see Alexander Morozov reply
either use new TextFieldInteger(refreshRate, refreshRateModel,
Integer.class);
or call textField.setType(Integer.class)
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 7:48 AM, nino martinez wael
nino.martinez.w...@gmail.com wrote:
same result :
private void
should I add one, its just inline with the other indicating components?
package com.netdesign.wallboard.component;
import java.util.List;
import org.apache.wicket.ajax.AjaxRequestTarget;
import org.apache.wicket.ajax.IAjaxIndicatorAware;
import
if you use 1.5 then you can use the new event mechanism. see WICKET-1312
in 1.4 you can use something like:
new AjaxFormSubmitBehavior(event) {
onSubmit(AjaxRequestTarget target, Form form) {
...
target.addChildren(getPage(), MyDialog.class);
}
}
The last line will register all
hi,
each page with all its components is being serialized and stored somewhere
(session, disk) at the end of a request.
This is needed to be able to support stateful pages and to be able to return
to previous page or version of a page with the browser back button.
Each component and model has
Yes, your code seems accordant with other indicating components.
should I add one, its just inline with the other indicating components?
package com.netdesign.wallboard.component;
import java.util.List;
import org.apache.wicket.ajax.AjaxRequestTarget;
import
Hi there,
For some time now I have been trying to put together a simple project to get
me off the ground with a Wicket/Spring/Hibernate setup. I've had lots of ups
and downs, and found this guide really useful:
http://wicketinaction.com/2009/06/wicketspringhibernate-configuration/
However, I
If you have full control over the contents of your dialog you could try to
1- create the interface to mark your dialog:
public interface IAjaxSubmitAware {
void onSubmit(AjaxRequestTarget target);
}
2- create your own link, buttons, etc as in
public abstract class
@SpringBean isn't for use inside your Spring services, just Wicket
stuff. Just use the native Spring injection mechanisms. Try
@Autowired.
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 5:43 AM, Adam Gibbons adam.s.gibb...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi there,
For some time now I have been trying to put together a simple
Works perfectly fine with the snapshot.
Thanks a lot for the quick change Pedro (gotta love the Wicket community
for its helpful members).
Cheers,
Daniel Soneira
On 14.12.2010 21:18, Pedro Santos wrote:
I changed the PagingToolbar to set the visibility at onConfigure to avoid
early
I'm kinda still stuck with this problem. Any help would be appreciated.
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/RadioGroup-Radio-runtime-exception-tp2331304p3088874.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
hmm that fixes it, it's because of generic limitations that we need to set
the class explicitly, correct?
2010/12/15 Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org
see Alexander Morozov reply
either use new TextFieldInteger(refreshRate, refreshRateModel,
Integer.class);
or call
function wicketGlobalPreCallHandler() {
}
this method gets called before sending ajaxrequest ?
can I retrieve more information about the request , please help me
understand
--
View this message in context:
Hi James,
Thanks for the suggestion! However, even with your change, I still get the
There is no application attached to current thread
ContainerBackgroundProcessor[StandardEngine[Catalina]] error.
Regards,
Adam
On 15 December 2010 11:17, James Carman [via Apache Wicket]
You need to be able to fire your spring context outside the context of
Wicket. Can it be instantiated outside your container? Once you get
that down, you should be good to go.
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 8:50 AM, adam.gibbons adam.s.gibb...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi James,
Thanks for the suggestion!
I thought that was the whole point of the Wicket-Spring project... That
tutorial looked like it worked as recently as a year ago. I find it hard to
believe that it's no longer possible or harder to integrate Wicket and
Spring than it was a year ago.
On researching that error, all I find are
Does the spring context startup without the wicket part?
I've integrated Wicket in an existing Spring project (following the
same guide as you did) and it worked without any (greater) problem.
cheers,
Matthias
Am 15.12.2010 um 15:06 schrieb adam.gibbons:
I thought that was the whole point
What's the code for UserServiceImpl?
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 9:02 AM, adam.gibbons adam.s.gibb...@gmail.com wrote:
New log:
org.springframework.beans.factory.BeanCreationException: Error creating bean
with name 'userServiceImpl' defined in file
Hi Matthias,
Sorry, I'm not sure what you mean by that? If you look at the new log I just
posted, Spring seems to be starting up fine. How could I check it without
the wicket part? What would I need to change exactly?
Thanks,
Adam
On 15 December 2010 14:15, Matthias Gasser [via Apache Wicket]
The UserServiceImpl code is in the first post.
On 15 December 2010 13:53, James Carman [via Apache Wicket]
ml-node+3089041-1452804699-201...@n4.nabble.comml-node%2b3089041-1452804699-201...@n4.nabble.com
wrote:
You need to be able to fire your spring context outside the context of
Wicket.
Lucky me. I checked newest Wicket release (1.4.14) and saw bugfix about Radio
button.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-3175
My bug occurred because we use one page for everything. That solution worked
like a charm.
--
View this message in context:
Spring is not starting up fine. It's unable to instantiate the
UserServiceImpl bean which is why I asked for the code for that class.
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 9:19 AM, adam.gibbons adam.s.gibb...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Matthias,
Sorry, I'm not sure what you mean by that? If you look at the new
So, you didn't change UserServiceImpl, as I suggested? The section
you need to change is:
@SpringBean
private Temp1DAO temp1DAO;
Change that to @Autowired instead of @SpringBean
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 9:23 AM, adam.gibbons adam.s.gibb...@gmail.com wrote:
The UserServiceImpl code is in
Hi, I dont see how this reply solves the problem.
The forms fields have this:
passwordField.setRequired(true);
the Page.properties file has the following structure:
Form.FeildName=fieldname
RequiredValidator=Holy cow, ${lablel} is blank.
This works fine, except the Required Validator part of
Hi all,
I have been working on a 1.5 WiQuery branch to see if we can get an
experimental version online. I am facing several problems, most of which I
can find a workaround for. One, though, I can't seem to tackle. We provide
ResourceReferences, Resources and ResourceStreams for the plugin
Yes but directly below it states: Caused by:
org.springframework.beans.BeanInstantiationException: Could not instantiate
bean class [uk.co.company.product.business.spring.UserServiceImpl]:
Constructor threw exception; nested exception is
org.apache.wicket.WicketRuntimeException: There is no
Sorry perhaps I didn't make that clear before. I made that change as you
suggested and this is the result.
On 15 December 2010 14:28, James Carman [via Apache Wicket]
ml-node+3089111-1454695690-201...@n4.nabble.comml-node%2b3089111-1454695690-201...@n4.nabble.com
wrote:
So, you didn't
Get rid of the InjectorHolder code in your constructor.
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 9:39 AM, adam.gibbons adam.s.gibb...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes but directly below it states: Caused by:
org.springframework.beans.BeanInstantiationException: Could not instantiate
bean class
hmm that fixes it, it's because of generic limitations that we need to set
the class explicitly, correct?
Yes, type information is only available at compile time, the compiler
synthesizes generics use into explicit casting used at runtime.
- Tor Iver
Hi Hielke,
So basically you
need org.apache.wicket.request.resource.PackageResource.getResourceStream()
to become protected, right ?
This way you can wrap super.getResourceStream() with compressing one.
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 11:35 AM, Hielke Hoeve hielke.ho...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi all,
I
Put a log statement in your DAO's constructor to see if it's getting
instantiated (it's probably not). Then turn on component scanning as
suggested by someone else.
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 10:01 AM, adam.gibbons adam.s.gibb...@gmail.com wrote:
There is definitely only 1 implementation. I read
Ok, I think this is now back to a Wicket question. Start up is ok now.
However when I try and invoke UserServiceImpl.authenticate(){
final Temp1 temp1 = new Temp1();
temp1.setValue(userName);
temp1DAO.save(temp1);
return testUserService.authenticate(userName,
In your web.xml
the OSV Filter must comes in front (first) of the wicket filter
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 12:58 PM, adam.gibbons [via Apache Wicket]
ml-node+3089284-1530997070-65...@n4.nabble.comml-node%2b3089284-1530997070-65...@n4.nabble.com
wrote:
Ok, I think this is now back to a Wicket
Hey Adam,
This is still a spring error, you need a sessionfactory and
transactionfactory and link them together. The opensessioninview filter only
opens a transaction if you get this right. The spring forums are filled with
examples.
Hielke
On 15 Dec 2010 16:58, adam.gibbons
Like this?:
?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8?
web-app
xmlns=http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee;
xmlns:xsi=http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance;
xsi:schemaLocation=
http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee
http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee/web-app_2_4.xsd
version=2.4
+1
I just made the exact same thing locally the other day. :)
-Original Message-
From: nino martinez wael [mailto:nino.martinez.w...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2010 2:14 AM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Wicket extensions AjaxIndicatingDropdownChoice?
should I add
Hi Hielke,
Thank you for the helpful reply. :) But I think I already have those in my
applicationConext.xml...:
?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8?
beans
xmlns=http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans;
xmlns:xsi=http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance;
See if this can help:
https://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/form-validation-messages.html
https://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/form-validation-messages.htmlFrom the link
aboves:
--- Changes in Wicket 1.3
Whether a field is required is now determined by testing the isRequired()
method of
Hello list,
I'm trying to set checkboxes with junit but without significant success.
My trouble is to find checkboxes. I've not found any way to access it if
I use CheckBoxMultipleChoice. With CheckGroup I get access with Visitor
tester.getLastRenderedPage().visitChildren(Check.class, new
Use getters:
https://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/type-safe-testing-in-wicket.html
2010/12/15 Anton Bessonov exe...@googlemail.com:
Hello list,
I'm trying to set checkboxes with junit but without significant success. My
trouble is to find checkboxes. I've not found any way to access it if I use
Thanks, I will try!
Use getters:
https://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/type-safe-testing-in-wicket.html
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Though this topic is quite old, I think it is still actual. Since the 1.5
release is not far away, did anybody thought if the (at least) js resource
merging should occur?
This is very useful when you have a page with a large number of components,
each loading a large number of small resources.
You also need to make sure you've set up your transactions properly.
Are you using the @Transactional annotations?
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 11:40 AM, adam.gibbons adam.s.gibb...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Hielke,
Thank you for the helpful reply. :) But I think I already have those in my
A good way to resolve the spring/hibernate/transactional errors first
(to separate from the wicket errors) is to create a junit test case that
bootstraps the spring context (everything except the wicketapplication
bean). You can verify that your transaction demarcation is correct
before
On 15 December 2010 21:05, Alex Objelean alex.objel...@gmail.com wrote:
Though this topic is quite old, I think it is still actual. Since the 1.5
release is not far away, did anybody thought if the (at least) js resource
merging should occur?
We at WiQuery have been discussing multiple
I noticed today that StringResourceModel could be slightly nicer to
use if the Object[] parameter used by the underlying MessageFormat was
replaced with a vararg in the StringResourceModel constructor. Sure
enough, there was an old thread that touched on this topic. The
defaultValue would have
I think this was discussed here but I can't seems to find it so I will
ask again.
I would like to mount a page Login to Login.class. I know how to do
this and have it working.
Now I would like to mount a page called AdminLogin to Login.class but
also pass a parameter to Login.class so
thanks for your reply.I'd like to try your second suggestion.
But after looking into AbstractFormValidator and other related examples, I
find that in my case I don't have any FormComponet to pass to
error(FormComponent fc) after validate.
Is there any way or examples to validate without
@Override
protected void onInitialize() {
super.onInitialize();
Form.findForm(this).add(new AbstractFormValidator() {
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
@Override
public void validate(Form? form) {
if (/* ... */) {
That's really what I want!Thank you very much.
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/how-to-validate-a-ListView-tp3088381p3090257.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Its fairly simple. Create a class Login, give it a constructor with
pageparameters. Create two panels, one for each login type. Based on the
page parameters you show one or the other. Mount the page on 2 paths, each
with its own parameter.
Hielke
On 16 Dec 2010 00:43, Jeffrey Schneller
50 matches
Mail list logo
