Igor, for now I'm concerned about how can I make sure that my code that
mimics form submitting lifecycles and wicket code in coming version do the
same things?
For instance the AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior:
@Override
protected final void onEvent(final AjaxRequestTarget
I just realized that maybe you need to extend your validators, too, at
least if you want your modelobject to be updated. And how you do that on
a textfield that is required, I don't really know.
Maybe that path is too complicated.
/Stefan
On 2009-07-06 22:55, Stefan Malmesjö wrote:
Could
Thanks, but I was not talking about using the submit behavior.
I was talking about the way to create my own ajax behavior to send the value
of multiple form fields.
I think this should be part of Wicket. It is not the first time I encounter
this problem. The first time, I found a workaround but
From the ajax perspective it should be possible to submit any dom element
with its descendants. I believe it is exactly what Wicket ajax submit is
doing. IMO forms needed just for regular form submit.
We just need to change an implementation to accept a list of dom elements
instead of just one.
Wicket has strong rules how to handle ajax form submit. Therefore partial
form submitting should be handled differently on the server side.
Anyway we could handle raw strings or invoke converter ourselves.
Vladimir K wrote:
From the ajax perspective it should be possible to submit any dom
you can see how the submit behavior does it and replicate the parts
you need. all these things are not using some magical internal apis.
you are meant to build your own things when the default
implementations do not do what you want.
-igor
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 6:35 AM, Thierry
Of course, but the goal of using a framework like Wicket is just that: avoid
having to write everything by myself. No?
So it is a suggestion to add in a future release. I think a lot of people
need that kind of functionality. If it could be generic enough.
I think Ajax is rarely used to submit a
no, the goal of a framework is to make the 90% usecase easy and the
10% usecase possible.
there arent many threads on this list requesting this particular
feature so i guess its not that common a usecase. of course, you can
always add a jira ticket with a patch.
-igor
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at
Any following on that?
Daniel, have you been able to solve your problem? Did you wrote your own
behavior?
I have the same requirement as you and I am trying to find a quick way to
solve my problem.
Can someone point me to some examples on how to write my own Ajax behavior?
Thanks
Thierry
On
Could setting visibility for the FeedbackPanel to false until the form has
been properly submitted with a press of a submit button work?
/Stefan
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 8:42 PM, Thierry Leveque tleve...@gmail.com wrote:
Any following on that?
Daniel, have you been able to solve your problem?
how are you planning on reading the other values? you cannot access
the model so you will have to call getinput(), are you also planning
on doing type conversion yourself then?
-igor
2009/6/2 Daniel Fernández dfernan...@users.sourceforge.net:
Hello,
I have a form with a DropDownChoice, on
Yes, I know it is tricky, but the fact is I don't think I would really need
type conversion in this case.
I will try to explain myself. I have the following UI:
|OPERATOR |V|
|INPUT1=aBc| |INPUT2=DeF |
...being OPERATOR the DropDownChoice, and both INPUT1 and
well, if you do not want to *submit* the form then dont use
ajaxformSUBMITbehavior :)
with little work you can roll your own behavior that does a simple
ajax get and appends whatever values you need from formcomponents to
the url. that way the form is not submitted and you have access to the
raw
13 matches
Mail list logo
