Thanks all the same.
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 5:27 PM, Stas Boukarev wrote:
> "Chun Tian (binghe)" writes:
>
>> Hi, Stas Boukarev
>>
>> You're right. We should always use "ns-try-again-condition" instead of
>> "ns-try-again" as most backends does.
>>
>> Fixed in trunk and earlier branches.
>>
>>
"Chun Tian (binghe)" writes:
> Hi, Stas Boukarev
>
> You're right. We should always use "ns-try-again-condition" instead of
> "ns-try-again" as most backends does.
>
> Fixed in trunk and earlier branches.
>
> P.S. Do you know how to reliably trigger this condition? I want to added
> "ns-try-aga
Hi, Stas Boukarev
You're right. We should always use "ns-try-again-condition" instead of
"ns-try-again" as most backends does.
Fixed in trunk and earlier branches.
P.S. Do you know how to reliably trigger this condition? I want to added
"ns-try-again-condition" into our always-broken unit test