e switch worked
>>> fine though). Jonathon P helped with a patch to get me going, but that
>>> obviously has been mainlined by now since they have a siggen working (it
>>> didn't exist yet when I did my block). The issue had something to do with
>>> the block sending
e they have a siggen working (it
>> didn't exist yet when I did my block). The issue had something to do with
>> the block sending data before everything have been initialized and came up
>> properly.
>>
>> So it isn't too bad to create one. Good luck!
>>
>>
&
thing have been initialized and came up
> properly.
>
> So it isn't too bad to create one. Good luck!
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -
> Subject: Re: [USRP-users] USRP X310 Remote Configuration
> From: "Rob Kossler via USRP-users"
> Date: 7
yet when I
did my block). The issue had something to do with the block sending data
before everything have been initialized and came up properly.
So it isn't too bad to create one. Good luck!
- Original Message - Subject: Re: [USRP-users] USRP X310 Remote
Configuration
Perhaps look at the RFNoC siggen block. You will need to add some component
such as a block memory or fifo to store the samples on the fpga and then
you will need a way to populate the memory and then play it out when
desired.
Rob
On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 3:49 AM Farnaz Chamanzadeh
wrote:
>
Dear Rob,
Thanks for your helpful response. The reason that we need to use a switch
is due to hour host hardware limits, which only have one 10GBE.
About the second remark in your email, do you have an example or a
reference where a similar case was implemented which we can use as a
guideline for
Hi Farnaz,
A couple of remarks and questions
- Remark 1: in order to get 200 MS/s transmit streaming, you will NEED to
have the samples on the USRP. The host-to-USRP streaming does not work at
200 MS/s for the transmit case (unless something has recently changed). The
host-to-USRP max for transmit
Dears,
To be more specific, we want to control multiple USRPs with one (remote)
computer. We would like to stream known and periodic signal from each USRP.
The sequence on each USRP is unique and is different from other USRPs.
Since the samples from each USRP are known, it would be more
Hi Farnaz,
To clarify and expand on Marcus' comments, the answer is maybe. You can do
burst captures and transmissions at full rate and you can even use timed
commands to synchronize them, but there are limitations. If you can
describe in more detail what you want to do, we can more clearly
Dear Fernaz,
you can't cheat 10Gig bandwidth! If you time-share any medium, then
it's bandwidth must be shared. Since ethernet is de facto a timesharing
thing, anyway, no, this won't work:
Since you need to push through all the data through a single 10GigE
connection, your 10 gigabits per second
Dear all,
I want to connect multiple USRP X310 to one host PC and control them all
from that Pc, using one 10Gigabit Ethernet switch. My question is that if
it is possible to stream from each USRP in a different time slot using the
full bandwidth and 200MS/s in a setup similar to the picture
11 matches
Mail list logo
