I think that was pure speculation. I use JDK 1.6 w/ Tomcat 5.5 in
production and have had no issue.
--David
Marco wrote:
Hello,
I read in previous post today that someone wasn't sure whether Java 1.6 is
compatible with tomcat 5.5.
This is new to me. Does anyone know more about this
David Smith wrote:
I think that was pure speculation. I use JDK 1.6 w/ Tomcat 5.5 in
production and have had no issue.
Likewise, and they go very nicely indeed.
p
--David
Marco wrote:
Hello,
I read in previous post today that someone wasn't sure whether Java
1.6 is
compatible
Is there any performance increase that you've noticed?
Pid wrote:
David Smith wrote:
I think that was pure speculation. I use JDK 1.6 w/ Tomcat 5.5 in
production and have had no issue.
Likewise, and they go very nicely indeed.
p
--David
Marco wrote:
Hello,
I read in previous post
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Daniel,
Daniel M Garland wrote:
Is there any performance increase that you've noticed?
Relative to what?
- -chris
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Pid,
Pid wrote:
I'm not sure if compiling Tomcat under 1.6 would produce even better
performance - I don't know enough about byte code to comment on that,
but some of the more enlightened listers may do.
I don't believe that javac has undergone
From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Java 1.6
I don't believe that javac has undergone significant upgrades through
the years...
Actually, it has, but the big improvements were between 1.3 and 1.5.
The javac in Java SE 6 doesn't appear to be much different from
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chuck,
Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Java 1.6
I don't believe that javac has undergone significant upgrades through
the years...
Actually, it has, but the big improvements were
From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Java 1.6
Really? Other than crap like auto-boxing, attributes, and
foreach-style 'for' syntax, what has the compiler done for
me, lately? I see all that as syntactic sugar.
Agreed, that is just syntax enhancement. I
Christopher Schultz wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chuck,
Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Java 1.6
I don't believe that javac has undergone significant upgrades through
the years...
Actually