Re: [vchkpw] Re: vpopmail FHS compliance

2009-03-18 Thread Joshua Megerman
proftpd-1.3.2-0.4.rc3.fc11.i586.rpm (info) (download) proftpd-ldap-1.3.2-0.4.rc3.fc11.i586.rpm (info) (download) proftpd-mysql-1.3.2-0.4.rc3.fc11.i586.rpm (info) (download) proftpd-postgresql-1.3.2-0.4.rc3.fc11.i586.rpm (info) (download) Again, I'm not sure how this makes it much easier for

Re: [vchkpw] Deleting primary domain; keeping alias domains

2009-03-18 Thread Charlie Garrison
Good morning, On 18/03/09 at 9:31 AM -0500, Matt Brookings m...@inter7.com wrote: Charlie Garrison wrote: Is there a proper way to delete a domain which is currently configured as the primary domain for an account? And I want one of the current domain aliases to become the primary domain. I

Re: [vchkpw] Deleting primary domain; keeping alias domains

2009-03-18 Thread Remo Mattei
Here is how you could make it work with the mv Backup all your data. Remove the domain and alias create a new domain and all users for that domain cp or mv all that mgs into the new domain. It should be fine for you. Just my 2 cents. Remo From: Charlie Garrison garri...@zeta.org.au

Re: [vchkpw] Re: vpopmail FHS compliance

2009-03-18 Thread Matt Brookings
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Joshua Megerman wrote: The trick here is that by separating out the back-end authentication schemes into modules, you can provide a single source build for package maintainers, which will generate multiple component packages for the whole setup.

Re: [vchkpw] Re: vpopmail FHS compliance

2009-03-18 Thread Matt Brookings
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Itamar Reis Peixoto wrote: Josh thanks for explaining the things for me, my english is not good making vpopmail support loadable module support will bring vpopmail into linux distros (fedora, opensuse, mandriva) and probably others and make

Re: [vchkpw] Deleting primary domain; keeping alias domains

2009-03-18 Thread Joshua Megerman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Joshua Megerman wrote: environment. When in doubt, DON'T DO THIS. Now, if you just want to stop receiving email for the primary domain and not delete it completely, take your server out of the MX entry, point the domain A record somewhere

Re: [vchkpw] Re: vpopmail FHS compliance

2009-03-18 Thread Joshua Megerman
Josh thanks for explaining the things for me, my english is not good You're welcome. making vpopmail support loadable module support will bring vpopmail into linux distros (fedora, opensuse, mandriva) and probably others and make the vpopmail userbase grow. Well, that's a rather

Re: [vchkpw] Re: vpopmail FHS compliance

2009-03-18 Thread Joshua Megerman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Joshua Megerman wrote: The trick here is that by separating out the back-end authentication schemes into modules, you can provide a single source build for package maintainers, which will generate multiple component packages for the whole

Re: [vchkpw] Re: vpopmail FHS compliance

2009-03-18 Thread Itamar Reis Peixoto
that's a great , but qmail is no more maintaned (no new features) will be a good ideia to make vpopmail more compatible with postfix and maybe others MTA's Well, that's a rather simplified statement.  After all, since vpopmail is currently tied to qmail, you also have to get qmail into the

Re: [vchkpw] Re: vpopmail FHS compliance

2009-03-18 Thread Joshua Megerman
that's a great , but qmail is no more maintaned (no new features) will be a good ideia to make vpopmail more compatible with postfix and maybe others MTA's Ad that, my friend, is a horse of a totally different color. To the best of my knowledge there is no plan to make vpopmail work

Re: [vchkpw] Re: vpopmail FHS compliance

2009-03-18 Thread Rick Macdougall
Itamar Reis Peixoto wrote: that's a great , but qmail is no more maintaned (no new features) will be a good ideia to make vpopmail more compatible with postfix and maybe others MTA's Qmail is now in the public domain. You are free to add any new features you want. Regards, Rick