Re: New Spam Mails plz suggest

2009-06-09 Thread Anshul Chauhan
Thanks a lot all of you for your help. Please help with this how can i do this * smtp-auth mails do not scan for spam at all* can somebody please guide me for this. Warm Regards, Anshul Chauhan Dream is not what you see while sleep, it's the thing that does not let you sleep. 2009/6/9

Re: [sa] Re: New Spam Mails plz suggest

2009-06-09 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 08.06.09 12:21, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote: By authenticated users? So that's no bot spam, and the user spams deliberately and consciously... On Mon, 2009-06-08 at 14:01 +0200, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: says who? Afaik spamware often uses outlook's SMTP engine, so it's quite common

Re: New Spam Mails plz suggest

2009-06-09 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 09.06.09 12:09, Anshul Chauhan wrote: Thanks a lot all of you for your help. Please help with this how can i do this * smtp-auth mails do not scan for spam at all* can somebody please guide me for this. OK, I'll ask again: Do you have problems with scanning authenticated outgoing

Re: New Spam Mails plz suggest

2009-06-09 Thread Anshul Chauhan
no i dont have any problem but because of authenticated outgoing as well as mail within my domain server is busy all the time with mails in queue so i just want to disable it for my users in my local network only. I've specified as *trusted_networks 10.* for all my networks by this it is scanning

Re: New Spam Mails plz suggest

2009-06-09 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 09.06.09 12:09, Anshul Chauhan wrote: Thanks a lot all of you for your help. Please help with this how can i do this * smtp-auth mails do not scan for spam at all* can somebody please guide me for this. On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 1:02 PM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas

Re: New Spam Mails plz suggest

2009-06-09 Thread Benny Pedersen
On Tue, June 9, 2009 09:40, Anshul Chauhan wrote: *trusted_networks 10.* for all my networks by this it is scanning mails marking them as non spam which i don't want. you ask for advice on how to get spamassassin malfunction ? see reports from spamassassin and remove the spam, is imho much

Add rule hits to all emails?

2009-06-09 Thread Rob Sharp
Hi there, A little while back someone posted an entry one can add to user_prefs to cause the SA rule breakdown to be added to the headers of all emails. I'm sure I saved the email somewhere, but cannot find it any more. Would someone be kind enough to repost it please? Rob

Re: Add rule hits to all emails?

2009-06-09 Thread Steeve McCauley
See add_header in the docs, http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.1.x/doc/Mail_SpamAssassin_Conf.html On Tue, Jun 09, 2009 at 10:42:30AM +0100, Rob Sharp wrote: Hi there, A little while back someone posted an entry one can add to user_prefs to cause the SA rule breakdown to be added to the

Re: tests= SIZE_LIMIT_EXCEEDED ??

2009-06-09 Thread Stefan Guenther
Hi, Karsten Bräckelmann-2 wrote: X-SpamScore: 0 tests= SIZE_LIMIT_EXCEEDED Some sw components to be ruled out: - this isn't amavisd-new doing it, at least none of the official versions; Right, that's definitely something else adding the headers, as has been pointed out

Re: [sa] New slew of spams

2009-06-09 Thread ktn
Martin, Do you mean not use hostmonster for email hosting at all? To run our own mail server? Martin Gregorie-2 wrote: On Mon, 2009-06-08 at 07:17 -0700, ktn wrote: I am also starting to get a lot of these .rtf attachment only with no email body text spams. Unfortunately, we use

Re: tests= SIZE_LIMIT_EXCEEDED ??

2009-06-09 Thread Karsten Bräckelmann
On Tue, 2009-06-09 at 04:46 -0700, Stefan Guenther wrote: Karsten Bräckelmann wrote: Some sw components to be ruled out: - this isn't amavisd-new doing it, at least none of the official versions; Right, that's definitely something else adding the headers, as has been pointed out

Re: New slew of spams

2009-06-09 Thread Adam Katz
ktn wrote: By default, the spamd daemon does not allow user defined rules. Hostmonster needs to set allow_user_rules to 1 in the system configuration file. I asked about this and that's something that they will not do. LuKreme wrote: It's a good thing there are other hosting companies that

Re: tests= SIZE_LIMIT_EXCEEDED ??

2009-06-09 Thread Martin Gregorie
On Tue, 2009-06-09 at 14:58 +0200, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote: On Tue, 2009-06-09 at 04:46 -0700, Stefan Guenther wrote: Karsten Bräckelmann wrote: Some sw components to be ruled out: - this isn't amavisd-new doing it, at least none of the official versions; Right, that's

Re: [sa] Re: New Spam Mails plz suggest

2009-06-09 Thread Charles Gregory
On Tue, 9 Jun 2009, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: I believe his request for stats is a polite way of disagreeing with your statement that bots 'often' use Outlook SMTP Auth. OK, to be more accurate: times change, and maybe currently it's not that common to use outlook's (or whatever's) engine

Re: [sa] Re: New Spam Mails plz suggest

2009-06-09 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On Tue, 9 Jun 2009, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: I believe his request for stats is a polite way of disagreeing with your statement that bots 'often' use Outlook SMTP Auth. OK, to be more accurate: times change, and maybe currently it's not that common to use outlook's (or whatever's)

sa-update and SA versions (was: Re: New slew of spams)

2009-06-09 Thread Karsten Bräckelmann
On Mon, 2009-06-08 at 07:57 -0700, John Hardin wrote: That is correct. I hope (when I get write access to the repo) to add them to the 3.2.5 rules so they will go out via sa-update. Is there any way you can upgrade to 3.2.5? The differences between 3.2.x versions are code fixes. There is no

Re: sa-update error

2009-06-09 Thread Bowie Bailey
Benny Pedersen wrote: On Mon, June 8, 2009 14:41, snowweb wrote: Then I tried again with sa-update and got the following: [r...@s1 spamassassin]# sa-update Can't locate Archive/Tar.pm in @INC (@INC contains: /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/per

spamassassin doesn't use modified @INC

2009-06-09 Thread Stefan Jakobs
Hello list, I'm in the progress of setting up a new Server with amavisd-new and spamassassin. I like to run the recent versions of this programms, but therefore I need some perl modules from cpan (e.g. IP::Country::Fast), because they are not in the repository of my distribution (SLES 11).

RE: sa-update and SA versions (was: Re: New slew of spams)

2009-06-09 Thread RobertH
From: Karsten Bräckelmann The differences between 3.2.x versions are code fixes. There is no difference in rules, when using sa-update. While it is possible to publish per micro version updates, this is not necessary and thus not used for 3.2.x. They all share the very same rules and

Re: spamassassin doesn't use modified @INC

2009-06-09 Thread Mark Martinec
Stefan, I'm in the progress of setting up a new Server with amavisd-new and spamassassin. I like to run the recent versions of this programms, but therefore I need some perl modules from cpan (e.g. IP::Country::Fast), because they are not in the repository of my distribution (SLES 11). The

RE: sa-update and SA versions

2009-06-09 Thread Karsten Bräckelmann
The differences between 3.2.x versions are code fixes. There is no difference in rules, when using sa-update. While it is possible to publish per micro version updates, this is not necessary and thus not used for 3.2.x. They all share the very same rules and updates. Karsten,

Re: spamassassin doesn't use modified @INC

2009-06-09 Thread Stefan Jakobs
Mark Martinec: Stefan, snip amavisd does not modify @INC nor use the 'use lib' pragma/module. %ENV: PERL5LIB=/usr/local/perl/lib:/usr/local/perl/lib/arch Note that amavisd runs in taint mode, so this will be ignored by perl according to its perlrun documentation: snip When

Re: spamassassin doesn't use modified @INC

2009-06-09 Thread Mark Martinec
Stefan, It would be simplest to install missing modules in one of the perl-default directories, such as /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.10.0/ . Or try adding: use lib your-directory at the start of file amavisd. I added use lib '/usr/local/perl/lib'; to /etc/amavisd.conf and it seams to

Re: sa-update error

2009-06-09 Thread Benny Pedersen
On Tue, June 9, 2009 17:33, Bowie Bailey wrote: I have a CentOS 5.3 system with everything installed from the repos and my @INC looks exactly the same, so I don't necessarily see a problem with the versions here. problem is that some users of yum, rpm, and friends forget to make reinstall of