Heiner Markert" (Mephisto, Mo 13 Jun 2016 09:04:40 CEST +0200:
> Since I upgraded to 2.3.12, I get
>
> <0x0x1491800[SOGoProductLoader]> SOGo products loaded from
> '/usr/lib/GNUstep/SOGo':
> <0x0x1491800[SOGoProductLoader]> Mailer.SOGo, SchedulerUI.SOGo,
> CommonUI.SOGo, ContactsUI.SOGo,
Odhiambo Washington" (Odhiambo), 14.3.2019 09:52 +0100:
> As I can see from my Firefox (65.0.2 (64-bit)), there seems to be a problem
> using SOGo with Mozilla.
> I am unable to select mails as that selection box does not appear.
Klicking on the avatar icon in the message list will select the
Ludovic Marcotte, 13.09.19, 13:04 CEST:
> We don't know how we'll name it - perhaps SOGo Connector, SOGo
> Integrator or something else. Any suggestions? :)
Yes: SOGo IC (Integrated Connector)
--
Regards
mks
--
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
Hi,
in the web interface of SOGo 4.2 is there a way to only show unread
messages in a given folder's message list?
This question has been asked before
https://lists.inverse.ca/sogo/arc/users/2017-05/msg00105.html
but I didn't find an answer.
--
Regards
mks
--
users@sogo.nu
Christian Mack, 21.01.20, 15:09 CET:
> Am 12.01.20 um 12:16 schrieb Markus Schönhaber
>> in the web interface of SOGo 4.2 is there a way to only show unread
>> messages in a given folder's message list?
>
> Sorry, that is currently not possible.
> See also bug 1417, bug 1710 and bug 2539
>
Hi all,
yesterday I upgraded Thunderbird 68.12.0 -> 78.4.0, created and
installed the SOGo connector from here
https://github.com/inverse-inc/sogo-connector
SOGo version is 5.0.1.
AFAICT things seems to work. There's one problem I can't solve, though:
After the upgrade all addrss books appeared
26.11.21, 17:48 +0100: Francis Lachapelle (flachape...@inverse.ca):
The same happens to me with SOGo 5.3.0 and 5.4.0. Going back to 5.2.0
makes the problem disappear.
I see this on a very small SOGo setup with 4 users and 2-3 devices each
syncing via CalDAV/CardDAV. It takes roughly a day till
23.02.22, 21:21 +0100, Philipp Kuehne (philipp.kue...@indurad.com):
we also just upgraded to SOGo 5.5.1 and today experienced the same error.
Our setup:
* OS debian10
* installed with apt
* libexpat1 (2.2.6-2+deb10u3)
After a couple hours of searching we figured out, that there was an
24.02.22, 17:48 +0100, Slávek Banko (slavek.ba...@axis.cz):
On Thursday 24 of February 2022 16:57:50 Markus Schönhaber wrote:
Hi Slávek!
24.02.22, 14:28 +0100, Slávek Banko (slavek.ba...@axis.cz):
there seems to have already been reported bug to Debian and created
Issue for wbxml2 on GitHub.
Hi Slávek!
24.02.22, 14:28 +0100, Slávek Banko (slavek.ba...@axis.cz):
there seems to have already been reported bug to Debian and created Issue
for wbxml2 on GitHub. I did some tests, but it requires more effort.
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1006337
01.03.22, 15:00 +0100, Slávek Banko (slavek.ba...@axis.cz):
FYI: libwbxml 0.11.8 was released, you can find updated source and binary
packages in my repository.
Awesome, thanks!
--
Regards
mks
--
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
24.02.22, 20:50 +0100, Slávek Banko (slavek.ba...@axis.cz):
On Thursday 24 of February 2022 16:57:50 Markus Schönhaber wrote:
Hi Slávek!
24.02.22, 14:28 +0100, Slávek Banko (slavek.ba...@axis.cz):
there seems to have already been reported bug to Debian and created
Issue for wbxml2 on GitHub.
02.02.22, 15:26 +0100, Francis Lachapelle (flachape...@inverse.ca):
I've pushed a fix yesterday regarding this issue. Can you try the latest
nightly build?
I've installed the SOGo 5.5.0.20220203-1 packages from Inverse's nightly
repository for Debian Buster.
With this version, the problem
Hi,
this will probably not come as a surprise: I'm still seeing the problem
with the exhaustion of DB connections on SOGo 5.5.0.
In the meantime I've migrated the DB to the combined 9-table-layout.
Makes no difference either.
Do you need additional logs?
As Cédric already asked: Should we
30.05.22, 12:19 +0200, HYVERNAT Philippe (p.hyver...@outlook.fr):
I just installed the new version of sogo 5.6 on FreeBSD and when i want
to login to my webmail it returns always on the login page.
[...]
*ERROR: Data
too long for column 'c_value' at row 1*
Drop the session table
Am 06.05.22 um 00:18 schrieb "Carsten Pieper" (i...@carstenpieper.com):
I had the problem with SOGo 5.5.1 on Ubuntu 20.04.4, that I could not get
tot he settings screen after login of a user.
I thought it is a good idea to update to 5.6.0 to get rid of it, but anyhow,
no login at all is
15.11.22, 14:22 +0100, "Support FoxNET" (supp...@foxnet.be):
I have this error in the logs when I connect?
[ERROR] <0x0x5635344c88e0[GCSSessionsFolder]> -[GCSSessionsFolder
writeRecordForEntryWithID:value:creationDate:lastSeenDate:]: cannot write record:
NAME:ExecutionFailed REASON:Data too
15.11.22, 18:30 +0100, "Support FoxNET" (supp...@foxnet.be):
On Tuesday, November 15, 2022 16:18 CET, Markus Schönhaber
(sogo-us...@list-post.ddt-consult.de) wrote:
nothing to do with this
Of course not. I didn't mention the DB's character set or collation
settings and
Hi all,
after upgrading SOGo v5.9.1 -> v5.10.0 the web interface looks different
color-wise than before (see screenshot comparing now and before).
To me, it seems like some background is missing. Since I assume that
this is not an intentional change, how do I find what might be wrong
with my SOGo
Hello,
yep, that fixed it, thanks!
Regards
mks
23.02.24, 14:01 +0100, qhivert (qhiv...@alinto.eu):
> Hello,
> There is a css failure with current 5.10. The packages are rebuiding as we
> speak.
> You can wait a bit for thew new 5.10 package or the workaround is:
>
> Search for the file
01.04.24, 03:20 +0200, Roman (adro...@yandex.ru):
> Dear friends,> I'm trying to test SOGo 5 nightly, so I installed it
and as described in
> documentation added two lines to /etc/sogo/sogo.conf:
>
> //WOPort = "192.168.5.229:2";
> //WOHttpAllowHost = ( localhost, "192.168.5.229" );
>
>
23.04.24, 09:28 +0200, "cezar.so...@desion.de" (cezar.so...@desion.de):
> I don't understand why I can't see the repeated events in the calendar.
>
> It's in Sogo because I can see it on Outlook.
I don't think that what you see in Outlook is really a proof for what
exists elsewhere.
In the
22 matches
Mail list logo
