Hi !!
If you dislike NFS, then why did you go with qmail to begin with?
That was the target for qmail. To use NFS without file locking.
I hope this never reaches djb since I'm 100% sure he never
thougth qmail to be designed for Network Failure System... :-)
=d0Mi=
At 12:01 AM 02-24-2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi !!
If you dislike NFS, then why did you go with qmail to begin with?
That was the target for qmail. To use NFS without file locking.
I hope this never reaches djb since I'm 100% sure he never
thougth qmail to be designed for Network Failure
How about this for an Idea. Since I believe that we all agree in the
power of Qmail and its superiority over the other systems. I think that
we leave that portion of Qmail and Vpopmail alone.
As a suggestion I think that Jesse did bring up some valid points when
it comes to the administration of
hi
I have qmailadmin+vpopmail working.
I want to add a footer automatically to all e-mails
received in my domain, for example "Powered by bubalu mail".
I have this working on my webmail system so every
sent messages have my footer but since the users are using pop3 instead of
webmail, I
I have installed qmail+vpopmail ,bur have a problem.
1. qmai-inject and smtp-deamon inject mails into and look for mailboxes in
$HOMEDIR/Maildir
2.Vpopmail tries to pop the mail from
/home/vpopmail/domains/mydomain.com.tr/ihsan/Maildir
3.When I manually copy the content of $HOMEDIR/Maildir to
On Sunday 23 February 2003 21:56, Jesse Guardiani wrote:
OK. Again, I admit lack of experience here. But, it still seems like a
vpopmail specific protocol would be faster than transfering and modifying
files over NFS. Does everyone really think that NFS would be faster?
First off, I've
