vpopmail 5.0pre1

2001-09-06 Thread lao nightwolf
Hello, We've installed vpopmail 5.0pre1 so that we have the possibility to add no password. However, adding a record with an empty password field returned an error since the table definition doesn't allow null values by default. We have changed this so that nulls for the password field can

RE: where does the netscape bug problem actually fall

2001-09-06 Thread Dave
The pop method is invisible to the Mail User Agent so Netscape has no problem with it. Thus users can receive messages fine When you setup Netscape there is a way to type in your user name to send to the smtp server. If you do that, netscape assumes there is smtp authentication. If you do not

RE: where does the netscape bug problem actually fall

2001-09-06 Thread Ken Jones
I was thinking about this last night. Do you have your qmail-smtpd setup to do authentication? If so, it might require your netscape to do smtp authentication. On Thu, 2001-09-06 at 08:14, Dave wrote: The pop method is invisible to the Mail User Agent so Netscape has no problem with it.

vqregister errors

2001-09-06 Thread Lanny Baron
Hello, Using vqregister on one of my domains, constantly produces an error when people try to subscribe to it. The message is: Unrecoverable Error: Internal field check error. An unrecoverable error occured while processing your request. Please contact the administrator if this continues.

Re: vpopmail 5.0pre1

2001-09-06 Thread Ken Jones
On Thu, 2001-09-06 at 02:12, lao nightwolf wrote: Hello, We've installed vpopmail 5.0pre1 so that we have the possibility to add no password. However, adding a record with an empty password field returned an error since the table definition doesn't allow null values by default. We have

Re: problems with latest vpopmail

2001-09-06 Thread Ken Jones
On Thu, 2001-09-06 at 09:57, Jens Georg wrote: dear list, today i downloaded and compiled vpopmail with romaing-users-support. well, so far it works. but i do need quota-support as well, so i compiled vpopmail again with both roaming users and quota support. i followed the steps described

Re: vqregister errors

2001-09-06 Thread vol
This means that you've enabled database storage, and that your fields to store in the database, and what's being given to the database are not matching up. Lanny Baron wrote: Hello, Using vqregister on one of my domains, constantly produces an error when people try to subscribe to it. The

recompiling vpopmail is dangerous ?

2001-09-06 Thread Jens Georg
hello, i am running a qmail+vpopmail+sqwebmail box with lots of domains and hundreds of vpopmail-users. my question now is: if i ever have to recompile and install my vpopmail package in order to add additional functions configure offers, will this affect existing vpopmail domaims users ? is

Re: recompiling vpopmail is dangerous ?

2001-09-06 Thread Richard A. Secor
With the amount of times I've installed newer versions of VPOPMail on top of itself on a Production Server. In my opinion it's pretty safe. Just make sure you have the right database information set-up in advance. -Rich - Original Message - From: Jens Georg [EMAIL PROTECTED] To:

Re: vpopmail5.0 relaible?

2001-09-06 Thread Ken Jones
On Thu, 2001-09-06 at 10:29, Jens Georg wrote: hi, right now i am setting up a new qmailvpopmailsqwebamil box. on inter7.com i found release 5.0 of vpopmail. i am going to setup qmail 1.03, sqwebmail 3.00 and vpopmail 4.10.x. may i use 5.0 instead 4.10.x of vpopmail in combination with

Re: recompiling vpopmail is dangerous ?

2001-09-06 Thread vol
Everything should be fine. At the very least, back up your current binaries from ~vpopmail/bin. If you want to be very safe, make sure you backup your ~vpopmail/domains directory, and if you use a database, dump the database to disk just in case. Jens Georg wrote: hello, i am running a

Re: vpopmail5.0 relaible?

2001-09-06 Thread Tren Blackburn
On Thu, 6 Sep 2001, Jens Georg wrote: hi, right now i am setting up a new qmailvpopmailsqwebamil box. on inter7.com i found release 5.0 of vpopmail. i am going to setup qmail 1.03, sqwebmail 3.00 and vpopmail 4.10.x. may i use 5.0 instead 4.10.x of vpopmail in combination with the other

NOTICED QUOTA WARNING

2001-09-06 Thread juan enciso
Hi friends... I have vpopmail+sqwebmail+qmail+mysql How can create a warning quota message when the quota is near to overflow? I need that vchkpw create a message same to this: Received: (qmail 23788 invoked by uid 501); 31 May 2001 11:00:15 - Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Authentication in 5.0pre3

2001-09-06 Thread Elric
I run a FreeBSD 4.3 system which allows the _ char in usernames. Currently I use vpopmail 4.9.10 and it works fine. But, 5.0pre3 fails with a user not found: Sep 6 11:56:45 colossus vpopmail[46550]: vchkpw: vpopmail user not found [EMAIL PROTECTED]:127.0.0.1 Matt Ford

Re: vpopmail5.0 relaible?

2001-09-06 Thread Ronald Rebideau
Ken Jones wrote: 5.0pre3, tomorrow it will be 5.0. Is actually the last 4.10 version. There are no known problems. I personally set it up on a 4 machine cluster with over 300,000 users and it has been rock solid for 2 months. I recommend the 5.0 release. 5.0 is going to be the

RE: vpopmail5.0 relaible?

2001-09-06 Thread Brad Dameron
Ken, I have been reporting a problem for some time and have yet to get a version that fixed it. I have sent several mails. Has my issue been resolved? --- Brad Dameron Network Account Executive TSCNet Inc.

RE: vpopmail5.0 relaible?

2001-09-06 Thread Alex Kramarov
If there is a feature that is hurting vpopmail alot in the mysql implementation, is that it's still bouncing mail when it's unable to connect to the mysql server (just saw this behaivour an hour ago with the 5pre3 release). will this ever be resolved ? Alex.

RE: vpopmail5.0 relaible?

2001-09-06 Thread Ken Jones
On Thu, 2001-09-06 at 14:07, Alex Kramarov wrote: If there is a feature that is hurting vpopmail alot in the mysql implementation, is that it's still bouncing mail when it's unable to connect to the mysql server (just saw this behaivour an hour ago with the 5pre3 release). will this ever be

Re: Authentication in 5.0pre3

2001-09-06 Thread Ken Jones
On Thu, 2001-09-06 at 11:58, Elric wrote: I run a FreeBSD 4.3 system which allows the _ char in usernames. Currently I use vpopmail 4.9.10 and it works fine. But, 5.0pre3 fails with a user not found: Sep 6 11:56:45 colossus vpopmail[46550]: vchkpw: vpopmail user not found [EMAIL

Re: vpopmail5.0 relaible?

2001-09-06 Thread Ken Jones
On Thu, 2001-09-06 at 12:25, Ronald Rebideau wrote: Ken Jones wrote: 5.0pre3, tomorrow it will be 5.0. Is actually the last 4.10 version. There are no known problems. I personally set it up on a 4 machine cluster with over 300,000 users and it has been rock solid for 2 months.

Users with _ character and authentication

2001-09-06 Thread Ken Jones
I tried to replicate the problem you saw with [EMAIL PROTECTED] on my machine. I can't get it to break. And I tested with the cdb and mysql modules ./vadddomain test.com test ./vadduser [EMAIL PROTECTED] test telnet localhost 110 user [EMAIL PROTECTED] pass test Said okay. Ken Jones

RE: Authentication in 5.0pre3

2001-09-06 Thread Brad Dameron
I don't believe this is a issue with the _. I do believe it is related to the same problem I am encountering when I upgrade. Here it is. Vpopmail will not authneticate virtual users. I get a vpopmail user not found [EMAIL PROTECTED]. My configuration is as follows: ./configure

Two minor issues

2001-09-06 Thread Einar Bordewich
In earlier versions of vpopmail, you could insert entries in the mysql table and then e-mail that address for autocreation of userdirectories. This only happens now when you pop the user or login through sqwebmail, which is nice. The question is, has the autocreation of Maildir been removed when

Re: Two minor issues

2001-09-06 Thread Ken Jones
On Thu, 2001-09-06 at 15:12, Einar Bordewich wrote: In earlier versions of vpopmail, you could insert entries in the mysql table and then e-mail that address for autocreation of userdirectories. This only happens now when you pop the user or login through sqwebmail, which is nice. The

Deferring email delivery when mysql is not availalble

2001-09-06 Thread Ken Jones
Turns out this was easier than I thought. I just tested it and I get the following when mysql isn't running.. @40003b97e8190189749c status: local 1/100 remote 0/400 @40003b97e81905e95034 delivery 1: deferral: could_not_connect_to_mysql_updat e_server/ @40003b97e81905e9929c status:

Re: Two minor issues

2001-09-06 Thread Einar Bordewich
This is the error reported back to the sender, before [EMAIL PROTECTED] is pop'ed into: Fixed. When vdelivermail was re-written, this code wasn't put it. it's in there now. I will post a pre4 at the end of the day. Good. Not sure how to handle this. Sounds like vadduser should check

Re: Two minor issues

2001-09-06 Thread Einar Bordewich
This is the error reported back to the sender, before [EMAIL PROTECTED] is pop'ed into: Fixed. When vdelivermail was re-written, this code wasn't put it. it's in there now. I will post a pre4 at the end of the day. Good. Not sure how to handle this. Sounds like vadduser should check

Re: Deferring email delivery when mysql is not availalble

2001-09-06 Thread Eduardo Augusto Alvarenga
Ken Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Turns out this was easier than I thought. I just tested it and I get the following when mysql isn't running.. @40003b97e8190189749c status: local 1/100 remote 0/400 @40003b97e81905e95034 delivery 1: deferral: could_not_connect_to_mysql_updat

vpopmail 4.9.10 stopped -- I'm stumped

2001-09-06 Thread CyberXXI
I've had vpopmail up and running for several weeks with mysql -- ver. 4.9.10. Using all name-based vdomains. Have serveral domains created with a number of users in each. The thing has always worked like a charm. Server froze today and when I rebooted everthing appears to work fine except all

Re: Two minor issues

2001-09-06 Thread Ken Jones
On Thu, 2001-09-06 at 16:29, Einar Bordewich wrote: This is the error reported back to the sender, before [EMAIL PROTECTED] is pop'ed into: Fixed. When vdelivermail was re-written, this code wasn't put it. it's in there now. I will post a pre4 at the end of the day. Good. Not

Re: Deferring email delivery when mysql is not availalble

2001-09-06 Thread Ken Jones
On Thu, 2001-09-06 at 16:39, Eduardo Augusto Alvarenga wrote: Ken Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Turns out this was easier than I thought. I just tested it and I get the following when mysql isn't running.. @40003b97e8190189749c status: local 1/100 remote 0/400

Re: vpopmail 4.9.10 stopped -- I'm stumped

2001-09-06 Thread Ken Jones
On Thu, 2001-09-06 at 16:38, CyberXXI wrote: I've had vpopmail up and running for several weeks with mysql -- ver. 4.9.10. Using all name-based vdomains. Have serveral domains created with a number of users in each. The thing has always worked like a charm. Server froze today and when I

Re: Deferring email delivery when mysql is not availalble

2001-09-06 Thread Eduardo Augusto Alvarenga
Ken Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Interesting, but overly complext in my opinion. Qmail already supports redelivery of the email, might was well let qmail handle all the complex safe email delivery stuff. Days ago I´ve posted a message suggesting outgoing quota support. Any threads about this ?

Re: Deferring email delivery when mysql is not availalble

2001-09-06 Thread Ken Jones
On Thu, 2001-09-06 at 17:08, Eduardo Augusto Alvarenga wrote: Ken Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Interesting, but overly complext in my opinion. Qmail already supports redelivery of the email, might was well let qmail handle all the complex safe email delivery stuff. Days ago I´ve posted a

RE: vpopmail 4.9.10 stopped -- I'm stumped

2001-09-06 Thread Tren Blackburn
Are you using Bruce Guntner (?)'s qmail rpm's? I remember there was a cron job or something like that that would clober one of the files needed by vpopmail. I dunno, I'm trying to remeber the exact issue and it was about a year ago now... Doubt that helps any... Tren. =) -Original

Re: vpopmail 4.9.10 stopped -- I'm stumped

2001-09-06 Thread CGI Guru
I installed it basically like this BSD install http://matt.simerson.net/computing/qmail/qmail.toaster1.5.shtml only on RH Linux 7.1 with TWIG -- so no rpm. I'm going to try adding some users and see if they'll work and maybe a domain or two. I may try upgrading to the new release if that fails.

RE: Authentication in 5.0pre3

2001-09-06 Thread Brad Dameron
I am using the default ones created by vpopmail on install. pw_name varchar(32) pw_domain varchar(223) pw_passwd varchar(255) pw_uid int(11) pw_gid int(11) NULL pw_gecos varchar(255) NULL pw_dir varchar(255) NULL pw_shell varchar(255) NULL pw_name pw_domain pw_passwd

Re: vpopmail 4.9.10 stopped -- I'm stumped

2001-09-06 Thread CGI Guru
Here's the final word on the extent of my predicament. If I send mail to a domain and user that was setup before my crash, I get the mail bounced back saying no user. I added a new domain and a couple of users to it and it works fine on the new one. So, somethings corrupted or out of wack on

Re: vpopmail 4.9.10 stopped -- I'm stumped

2001-09-06 Thread Ben Beuchler
On Thu, Sep 06, 2001 at 08:13:01PM -0500, CGI Guru wrote: Here's the final word on the extent of my predicament. If I send mail to a domain and user that was setup before my crash, I get the mail bounced back saying no user. I added a new domain and a couple of users to it and it works

Some misunderstanding

2001-09-06 Thread Vladimir Kabanov
Good ady, friends! Forgive me if I misunderstood something, but how to use .qmail file for virtual users? I wish do following: i've got an account and want : deliver mail for this account, and forward to someone else. With clean qmail its looking like ./Maildir/ someone.else

Re: Some misunderstanding

2001-09-06 Thread Vladimir Kabanov
No prob, this is easy with virt users. All you have to do is put the .qmail file in the root dir of the domain (/home/vpopmail/domains/mydomain.com/). Just do a normal dot-qmail file (.qmail-username) and put the usual stuff in it except for the ./Maildir/, put the full path