.local is a valid tld for LANs.
Please do not mess with the DNS.
On Sun, Nov 4, 2018 at 17:14, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> is it a problem ?
>
> i think it should be solved to make configfiles local dns resolved only,
> if at all it needs to be dns
>
> so cf changes to cf.localdomain or
On 11/04/2018 09:14 AM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
is it a problem ?
i think it should be solved to make configfiles local dns resolved only,
if at all it needs to be dns
so cf changes to cf.localdomain or cf.localhost, not just use cf with is
a valid cctlds :(
is cf.local valid and where ?
i
is it a problem ?
i think it should be solved to make configfiles local dns resolved only,
if at all it needs to be dns
so cf changes to cf.localdomain or cf.localhost, not just use cf with is
a valid cctlds :(
is cf.local valid and where ?
i have not maked a bug on it yet, but will start
On Sun, 4 Nov 2018, Benny Pedersen wrote:
is it a problem ?
i think it should be solved to make configfiles local dns resolved only, if
at all it needs to be dns
so cf changes to cf.localdomain or cf.localhost, not just use cf with is a
valid cctlds :(
is cf.local valid and where ?
i
On 4 Nov 2018, at 11:45, Grant Taylor wrote:
> Why does it matter if there's a naming collision between DNS domain names and
> file names?
Discussion of config files for SpamAssassin and Postfix has intermittently been
matched by URI DNSBLs. Some years ago I discovered just how widespread dumb
On 11/04/2018 11:48 AM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
Nov 3 03:22:50 localhost named[2301]: connection refused resolving
'72_scores.cf/NS/IN': 2a04:1b00:6::1#53
Nov 3 03:22:50 localhost named[2301]: connection refused resolving
'72_scores.cf/A/IN': 2a04:1b00:6::1#53
Nov 3 14:59:26 localhost
Bill Cole skrev den 2018-11-04 19:25:
On 4 Nov 2018, at 11:45, Grant Taylor wrote:
Why does it matter if there's a naming collision between DNS domain
names and file names?
Discussion of config files for SpamAssassin and Postfix has
intermittently been matched by URI DNSBLs. Some years ago I
On 4 Nov 2018, at 11:45, Grant Taylor wrote:
Why does it matter if there's a naming collision between DNS
domain names and file names?
Bill Cole skrev den 2018-11-04 19:25:
Discussion of config files for SpamAssassin and Postfix has
intermittently been matched by URI DNSBLs. Some years ago I
On Sun, 4 Nov 2018, Benny Pedersen wrote:
Bill Cole skrev den 2018-11-04 19:25:
On 4 Nov 2018, at 11:45, Grant Taylor wrote:
Why does it matter if there's a naming collision between DNS domain names
and file names?
Discussion of config files for SpamAssassin and Postfix has
intermittently
On Sun, 4 Nov 2018, John Hardin wrote:
Why is your system doing that?
...never mind, explained in a later post.
--
John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhar...@impsec.orgFALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhar...@impsec.org
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411
On Sun, Nov 04, 2018 at 04:12:12PM -0500, Bill Cole wrote:
>
> That would be SpamAssassin itself. The policy of treating anything matching
> '[-a-zA-Z0-9_]+\.' as an URI in all contexts dates back to v3.3.1
> at least. See https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6716 and
> note this
On 4 Nov 2018, at 16:27, Henrik K wrote:
Can someone actually register and use a domain with underscore in it?
No.
It is worth noting that the SA "standard" for what is treated as a
domain part of an URI is grounded in how MUAs behave, not in conformance
to to any well-defined
On Friday, 2 November 2018 3:45:08 ACDT RW wrote:
> On Wed, 31 Oct 2018 22:59:55 +1030
>
> Rodney Baker wrote:
> > On Wednesday, 31 October 2018 7:29:51 ACDT RW wrote:
> > > curl --verbose -L -O --remote-time -g --max-redirs 2
> > > --connect-timeout 30 --max-time 300
> > >
On 4 Nov 2018, at 14:48, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 4 Nov 2018, at 11:45, Grant Taylor wrote:
Why does it matter if there's a naming collision between DNS domain
names and file names?
Bill Cole skrev den 2018-11-04 19:25:
Discussion of config files for SpamAssassin and Postfix has
On 11/04/2018 04:02 PM, Grant Taylor wrote:
I have been downloading a daily lists of newly registered domains
for almost a year.
I have grand plans of turning the data into an RBL (of sorts) that I can
use to artificially add score to young domain names. Something like
last day, last week,
On 11/04/2018 02:27 PM, Henrik K wrote:
It does seems wasteful parsing 72_foobar.cf as a legal domain.
Agreed.
Can someone actually register and use a domain with underscore in it?
I don't know.
Does anyone have access to some URIBL data, is something actually listed
with an underscore?
--On Sunday, November 04, 2018 7:28 PM -0500 Bill Cole
wrote:
most of my examples of "Not A URI" were in fact turned into clickable
links by some horrific MUA.
If it's clickable, some user will click on it. If it's not, a malicious
message may beg the user to copy and paste it into the
17 matches
Mail list logo
