looks nice, but no support for postgresql :-(
Am 02.07.2009 um 21:54 schrieb John Armstrong:
Since we are plugging our favorite DB tools I swear by Database
Workbench Pro (http://www.upscene.com/). The author is extremely
responsive (he'll give you a custom build, usually in 48 hours, when
you
Since we are plugging our favorite DB tools I swear by Database
Workbench Pro (http://www.upscene.com/). The author is extremely
responsive (he'll give you a custom build, usually in 48 hours, when
you find a bug), it supports a nice variety of databases and has some
killer tools like cross-databas
Now that Oracle bought Sun I wonder if JDev and Netbeans will cross paths.
A great free, cross-platform SQL tool is SQuirreL (
http://squirrel-sql.sourceforge.net/).
On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 4:45 PM, Scott Swank wrote:
> I'm at best 50% DBA, by training. You end up with multi-step
> operations
I'm at best 50% DBA, by training. You end up with multi-step
operations that work very well as sql*plus scripts. I also run
analogous queries in TOAD, PL/SQL Dev or SQL Dev -- but no DBA worth
hiring works in the click-and-drag world. But then I suppose this has
gotten off topic.
On Sat, Jun 20
As a DBA, you use SQL Plus? I would think most DBAs would either use the
console thingy that comes with Oracle or Toad. SQL Plus always seemed a bit
limiting to me, but that's probably because of my limited knowledge of all
the commands, so I need the nice GUI stuff to guide me along. :)
On Sat,
And if you're an Oracle DBA your main tool is called "SQL Plus".
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 8:58 PM, James
Carman wrote:
> +1 to sqldeveloper (java or native). For developers (not DBAs), it's a very
> nice tool and does what you need for the majority of the cases.
>
> On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 11:28 P
+1 to sqldeveloper (java or native). For developers (not DBAs), it's a very
nice tool and does what you need for the majority of the cases.
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 11:28 PM, Vasu Srinivasan wrote:
> JDeveloper is good to target a narrow Oracle infrastructure. We use it for
> Oracle soa suite, a
JDeveloper is good to target a narrow Oracle infrastructure. We use it for
Oracle soa suite, and there are no other IDEs / plugins which can match
that, it has good integration for ADF too. And thats pretty much it.
Otherwise, it doesn't come half close to IDEA or Eclipse. The project
structure it
Juan Carlos Garcia M. gmail.com> writes:
>
> I always thought God used only in LISP :)
>
> Nicolas Melendez wrote:
> >
> > god used Eclipse 1.0 to develop universe.
> >
> > NM
> > Software Developer - Buenos aires, Argentina.
> >
No. Sadly, He didn't:
http://xkcd.com/224/
Daniel
I always thought God used only in LISP :)
Nicolas Melendez wrote:
>
> god used Eclipse 1.0 to develop universe.
>
> NM
> Software Developer - Buenos aires, Argentina.
>
> On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 5:44 PM, Martijn Reuvers
> wrote:
>
>> You might want to try Netbeans for UML (there is a sin
God tryed Netbeans. And now we have Argentina!
heheheeh just a little brazillian joke!
Someone has posted and i agree. Thas not a manager decision. Developer
should ask the manager why he is taking that decision, and show the benefits
of using another IDE. After all, the developers will use the ID
JDev is not a bad IDE actually. If you want a lot of ready to use
integrated functionality then its by far better than any of the
earlier mentioned IDE's (especially if you use e.g. bc4j, soa, adf
etc) - this is true as long as you need the oracle taste that is.
For pure java programming the other
god used Eclipse 1.0 to develop universe.
NM
Software Developer - Buenos aires, Argentina.
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 5:44 PM, Martijn Reuvers
wrote:
> You might want to try Netbeans for UML (there is a single plugin,
> install it and it works fine). I have not had any problems with it, it
> has qu
James & Igor, It sounds like your experiences with UML are about what
I am expecting it to be like.
Scott, the move to drop other programs in favor of JDeveloper is
partly about cost-cutting, but more so about standardization. As I've
mentioned, I'm the only Java programmer on staff, and I think
J
You might want to try Netbeans for UML (there is a single plugin,
install it and it works fine). I have not had any problems with it, it
has quite some features (similar to the ones in JDeveloper).
Use SQLDeveloper (of Oracle as well) if you need to replace Toad,
however keep in mind it does not h
Dane,
I have used JDev and it is not my preference for a Java IDE. That
said, if you're having trouble with it your best resource is posting
at forums.oracle.com. As for a PL/SQL IDE, why are you moving away
from TOAD, the price ($600 if I remember right...)? The product
"PL/SQL Developer" from
we found uml works great in the beginning of an iteration to represent
high level architecture and processes to get everyone on the same
page. after that we fill in the blanks in code. all this roundtripping
into uml, etc, is insane imho.
-igor
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 8:30 AM, James
Carman wrote:
I've always found that trying to do the UML thing just turns out to be more
of a pain than it's worth. For me, it's just easier to code the stuff. You
can generate UML from the code pretty easily (check out the yfiles Javadocs
for an example that's generated using yworks' yDoc product).
On Fri,
dont you mean
1. Eclipse
2. IntelliJ IDEA
3. Netbeans
:)
-igor
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 3:25 AM, James
Carman wrote:
> Absolutely not. I don't know that I've even heard anyone say they're
> using it. It's funny how management thinks they can make these sort
> of decisions for developers. I
I've really enjoyed getting to use Maven on my recent projects. I'm no
Maven expert, but I'm finding that I don't have to be -- it really
just does a great job. Getting Maven working with JDeveloper has not
been going well so far, so that's been one hangup.
There are a few reasons for the departme
+1 on using Maven. Most folks at our job site use eclipse, but I'm an
IntelliJ junkie (they got me hooked many years ago and I can't break
free). For the most part, we don't have issues between environments,
provided folks have their plugins set up correctly.
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 6:39 AM, Mar
When you use ADF, then stick to JDeveloper you'll get a lot of
integration for your application and can really build applications
fast.
However if you use open-source frameworks like wicket, you're better
off using one of the other IDE's (Netbeans, Eclipse, IntelliJ). Just
use maven or so, then yo
Absolutely not. I don't know that I've even heard anyone say they're
using it. It's funny how management thinks they can make these sort
of decisions for developers. I'd say stick with one of the top three
(in my opinion), in this order:
1. IntelliJ IDEA
2. Eclipse
3. Netbeans
On Thu, Jun
http://instantcrickets.com
Ryan Gravener
http://bit.ly/no_word_docs
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 7:12 PM, Nick Heudecker wrote:
> JDeveloper?
>
> *crickets*
>
> :)
>
> --
> Nick Heudecker
> Professional Wicket Training & Consulting
> http://www.systemmobile.com
>
JDeveloper?
*crickets*
:)
--
Nick Heudecker
Professional Wicket Training & Consulting
http://www.systemmobile.com
25 matches
Mail list logo