[Uta] Warren Kumari's Discuss on draft-ietf-uta-smtp-tlsrpt-18: (with DISCUSS)

Warren Kumari has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-uta-smtp-tlsrpt-18: Discuss When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to

Re: [Uta] Warren Kumari's Discuss on draft-ietf-uta-smtp-tlsrpt-18: (with DISCUSS)

> On Apr 16, 2018, at 1:58 PM, Warren Kumari wrote: > > I throw away the one that contains 'bar', fair enough, got it. What I don't > understand is what a record would look like which is a single record (#2), but > that contains multiple strings (#3). Can you provide an

Re: [Uta] Warren Kumari's Discuss on draft-ietf-uta-smtp-tlsrpt-18: (with DISCUSS)

On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 2:08 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: > > >> On Apr 16, 2018, at 1:58 PM, Warren Kumari wrote: >> >> I throw away the one that contains 'bar', fair enough, got it. What I don't >> understand is what a record would look like which is a

[Uta] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-uta-smtp-tlsrpt-18: (with COMMENT)

Benjamin Kaduk has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-uta-smtp-tlsrpt-18: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer

Re: [Uta] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-uta-smtp-tlsrpt-18: (with COMMENT)

Hi Benjamin, Thank you for your review comments! Just a generic reply on one of them: On 16/04/2018 16:22, Benjamin Kaduk wrote: Section 3 o "v": This value MUST be equal to "TLSRPTv1". How about something like "This document defines version 1; other versions may be defined in later

[Uta] Proposed text for registering _tls DNS label

Hi, I response to Phillip Hallam-Baker's SecDir review, I propose to add the following note to the document: -- [[RFC Editor: if draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf gets published as an RFC before this document, please add the following text (as a new 6.X Section) to the

Re: [Uta] Warren Kumari's Discuss on draft-ietf-uta-smtp-tlsrpt-18: (with DISCUSS)

> On Apr 16, 2018, at 2:24 PM, Warren Kumari wrote: > >> Strings in TXT records have a single-octet length field. When returning a >> longer >> string, or when one wants to explicitly segment a TXT RDATA into multiple >> strings >> one returns: >> >>txt.example.