Re: Request for a technical review

2018-12-14 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Guido, On 12/13/18 03:33, Jäkel, Guido wrote: > Dear Mallory and Mark, > > then I'm the one of the rare who use an "unusual" setups for more > than 10 years :) . On a staged farm of about 3*10 Tomcat's we run a > whole bunch of "webapps"; most of

Re: Request for a technical review

2018-12-13 Thread Mark Thomas
applications. > This one is addressed via the http Connector. What is unusual about that? Seems fairly standard virtual hosting to me. Mark > > Guido > >> -Original Message- >> From: Mark Thomas [mailto:ma...@apache.org] >> Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2018

RE: Request for a technical review

2018-12-13 Thread Jäkel , Guido
--- >From: Mark Thomas [mailto:ma...@apache.org] >Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2018 3:26 PM >To: users@tomcat.apache.org >Subject: Re: Request for a technical review >The first architecture diagram: > - doesn't show any hosts > - incorrectly classes a "Service" as a "we

Re: Request for a technical review

2018-12-12 Thread Mallory Mooney
Appreciate your feedback, Mark. I'll get it incorporated ASAP. On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 8:26 AM Mark Thomas wrote: > On 11/12/2018 19:20, Mallory Mooney wrote: > > Hi all! > > > > It's been a long time coming, so I wanted to resurrect this thread one > more > > time to share the now published

Re: Request for a technical review

2018-12-12 Thread Mark Thomas
On 11/12/2018 19:20, Mallory Mooney wrote: > Hi all! > > It's been a long time coming, so I wanted to resurrect this thread one more > time to share the now published post. You can find it at > https://www.datadoghq.com/blog/tomcat-architecture-and-performance/. Now I can see the document

Re: Request for a technical review

2018-12-11 Thread Mallory Mooney
Hi all! It's been a long time coming, so I wanted to resurrect this thread one more time to share the now published post. You can find it at https://www.datadoghq.com/blog/tomcat-architecture-and-performance/. I hope everyone has a great week! Mallory On Sat, Nov 3, 2018 at 4:28 AM Mark

Re: Request for a technical review

2018-11-03 Thread Mark Thomas
On 02/11/2018 16:34, Mallory Mooney wrote: > Hi everyone! > > Just wanted to check-in to see if anyone has had the chance to take a look > at the draft and leave feedback. I'll be locking things down for this one > by Thursday of next week (Nov. 8), so there's some time left if you are > still

Re: Request for a technical review

2018-11-02 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Mallory, On 11/2/18 12:34, Mallory Mooney wrote: > Hi everyone! > > Just wanted to check-in to see if anyone has had the chance to take > a look at the draft and leave feedback. I'll be locking things down > for this one by Thursday of next week

Re: Request for a technical review

2018-11-02 Thread Mallory Mooney
Hi everyone! Just wanted to check-in to see if anyone has had the chance to take a look at the draft and leave feedback. I'll be locking things down for this one by Thursday of next week (Nov. 8), so there's some time left if you are still working through it. Have a great weekend! On Fri, Oct

Re: Request for a technical review

2018-10-19 Thread Mallory Mooney
Hi all! Just wanted to give you an update. I am working to get things for this series wrapped up by the first week of November. Hopefully, that still gives everyone enough time to review and leave any feedback. Mallory On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 3:37 PM Mallory Mooney wrote: > Igal, it will be

Re: Request for a technical review

2018-10-12 Thread Mallory Mooney
Igal, it will be available publicly once published! I don't have an official publish date yet but can share that when it becomes more concrete. And no PRs yet, Chris! It's still in the less cool GDoc stage of the review process. :) On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 1:36 PM Igal Sapir wrote: > On

Re: Request for a technical review

2018-10-12 Thread Igal Sapir
On 10/12/2018 11:23 AM, Christopher Schultz wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Mallory, On 10/12/18 13:23, Mallory Mooney wrote: I definitely appreciate everyone's willingness to help out! Here is the link to the GDoc:

Re: Request for a technical review

2018-10-12 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Mallory, On 10/12/18 13:23, Mallory Mooney wrote: > I definitely appreciate everyone's willingness to help out! > > Here is the link to the GDoc: > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1fudlXj055nnPd-1lUoAXIS2ge8qNI56_jg UhHgKczFE/edit?usp=sharing

Re: Request for a technical review

2018-10-12 Thread Mallory Mooney
I definitely appreciate everyone's willingness to help out! Here is the link to the GDoc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1fudlXj055nnPd-1lUoAXIS2ge8qNI56_jgUhHgKczFE/edit?usp=sharing Requesting access will still be needed, but I can grant that ASAP. I want to make sure I can attribute

Re: Request for a technical review

2018-10-11 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Mark, On 10/10/18 6:00 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: > On 10/10/18 17:44, Mallory Mooney wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I work for Datadog and am writing a guide about monitoring Tomcat >> (with or without Datadog). I'd love to get some feedback on the >>

Re: Request for a technical review

2018-10-10 Thread Mark Thomas
On 10/10/18 17:44, Mallory Mooney wrote: > Hi all, > > I work for Datadog and am writing a guide about monitoring Tomcat (with or > without Datadog). I'd love to get some feedback on the technical content. > The project maintainers we reached out to recommended we post a request > here. > >

Re: Request for a technical review

2018-10-10 Thread Deepak Behera
Hi Mallory, I can have a look. Please let me know further details. Thanks, Deepak Behera