Re: Introduction and some questions about Wicket

2013-06-13 Thread Mike Pence
contract gets signed, now... FYI, here is me trying to explain the advantages of component-oriented development at the Ruby conference in '08: http://www.confreaks.com/videos/1162-rubyconf2008-components-are-not-a-dirty-word Best, Mike Pence On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 8:18 AM, Nick Pratt

A Wicket in Ruby

2013-06-21 Thread Mike Pence
So I have this crazy idea to try to write some subset of Wicket using CRuby and the variety of technologies it employs (EventMachine, etc.) Hard to know where to start though, or how best to form a mental model of what Wicket does vs. doing a straight class-to-class conversion. Maybe there is a te

Re: A Wicket in Ruby

2013-06-25 Thread Mike Pence
seems like a > thankless task awaits you! :) > > Cheers, > Col. > > -Original Message- > From: Mike Pence [mailto:mike.pe...@gmail.com] > Sent: 22 June 2013 02:21 > To: users@wicket.apache.org > Subject: A Wicket in Ruby > > So I have this crazy idea to try to

Re: A Wicket in Ruby

2013-06-27 Thread Mike Pence
... and Wicket and the super-fast modern JVMs... and t's still quicker > > and easier and ultimately less verbose to do something in Wicket/Java, > than > > pretty much any other Web framework, IMHO - regardless of Java as a > > language. > > > > >

Looking to pair

2013-07-07 Thread Mike Pence
your virtual shoulder for a few hours sometime, it would be much appreciated. FYI, I have been programming for 20+ years (VB, Delphi, Java, Ruby, etc.) so it is not like I am a total newbie. Thanks in advance. Mike Pence

Re: Looking to pair

2013-07-07 Thread Mike Pence
r than the other. > > Have a great day, > Paul Bors > > On Jul 7, 2013, at 1:16 PM, Mike Pence wrote: > > > Hi guys. Hope that this is appropriate for this list: I am looking for > > someone who is willing to pair program with me (although it would > probably >

Re: Looking to pair

2013-07-08 Thread Mike Pence
tin Grigorov >wrote: > > > Hi Sebastien, > > > > > > On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 2:30 PM, Sebastien wrote: > > > > > Hi Martin, I have a doubt on the thread you answered... :) > > > > > > > No. It is the correct thread. > > I suggest Mike