Good afternoon,
Is there a proper way to delete a domain which is currently
configured as the primary domain for an account? And I want one
of the current domain aliases to become the primary domain.
I can't find any comprehensive documentation for vdeldomain.
Maybe it will do what I want; I
to make it packagable like proftpd
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=91270
fedora compile proftpd only one time and the users have the choice of
ldap, mysql and pgsql database.
if we need proftpd with mysql then I will install proftpd and
proftpd-mysql packages and it will wo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Itamar Reis Peixoto wrote:
> at current state of vpopmail if we need vpopmail with mysql support,
> then I need to compile vpopmail and link with mysql librarys
>
> if we need vpopmail with pgsql support then I need to recompile
> everthing with pgsql
please look at fedora proftpd package
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=91270
he have some sub-packages, mysql, pgsql etc..
at current state of vpopmail if we need vpopmail with mysql support,
then I need to compile vpopmail and link with mysql librarys
if we need vpopmail w
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Itamar Reis Peixoto wrote:
> Also will be a good idea to have loadable module support for databases
>
> mysql
> sqlite
> pgsql
> cdb
>
> etc...
I'm not sure loadable module support is really all that useful.
> this will make packaging easy
Please
Also will be a good idea to have loadable module support for databases
mysql
sqlite
pgsql
cdb
etc...
this will make packaging easy
> I'm currently working on adding FHS compliance to the 5.5 branch. 5.4 is
> frozen
> to everything except bugfixes.
Itamar Reis Peixoto
e-mail/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Japheth Cleaver wrote:
> On Sat, March 14, 2009 10:30 am, aledr wrote:
>> On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 2:03 PM, Matt Brookings wrote:
>
> *snip*
>
> We've had the same sort of concerns regarding FHS compliance (and
> eas-of-package-building) for some tim
On Sat, March 14, 2009 10:30 am, aledr wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 2:03 PM, Matt Brookings wrote:
*snip*
We've had the same sort of concerns regarding FHS compliance (and
eas-of-package-building) for some time, and have had a set of patches
within our RPM that have proved effective for us.
