Hi,
what's the best way to implement an IDataProvider and a LoadableDetachable
for an indexed list? Suppose I have a Customer who has a list of Adresses.
class Customer {
ListAdress adresses;
}
Now I want to implement a data provider/ldm for the adresses of a customer.
I suppose the usual
igor.vaynberg wrote:
class addressmodel extends ldm {
private final int idx;
private final imodel customer;
public addressmodel(imodel customer, address address) {
this.customer=customer;
this.idx=customer.getaddresses().indexof(address);
}
...
Nice. Thanks igor.
Hi,
I'm having a problem regarding JavaScript/Ajax and I'm not sure if it's
actually related to Wicket.
I've got a Button and a TextField within a Form. The TextField uses an
AjaxUpdatingBehavior for validation, which is fired onchange. The Button
submits the form via Ajax onclick. In my case,
Hi Timo,
thanks for your reply.
Anyway, if your intent to only validate when the textfield
loses focus? If it would be OK to validate on each keypress,
you could try using OnChangeAjaxBehavior in the TextField.
We are doing validation via Ajax, so we decided to not to validate on each
the button div a tabIndex=0 attribute on in its
onclick I call this.focus(). Then it works (even in IE).
cretzel wrote:
Hi,
I'm having a problem regarding JavaScript/Ajax and I'm not sure if it's
actually related to Wicket.
I've got a Button and a TextField within a Form. The TextField
Hi Timo,
thanks for that hint. Actually, we didn't prove these issues. We should give
it a try ...
Thanks
Timo Rantalaiho wrote:
Hello,
Great that you could solve your issue, but I'll comment on a
couple of things anyway.
On Wed, 16 Jul 2008, cretzel wrote:
We are doing validation
Antony Stubbs wrote:
Yes, the ⇒ is actually what the = is supposed to be in Scala, and is a
UTF8 character, which I'm sure would be supported by all modern editors.
I'm surprised you can't see it properly. What OS and version of Eclipse
are you viewing them with? I am toying around with
We are using Spring.
Liam Clarke-Hutchinson-3 wrote:
Are you using an IoC container at all?
On 4/24/09, Nick Wiedenbrück mailinglists...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm having many Components (DropDowns, ChoiceRenderers, ...) that are
reused
in different places in my application. For
My primary reason is to be able to substitute another (improved) version for
this component.
For example, if we have a simple custom DropDown and we instantiate it by
calling new DropDown() all over in the code it might be difficult, to
replace that by a new version, e.g.
relied on an interface IModificationWatcher in
future versions, so that it can be replaced by a customized version. Or
don't make it final.
- cretzel
Jonathan Locke wrote:
not sure, but try getResourceSettings().setResourcePollFrequency(null) in
your app init
Matt Welch wrote:
I'm
Posted https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-2340
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-2340
igor.vaynberg wrote:
or you can add an rfe into jira to make it more open...
-igor
--
View this message in context:
Fixed as of Wicket 1.4.0-RC6.
now uses an interface. you may use IResourceSettings.setResourceWatcher()
to set whatever IModificationWatcher you want
cretzel wrote:
Posted https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-2340
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-2340
Stupid me. Thx.
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/AjaxEditableLabel-uses-wicketAjaxGet-tp2719139p2719168.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To
We're building a multi-tenant capable application. The basic idea is to
identify the tenant for a request and put the tenant information into a
ThreadLocal.
One requirement is to enable 'localization' per tenant, i.e. to allow
tenant-specific labels, like for example one tenant wants to display
Hi,
I'm using Wicket together with Spring and Hibernate. And it's quite common,
I think, to use an OpenSessionInViewFilter and a LoadableDetachableModel
which wraps the domain objects loaded with Hibernate, so that when the model
is detached it only holds the ID of the domain object and when its
Thanks for the immediate replies.
Seems that, when using that pattern, one really always has to be aware of
the fact that changes are made directly to persistent instances. Otherwise
it could easily happen to get inconsistent data into the DB.
Michael Sparer wrote:
I'd say either enable
you are right. That's the reason of using OSIV, although these two concepts
are somewhat related to each other. I mean, when you are not using OSIV, you
have to collect all the data you want to display on the presentation tier
within a facade, for example. One possiblity is then to
17 matches
Mail list logo