On Monday 17 October 2016 at 17:14:18, Bill Cole wrote:
> On 17 Oct 2016, at 9:04, Antony Stone wrote:
> > DNS runs over UDP, not TCP.
>
> True AND false.
Agreed; thanks for the detailed clarification, however I was answering a
question specifically about rbldnsd.
> A DNS server that does not
On 17 Oct 2016, at 9:04, Antony Stone wrote:
DNS runs over UDP, not TCP.
True AND false.
Most DNS queries can be answered in a single UDP packet and so most
queries are tried over UDP first. Traditionally, DNS answers over UDP
were limited to 512 bytes, although modern extensions typically
On Monday 17 October 2016 at 15:00:08, Nicola Piazzi wrote:
> Someone use dnsrbld to create personal rbl ?
> I am unable to bind to port 53 (and other ports)
Oh?
> I start and it tell that bind :
>
> [root@EFALIST rbldnsd]# ./start.sh
> rbldnsd: listening on ::1/53
> rbldnsd: listening on 127.0
Rob McEwen wrote:
John
Hardin wrote:
On Tue, 16 Sep 2008, Marc Perkel wrote:
Looking from opinions from people running rbl blacklists.
I have a list that contains a lot of name based information. I'm
about to add a lot more information to the list and what will happen
is that when you look u
John Hardin wrote:
On Tue,
16 Sep 2008, Marc Perkel wrote:
Looking from opinions from people running rbl blacklists.
I have a list that contains a lot of name based information. I'm
about to add a lot more information to the list and what will happen
is that when you look up a name you migh
Marc Perkel wrote:
Looking from opinions from people running rbl blacklists.
I have a list that contains a lot of name based information. I'm about
to add a lot more information to the list and what will happen is that
when you look up a name you might get several results. For example, a
host
On Tue, 2008-09-16 at 20:12 +0200, mouss wrote:
> Marc Perkel wrote:
> > Looking from opinions from people running rbl blacklists.
> >
> > I have a list that contains a lot of name based information. I'm about
> > to add a lot more information to the list and what will happen is that
> > when yo
Marc Perkel wrote:
Looking from opinions from people running rbl blacklists.
I have a list that contains a lot of name based information. I'm about
to add a lot more information to the list and what will happen is that
when you look up a name you might get several results. For example, a
host
John Hardin wrote:
On Tue, 16 Sep 2008, Marc Perkel wrote:
Looking from opinions from people running rbl blacklists.
I have a list that contains a lot of name based information. I'm
about to add a lot more information to the list and what will happen
is that when you look up a name you might
On Tue, 16 Sep 2008, Marc Perkel wrote:
Looking from opinions from people running rbl blacklists.
I have a list that contains a lot of name based information. I'm about
to add a lot more information to the list and what will happen is that
when you look up a name you might get several results
Rodney Richison a écrit :
> Is there a tool or howto to let users easily remove themselves? And for
> that matter, allow employees to add ip's. :)
>
I guess No. Now, employees/users should not modify the rbldnsd data,
since this data is "global", and also because that would mean reloading
data (
On Sunday, January 22, 2006, 4:38:11 PM, mouss mouss wrote:
> Larry Rosenman a écrit :
>> Jeff Peng wrote:
>>
>>>hi,Irina,
>>>rbldnsd is really a simple dns server.you can use it directly,no any
>>>need to bind.and,you can use rsync to download the rbl files.
>>>
>>
>> I have both rbldnsd and bi
Larry Rosenman a écrit :
> Jeff Peng wrote:
>
>>hi,Irina,
>>rbldnsd is really a simple dns server.you can use it directly,no any
>>need to bind.and,you can use rsync to download the rbl files.
>>
>
> I have both rbldnsd and bind running on my 2 nameservers. I had to
> bind(pardon the pun) rbldn
Jeff Peng wrote:
> when you run ./rbldnsd -h
> you should see:
> -b address[/port] - bind to (listen on) this address (required)
>
> So you can bind the rbldnsd to another alias IP address,diff from the
> IP that your BIND server is listening to. I think there is no
> conflict between the rbldnsd
when you run ./rbldnsd -h
you should see:
-b address[/port] - bind to (listen on) this address (required)
So you can bind the rbldnsd to another alias IP address,diff from the IP that
your BIND server is listening to.
I think there is no conflict between the rbldnsd and the BIND.
>Jeff Peng wrot
Some of the HowTo documents at:
http://www.surbl.org/rsync-signup.html
may be of use in setting up and rbldnsd server, including port
forwarding from BIND.
Jeff C.
--
Jeff Chan
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.surbl.org/
Jeff Peng wrote:
> hi,Irina,
> rbldnsd is really a simple dns server.you can use it directly,no any
> need to bind.and,you can use rsync to download the rbl files.
>
I have both rbldnsd and bind running on my 2 nameservers. I had to
bind(pardon the pun) rbldnsd
To a separate alias IP, as I could
hi,Irina,
rbldnsd is really a simple dns server.you can use it directly,no any need to
bind.and,you can use rsync to download the rbl files.
> --- Ursprüngliche Nachricht ---
> Von: "Irina" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> An:
> Betreff: rbldnsd on FreeBSD
> Datum: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 14:57:02 -0500
>
> Hel
Irina wrote:
Hello all,
Thank you for your answers on SURBL (few days back). I decided to install
rbldnsd with rsync and have few things to ask.
It will run on FreeBSD 5.4 with no named running. Server uses resolve.conf
with 2 our DNS servers.
Do I need to use BIND with rbldnsd and rsync? O
19 matches
Mail list logo
