Is it possible at all to have content at / ? Trying to mount something at
/
results in an error and I'm wondering of there's a workaround.
By default it displays your home page (actually the page represented by the
page class returned by WebApplication's getHomePage() method) if you
But that is not the problem or the question here.
There is only talk that it must look nice
I even heard somebody saying yes it looks nice it is a bookmarkable url
but it is not really bookmarkable... (because the page state isn't preserved
in the url)
Whats the point for that? nothing.
I
can't you attach those to a jira issue. Then it is not getting lost.
On Feb 6, 2008 8:16 AM, SantiagoA [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.nabble.com/file/p15306186/ValidationTest1.iamzip
ValidationTest1.iamzip
http://www.nabble.com/file/p15306186/ValidationTest2.iamzip
hi
i want to use jasperreport in wicket 1.3. i have used it with wicket 1.2.
in wicket 1.2 we can set parameters in web.xml to call jasper report as
servlet
servlet-nameReportServlet/servlet-name
Hello guys,
I'm having a little problem with the use of AjaxFormValidatingBehavior.
I add it to all my fields, using a visitor.
form.visitChildren(FormComponent.class, new IVisitor()
{
public Object component(Component component) {
if (component instanceof TextField) {
component.add(new
Okay.
I made a jira issue and attach one zipfile with both examples.
JIRA-Issue WICKET-1325
Hope that works. Never worked with jira before.
-
rename your foo.zip to foo.iamzip and attach it to the email.
-igor
--
View this message in context:
My first guess is that the IVisitor is not serializable. Since you
create two nested anonymous inner classes inside one another, the
behaviors keep a reference to the IVisitor.
Martijn
On 2/6/08, Sébastien Piller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello guys,
I'm having a little problem with the use
That's it! I'm too stupid... sorry for the disturbing ;)
Martijn Dashorst a écrit :
My first guess is that the IVisitor is not serializable. Since you
create two nested anonymous inner classes inside one another, the
behaviors keep a reference to the IVisitor.
Martijn
Hi to all.
This is my first post, here's a quick introduction of
myself. My name is Fabrizio Giudici, I'm a senior architect
and I've been working with Wicket for a bit more than one
year.
I've recently upgraded to 1.3 (I was working with an 1.3
snapshot that dated back to a few months ago) and
Hi,
I'm developing custom IModel implementation which will be used as a
model in forms. This model is able to record changes made by a form in
the editing object (POJO). I do not store this changes directly to the
base object, but they are stored somwhere inside this model (eg. in a
Map of
Hello,
I have a Link (not Ajax) on a component that does some heavyweight
processing in onClick. During this processing I want to block other
clicks from the same user. Is there a generic way to block multiple
requests on the same link? I would prefer a solution without Ajax /
JavaScript,
Hi people,
currently I'm evaluating wicket as the future framework in our company. I
already found a lot of information but still there is some missing. I hope
you can help me out answering these questions.
* What experience do you have regarding performance of wicket applications?
* Is there a
Try here:
http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/how-to-do-things-in-wicket.html
As for some of the other questions, Ive answered inline..
René Samselnig wrote:
Hi people,
currently I'm evaluating wicket as the future framework in our company. I
already found a lot of information but still there is
So I take it, it's currently not possible.
oliverw wrote:
Is it possible at all to have content at / ? Trying to mount something at
/ results in an error and I'm wondering of there's a workaround.
--
View this message in context:
If we has such an interface then we need to rewrite most things because now
its just a static method and then we need to have instances.
i guess you want then to have AbstractPropertyModel to have a
getPropertyResolver method
that you can override and give something else back?
But i still dont
Hmm I beg to differ:)
http://developer.yahoo.com/yui/examples/menu/example03.html
Theres also an wicket integration project for this on wicketstuff..
Again; i might have misunderstood this..
regards Nino
Edvin Syse wrote:
That's purely a css issue, most menues are laid out using an ul and
So I take it, it's currently not possible.
Looks like I was not clear enough, sorry:)
Configure your wicket filter to /* and return the page class you want to
view as / as the home page in your application class. You don't have to
mount anything, it will be displayed as /
On Feb 6, 2008 3:45 PM, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If we has such an interface then we need to rewrite most things because now
its just a static method and then we need to have instances.
I know that. It is not a simple change.
i guess you want then to have AbstractPropertyModel
Hi!
I have one model and 4 different web applications. All webapplications is
using the same model but different views. There is Different virtual hosts
on the same server. Can I use wicket for this?
ie
Domain1.se, Domain1.com, Domain2.se, Domain2.com same server different
virtual hosts same
Here's what we ended up doing to address this (since there didn't seem to be
a consistent approach to handling the variety of scenarios from the the
framework's perspective):
1. Disabled the back button by agressively expiring visited pages (negating
a huge benefit of using wicket in the first
If you're looking for a way to use different layouts, templates for
different virtual servers you have several options:
- use the Session.setStyle() to set the style... you can do this in a custom
WebRequest and by examining the server name of the request url. Then you can
have different .html
g.. getting late, the setter should be:
public abstract void setObject(Object obj) {
if (!isEquals(obj, getObject()) {
editedValues.put(obj);
}
}
Thomas
-Original Message-
From: Maeder Thomas [mailto:[EMAIL
On Wed, 06 Feb 2008, Matthijs Wensveen wrote:
I have a Link (not Ajax) on a component that does some heavyweight
processing in onClick. During this processing I want to block other
clicks from the same user. Is there a generic way to block multiple
requests on the same link? I would prefer
Matthijs Wensveen wrote:
Hello,
I have a Link (not Ajax) on a component that does some heavyweight
processing in onClick. During this processing I want to block other
clicks from the same user. Is there a generic way to block multiple
requests on the same link?
I would prefer a solution
there is a mask component in wicketstuff-minis. you can write a call
decorator that will bring up the mask that will cover the whole screen
and prevent the user from clicking.
-igor
On Feb 6, 2008 4:37 AM, Matthijs Wensveen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I have a Link (not Ajax) on a
Hi all
I'm writing test cases for my wicket application (1.2.6), and I'm
having problems with the ResourceModel and StringResourceModel. It
seems like when loaded by a WicketTester (with startPage method) these
components doesn't load the global resource file
MyApplication.properties. If I put
you have to make wicket tester use _your_ application subclass
-igor
On Feb 6, 2008 8:50 AM, Marco Aurélio Silva [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all
I'm writing test cases for my wicket application (1.2.6), and I'm
having problems with the ResourceModel and StringResourceModel. It
seems like
Thanks for your response. Your solution looks interesting and even
quite similar to mine, but... :)
My ObjectEditor interface is like your Map editedValues, IModel
underlyingModel coupled together. But underlyingModel in my solution
holds the whole object, not a single property:
Object
How to make it use my application subclass?
WicketTester.set(Application application) trow this exception:
wicket.WicketRuntimeException: Use Application.init() method for
configuring your application object
at wicket.Application.getSettings(Application.java:606)
at
On Feb 6, 2008 4:40 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1. I've always experienced some sudden session expiration
problems with no apparent reason (I mean, the user wasn't
actually sleeping). But they happened only once in a while.
After upgrading to 1.3 they occur very often and
So long as everything runs in the same webapp, you should be able to use the
same model. From a wicket application, you can always get to the request
object to get to the virtual host, so you can use that info to present a
different view.
Mathias P.W Nilsson wrote:
Hi!
I have one model
I almost have a component ready for wicketstuff.. Should I spend the
extra hour generalizing it and putting it up on wicketstuff?
http://www.hedgerwow.com/360/mwd/accordion/demo.php
--
Nino Martinez Wael
Java Specialist @ Jayway DK
http://www.jayway.dk
+45 2936 7684
Hi
If you have trouble localizing your backend components, domain classes
etc... Look no futher:)
http://code.google.com/p/jpa-translator/ (licensed under apache)
Disclaimer, im one of the authors:) But it fits really great into wicket
and it's plugable too...
--
Nino Martinez Wael
Java
All right. Now I feel stupid. Thanks it worked!
Janos Cserep-3 wrote:
Is it possible at all to have content at / ? Trying to mount something at
/
results in an error and I'm wondering of there's a workaround.
By default it displays your home page (actually the page represented by
Hi,
I'm myself discovering Wicket, but I'll try to nswer some of your questions
;)
René Samselnig wrote:
* What experience do you have regarding performance of wicket
applications?
I haven't built a large application with Wicket yet, but in a JPA CRUD
examples I made, Wicket performs
The chief advantage in my mind is that the code is all Java. I was
easily (2 dozen lines of code) able to write a behavior that
replicates model between related form components so that when someone
types a first name into a field it is replicated to other first name
fields and those fields are
Hi Rene,
Some answers...
* What experience do you have regarding performance of wicket applications?
We're still in development, but so far performance hasn't been an issue.
* Is there a way to cluster wicket applications?
Yes. Same way you would cluster any webapp. Wicket also has a number of
dont know about 1.2, but in 1.3 there is a constructor that takes an
instance of application, so you would do new WicketTester(new
MyApplication());
-igor
On Feb 6, 2008 9:11 AM, Marco Aurélio Silva [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How to make it use my application subclass?
One of our more clever developers created a CompoundPropertyModel that
uses a cglib proxy to strongly bind the mutators to the model. It
looks like this:
SharedPropertyModelCustomer model = new
SharedPropertyModelCustomer(customer);
this.setModel(model);
Ah, just an addition about performance:
Session size can be a bottleneck in performance, so one have just to be
careful about what to put in his session and by using detachable models for
example.
--
View this message in context:
very nice!
-Original Message-
From: Scott Swank [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2008 12:57 PM
To: Wicket User List
Subject: CompoundModel based on proxies
One of our more clever developers created a CompoundPropertyModel that
uses a cglib proxy to strongly bind
As you might have guessed we use cglib to wrap domain classes and proyx
them... This approach lets you inject localizing into existing systems..
So you do this:
@Translatable
public class Hotel {
private Long id;
private String name;
@Translate
private String description;
[...getter
Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael schrieb:
I almost have a component ready for wicketstuff.. Should I spend the
extra hour generalizing it and putting it up on wicketstuff?
http://www.hedgerwow.com/360/mwd/accordion/demo.php
SURE!
Scott Swank wrote:
We're happy to share if folk like this approach. N.B. that the .to()
call is for readability rather than out of any necessity.
I'm quite interested in this. This looks like it is just crazy and
clever enough to be really useful :-)
Thanks!
Carl-Eric
Are you using our modal window implementation or your own?
Wicket implementation. BTW, I have another modal window that doesn't
create problem. I'll later post the code, when I'm able to cut it down.
3. I have still some confusion about serialization of things
in sessions. I've always
Translator translator = new Translator( Locale.GERMAN );
Hotel translatedHotel = translator.translate( hotel );
translatedHotel.getDescription(); // return description in german
translatedHotel.setDescription( die Beschreibung ); // persist german
description
I think it would be very cool
On Feb 6, 2008 10:28 AM, Fabrizio Giudici [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are you using our modal window implementation or your own?
Wicket implementation. BTW, I have another modal window that doesn't
create problem. I'll later post the code, when I'm able to cut it down.
are you using it to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Guys,
Under the source dir that contains my page and html, I have two dirs,
css and images. Inside css, I have two files, main.css and ie.css.
These css files reference images, such as:
main.css:
a.download-but{
float:right;
Hi All,
I was wondering if there's a way to add or decorate a javascript call in
CheckBox? What I did was:
new CheckBox(checkBox, new Model()) {
protected void onComponentTag(ComponentTag tag) {
tag.put(onclick,executeSomething(););
tag.put(onclick,executeSomething();+tag.getattributes().get(onclick));
-igor
On Feb 6, 2008 10:39 AM, Beyonder Unknown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All,
I was wondering if there's a way to add or decorate a javascript call in
CheckBox? What I did was:
new CheckBox(checkBox, new Model()) {
Why not just return a hashmap as the model object and have besides
that hashmap your real object
On 2/6/08, Daniel Stoch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 6, 2008 3:45 PM, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If we has such an interface then we need to rewrite most things because
now
its
+1
2008/2/6, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I almost have a component ready for wicketstuff.. Should I spend the
extra hour generalizing it and putting it up on wicketstuff?
http://www.hedgerwow.com/360/mwd/accordion/demo.php
--
Nino Martinez Wael
Java Specialist
be careful only to evaluate performance in wicket in deployment mode.
development mode is subject to a potentially very high level of overhead
that you don't want to profile.
René Samselnig wrote:
Hi people,
currently I'm evaluating wicket as the future framework in our company. I
This is exactly how ObjectEditor default implementation would looks
like: it contains hashmap for edited values.
Simple HashMap as a model is not a good solution, because you must
somehow initialize it with object properties' values first. I think a
better is to hide such details inside an
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thanks Matej. For now, I've converted to .gif until I can find a better
solution.
Matej Knopp wrote:
Hi,
I'm affraid the url for alphaimageloader needs to be absolute. IE
can't handle relative urls for filters. That is a problem because in
I have seen the behavior but that seems to be endemic to windows.
I have not seen that on Linux or OS X.
On Wed, Feb 6, 2008 at 12:08 PM, gantini [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Strangethis dosn't work for me...
When wicket starts, in the tomcat console I can read:
Does your IDE copy the HTML files over to the classpath?
Martijn
On 2/6/08, gantini [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Strangethis dosn't work for me...
When wicket starts, in the tomcat console I can read:
*** WARNING: Wicket
How do you modify the html, in what tool, how do you ensure the html
gets inside the deployed and unpacked war running in tomcat?
Martijn
On 2/6/08, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does your IDE copy the HTML files over to the classpath?
Martijn
On 2/6/08, gantini [EMAIL
You can have transparent pngs without alpha blending (1 bit
transparency). I believe IE6 supports that. It's useful if your images
need more than 255+1 color palette.
-Matej
On Feb 6, 2008 9:42 PM, Philip A. Chapman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Well I forget that PropertyResolver works with maps, so custom models
probably are not necessary then :). Thanks for tip.
But in my application I have to use some solutions from other
application layer (persistance layer), where a special mechanisms to
track changes in objects are
I didn't see any response to this so I'm going to bump it once.
-Original Message-
From: Dan Kaplan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2008 11:36 AM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: RE: mounted url bug or request for enhancement
I made a very big typo in that last
im on windows and have never experienced this...
-igor
On Feb 6, 2008 12:22 PM, Konstantin Ignatyev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have seen the behavior but that seems to be endemic to windows.
I have not seen that on Linux or OS X.
On Wed, Feb 6, 2008 at 12:08 PM, gantini [EMAIL PROTECTED]
test it out this way:
go here
http://wicket.apache.org/quickstart.html
copy and paste the maven command to create a quickstart project
find the Start class, right click and do run as java application
this will start embedded jetty, go to localhost:8080, then find
Index.html, edit it, and
please share for Wicket 1.4, if cglib's license is permitting, I think
we should add this to core.
Martijn
On 2/6/08, Scott Swank [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One of our more clever developers created a CompoundPropertyModel that
uses a cglib proxy to strongly bind the mutators to the model. It
if not cglib i can rewrite that with asm, its license is very liberal
and we can even embed it into wicket - at least thats what ive done
for salve to avoid version conflicts with other asm versions.
-igor
On Feb 6, 2008 1:04 PM, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
please share for
Hi,
I have implemented such model (as Johan wrote) in our application. It
uses observer pattern and it has methods like: addListener,
removeListener and notify(Event event) (Event is an enum). Each panel
register itself as a proper events listener and in onClick() you
can simply call
Hi *,
i use an application. This will be called by different urls via filters in
web.xml I set a custom init-param for every filter. I can access the
parameter and thus load my data based on the value. So far all ok.
But i'm tired of adding always a new filter and the definition to the web.xml
The cglib website http://cglib.sourceforge.net/ points here for their
license: http://www.apache.org/foundation/licence-FAQ.html
So I don't think there are any issues. :)
Are there any issues with attaching a zip file to an e-mail, or would
you prefer another means?
On Feb 6, 2008 1:06 PM,
Hi,
gantini wrote:
But when I modify any html file, no reload is performed :-((
This may take time, especially with HTML files (in opposition to class files
change) and in an unvisible manner (again in opposition to class files
change where Tomcat reloads the context).
Try waiting for
I'm quite interested too.
Daniel
On 2008-02-06, at 19:27, Carl-Eric Menzel wrote:
Scott Swank wrote:
We're happy to share if folk like this approach. N.B. that the .to()
call is for readability rather than out of any necessity.
I'm quite interested in this. This looks like it is just
jira, that way you can click the im donating attachment to the
project through ASL license checkbox
-igor
On Feb 6, 2008 1:10 PM, Scott Swank [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The cglib website http://cglib.sourceforge.net/ points here for their
license:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1327
On Feb 6, 2008 1:12 PM, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
jira, that way you can click the im donating attachment to the
project through ASL license checkbox
-igor
On Feb 6, 2008 1:10 PM, Scott Swank [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The
Hi
I am looking for some wicket code or a component that can show mouseover
popups loaded by AJAX.
Exactly as can be seen on this page
http://www.mathertel.de/AJAXEngine/S03_AJAXControls/AJAXPopUpDemo.aspx
http://www.mathertel.de/AJAXEngine/S03_AJAXControls/AJAXPopUpDemo.aspx
Many thanks if
Another thing that is confusing to me is that, why is it that when I override
the onComponentTag() the name attribute in the generated markup disappear.
I'm just appending function in the onClick when I override onComponentTag().
Thoughts?
Thanks,
Wen Tong
--
The only constant in life is
because you dont call super.oncomponenttag()
-igor
On Feb 6, 2008 2:14 PM, Beyonder Unknown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Another thing that is confusing to me is that, why is it that when I override
the onComponentTag() the name attribute in the generated markup disappear.
I'm just appending
Never mind, I noticed that it doesn't call the super.onComponentTag().
my bad.
Wen Tong
--
The only constant in life is change.
- Original Message
From: Beyonder Unknown [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, February 6, 2008 2:14:12 PM
Subject: Re: adding
Thanks! And I always thought: what happens in Vegas, stays in Vegas...
Martijn
On 2/6/08, Scott Swank [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1327
On Feb 6, 2008 1:12 PM, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
jira, that way you can click the im donating
Thanks Igor!
--
The only constant in life is change.
- Original Message
From: Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, February 6, 2008 2:19:44 PM
Subject: Re: adding extra javascript call in CheckBox
because
you
dont
call
I would be happy to - what is the URL for this? (first time - new
contributor).
In that context - I recently grepped through the Wicket source and
noticed that all the javascript event calls (onchange, onclick, etc.)
are all in the code as plain strings, which is bad practice. Thus I
wrote a
djo.mos wrote:
Try waiting for some seconds and keep hitting the refresh button.
Something wrong in my project
I'm wait for some minutes, and nothing was happened
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Reloading-resource-tp15268997p15322083.html
Sent from the
If you use any IDE other than Eclipse, you have to *make* the project
in order to get the html files to refresh.
Martijn
On 2/7/08, gantini [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
djo.mos wrote:
Try waiting for some seconds and keep hitting the refresh button.
Something wrong in my project
I'm
I don't wont using Jetty I'm Tomcat fan :-)
I'm usually use Eclipse+MyEclise+Tomcat for my web application (spring MVC).
Is a Tomcat-wicket integration problem?
igor.vaynberg wrote:
test it out this way:
go here
http://wicket.apache.org/quickstart.html
copy and paste the maven
Windows?!!?! What's Windows? :-)
No windows in my computer!
I'm using ***ONLY*** Linux
Konstantin Ignatyev-3 wrote:
I have seen the behavior but that seems to be endemic to windows.
I have not seen that on Linux or OS X.
On Wed, Feb 6, 2008 at 12:08 PM, gantini [EMAIL
there is no tomcat-wicket integration, just like there is no
jetty-wicket integration. you simply have to make your ide copy files
to where tomcat loads them from when they are saved.
-igor
On Feb 6, 2008 3:11 PM, gantini [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't wont using Jetty I'm Tomcat fan
Yes!!!
I'm use Eclipe+Myeclipse.
When I change an HTML file, this is automatically deployed. I've checked the
file on the tomcat dir and it is changed
:-(
Martijn Dashorst wrote:
How do you modify the html, in what tool, how do you ensure the html
gets inside the deployed and unpacked
No problem. I didn't even write a line of it. :)
On Feb 6, 2008 2:30 PM, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks! And I always thought: what happens in Vegas, stays in Vegas...
Martijn
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
On 2/7/08, Scott Swank [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No problem. I didn't even write a line of it. :)
Just for the record keeping: are you allowed to grant us the use of
said model? Typically that should be done by the original copyright
holder.
Martijn
--
Buy Wicket in Action:
I have his approval, but I can get him if you like. Let me know either way.
On Feb 6, 2008 3:22 PM, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/7/08, Scott Swank [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No problem. I didn't even write a line of it. :)
Just for the record keeping: are you allowed to
Using quickstart and Jetty project (with eclispe) all work correctly
I think that the problem is in myeclipse+tomcat
igor.vaynberg wrote:
test it out this way:
go here
http://wicket.apache.org/quickstart.html
copy and paste the maven command to create a quickstart project
If he could leave a comment on the issue that would be great.
If he has more ideas like this, get him to open a JIRA account :)
Martijn
On 2/7/08, Scott Swank [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have his approval, but I can get him if you like. Let me know either way.
On Feb 6, 2008 3:22 PM, Martijn
Resolved
Incredible. the problem was caused by wrong version of slf4j-log4j12
library, version 1.0.1 instead of 1.4.2
The right libraries is slf4j-api-1.4.2 + slf4j-log4j12-1.4.2 !!!
I hope this useful for other newbie of Wicket
gantini wrote:
I'm
I've committed a ticket for this, should have mentioned it here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1324
-sam
On Feb 6, 2008, at 2:47 PM, Michael Mehrle wrote:
I would be happy to - what is the URL for this? (first time - new
contributor).
In that context - I recently grepped
On Feb 6, 2008 4:20 PM, gantini [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Resolved
Incredible. the problem was caused by wrong version of slf4j-log4j12
library, version 1.0.1 instead of 1.4.2
The right libraries is slf4j-api-1.4.2 + slf4j-log4j12-1.4.2 !!!
I don't
like BoundCompoundPropertyModel, but safer. i think this almost might be too
clever as it sacrifices some intuitiveness. also, it's filling in for a
missing java feature. this should really be:
boundModel.bind(component, firstName.property)
(where .property, .field and .method are
another thing that occurs to me is that perhaps the method would be more
generalized we basically made a fill-in for the missing .property feature.
we could have a method like Reflection.property(expr) return a property
expression string (or a compiled version of it). this makes me think
i disagree. i dont think we should be doing more with cglib in core or
any other bytecode magic. have you ever tried to walk code that uses
bytecode generation? its a nightmare. one of my favorite things about
wicket is that it is just java and its easy as hell to debug. im not
really against
so you don't support this model then?
igor.vaynberg wrote:
i disagree. i dont think we should be doing more with cglib in core or
any other bytecode magic. have you ever tried to walk code that uses
bytecode generation? its a nightmare. one of my favorite things about
wicket is that it
i support it in a non-core module
-igor
On Feb 6, 2008 5:41 PM, Jonathan Locke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
so you don't support this model then?
igor.vaynberg wrote:
i disagree. i dont think we should be doing more with cglib in core or
any other bytecode magic. have you ever tried to
There are additional considerations (at least in this implementation),
all of which should be familiar to users of Hibernate or any
proxy-based framework.
1) classes may not be final
2) methods may not be final
3) classes must have a no-method constructor
Some folk may not be happy with these
If you're interested in using proxies, you could check out Apache
Commons Proxy. It hasn't been released yet, but I would imagine we
could get a release out the door in short order if it was wanted. The
cool thing about ACP is that you can swap out the proxying technology
easily (JDK proxies,
1 - 100 of 105 matches
Mail list logo
