Re: Java 1.6

2007-09-26 Thread David Smith
I think that was pure speculation. I use JDK 1.6 w/ Tomcat 5.5 in production and have had no issue. --David Marco wrote: Hello, I read in previous post today that someone wasn't sure whether Java 1.6 is compatible with tomcat 5.5. This is new to me. Does anyone know more about this

Re: Java 1.6

2007-09-26 Thread Pid
David Smith wrote: I think that was pure speculation. I use JDK 1.6 w/ Tomcat 5.5 in production and have had no issue. Likewise, and they go very nicely indeed. p --David Marco wrote: Hello, I read in previous post today that someone wasn't sure whether Java 1.6 is compatible

Re: Java 1.6

2007-09-26 Thread Daniel M Garland
Is there any performance increase that you've noticed? Pid wrote: David Smith wrote: I think that was pure speculation. I use JDK 1.6 w/ Tomcat 5.5 in production and have had no issue. Likewise, and they go very nicely indeed. p --David Marco wrote: Hello, I read in previous post

Re: Java 1.6

2007-09-26 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Daniel, Daniel M Garland wrote: Is there any performance increase that you've noticed? Relative to what? - -chris -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

Re: Java 1.6

2007-09-26 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Pid, Pid wrote: I'm not sure if compiling Tomcat under 1.6 would produce even better performance - I don't know enough about byte code to comment on that, but some of the more enlightened listers may do. I don't believe that javac has undergone

RE: Java 1.6

2007-09-26 Thread Caldarale, Charles R
From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Java 1.6 I don't believe that javac has undergone significant upgrades through the years... Actually, it has, but the big improvements were between 1.3 and 1.5. The javac in Java SE 6 doesn't appear to be much different from

Re: Java 1.6

2007-09-26 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Chuck, Caldarale, Charles R wrote: From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Java 1.6 I don't believe that javac has undergone significant upgrades through the years... Actually, it has, but the big improvements were

RE: Java 1.6

2007-09-26 Thread Caldarale, Charles R
From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Java 1.6 Really? Other than crap like auto-boxing, attributes, and foreach-style 'for' syntax, what has the compiler done for me, lately? I see all that as syntactic sugar. Agreed, that is just syntax enhancement. I

Re: Java 1.6

2007-09-26 Thread David kerber
Christopher Schultz wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Chuck, Caldarale, Charles R wrote: From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Java 1.6 I don't believe that javac has undergone significant upgrades through the years... Actually