running wicket 1.2.6 and getting the following error. This is somehow
triggered (I wish I had a more specific test case) by my login form. But
what is really strange is that it isn't just appearing on form submission.
Once I see the error in the logs, it occurs even on a page refresh. I am
wonderi
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Wicket-really-dumb--Converting---to--amp--in-password-fields--tp14460118p14460165.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe,
I've been debugging a (hopefully) unrelated problem when I came across
this...
Someone submits "passw&rd" as a password in my login form and the back-end
gets it as passw&rd
Are you kidding me? Why would that be happening?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Wicket-reall
roper thing would be
> creating a jira issue instead of calling the framework dumb. And I
> doubt anyone would bother to be kidding you.
>
> -Matej
>
> On Dec 21, 2007 7:23 PM, fattymelt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> I've been debugging a (hopefully) unr
I'm using the wicket-auth-roles package. I see the code that returns the
password is
password.getModelObjectAsString()
perhaps that is mucking with it?
fattymelt wrote:
>
> I've been debugging a (hopefully) unrelated problem when I came across
> this...
>
> Someon
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/%22parsevelocity-template-tp14999729p14999729.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additio
I am using a velocity template, and within it would like to use velocity's
"parse" directive (to include another template within the current template)
but it complains that it can not find the template in velocity's
"TEMPLATE_ROOT." I have triple-checked that the template is in the same
directory
t, is that I have working templates now that are in
WEB-IN/templates. So, it isn't like velocity-contrib isn't finding them. So
I'm not sure why the "parse" directive isn't looking there, too?
James McLaughlin-3 wrote:
>
> fattymelt,
> It used to work that
2
James McLaughlin-3 wrote:
>
> On Jan 21, 2008 11:45 PM, fattymelt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Just to be sure...
>>
>> In the Wicket section of web.xml I am going to add the two init-params.
>> One
>> of which defines the folder in which