Sorry for the off topic.
Does anyone know about good clones/substitutes of tcpserver and rblsmtpd?
I'ld like they to have a more open licensing, so developing and
deployment of new integrated features could be more easy.
Thanks,
Tonino
On 2006-10-26, at 0441, tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote:
Does anyone know about good clones/substitutes of tcpserver and
rblsmtpd?
I'ld like they to have a more open licensing, so developing and
deployment of new integrated features could be more easy.
(sorry for going even further off topic)
John Simpson wrote:
i've heard it said that all of djb's other software is essentially
public domain, but now i'm curious and would like know for sure. has
anybody heard or seen any kind of statement from djb about this, and
if so where can i find a copy of it?
Most of his software is not
On 2006-10-26, at 1454, David Chaplin-Loebell wrote:
John Simpson wrote:
i've heard it said that all of djb's other software is essentially
public domain, but now i'm curious and would like know for sure.
has anybody heard or seen any kind of statement from djb about
this, and if so
John Simpson wrote:
i don't really mind either way, but i'd like to know what his policy
is, just to be sure. before you pointed out this page this i was not
aware of 2007-01-01 having any significance (other than new years
day, obviously.)
He periodically updates those dates. I think the
On 2006-10-26, at 1737, David Chaplin-Loebell wrote:
John Simpson wrote:
i don't really mind either way, but i'd like to know what his
policy is, just to be sure. before you pointed out this page this
i was not aware of 2007-01-01 having any significance (other than
new years day,
