Re: [vchkpw] disable_smtp / no_smtp gid flag smtp-auth question

2004-11-23 Thread Steve
On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 17:20:15 -0800, Tom Collins wrote:  On Nov 22, 2004, at 3:30 PM, Rick Macdougall wrote:  Tom Collins wrote:  On Nov 22, 2004, at 12:01 PM, Steve wrote:  Please could someone tell me exactly what is the use of the  disable_smtp  no_smtp gid flag ? I ask that because I use  qmail

Re: [vchkpw] disable_smtp / no_smtp gid flag smtp-auth question

2004-11-23 Thread Steve
On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 17:20:15 -0800, Tom Collins wrote:  On Nov 22, 2004, at 3:30 PM, Rick Macdougall wrote:  Tom Collins wrote:  On Nov 22, 2004, at 12:01 PM, Steve wrote:  Please could someone tell me exactly what is the use of the  disable_smtp  no_smtp gid flag ? I ask that because I use  qmail

[vchkpw] Custom Maildir Structure

2004-11-23 Thread Robin Bowes
Hi, I use bincimap with vpopmail and use the IMAPDir structure which looks like this: domains | +-domain | +-user | +-IMAPDir | | | +-INBOX - ../Maildir | +-Maildir | +-new | +-cur

RE: [vchkpw] Custom Maildir Structure

2004-11-23 Thread Jeremy Eder
-Original Message- From: Robin Bowes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2004 7:40 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [vchkpw] Custom Maildir Structure Hi, I use bincimap with vpopmail and use the IMAPDir structure which looks like this: domains | +-domain

[vchkpw] Courier-Imap patch to allow webmail access for specified IP's when no_imap or no_pop is specified

2004-11-23 Thread Rick Macdougall
Hi, A little patch against preauthvchkpw.c to allow local imap and/or pop access even if no_pop or no_imap is set. It used here to allow webmail access from localhost. It is a patch against 3.0.8 but it is a small change and easily adjustable to other versions. Based on Tom Collins code in

Re: [vchkpw] Custom Maildir Structure

2004-11-23 Thread Tom Collins
On Nov 23, 2004, at 4:39 AM, Robin Bowes wrote: Is it possible to configure vpopmail (i.e. vadduser) and, by extension, qmailadmin to create this structure automatically when I new user is added? i.e. Does vpopmail support the concept of a skel directory like the adduser command uses /etc/skel

[vchkpw] autoresponder supposed to cause message loss?

2004-11-23 Thread David Hubbard
In a vpopmail 5.4.6 site with autoresponder 2.0.4, the behavior we're seeing is that when a user sets a vacation message, vpopmail sets up the autoresponder with a 3 messages per day limit. The .qmail file it creates for that person has autoresponder on the first line and then the Maildir

[vchkpw] just noticed something with chkuser ....

2004-11-23 Thread Jeremy Kitchen
mail from: 571 sorry, sender address has invalid format (#5.7.1 - chkuser) HUH? this is fixed in a newer version I hope? -Jeremy -- Jeremy Kitchen ++ Systems Administrator ++ Inter7 Internet Technologies, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ++ www.inter7.com ++ 866.528.3530 ++ 815.776.9465 int'l

Re: [vchkpw] just noticed something with chkuser ....

2004-11-23 Thread Jeremy Kitchen
On Tuesday 23 November 2004 04:53 pm, Rick Macdougall wrote: Jeremy Kitchen wrote: mail from: 571 sorry, sender address has invalid format (#5.7.1 - chkuser) HUH? this is fixed in a newer version I hope? Hi, Is CHKUSER_ENABLE_NULL_SENDER_WITH_TCPREMOTEHOST defined in your config

Re: [vchkpw] just noticed something with chkuser ....

2004-11-23 Thread Rick Macdougall
Jeremy Kitchen wrote: mail from: 571 sorry, sender address has invalid format (#5.7.1 - chkuser) HUH? this is fixed in a newer version I hope? Hi, Is CHKUSER_ENABLE_NULL_SENDER_WITH_TCPREMOTEHOST defined in your config ? From the manual CHKUSER_ENABLE_NULL_SENDER_WITH_TCPREMOTEHOST 2.0.5

Re: [vchkpw] just noticed something with chkuser ....

2004-11-23 Thread Rick Macdougall
Jeremy Kitchen wrote: On Tuesday 23 November 2004 04:53 pm, Rick Macdougall wrote: CHKUSER_ENABLE_NULL_SENDER_WITH_TCPREMOTEHOST 2.0.5 defined Enables accepting null sender from hosts which have a name associated to their IP oh, and we don't do reverse dns lookups.. that would explain

Re: [vchkpw] autoresponder supposed to cause message loss?

2004-11-23 Thread Tom Collins
On Nov 23, 2004, at 11:01 AM, David Hubbard wrote: Is there a way to override that behavior so messages are not lost? Is this the expected behavior even or is something else incorrect? If I reverse the order in the .qmail file it works as intended but I'd rather not patch vpopmail for all of our

Re: [vchkpw] just noticed something with chkuser ....

2004-11-23 Thread Remo Mattei
I had the same problem I had to make sure that the patch was applied correctly otherwise it will not accept your bounce messages. Remo - Original Message - From: Jeremy Kitchen [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2004 5:08 PM Subject: Re: [vchkpw] just