Re: Bypass CDATA contribution on script tags

[Serban Balamaci]

Hi Martin,
Problem was, the JS dev was specific about not wanting to contribute to the
head portion the JS template.
What I've done for a quick solution is that we moved the js templates in a
separate .tmpl files which sit next to the .html
Then I use a PackageTextTemplate to provide the template string to
replaceComponentTagBody of a WebMarkupContainer.

The template file contains all the embeded in 

Re: Bypass CDATA contribution on script tags

[Martin Grigorov]

Hi,

Yes, this CDATA is there to be able to use > and < with XHTML.
You can construct the templates directly with renderString() method to
avoid the CDATA.

On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 3:17 PM, Serban Balamaci  wrote:
> Hi all,
> Our javascript developer complains that Wicket automatically adds the CDATA
> part whenever it encounters the *script* tag.
> He's trying to embed a template in the html file(not in the head section)
>
>
> and he gets a bunch of CDATA along with the html which will get
> multiplied(we're creating a breadcrumb component)
>
>
> we're using underscore.js and the idea it's based on
> http://ejohn.org/blog/javascript-micro-templating/
>
>
> I've said that the CDATA is there to pass the validation of the html, but he
> says html5 is not xhtml and is much looser with validations.
>
> -
> http://balamaci.wordpress.com
> --
> View this message in context: 
> http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Bypass-CDATA-contribution-on-script-tags-tp4176752p4176752.html
> Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>



-- 
Martin Grigorov
jWeekend
Training, Consulting, Development
http://jWeekend.com

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org