Re: [Announce] wicketstuff-push ported to use wicket 1.4 jetty 6.1.14
Hello, Is there a patch/servlet to run cometd in glassfish? because im having trouble to run push-examples on glassfish as it will be used in production. Thanks a lot. Cheers. Rodolfo Hansen wrote: On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 6:26 AM, pmarrone paolo.marr...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Rodolfo, I'm trying to deploy the wicketstuff-push example on a Glassfish server V3, but without success. Can you give some information about how to use your wicketstuff-push implementation outside Jetty? For Glassfish there are a couple of configurations you need to set in the glassfish domain. Also, you might have to write your own servlet, as in this post: http://weblogs.java.net/blog/jfarcand/archive/2006/10/writting_a_come.html I know that Glassfish has support for cometd, so it should be possible. I propose to insert in the example package this kind of information, because jetty is not normally adopted in real production environments. Yes, if you can, can you write the Glassfish Servlet for cometd integration and post it as a patch, or send it to me directly? rhan...@kindleit.net Thank you very much for your kind response. Regards Paolo Rodolfo Hansen-2 wrote: Hi, a new version of wicketstuff-push was moved to the wicketstuff-core group of projects, as push-parent (as was specified in the wiki) A couple of new things were done: It is no longer compatible with java 1.4, is built for wicket 1.4 and requires jetty 6.1.14. The dependencies on dojo have been reduced even further, so this package is basically just a cometd client/server project for wicket. The RemoveListener is now working and is extended with a new type of WicketRemoveListener that allows access to the Wicket Application Singleton and the session that registered the singleton (i thought of a couple of ways to register them, and decided to choose the one present in the code for it) Please let me know of any suggestions, ideas for the proj. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-Announce--wicketstuff-push-ported-to-use-wicket-1.4-jetty-6.1.14-tp20914051p23134109.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org -- Rodolfo Hansen CEO, KindleIT Software Development Email: rhan...@kindleit.net Office: 1 (809) 732-5200 Mobile: 1 (809) 299-7332 -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-Announce--wicketstuff-push-ported-to-use-wicket-1.4-jetty-6.1.14-tp20914051p24512870.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: [Announce] wicketstuff-push ported to use wicket 1.4 jetty 6.1.14
No, not yet. I haven't had a chance to write it, nor test it out. Check bellow in the thread for some guidance, and if you want write me directly at kryptt at gmail.com to see if we can start a patch with it. On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 5:06 AM, freak182 eman.noll...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, Is there a patch/servlet to run cometd in glassfish? because im having trouble to run push-examples on glassfish as it will be used in production. Thanks a lot. Cheers. Rodolfo Hansen wrote: On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 6:26 AM, pmarrone paolo.marr...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Rodolfo, I'm trying to deploy the wicketstuff-push example on a Glassfish server V3, but without success. Can you give some information about how to use your wicketstuff-push implementation outside Jetty? For Glassfish there are a couple of configurations you need to set in the glassfish domain. Also, you might have to write your own servlet, as in this post: http://weblogs.java.net/blog/jfarcand/archive/2006/10/writting_a_come.html I know that Glassfish has support for cometd, so it should be possible. I propose to insert in the example package this kind of information, because jetty is not normally adopted in real production environments. Yes, if you can, can you write the Glassfish Servlet for cometd integration and post it as a patch, or send it to me directly? rhan...@kindleit.net Thank you very much for your kind response. Regards Paolo Rodolfo Hansen-2 wrote: Hi, a new version of wicketstuff-push was moved to the wicketstuff-core group of projects, as push-parent (as was specified in the wiki) A couple of new things were done: It is no longer compatible with java 1.4, is built for wicket 1.4 and requires jetty 6.1.14. The dependencies on dojo have been reduced even further, so this package is basically just a cometd client/server project for wicket. The RemoveListener is now working and is extended with a new type of WicketRemoveListener that allows access to the Wicket Application Singleton and the session that registered the singleton (i thought of a couple of ways to register them, and decided to choose the one present in the code for it) Please let me know of any suggestions, ideas for the proj. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-Announce--wicketstuff-push-ported-to-use-wicket-1.4-jetty-6.1.14-tp20914051p23134109.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org -- Rodolfo Hansen CEO, KindleIT Software Development Email: rhan...@kindleit.net Office: 1 (809) 732-5200 Mobile: 1 (809) 299-7332 -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-Announce--wicketstuff-push-ported-to-use-wicket-1.4-jetty-6.1.14-tp20914051p24512870.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org -- Rodolfo Hansen CTO, KindleIT Software Development Email: rhan...@kindleit.net Office: 1 (809) 732-5200 Mobile: 1 (809) 299-7332
Re: [Announce] wicketstuff-push ported to use wicket 1.4 jetty 6.1.14
Hello, I checkout the latest wicket-push in wicketstuff but unfortunately this was built in 1.4. How can I build for 1.3.x wicket? Because our application is using 1.3.x and I cannot tell them to migrate to 1.4 since the development has already started. Thanks a lot. Cheers. Rodolfo Hansen wrote: On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 6:26 AM, pmarrone paolo.marr...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Rodolfo, I'm trying to deploy the wicketstuff-push example on a Glassfish server V3, but without success. Can you give some information about how to use your wicketstuff-push implementation outside Jetty? For Glassfish there are a couple of configurations you need to set in the glassfish domain. Also, you might have to write your own servlet, as in this post: http://weblogs.java.net/blog/jfarcand/archive/2006/10/writting_a_come.html I know that Glassfish has support for cometd, so it should be possible. I propose to insert in the example package this kind of information, because jetty is not normally adopted in real production environments. Yes, if you can, can you write the Glassfish Servlet for cometd integration and post it as a patch, or send it to me directly? rhan...@kindleit.net Thank you very much for your kind response. Regards Paolo Rodolfo Hansen-2 wrote: Hi, a new version of wicketstuff-push was moved to the wicketstuff-core group of projects, as push-parent (as was specified in the wiki) A couple of new things were done: It is no longer compatible with java 1.4, is built for wicket 1.4 and requires jetty 6.1.14. The dependencies on dojo have been reduced even further, so this package is basically just a cometd client/server project for wicket. The RemoveListener is now working and is extended with a new type of WicketRemoveListener that allows access to the Wicket Application Singleton and the session that registered the singleton (i thought of a couple of ways to register them, and decided to choose the one present in the code for it) Please let me know of any suggestions, ideas for the proj. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-Announce--wicketstuff-push-ported-to-use-wicket-1.4-jetty-6.1.14-tp20914051p23134109.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org -- Rodolfo Hansen CEO, KindleIT Software Development Email: rhan...@kindleit.net Office: 1 (809) 732-5200 Mobile: 1 (809) 299-7332 -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-Announce--wicketstuff-push-ported-to-use-wicket-1.4-jetty-6.1.14-tp20914051p24457098.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: [Announce] wicketstuff-push ported to use wicket 1.4 jetty 6.1.14
Hi, You have two options: 1. use a previous version of wicketstuff-push, 2. or help out with branching the current code back to 1.3.x Right now, the code requres java 1.5, so if your proyect requires java 1.4 then I recomend using a previous version. the old wicket 1.3, java 1.4 branch is here: https://wicket-stuff.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/wicket-stuff/branches/wicketstuff-push/ On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 3:10 AM, freak182 eman.noll...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, I checkout the latest wicket-push in wicketstuff but unfortunately this was built in 1.4. How can I build for 1.3.x wicket? Because our application is using 1.3.x and I cannot tell them to migrate to 1.4 since the development has already started. Thanks a lot. Cheers. Rodolfo Hansen wrote: On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 6:26 AM, pmarrone paolo.marr...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Rodolfo, I'm trying to deploy the wicketstuff-push example on a Glassfish server V3, but without success. Can you give some information about how to use your wicketstuff-push implementation outside Jetty? For Glassfish there are a couple of configurations you need to set in the glassfish domain. Also, you might have to write your own servlet, as in this post: http://weblogs.java.net/blog/jfarcand/archive/2006/10/writting_a_come.html I know that Glassfish has support for cometd, so it should be possible. I propose to insert in the example package this kind of information, because jetty is not normally adopted in real production environments. Yes, if you can, can you write the Glassfish Servlet for cometd integration and post it as a patch, or send it to me directly? rhan...@kindleit.net Thank you very much for your kind response. Regards Paolo Rodolfo Hansen-2 wrote: Hi, a new version of wicketstuff-push was moved to the wicketstuff-core group of projects, as push-parent (as was specified in the wiki) A couple of new things were done: It is no longer compatible with java 1.4, is built for wicket 1.4 and requires jetty 6.1.14. The dependencies on dojo have been reduced even further, so this package is basically just a cometd client/server project for wicket. The RemoveListener is now working and is extended with a new type of WicketRemoveListener that allows access to the Wicket Application Singleton and the session that registered the singleton (i thought of a couple of ways to register them, and decided to choose the one present in the code for it) Please let me know of any suggestions, ideas for the proj. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-Announce--wicketstuff-push-ported-to-use-wicket-1.4-jetty-6.1.14-tp20914051p23134109.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org -- Rodolfo Hansen CEO, KindleIT Software Development Email: rhan...@kindleit.net Office: 1 (809) 732-5200 Mobile: 1 (809) 299-7332 -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-Announce--wicketstuff-push-ported-to-use-wicket-1.4-jetty-6.1.14-tp20914051p24457098.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org -- Rodolfo Hansen CEO, KindleIT Software Development Email: rhan...@kindleit.net Office: 1 (809) 732-5200 Mobile: 1 (809) 299-7332
Re: [Announce] wicketstuff-push ported to use wicket 1.4 jetty 6.1.14
Hello, Although we use java 1.5, the wicket version we are gonna use it wicket 1.3.6 ..the problem from the latest branch is the MetaDataKey is now generified becuase it is built against 1.4. I found out that in 1.3.x branch has same wicket-push codebase but the metadatakey is not using generics. i just replace the files that contains metadatakey class that use generics. :) And i tested and it work. ;)) Thanks a lot. Cheers. Rodolfo Hansen wrote: Hi, You have two options: 1. use a previous version of wicketstuff-push, 2. or help out with branching the current code back to 1.3.x Right now, the code requres java 1.5, so if your proyect requires java 1.4 then I recomend using a previous version. the old wicket 1.3, java 1.4 branch is here: https://wicket-stuff.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/wicket-stuff/branches/wicketstuff-push/ On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 3:10 AM, freak182 eman.noll...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, I checkout the latest wicket-push in wicketstuff but unfortunately this was built in 1.4. How can I build for 1.3.x wicket? Because our application is using 1.3.x and I cannot tell them to migrate to 1.4 since the development has already started. Thanks a lot. Cheers. Rodolfo Hansen wrote: On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 6:26 AM, pmarrone paolo.marr...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Rodolfo, I'm trying to deploy the wicketstuff-push example on a Glassfish server V3, but without success. Can you give some information about how to use your wicketstuff-push implementation outside Jetty? For Glassfish there are a couple of configurations you need to set in the glassfish domain. Also, you might have to write your own servlet, as in this post: http://weblogs.java.net/blog/jfarcand/archive/2006/10/writting_a_come.html I know that Glassfish has support for cometd, so it should be possible. I propose to insert in the example package this kind of information, because jetty is not normally adopted in real production environments. Yes, if you can, can you write the Glassfish Servlet for cometd integration and post it as a patch, or send it to me directly? rhan...@kindleit.net Thank you very much for your kind response. Regards Paolo Rodolfo Hansen-2 wrote: Hi, a new version of wicketstuff-push was moved to the wicketstuff-core group of projects, as push-parent (as was specified in the wiki) A couple of new things were done: It is no longer compatible with java 1.4, is built for wicket 1.4 and requires jetty 6.1.14. The dependencies on dojo have been reduced even further, so this package is basically just a cometd client/server project for wicket. The RemoveListener is now working and is extended with a new type of WicketRemoveListener that allows access to the Wicket Application Singleton and the session that registered the singleton (i thought of a couple of ways to register them, and decided to choose the one present in the code for it) Please let me know of any suggestions, ideas for the proj. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-Announce--wicketstuff-push-ported-to-use-wicket-1.4-jetty-6.1.14-tp20914051p23134109.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org -- Rodolfo Hansen CEO, KindleIT Software Development Email: rhan...@kindleit.net Office: 1 (809) 732-5200 Mobile: 1 (809) 299-7332 -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-Announce--wicketstuff-push-ported-to-use-wicket-1.4-jetty-6.1.14-tp20914051p24457098.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org -- Rodolfo Hansen CEO, KindleIT Software Development Email: rhan...@kindleit.net Office: 1 (809) 732-5200 Mobile: 1 (809) 299-7332 -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-Announce--wicketstuff-push-ported-to-use-wicket-1.4-jetty-6.1.14-tp20914051p24464690.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: [Announce] wicketstuff-push ported to use wicket 1.4 jetty 6.1.14
Hi Rodolfo, I'm trying to deploy the wicketstuff-push example on a Glassfish server V3, but without success. Can you give some information about how to use your wicketstuff-push implementation outside Jetty? I know that Glassfish has support for cometd, so it should be possible. I propose to insert in the example package this kind of information, because jetty is not normally adopted in real production environments. Thank you very much for your kind response. Regards Paolo Rodolfo Hansen-2 wrote: Hi, a new version of wicketstuff-push was moved to the wicketstuff-core group of projects, as push-parent (as was specified in the wiki) A couple of new things were done: It is no longer compatible with java 1.4, is built for wicket 1.4 and requires jetty 6.1.14. The dependencies on dojo have been reduced even further, so this package is basically just a cometd client/server project for wicket. The RemoveListener is now working and is extended with a new type of WicketRemoveListener that allows access to the Wicket Application Singleton and the session that registered the singleton (i thought of a couple of ways to register them, and decided to choose the one present in the code for it) Please let me know of any suggestions, ideas for the proj. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-Announce--wicketstuff-push-ported-to-use-wicket-1.4-jetty-6.1.14-tp20914051p23134109.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: [Announce] wicketstuff-push ported to use wicket 1.4 jetty 6.1.14
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 6:26 AM, pmarrone paolo.marr...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Rodolfo, I'm trying to deploy the wicketstuff-push example on a Glassfish server V3, but without success. Can you give some information about how to use your wicketstuff-push implementation outside Jetty? For Glassfish there are a couple of configurations you need to set in the glassfish domain. Also, you might have to write your own servlet, as in this post: http://weblogs.java.net/blog/jfarcand/archive/2006/10/writting_a_come.html I know that Glassfish has support for cometd, so it should be possible. I propose to insert in the example package this kind of information, because jetty is not normally adopted in real production environments. Yes, if you can, can you write the Glassfish Servlet for cometd integration and post it as a patch, or send it to me directly? rhan...@kindleit.net Thank you very much for your kind response. Regards Paolo Rodolfo Hansen-2 wrote: Hi, a new version of wicketstuff-push was moved to the wicketstuff-core group of projects, as push-parent (as was specified in the wiki) A couple of new things were done: It is no longer compatible with java 1.4, is built for wicket 1.4 and requires jetty 6.1.14. The dependencies on dojo have been reduced even further, so this package is basically just a cometd client/server project for wicket. The RemoveListener is now working and is extended with a new type of WicketRemoveListener that allows access to the Wicket Application Singleton and the session that registered the singleton (i thought of a couple of ways to register them, and decided to choose the one present in the code for it) Please let me know of any suggestions, ideas for the proj. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-Announce--wicketstuff-push-ported-to-use-wicket-1.4-jetty-6.1.14-tp20914051p23134109.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org -- Rodolfo Hansen CEO, KindleIT Software Development Email: rhan...@kindleit.net Office: 1 (809) 732-5200 Mobile: 1 (809) 299-7332
Re: [Announce] wicketstuff-push ported to use wicket 1.4 jetty 6.1.14
Ok, I moved it into the 1.3.x branch as you suggested so trunk can stay clean. Thanks for the heads up on the clutter. On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 1:25 PM, Jeremy Thomerson jer...@wickettraining.com wrote: svn mv to the 1.3 branch: https://wicket-stuff.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/wicket-stuff/branches/wicket-1.3.x/ You'll have to see if whatever you already have existing in that branch can be overwritten. Let me know if I can be of assistance to you in any way. -- Jeremy Thomerson http://www.wickettraining.com On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 2:08 AM, Rodolfo Hansen kry...@gmail.com wrote: Sorry, was away. Um, I don't know where to put the old one. Basically the old code still works with Java 1.4 and wicket 1.3, where would the best place to put it be? just drop it? On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 3:31 PM, Jeremy Thomerson jer...@wickettraining.com wrote: Rodolfo - why is there still a wicketstuff-push folder in trunk [1]? I didn't notice until today when a user asked a question about it. Was it an oversight, or is it something different? Just Curious and Confused, Jeremy Thomerson http://www.wickettraining.com On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 6:46 AM, Rodolfo Hansen rhan...@kindleit.net wrote: Hi, a new version of wicketstuff-push was moved to the wicketstuff-core group of projects, as push-parent (as was specified in the wiki) A couple of new things were done: It is no longer compatible with java 1.4, is built for wicket 1.4 and requires jetty 6.1.14. The dependencies on dojo have been reduced even further, so this package is basically just a cometd client/server project for wicket. The RemoveListener is now working and is extended with a new type of WicketRemoveListener that allows access to the Wicket Application Singleton and the session that registered the singleton (i thought of a couple of ways to register them, and decided to choose the one present in the code for it) Please let me know of any suggestions, ideas for the proj.
Re: [Announce] wicketstuff-push ported to use wicket 1.4 jetty 6.1.14
Sorry, was away. Um, I don't know where to put the old one. Basically the old code still works with Java 1.4 and wicket 1.3, where would the best place to put it be? just drop it? On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 3:31 PM, Jeremy Thomerson jer...@wickettraining.com wrote: Rodolfo - why is there still a wicketstuff-push folder in trunk [1]? I didn't notice until today when a user asked a question about it. Was it an oversight, or is it something different? Just Curious and Confused, Jeremy Thomerson http://www.wickettraining.com On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 6:46 AM, Rodolfo Hansen rhan...@kindleit.net wrote: Hi, a new version of wicketstuff-push was moved to the wicketstuff-core group of projects, as push-parent (as was specified in the wiki) A couple of new things were done: It is no longer compatible with java 1.4, is built for wicket 1.4 and requires jetty 6.1.14. The dependencies on dojo have been reduced even further, so this package is basically just a cometd client/server project for wicket. The RemoveListener is now working and is extended with a new type of WicketRemoveListener that allows access to the Wicket Application Singleton and the session that registered the singleton (i thought of a couple of ways to register them, and decided to choose the one present in the code for it) Please let me know of any suggestions, ideas for the proj.
Re: [Announce] wicketstuff-push ported to use wicket 1.4 jetty 6.1.14
svn mv to the 1.3 branch: https://wicket-stuff.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/wicket-stuff/branches/wicket-1.3.x/ You'll have to see if whatever you already have existing in that branch can be overwritten. Let me know if I can be of assistance to you in any way. -- Jeremy Thomerson http://www.wickettraining.com On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 2:08 AM, Rodolfo Hansen kry...@gmail.com wrote: Sorry, was away. Um, I don't know where to put the old one. Basically the old code still works with Java 1.4 and wicket 1.3, where would the best place to put it be? just drop it? On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 3:31 PM, Jeremy Thomerson jer...@wickettraining.com wrote: Rodolfo - why is there still a wicketstuff-push folder in trunk [1]? I didn't notice until today when a user asked a question about it. Was it an oversight, or is it something different? Just Curious and Confused, Jeremy Thomerson http://www.wickettraining.com On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 6:46 AM, Rodolfo Hansen rhan...@kindleit.net wrote: Hi, a new version of wicketstuff-push was moved to the wicketstuff-core group of projects, as push-parent (as was specified in the wiki) A couple of new things were done: It is no longer compatible with java 1.4, is built for wicket 1.4 and requires jetty 6.1.14. The dependencies on dojo have been reduced even further, so this package is basically just a cometd client/server project for wicket. The RemoveListener is now working and is extended with a new type of WicketRemoveListener that allows access to the Wicket Application Singleton and the session that registered the singleton (i thought of a couple of ways to register them, and decided to choose the one present in the code for it) Please let me know of any suggestions, ideas for the proj.
Re: [Announce] wicketstuff-push ported to use wicket 1.4 jetty 6.1.14
Rodolfo - why is there still a wicketstuff-push folder in trunk [1]? I didn't notice until today when a user asked a question about it. Was it an oversight, or is it something different? Just Curious and Confused, Jeremy Thomerson http://www.wickettraining.com On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 6:46 AM, Rodolfo Hansen rhan...@kindleit.net wrote: Hi, a new version of wicketstuff-push was moved to the wicketstuff-core group of projects, as push-parent (as was specified in the wiki) A couple of new things were done: It is no longer compatible with java 1.4, is built for wicket 1.4 and requires jetty 6.1.14. The dependencies on dojo have been reduced even further, so this package is basically just a cometd client/server project for wicket. The RemoveListener is now working and is extended with a new type of WicketRemoveListener that allows access to the Wicket Application Singleton and the session that registered the singleton (i thought of a couple of ways to register them, and decided to choose the one present in the code for it) Please let me know of any suggestions, ideas for the proj.
Re: [Announce] wicketstuff-push ported to use wicket 1.4 jetty 6.1.14
AFAIK jquery started something, but I just heard of that and didn't look into it. If dojo seems too bloated to you you can easily build your own dojo with just the modules you need - then it isn't bloated at all (except you're using too many components). There's a post announcing wicketstuff-dojo-1.1. somewhere on the mailinglist that explained (or at least offered to explain ;-)) how to build your own dojo - on the wiki it's described with 0.4 if I remember correctly regards, michael Peter Ertl-3 wrote: concerning the proper javascript client for comet... is there anything reasonable except dojo-cometd-client to use? The dojo stuff feels really bloated for me Am 11.12.2008 um 15:00 schrieb Michael Sparer: Alright, I'll keep an eye on changes of your project. Maybe we can merge some useful stuff in the future, but for now I'm of the same opinion as you. Let's keep them seperate for now. greetings from ice-cold austria, Michael Rodolfo Hansen-2 wrote: Yeah, I think we might just want to separate them, the goals will start becoming a bit different as well.. Especially since push has other options other than cometd / dojo for the general notion of getting push to web clients... So its better to separate those concerns and have push with its own mindset, no? On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 9:40 AM, Michael Sparer michael.spa...@gmx.atwrote: Rodolfo, so you finally decided to stick with your initial idea ;-) did you at least have a look at the cometd stuff in the new wicketstuff-dojo-1.1. project? I'm still against the idea to split up wicketstuff-push completely from the dojo project, but we had the discussion before without result ... regards, Michael Rodolfo Hansen-2 wrote: Hi, a new version of wicketstuff-push was moved to the wicketstuff-core group of projects, as push-parent (as was specified in the wiki) A couple of new things were done: It is no longer compatible with java 1.4, is built for wicket 1.4 and requires jetty 6.1.14. The dependencies on dojo have been reduced even further, so this package is basically just a cometd client/server project for wicket. The RemoveListener is now working and is extended with a new type of WicketRemoveListener that allows access to the Wicket Application Singleton and the session that registered the singleton (i thought of a couple of ways to register them, and decided to choose the one present in the code for it) Please let me know of any suggestions, ideas for the proj. - Michael Sparer http://talk-on-tech.blogspot.com -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-Announce--wicketstuff-push-ported-to-use-wicket-1.4-jetty-6.1.14-tp20914051p20914877.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - Michael Sparer http://talk-on-tech.blogspot.com -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-Announce--wicketstuff-push-ported-to-use-wicket-1.4-jetty-6.1.14-tp20914051p20955950.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - Michael Sparer http://talk-on-tech.blogspot.com -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-Announce--wicketstuff-push-ported-to-use-wicket-1.4-jetty-6.1.14-tp20914051p20971370.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: [Announce] wicketstuff-push ported to use wicket 1.4 jetty 6.1.14
Yeah, Jquery started something which I tested a couple of months ago with no luck. Writing/Finding a leaner comet client is in the TODO right now... The idea Jesse McConnel has is of making it simpler to marshall data to-from clients. To make it, an actual bus for communication. We haven't had much time to discuss all this though. On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 4:09 AM, Michael Sparer michael.spa...@gmx.atwrote: AFAIK jquery started something, but I just heard of that and didn't look into it. If dojo seems too bloated to you you can easily build your own dojo with just the modules you need - then it isn't bloated at all (except you're using too many components). There's a post announcing wicketstuff-dojo-1.1. somewhere on the mailinglist that explained (or at least offered to explain ;-)) how to build your own dojo - on the wiki it's described with 0.4 if I remember correctly regards, michael Peter Ertl-3 wrote: concerning the proper javascript client for comet... is there anything reasonable except dojo-cometd-client to use? The dojo stuff feels really bloated for me Am 11.12.2008 um 15:00 schrieb Michael Sparer: Alright, I'll keep an eye on changes of your project. Maybe we can merge some useful stuff in the future, but for now I'm of the same opinion as you. Let's keep them seperate for now. greetings from ice-cold austria, Michael Rodolfo Hansen-2 wrote: Yeah, I think we might just want to separate them, the goals will start becoming a bit different as well.. Especially since push has other options other than cometd / dojo for the general notion of getting push to web clients... So its better to separate those concerns and have push with its own mindset, no? On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 9:40 AM, Michael Sparer michael.spa...@gmx.atwrote: Rodolfo, so you finally decided to stick with your initial idea ;-) did you at least have a look at the cometd stuff in the new wicketstuff-dojo-1.1. project? I'm still against the idea to split up wicketstuff-push completely from the dojo project, but we had the discussion before without result ... regards, Michael Rodolfo Hansen-2 wrote: Hi, a new version of wicketstuff-push was moved to the wicketstuff-core group of projects, as push-parent (as was specified in the wiki) A couple of new things were done: It is no longer compatible with java 1.4, is built for wicket 1.4 and requires jetty 6.1.14. The dependencies on dojo have been reduced even further, so this package is basically just a cometd client/server project for wicket. The RemoveListener is now working and is extended with a new type of WicketRemoveListener that allows access to the Wicket Application Singleton and the session that registered the singleton (i thought of a couple of ways to register them, and decided to choose the one present in the code for it) Please let me know of any suggestions, ideas for the proj. - Michael Sparer http://talk-on-tech.blogspot.com -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-Announce--wicketstuff-push-ported-to-use-wicket-1.4-jetty-6.1.14-tp20914051p20914877.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - Michael Sparer http://talk-on-tech.blogspot.com -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-Announce--wicketstuff-push-ported-to-use-wicket-1.4-jetty-6.1.14-tp20914051p20955950.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - Michael Sparer http://talk-on-tech.blogspot.com -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-Announce--wicketstuff-push-ported-to-use-wicket-1.4-jetty-6.1.14-tp20914051p20971370.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: [Announce] wicketstuff-push ported to use wicket 1.4 jetty 6.1.14
Yeah, I think we might just want to separate them, the goals will start becoming a bit different as well.. Especially since push has other options other than cometd / dojo for the general notion of getting push to web clients... So its better to separate those concerns and have push with its own mindset, no? On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 9:40 AM, Michael Sparer [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: Rodolfo, so you finally decided to stick with your initial idea ;-) did you at least have a look at the cometd stuff in the new wicketstuff-dojo-1.1. project? I'm still against the idea to split up wicketstuff-push completely from the dojo project, but we had the discussion before without result ... regards, Michael Rodolfo Hansen-2 wrote: Hi, a new version of wicketstuff-push was moved to the wicketstuff-core group of projects, as push-parent (as was specified in the wiki) A couple of new things were done: It is no longer compatible with java 1.4, is built for wicket 1.4 and requires jetty 6.1.14. The dependencies on dojo have been reduced even further, so this package is basically just a cometd client/server project for wicket. The RemoveListener is now working and is extended with a new type of WicketRemoveListener that allows access to the Wicket Application Singleton and the session that registered the singleton (i thought of a couple of ways to register them, and decided to choose the one present in the code for it) Please let me know of any suggestions, ideas for the proj. - Michael Sparer http://talk-on-tech.blogspot.com -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-Announce--wicketstuff-push-ported-to-use-wicket-1.4-jetty-6.1.14-tp20914051p20914877.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [Announce] wicketstuff-push ported to use wicket 1.4 jetty 6.1.14
Alright, I'll keep an eye on changes of your project. Maybe we can merge some useful stuff in the future, but for now I'm of the same opinion as you. Let's keep them seperate for now. greetings from ice-cold austria, Michael Rodolfo Hansen-2 wrote: Yeah, I think we might just want to separate them, the goals will start becoming a bit different as well.. Especially since push has other options other than cometd / dojo for the general notion of getting push to web clients... So its better to separate those concerns and have push with its own mindset, no? On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 9:40 AM, Michael Sparer [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: Rodolfo, so you finally decided to stick with your initial idea ;-) did you at least have a look at the cometd stuff in the new wicketstuff-dojo-1.1. project? I'm still against the idea to split up wicketstuff-push completely from the dojo project, but we had the discussion before without result ... regards, Michael Rodolfo Hansen-2 wrote: Hi, a new version of wicketstuff-push was moved to the wicketstuff-core group of projects, as push-parent (as was specified in the wiki) A couple of new things were done: It is no longer compatible with java 1.4, is built for wicket 1.4 and requires jetty 6.1.14. The dependencies on dojo have been reduced even further, so this package is basically just a cometd client/server project for wicket. The RemoveListener is now working and is extended with a new type of WicketRemoveListener that allows access to the Wicket Application Singleton and the session that registered the singleton (i thought of a couple of ways to register them, and decided to choose the one present in the code for it) Please let me know of any suggestions, ideas for the proj. - Michael Sparer http://talk-on-tech.blogspot.com -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-Announce--wicketstuff-push-ported-to-use-wicket-1.4-jetty-6.1.14-tp20914051p20914877.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Michael Sparer http://talk-on-tech.blogspot.com -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-Announce--wicketstuff-push-ported-to-use-wicket-1.4-jetty-6.1.14-tp20914051p20955950.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [Announce] wicketstuff-push ported to use wicket 1.4 jetty 6.1.14
concerning the proper javascript client for comet... is there anything reasonable except dojo-cometd-client to use? The dojo stuff feels really bloated for me Am 11.12.2008 um 15:00 schrieb Michael Sparer: Alright, I'll keep an eye on changes of your project. Maybe we can merge some useful stuff in the future, but for now I'm of the same opinion as you. Let's keep them seperate for now. greetings from ice-cold austria, Michael Rodolfo Hansen-2 wrote: Yeah, I think we might just want to separate them, the goals will start becoming a bit different as well.. Especially since push has other options other than cometd / dojo for the general notion of getting push to web clients... So its better to separate those concerns and have push with its own mindset, no? On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 9:40 AM, Michael Sparer michael.spa...@gmx.atwrote: Rodolfo, so you finally decided to stick with your initial idea ;-) did you at least have a look at the cometd stuff in the new wicketstuff-dojo-1.1. project? I'm still against the idea to split up wicketstuff-push completely from the dojo project, but we had the discussion before without result ... regards, Michael Rodolfo Hansen-2 wrote: Hi, a new version of wicketstuff-push was moved to the wicketstuff-core group of projects, as push-parent (as was specified in the wiki) A couple of new things were done: It is no longer compatible with java 1.4, is built for wicket 1.4 and requires jetty 6.1.14. The dependencies on dojo have been reduced even further, so this package is basically just a cometd client/server project for wicket. The RemoveListener is now working and is extended with a new type of WicketRemoveListener that allows access to the Wicket Application Singleton and the session that registered the singleton (i thought of a couple of ways to register them, and decided to choose the one present in the code for it) Please let me know of any suggestions, ideas for the proj. - Michael Sparer http://talk-on-tech.blogspot.com -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-Announce--wicketstuff-push-ported-to-use-wicket-1.4-jetty-6.1.14-tp20914051p20914877.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - Michael Sparer http://talk-on-tech.blogspot.com -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-Announce--wicketstuff-push-ported-to-use-wicket-1.4-jetty-6.1.14-tp20914051p20955950.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: [Announce] wicketstuff-push ported to use wicket 1.4 jetty 6.1.14
Rodolfo, so you finally decided to stick with your initial idea ;-) did you at least have a look at the cometd stuff in the new wicketstuff-dojo-1.1. project? I'm still against the idea to split up wicketstuff-push completely from the dojo project, but we had the discussion before without result ... regards, Michael Rodolfo Hansen-2 wrote: Hi, a new version of wicketstuff-push was moved to the wicketstuff-core group of projects, as push-parent (as was specified in the wiki) A couple of new things were done: It is no longer compatible with java 1.4, is built for wicket 1.4 and requires jetty 6.1.14. The dependencies on dojo have been reduced even further, so this package is basically just a cometd client/server project for wicket. The RemoveListener is now working and is extended with a new type of WicketRemoveListener that allows access to the Wicket Application Singleton and the session that registered the singleton (i thought of a couple of ways to register them, and decided to choose the one present in the code for it) Please let me know of any suggestions, ideas for the proj. - Michael Sparer http://talk-on-tech.blogspot.com -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-Announce--wicketstuff-push-ported-to-use-wicket-1.4-jetty-6.1.14-tp20914051p20914877.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
