On May 4, 2004, at 3:31 PM, X-Istence wrote:
Mabey its time to fix your server time.
This shouldnt happen.
If I don't build the tarball correctly, it will happen.
--
Tom Collins - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
QmailAdmin: http://qmailadmin.sf.net/ Vpopmail: http://vpopmail.sf.net/
Info on the Sniffter
Tom Collins wrote:
On May 4, 2004, at 3:31 PM, X-Istence wrote:
Mabey its time to fix your server time.
This shouldnt happen.
If I don't build the tarball correctly, it will happen.
--
Tom Collins - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
QmailAdmin: http://qmailadmin.sf.net/ Vpopmail: http://vpopmail.sf.net/
Info
On May 5, 2004, at 12:25 PM, X-Istence wrote:
ntpdate ntp.nasa.gov before you build the tar ball :P.
Actually, it's more a problem of the CVS server not maintaining the
proper dates on the files used in the build process. It has to do with
relative dates (which files are newer) than absolute
Tom Collins wrote:
On May 5, 2004, at 12:25 PM, X-Istence wrote:
ntpdate ntp.nasa.gov before you build the tar ball :P.
Actually, it's more a problem of the CVS server not maintaining the
proper dates on the files used in the build process. It has to do
with relative dates (which files are
Hi all,
I'm new to both this list and linux so forgive my ignorance and that my
question most likely has been asked before.
I have been trying to install just about any version of vpopmail, but all have
problems when I run make.
I use this commandline to install:
[EMAIL
Hi all,
I'm new to both this list and linux so forgive my ignorance and that my
question most likely has been asked before.
I have been trying to install just about any version of vpopmail, but all have
problems when I run make.
I use this commandline to install:
[EMAIL
Anybody willing to comment on my problem, or are there only 3 people on
this list?
Patrick Donker wrote:
Hi all,
I'm new to both this list and linux so forgive my ignorance and that my
question most likely has been asked before.
I have been trying to install just about any version of
David Wolfskill wrote:
On Tue, May 04, 2004 at 09:50:01PM +0200, Patrick Donker wrote:
Anybody willing to comment on my problem, or are there only 3 people on
this list?
Some of us who are on the list are not qualified to respond to what
appear to be Linux-specific
Hi,
On Tue, 2004-05-04 at 21:50, Patrick Donker wrote:
Anybody willing to comment on my problem, or are there only 3 people on
this list?
From my experience, there is lots of clever and helpful people on this
this list and in the vpopmail community in general. Have patience ;)
About your
http://scriptkitchen.com/godkills.jpg -- please, think of the kittens.
On Tuesday 04 May 2004 02:50 pm, Patrick Donker wrote:
Anybody willing to comment on my problem, or are there only 3 people on
this list?
patience is a virtue. Your first post was this morning. If you expect to
have
Jeremy Kitchen wrote:
http://scriptkitchen.com/godkills.jpg -- please, think of the kittens.
On Tuesday 04 May 2004 02:50 pm, Patrick Donker wrote:
Anybody willing to comment on my problem, or are there only 3 people on
this list?
patience is a virtue. Your first post
have you tried:
touch *
in the root of the source tree?
-Jeremy
Thanks for this tip Jeremy; it solved my problem.
Only thing is that I dont understand why. I've looked at man touch, and
I know what it does, but dont understand why and how it solved my
problem(?). Maybe you can clue me in?
Dude, relax!
Rick Widmer wrote:
Its not a fucking instant message system!
Plan to wait for up to a day for an answer, not one hour
Patrick Donker wrote:
David Wolfskill wrote:
On Tue, May 04, 2004 at 09:50:01PM +0200, Patrick Donker wrote:
Anybody willing to comment on my problem, or
On Tuesday 04 May 2004 03:28 pm, Patrick Donker wrote:
have you tried:
touch *
in the root of the source tree?
-Jeremy
Thanks for this tip Jeremy; it solved my problem.
Only thing is that I dont understand why. I've looked at man touch, and
I know what it does, but dont understand why
Jeremy Kitchen wrote:
On Tuesday 04 May 2004 03:28 pm, Patrick Donker wrote:
have you tried:
touch *
in the root of the source tree?
-Jeremy
Thanks for this tip Jeremy; it solved my problem.
Only thing is that I dont understand why. I've looked at man touch, and
I know what it does, but dont
X-Istence wrote:
Jeremy Kitchen wrote:
On Tuesday 04 May 2004 03:28 pm, Patrick Donker wrote:
have you tried:
touch *
in the root of the source tree?
-Jeremy
Thanks for this tip Jeremy; it solved my problem.
Only thing is that I dont understand why. I've looked at man touch, and
I know what
On Tuesday 04 May 2004 05:31 pm, X-Istence wrote:
have you tried:
touch *
in the root of the source tree?
Mabey its time to fix your server time.
happened to me the other day, which is why I said to touch *
I think there's something wrong with the tarball again *shrugs*
-Jeremy
--
Jeremy
Jeremy Kitchen wrote:
On Tuesday 04 May 2004 05:31 pm, X-Istence wrote:
have you tried:
touch *
in the root of the source tree?
Mabey its time to fix your server time.
happened
18 matches
Mail list logo
