliseconds
//second try with the property set: 3852 milliseconds
//third try with subsamplingAllowed: 3362 milliseconds
}
***
From: Tilman Hausherr <thaush...@t-online.de>
Sent: Monday,
he property set: 3852 milliseconds
//third try with subsamplingAllowed: 3362 milliseconds
}
***
From: Tilman Hausherr <thaush...@t-online.de>
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2018 10:55 AM
To: users@pdfbox.apache.org
Su
"
milliseconds");
}//else
//first try without setting property: 3779 milliseconds
//second try with the property set: 3852 milliseconds
//third try with subsamplingAllowed: 3362 milliseconds
}
***
From: Tilman Hausherr <thaush...@t-online.de>
Sent:
.@t-online.de>
*Sent:* Monday, April 16, 2018 8:57 AM
*To:* users@pdfbox.apache.org
*Subject:* Re: Performance issue with PDFBox 2.0.8
Please
- retry with the current version 2.0.9
- share your file for a profiler analysis
- as said by Itai (who implemented it) try enabling subsampling in
PDF
_
From: Tilman Hausherr <thaush...@t-online.de>
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2018 8:57 AM
To: users@pdfbox.apache.org
Subject: Re: Performance issue with PDFBox 2.0.8
Please
- retry with the current version 2.0.9
- share your file for a profiler analysis
- as said by Itai (who i
Please
- retry with the current version 2.0.9
- share your file for a profiler analysis
- as said by Itai (who implemented it) try enabling subsampling in
PDFRenderer (read the javadoc first). Compare the results and decide
whether the quality is OK for you.
- set the energy settings of your
If the files in question include very large JPEG or JBIG images, and if you
are rendering at a relatively low DPI, allowing subsampling may help (
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-4137), but you will have to
upgrade to 2.0.9.
In my use-case it increased speed by an order of magnitude,
7 matches
Mail list logo
