[vchkpw] Webmail question

2003-08-18 Thread Widmer Hannes
Hello List Small Question. I set up a verry nice qmail - vpopmail - mysql System taht works great !!! Now, for the Webmail Acces, I installed squirrelmail. Now, some user's has a problem that i looks not verry nice, is complicated and and and Now, I'm looking for a webmail like @mail

RE: [vchkpw] Webmail question

2003-08-18 Thread Hannes Widmer
Hi Darcy Thanks for your verry fast reply *s*... I know sqwebmail and i testetd but my problem is that I'm not a good Programmer and so it's difficult for me and sqwebmail is nice, but the look needs to be changed or are here any templates? Thanks a lot for your assistance... Hannes

[vchkpw] RE : [vchkpw] Webmail question

2003-08-18 Thread Sébastien Bourgasser
Hi, I'm using IMP with imap. I find it nice. Look at http://www.horde.org Best regards, -- Sebastien BOURGASSER GANESKO Consulting -Message d'origine- De : Hannes Widmer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Envoyé : lundi 18 août 2003 11:58 À : 'DARCY,MATTHEW (HP-UnitedKingdom,ex2)' Cc :

Re: [vchkpw] Re: QMAIL: SMTP-AUTH-SSL

2003-08-18 Thread eLgino
ok the SMTP-AUTH works fine but if i set in Outlook Express to send it with SSL then come a input field to enter my login and password and he sends PLAIN-TEXT. can outlook handle TSL/SSL for SMTP-AUTH? thanks - Original Message - From: Rick Macdougall [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL

[vchkpw] vpopbull question

2003-08-18 Thread Evren Yurtesen
I have a funny question, unless I set the date in the email file that I provide to vpopbull, the email is dated that its sent at about 1970 :) or the mail client assumes so... Is there any way to set the date automatically? Evren

RE: [vchkpw] vpopbull question

2003-08-18 Thread Tom Walsh
vpopbull expects a fully rfc compliant email message as its input. Make sure you have the email headers in place and correctly formatted. Also any aliased domains will have duplicate emails delivered Learned that one the hard way... Tom Walsh Network Administrator http://www.ala.net/

RE: [vchkpw] vpopbull question

2003-08-18 Thread Evren Yurtesen
thats nice but there could be also a nice switch to just set the date :) or insert the date headers... Thanks, Evren On Mon, 18 Aug 2003, Tom Walsh wrote: vpopbull expects a fully rfc compliant email message as its input. Make sure you have the email headers in place and correctly

RE: [vchkpw] vpopbull question

2003-08-18 Thread Benjamin Tomhave
No, there can't be a switch to do that because vpopbull doesn't do any processing on the input, it only copies it into place. It doesn't take much to create a properly formatted email message. -Original Message- From: Evren Yurtesen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 18,

Re: [vchkpw] Problems Upgrading from 5.3.20 to 5.3.24

2003-08-18 Thread cyko
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I was successfully running vpopmail-5.3.20. I decided to upgrade to vpopmail-5.3.24 and now I'm getting the following bounce messages: [snip] [EMAIL PROTECTED]: vmysql: sql error[3]: Sorry, no mailbox here by that name. vpopmail (#5.1.1)

RE: [vchkpw] Problems Upgrading from 5.3.20 to 5.3.24

2003-08-18 Thread Tom Walsh
::I think I may have found the problem. Was there a structural ::change from 5.3.20 ::to 5.3.24 in the mysql database? :: ::Just to see if I could create a new domain and have it work, I did the ::following: :: ::[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/local/vpopmail/bin# ./vadddomain blah.com ::Please enter

RE: [vchkpw] Problems Upgrading from 5.3.20 to 5.3.24

2003-08-18 Thread cyko
Quoting Tom Walsh [EMAIL PROTECTED]: ::I think I may have found the problem. Was there a structural ::change from 5.3.20 ::to 5.3.24 in the mysql database? :: ::Just to see if I could create a new domain and have it work, I did the ::following: :: ::[EMAIL

Re: [vchkpw] Problems Upgrading from 5.3.20 to 5.3.24

2003-08-18 Thread Evren Yurtesen
what was the parameters you used last time to configure vpopmail? before the upgrade? for version 5.3.20 ? Evren On Mon, 18 Aug 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I was successfully running vpopmail-5.3.20. I decided to upgrade to vpopmail-5.3.24 and now I'm getting the following bounce

Re: [vchkpw] Problems Upgrading from 5.3.20 to 5.3.24

2003-08-18 Thread Evren Yurtesen
Perhaps you didnt upgrade qmailadmin, if you even do a reinstall it might get broken again. Qmailadmin statically compiles in some vpopmail conf files inside... On Mon, 18 Aug 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I was successfully running

Re: [vchkpw] Problems Upgrading from 5.3.20 to 5.3.24

2003-08-18 Thread Evren Yurtesen
AH I SEE you should recompile without enable clear passwords (which doesnt seem to be in your configure options anyhow, weird) or perhaps if it is enabled automatically for some weird reason in newer versions you just have to add the disabling option perhaps the only difference is that you dont

RE: [vchkpw] vpopbull question

2003-08-18 Thread Ron Guerin
On Mon, 2003-08-18 at 10:55, Tom Walsh wrote: Also any aliased domains will have duplicate emails delivered Learned that one the hard way... What version of vpopmail? I'm just curious if that behavior remains in the development version. That sounds like a bug. - Ron

[vchkpw] Similar to per-domain quotas

2003-08-18 Thread cyko
I've looked through the docs and googled and I didn't see anything in regards to this topic. I've set a default-quota 1or 20m, thus any user created gets set a 10m quota unless I change it manually. Now, I want to be able to (maybe upon vadddomain) to set a domain quota. By this, I mean if I

RE: [vchkpw] vpopbull question

2003-08-18 Thread Tom Walsh
Ron, This was 5.2.0 or 5.2.1 I forget which one I was running at the time (about 2 months ago). I have since upgraded to 5.3.20, and have only sent each iteration of vpopbull to only one domain at a time. I had enough egg on my face (and an increased level of tech calls, those tech support techs

Re: [vchkpw] QMAIL: SMTP-AUTH-SSL

2003-08-18 Thread John Johnson
got o http://www.shupp.org his Mega patch is NICE! -John - Original Message - From: eLgino [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, August 17, 2003 7:07 AM Subject: [vchkpw] QMAIL: SMTP-AUTH-SSL hi guys, sorry that i write to this mailinglist, but i traffic is not

[vchkpw] autorespond (CAN-2003-0654)

2003-08-18 Thread Oden Eriksson
Hi. This isn't really my bag, but I rolled a tarball out of autorespond with the debian CAN-2003-0654 patch applied, I also added their man page and a ChangeLog file. Please use this one or roll an authorized tar ball immediately (Ken Jones?). Here's my tar ball: